AW: New API extension in Apache PLC4X, that might be interesting for you folks?

for the information. That sounds super interesting. I like the idea of a generic PLC4X adapter that supports all protocols. Cheers, Philipp Von: Christofer Dutz Datum: Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2024 um 09:30 An: dev@streampipes.apache.org Betreff: New API extension in Apache PLC4X, that might be interesting for you

New API extension in Apache PLC4X, that might be interesting for you folks?

Hi all, I would say one of the major topics for 0.12.0 definitely is an update to the API, that allows users of the API to learn a lot more about the drivers the DriverManager provides. So now in the Metadata of a driver, you can learn: * What are the supported transport types for a given

Interest in an Apache IoT Track at EclipseCon EU in Mainz (Germany) later this year?

Hi folks, I was contacted by some of my friends in the IoT Space at the Eclipse Foundation. They are planning this year's EclipseCon to work closer together with the other foundations in this space and proposed an Apache IoT Track in paralel to the EclipseCon. This will be happening in Mainz

Mailing list threading improvements

TL;DR: We’re updating how auto-generated email from Github will be threaded on your mailing lists. If you want to keep the old defaults, details are below. We’re pleased to let you know that we’re tweaking the way that auto- generated email from Github will appear on your mailing lists. This will

[NOTICE] the "repository" is no longer needed in the email templates

Hi all, I finally had another PR of mine merged and now the „repository” is no longer needed in the email templates. I’ve removed it in PLC4X and quite happy with the results. As you’re also just mainly working on one repo … perhaps something worth removing too? Chris

[REMEMBER] The IoT Track at this year's Community over Code conference is still open and waiting for submissions ;-)

I guess the subject says it all ;-) Please be sure to submit your proposals is available at: https://communityovercode.org/call-for-presentations/ And open till July 13th. Please do me a huge favor: If you plan on submitting something, don’t do it on the last minute. Not only do you make it

AW: My first PR merged for the GitHub tooling ... allowing to customize GitHub Discussion emails

GitHub Discussion emails Thank you Chris! That’s absolutely great and I guess we will add this to the yaml file. Cheers Dominik Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Monday, May 15, 2023 4:37:13 PM An: dev@streampipes.apache.org Betreff: AW: My first PR merged

AW: My first PR merged for the GitHub tooling ... allowing to customize GitHub Discussion emails

tory})" edit_comment_discussion: "Re: [D] {title} ({repository})" delete_comment_discussion: "Re: [D] {title} ({repository})" Chris Von: Christofer Dutz Datum: Montag, 15. Mai 2023 um 16:24 An: dev@streampipes.apache.org Betreff: My first PR merged for th

My first PR merged for the GitHub tooling ... allowing to customize GitHub Discussion emails

Hi all, I just also added the documentation on my latest addition to the GitHub tooling. Now we can customize the email titles sent to the mailinglists … I bet you folks will be relieved by that, right? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Git+-+.asf.yaml+features I would suggest

WG: TAC supporting Berlin Buzzwords

FYI Von: Gavin McDonald Datum: Freitag, 24. März 2023 um 10:57 An: gmcdon...@apache.org Betreff: TAC supporting Berlin Buzzwords PMCs, Please forward to your dev and user lists. Hi All, The ASF Travel Assistance Committee is supporting taking up to six (6) people to attend Berlin Buzzwords

Re: how to update dependencies?

Hi Florian, well depdenabot is a service running on GitHub that simply checks dependencies and proposes updates if it detects them. It’s a bot. In PLC4X we manage external dependencies versions in the main pom.xml files dependencyManagement section. The reason for this is that there are many

Re: [DRAFT] February Board Report

://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=240881564 Cheers, Philipp Von: Philipp Zehnder Datum: Dienstag, 31. Januar 2023 um 18:29 An: dev@streampipes.apache.org Betreff: AW: [DRAFT] February Board Report Hi Chris, thanks a lot, I will add it. Cheers, Philipp Von: Christofer Dutz Datum

Re: [DRAFT] February Board Report

Hi Philip, Well I would add in “community health” that after enabling github discussions a lot of discussions started but the emails completely swamped the mailinglists and we’re trying to use different settings in order to make the list manageable again (This would be the sort of thing that I

Re: AW: Updating the notification schema for GitHub?

e we can also talk about a convention to set the name for PRs. > > Cheers, > Philipp > > Von: Christofer Dutz > Datum: Montag, 23. Januar 2023 um 11:45 > An: dev@streampipes.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Updating the notification schema for GitHub? > Well, a PR is a PR and an Issue is

Usage of Github Discussions

Hi all, while I’m currently focusing on helping communication work again for Apache, after mis-configured tools were flooding the lists and hereby rendering them useless. I did stumble over the fact that the StreamPipes community seems to have switched to using GitHub Discussions. While in

Re: Usage of Github Discussions

/streampipes/blob/dev/.asf.yaml [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/jr9d18ow367bq3vovh6blxqsnlordpj3 -Original Message- From: Christofer Dutz Sent: Monday, January 23, 2023 2:26 PM To: dev@streampipes.apache.org Subject: Usage of Github Discussions Hi all, while I’m currently focusing

Re: Updating the notification schema for GitHub?

ay attention that the PR titles match the related issue titles with this config? What do others think? Best, Dominik -Original Message- From: Christofer Dutz Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2023 6:38 PM To: dev@streampipes.apache.org Subject: Updating the notification schema

Updating the notification schema for GitHub?

Hi all, GitHub emails have been annoying in this project for quite some time, with the increased usage of discussions, this has become worse. This is not something unique to StreamPipes, but also happens in other projects. I did manage to convince Infra to update their notification bot to

Re: loosing track of too many emails about github

I think I’m just probably gonna filter the emails with a github prefix. I almost didn’t notice the Vote thread in-between all of the “comment added” notifications. Chris From: Philipp Zehnder Date: Monday, 9. January 2023 at 07:16 To: dev@streampipes.apache.org Subject: AW: loosing track of

Re: [DISCUSS] Plan to release StreamPipes 1.0

If you folks are planning any breaking changes to the API, I would suggest to do that before the 1.0 … but if the system is API-wise mature, go for it ;-) In PLC4X I’m trying to shape the API in this and the next release into a form we’ll be able to not have to do major releases too often.

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate from Jira to Github Issues?

In the PLC4X project, we did the same, We did see a petty noticeable uptake on activity since then. Chris From: Dominik Riemer Date: Friday, 25. November 2022 at 06:37 To: dev@streampipes.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Migrate from Jira to Github Issues? Hi everyone, just to let you know

Re: Apache License Header Format

party code (e.g., MIT, but these files must be explicitly mentioned in the LICENSE file). * License headers itself should never be added automatically as it is our responsibility to make sure correct licenses are used. Cheers Dominik On 2022/11/24 20:14:19 Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi

Re: Apache License Header Format

Hi all, Automatically sticking Apache Headers to code isn’t a good idea. If someone adds something that’s copied from somewhere else, we’re actually not allowed to add Apache headers to it. Chris From: Tim Date: Tuesday, 22. November 2022 at 20:12 To: dev@streampipes.apache.org Subject: Re:

Re: Post-graduation tasks

Congrats from my side too :-) Well deserved :-) Chris From: Zike Yang Date: Friday, 18. November 2022 at 16:52 To: dev@streampipes.apache.org Subject: Re: Post-graduation tasks Congratulations! Thanks to everyone who makes it happen. GitHub has already set up the URL redirect, so it still

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] StreamPipes graduation: Draft Resolution

; > > > > related to a self-service Industrial IoT toolbox which enables > > > > > non-technical users to connect, analyze and explore IoT > > > > > data streams. > > > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project M

Re: [DISCUSS] What is the Master branch currently used for?

IPES/Post-release+steps%5d(https:/cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STREAMPIPES/Post-release+steps>) >  > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Christofer Dutz > <[christofer.d...@c-ware.de](mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de)> > Sent: Thursday, November

Re: [DISCUSS] What is the Master branch currently used for?

; "develop", what do you think? >> >> Cheers >> Dominik >> >> On 2022/11/03 14:39:54 Christofer Dutz wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> good point … also it tends to upset some people. Most projects >>> settled on “main” instead of “maste

Re: [DISCUSS] What is the Master branch currently used for?

Hi, good point … also it tends to upset some people. Most projects settled on “main” instead of “master”. In the PLC4X project however we decided to call the development branch “develop” and the banch where we merge releases “release”. This way the branches sort of explain what they are

Re: [VOTE] Graduate StreamPipes as TLP

+1 (binding) Chris On 28.10.22, 07:51, "Cedric Kulbach" wrote: +1 Best, Cedric > On 27. Oct 2022, at 21:40, Dominik Riemer > mailto:dominik.rie...@bytefabrik.ai>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > following the DISCUSS thread at [1]: > > This is a call to VOTE on graduation of Apache StreamPipes from

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate StreamPipes as TLP?

or less-active PPMC member, committer or contributor ;-) Cheers Dominik On 2022/10/25 08:18:54 Christofer Dutz wrote: > With my mentor hat on: I think you are ready, so I support this. > > Also think about discussing things like: Who will be part of the initial PMC? > I remember in

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate StreamPipes as TLP?

With my mentor hat on: I think you are ready, so I support this. Also think about discussing things like: Who will be part of the initial PMC? I remember in PLC4X we had loads of totally inactive PPMC members, some never even bothered signing up for the private project list or the project list.

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.70.0 (incubating) RC1 release

+1 (binding) Chris [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email. [MINOR] Verify the signature is correct. [OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [OK] Verify the SHA512 hashes. [OK] Unzip the archive. [OK] Verify the existence of

RE: Podling Streampipes Report Reminder - May 2022

OR/May2022 -Original Message----- From: Christofer Dutz Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 10:52 AM To: dev@streampipes.apache.org Subject: RE: Podling Streampipes Report Reminder - May 2022 Hi all, you might have noticed that we had some issues in the incubator with out last reports. Therefore,

RE: Podling Streampipes Report Reminder - May 2022

Hi all, you might have noticed that we had some issues in the incubator with out last reports. Therefore, it's quite important for us to get back on track and I would highly appreciate you submitting the report as soon as possible and not wait till the last minute. Thanks, Chris

[ApacheCon] Please submit your proposals for the ApacheCon NA 2022 in NewOrleans (And some news on TAC)

Hi all, being the Track Chair for the IoT Track this year, I was just going through the proposals that have been submitted so-far. The reason is, that I wanted to get an idea of the story we want to tell with the track. Unfortunately, there's close to nothing available yet. I would strongly

[DISCUSS] Apache StreamPipes 0.69.0 (incubating) RC1 release

By the way ... nice job in cleaning up the build and release process. It's a lot more fun to validate this way ;-) Would it however be possible to add the Apache Headers to those ".en" files (Guess they are I18N files) ... and I know it's possible to add them to the package.java files. I

RE: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.69.0 (incubating) RC1 release

+1 (binding) Built on Windows 11 Chris [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email. [OK] Verify the signature is correct. [OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [OK] Verify the SHA512 hashes. [OK] Unzip the archive. [OK] Verify

New Apache Parent

Hi all, I assume not all of you are following the Maven mailing-list. A new version of the Apache-parent pom has been released. Please update your projects to version 25 before doing a new release. Chris

RE: Making MQTT the default protocol?

Which version? 3.x or the more moden 5.x (I would suggest to adopt the newer version as with sparkplug this will only bring benefits) Just my 5ct from the peanut-gallery ;) Chris -Original Message- From: Lukas Ott Sent: Montag, 14. Februar 2022 18:08 To: dev@streampipes.apache.org

Post on hop integration on i...@apache.org

Hi all, Did you folks see my post on an apache hop and streampipes integration on the i...@apache.org list? Chris Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android

RE: [DISCUSSION] Community call

Good idea :-) In PLC4X we do it monthly on the first Tuesday of the month at a time that allows most of our community members to participate. We use Zoom and it works nicely, but I guess mainly cause I've got a Zoom Pro Account. Chris -Original Message- From: P0512 Hrushikesh

AW: Alternative Docker Registry

Hi Dominick, yeah … as I said, this is less a technical than a legal issue. The StreamPipes project, as an Apache project has to ensure the correctness of code it releases. That’s why an Apache release is quite a process. But this ensures the safety of users using our products and it helps

AW: Alternative Docker Registry

Hi all, I would be careful with simply starting to setup something like this. Please ask infra for guidance as you are not the only project having this sort of problem and I know that most „solution“ other projects came up with were rather problematic. Not from a technical point of view, but

[DISCUSS] Work together with the PLC4X team for getting the PLC4J Browse and Discovery API into shape

Hi all, I just wanted to take the opportunity, to ask what you folks would think about working together with us at the PLC4X project. We're currently working on improving the Java API to be more friendly for tool-creators. I think you would probably have the biggest interest in such features

AW: [Discuss] Optimize Github build

't follow up on this. >>>>>> >>>>>> My preference would be to merge the incubator-streampipes-extensions >>>>>> project into the main project to have a single build for the whole >>>>>> project. Concerning the insta

Re: [Discuss] Unify the release artifacts?

staller >> doesn't work anyways at release validation time as the artifacts are not >> yet available, it could be a separate vote process and we could also easily >> reduce the frequency of releases by pointing to the latest release in the >> version tag. >>>> &g

[Discuss] Unify the release artifacts?

Hi all, I have observed quite a bit of hesitation of IPMC votes to come in. One thing I noticed when reviewing your latest release (and the prior ones): You currently have 3 release artifacts: - Core - Extensions - Installer Unfortunately thoroughly doing a release validation is like doing 3

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.68.0 (incubating) RC1 release

+1 (binding) Christofer Dutz (Please also carry over my mentor vote to the incubator list when starting the vote there) This vote applies to all 3 release-artifacts I only found some very minor issues. None of which would prevent the release (The most severe ones only happen during

Last boarding call for ApacheCon NA/EU and Asia .... CFP closes in a week ...

Hi folks, I am writing to your project list as there have been submissions from your project to the IoT track in the past, we have integration modules for your project in PLC4X, you are listed as "IoT" category project, or I just thought your project would be a good match for an IoT related

No submissions for any of the two ApacheCons?

Hi Streampipes folks, As the chair of the IoT Track for the NA/EU ApacheCon and Co-Chair of the Asia, I regularly review the submissions for the IoT tracks. I have noticed that there aren't any submissions from your project. If you plan on submitting something, I strongly ask to you do it soon

AW: Incubator Report?

Hi, Well, I usually include them in my reports as the "increase/decrease" is the part I think is interesting. But ... you just got feedback from someone who's doing the official report approval ... so ;-) Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Justin Mclean Gesendet: Montag, 8. März

AW: Incubator Report?

ll send around a draft report tomorrow early morning. > > Dominik > > On 2021/03/07 11:38:55, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > You folks on it? > > > > March2021 - INCUBATOR - Apache Software > > Foundation<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/March2021> > > > > Chris > > >

Incubator Report?

You folks on it? March2021 - INCUBATOR - Apache Software Foundation Chris

AW: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes logo

Hi all, I like the one where the S is not turned by 90° ... perhaps it's just me, but that one looks as if the "Data" could flow through the pipe on it's own ... the others feel as if stuff wouldn't flow as eays ... the other sort of reminds me of a siphon ;-) So my vote is: #4 Chris

AW: [ANNOUNCE] New PPMC member: Marco Heyden

YAY!!! ... welcome to the club ;-) Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Philipp Zehnder Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2020 22:40 An: dev@streampipes.apache.org Betreff: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PPMC member: Marco Heyden Hi Marco, congratulations! I am very happy to have you in our team!

AW: Podling Streampipes Report Reminder - December 2020

Looks good to me ;-) Chris Von: Dominik Riemer Datum: Montag, 30. November 2020 um 21:14 An: dev@streampipes.apache.org Betreff: Re: Podling Streampipes Report Reminder - December 2020 Hi all, I added a first draft of our next report to our wiki [1], feel free to comment or directly modify

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.67.0 (incubating) Installer RC3 release

+1 (binding) Chris Intaller: --- [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory [OK] Verify the signature is correct: Additional Apache tutorial on how to verify downloads can be

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.67.0 (incubating) RC2 release

Ok ... here my results Core: +1 (binding) Extensions: +1 (binding) Installer: -1 (binding) ... contains ".git" directory I would say, if you repackage the installer archive, we would only have to do an rc3 for that the rest is ok. Chris Core:

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.67.0 (incubating) RC2 release

I hope to find the time to do the review this weekend. Starting at my new job did sort of gobble up all free time the last few days. Chris Am 08.10.20, 08:25 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" : Hi Justin, thanks - we just thought that it might be good to have at least one +1 binding vote

Re: [DISCUSS] Sending all Jira notifications to the issues list

Hi Dominik, I personally always delete emails that are obviously Jira emails first (In almost all lists I am on) If you and the community have an eye on incoming open issues, I have no objections. Perhaps just sending an email on creation, but not on closing an issue would be an option?

Re: Move the build jobs to ci-builds.apache.org

of this! Dominik On 2020/08/15 16:44:51, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > just in case you haven’t noticed. The builds.apach.org CI server will be > turned off next week. So far I can’t see any jobs setup on the new > ci-builds.apache.org server. Someone should take care o

Move the build jobs to ci-builds.apache.org

Hi all, just in case you haven’t noticed. The builds.apach.org CI server will be turned off next week. So far I can’t see any jobs setup on the new ci-builds.apache.org server. Someone should take care of the migration. Chris

Discussions on dev?

Hi folks, today I was going through the emails in the issues@ list as I was sort of missing any form of technical discussion on this list. It turned out all were simple git commit notifications. So where and how are technical discussions done in the StreamPipes project? Would be cool if it was

Someone should get started on migrating your build jobs to ci-builds.apache.org

Hi all, Apache is currently migrating the old builds.apache.org to ci-builds.apache.org as that server is running a more enterprizy commercial Jenkins distribution that is told to cope much better with the usual load our Jenkins has. However this migration is not done automatically and has to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add better PLC4X-API support for Input Dialogs

Hi Phillip, In plc4x we always had the proposed functionality to browse remote plcs. This should be used to list remote resources. However this api part s never filed with life. I think we should start doing this. But I would consider this part a first class citizen in the api and not think of

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add better PLC4X-API support for Input Dialogs

I fully agree that we need such a thing. Chris Am 29.05.20, 10:50 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi folks, this is an old Issue (see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PLC4X/API+Extension+for+1.0). What I generally would like to have is a way to communicate with the API /

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache StreamPipes (incubating) 0.66.0 RC1 release

t probably in the future not all artifacts will be released at the same time)? Do you have any opinion? Dominik On 2020/05/07 09:33:29, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi All, > > Just for clarification … you are voting on releasing all 3 repos “core”, “extensi

Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes (incubating) 0.66.0 RC1 release

+1 (binding) Chris However this +1 is due to the fact that you're using the WIP disclaimer which sort of allows you to do what you want ... I reviewed the RC as if it had the normal incubation disclaimer so perhaps for the next release you could even switch to the normal disclaimer (which is

[DISCUSS] Apache StreamPipes (incubating) 0.66.0 RC1 release

Hi All, Just for clarification … you are voting on releasing all 3 repos “core”, “extensions” and “installer” in this release? Chris

Re: [DISCUSS] Shorter folder names in resource folder

I agree ... And I had issues in the past with these directory names including dots. It's sort of impossible to see if this is a set of nested directories or just one (or something in between) in most IDEs I'm using. I would really prefer to not have "." in directory names. Chris Am

Re: Time for a first Apache release?

Hi Dominik, I agree that this would be great ... after all ... incubation is about learning to release stuff. Nothing helps better than actually doing it. If you need help in the process, just ask. I would prefer to stay in the background as helpful mentor for your first 1-2 releases as I have

Little PLC4X update

While at it … I think my KNX driver for PLC4X is starting to work and feel better and better … looking forward to cranking up my SP integration efforts soon. Now I can create multiple subscriptions for different parts of the KNX datastream … potentially with this I could now start creating some

Re: Recent "discussions"

hat there could have been more discussions on the list last month. Dominik On 2020/02/11 06:27:59, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi, > > When reading the incubator report I noticed you folks mentioning discussing a new logo and yesterday creating a new mailing list

Recent "discussions"

Hi, When reading the incubator report I noticed you folks mentioning discussing a new logo and yesterday creating a new mailing list. However I can't find any reference to any of these on this list. Where do discussions happen here? Chris

Re: ApacheCon NA 2020

Well you can count me in for PLC4X ;-) Chris Am 22.01.20, 11:14 schrieb "Patrick Wiener" : Hi, I also like the idea of one joint talk with other projects from the Apache IoT world to showcase the interoperability of our projects. Speaking about ideas for the other talk:

Helping out a fellow Apache project with some "web-stuff"?

Hi all, in the PLC4X project we’re currently working on re-doing our website. For the landing page we would need some help to make things prettier. I started a call for volunteers on our mailing-list:

Incubator report?

Hi all, Just wanted to als if you guys got the report on your radar. This is the last time you have to submit in the monthly frequency, but it's important you have it ready soon. Chris

Re: Draft Board Report January

Yup ... guess you'll have to whip up a report next month again and from then on it'll be quarterly reports. But coming back to the report ... all good with it. I'll sign it off as soon as it's staged. Chris Am 31.12.19, 13:19 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" : Hi Justin, we should still

Re: CI Pipelines

Hi all, it is possible to specify secret credentials in Jenkins and assign a name to them. We are using this feature in the PLC4X sonar-cloud tests. Here I deployed my sonarcloud login token to Jenkins and gave it a name. I then use this name to get the credentials and use them in the build.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Confluence wiki for StreamPipes

Done: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STREAMPIPES Chris Am 07.12.19, 12:10 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" : Hi all, so the vote has passed with 5 +1 votes (1 binding, 3 PPMC-binding and 1 non-binding). Thanks for voting!

Re: I18N Resources

e they will not be found once you start the container. Hope this helps! Dominik On 2019/12/05 11:58:33, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > today I cloned the new repos, updated SP to the latest released version and started work on the new EDE

Today I requested the clearance for the ASF to become members of some of the Industry organizations

Hi all, even if I initiated this for the PLC4X project, today I opened some legal issues where I ask for mermission to request a membership for the ASF in the OPC-Foundation (Logo Membership), EtherCAT Technology Group (Feee Membership) and get a ProfiNet Vendor ID assigned. I know that for

New TAC-mode for all Apache Committers: Applications open for FOSDEM 2020

Hi all, perhaps some of you have missed this information so I would like to promote this again in the communities I’m involved in. Apache has setup some completely new funds for making it possible for Apache committers to travel to non-Apache open-source events. In this case we are sponsoring

Re: [VOTE] Confluence wiki for StreamPipes

Or new Committers and/or PPMCs (but that would happen on the private list) Chris Am 03.12.19, 09:44 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" : Hi Justin, ok, thanks for this advice, we appreciate your help! So the next vote will be on our first ASF release ;-) Dominik

Re: Board Report December / Mentor sign-off

Ok ... and signed ;-) Chris Am 03.12.19, 09:07 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" : Hi all, as it seems there are no more comments regarding the draft of our board report, I'd kindly ask our mentors to sign-off the report in the wiki:

AW: Improving the Live Dashboard

Hi folks, One thing I'd enjoy would be to have more than the fixed maximum of 6 rows. Chris Von: Philipp Zehnder Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2019 07:16:55 An: dev@streampipes.apache.org Betreff: Re: Improving the Live Dashboard Hi, thanks for creating a

Re: [VOTE] Confluence wiki for StreamPipes

Hi Justin, Well in general it is something to vote on (my opinion) just like creating new repos etc. it IS sort of like voting to accept the Air you breathe, but I still thought ... learning to vote is something good and practicing it is even better. Chris Am 02.12.19, 22:41 schrieb "Justin

Re: [VOTE] Confluence wiki for StreamPipes

+1 (binding) from my side too Chris Am 02.12.19, 17:36 schrieb "Johannes Tex" : +1 On 2019/12/02 16:23:57, Philipp Zehnder wrote: > +1 > > > On 2. Dec 2019, at 16:53, wiener wrote: > > > > Sounds like a good idea. > > > > +1 > > > > On

[DISCUSS] Request a Confluence space?

Hi all, as the initial list of requested services didn’t contain Confluence, we haven’t setup one. I think if you would like one, please start a vote thread on this topic. Chris

Congrats on passing the podlingnamesearch

Hi all, if you haven’t noticed, the POGLINGNAMESEARCH seems to have been approved: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-174 Think this should be mentioned in the board report. Chris

Re: December Podling Report - Draft

ere answered immediately by our mentors. > > ### Is the PPMC managing the podling's brand / trademarks? > Are 3rd parties respecting and correctly using the podlings name and > brand? If not what actions has the PPMC taken to correct this? Has the >

Re: Podling Name Search / Logo

ot;conclude" anything as the guidelines said only facts should be provided.l Thanks! Dominik On 2019/11/25 09:03:29, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > I would suggest you add to your Jira issues some details: > - Mention you checked

Re: Podling Name Search / Logo

ould be great if you could have a look and provide any feedback or things I've missed! Dominik On 2019/11/19 21:13:18, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > I for my part would highly suggest to do it early. > > If you have a look at the A

Some things I noticed ...

Hi all, I just want to bring to the list some things I noticed, which could be worth finding a solution for as this could ease new developers start working with SP. 1. If I develop any component, the declareModel method defines the configuration of this component. The first time it is used

Re: Podling Name Search / Logo

Hi Dominik, I for my part would highly suggest to do it early. If you have a look at the Apache Edgent project, you will find lots of material mentioning Quarks (Which was the original name). The later the change (if the name-search would fail) the more needs to be changed. The later the

Re: Website Migration / Non-Apache releases

k On 2019/11/18 14:04:47, Christofer Dutz wrote: > By the way ... what are you building your website with? > > Are you editing the html, javascript, css etc. manually or are is there some sort of build involved? > > If it's pure "HTML-Pr

BACnet/IP and KNXnet/IP stuff

Hi all, I just wanted to tell you that in the Apache PLC4X project I’m working on two tuples of StreamPipes adapters: * BACnet/IP * KNXnet/IP Both will contain two pipeline elements: * A source which generates a data-stream of data going over the bus * A transformer which

Re: Website Migration / Non-Apache releases

By the way ... what are you building your website with? Are you editing the html, javascript, css etc. manually or are is there some sort of build involved? If it's pure "HTML-Programming" (Couldn’t make the double quotes bigger and fatter) you probably don't need to do anything. If you're

Re: Website Migration / Non-Apache releases

Hi Dominik, please be careful with using the word "release" ... generally Apache only releases source-bundles ... if, during a release, we also create and distribute binaries these are always considered convenience binaries ;-) Chris Am 18.11.19, 10:54 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" : Hi

Re: Website Migration / Non-Apache releases

Hi Dominik, I don't think that you have to remove the references. But you have to make it clearly visible that these are NOT Apache Releases. I think as soon as it's obvious (By being located in a section "Non-Apache releases pre entering Incubation" this schoud be ok .. but I'm sure Justin

  1   2   >