Re: [DISCUSS] Amend provider listing policies

he pom.xml is a sufficient expression of "version compatibility". On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > If i maintained such a project i would certainly have that kind of > information. From the TinkerPop perspective however,i think it woul

Re: [DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

utables, so maybe we can just do: > > tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip > tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > jason i think that was a suggestion to conform mo

Re: When does incubator-suffix get dropped?

Gruno has said that there were problems in infrastructure with the incubation "upgrade" process - like stuff was broken. That was most of the hangup as I understood it. On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > As soon as the graduation is announced. > >

Follow-up on JIRA after merge

I've noticed that sometimes Apache JIRA/GitHub integration doesn't always behave nicely. Sometimes the JIRA issue doesn't close when you close the PR. I ran into a bunch of those yesterday while reviewing some old branches and had to close the JIRAs manually. It seems it might have happened again

Re: "Incubating" still in GitHub project description...

I ping'd Gruno in hipchat over thatdoesn't seem possible to edit directly from what i can tell. On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hello, > > Please click: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop < > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop> > > Note

Re: Another "Incubator" change.

we dont' have any releases yet outside of incubator so it is my understanding that the archive wont' reflect any. note that our release directory however is in place and ready to go: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tinkerpop/ i think that when we add our first non-incubator release

Move Hadoop-Gremlin doccs to Provider Docs

Is there any reason this section is in the reference documentation: http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/#_hadoop_gremlin_for_graph_system_providers seems like it belongs here somewhere: http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/dev/provider/

[DISCUSS] ASF Board Draft Report - June 2016

As TinkerPop has graduated from incubator, we no longer need to produce incubator reports. Instead, TinkerPop needs to now provide reports to the ASF Board. Ultimately, as PMC chair it is my responsibility to submit the report when required, but I liked our method of discussing the incubator

Re: I just merged master into tp31... please don't touch the repo.

The --force was not ideal, but given the small time window where we had a problem it seemed unlikely that anyone would have had major losses as a result. Hope it didn't cause any inconvenience. On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hi, > > Stephen just

Re: Unicorn supports their own version of Gremlin.

pets w/o being aware of 2.x/3.x sort of stuff > aren't worth the trouble we will cause those who legitimately still use 2.x > and the respective docs. > > Marko. > > > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > > wrote: >

Re: Gremlin-Python package structure

> Please make the changes as you see fit and provide a PR. +1 On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > HI David, > > Please make the changes as you see fit and provide a PR. I read through > your explanation and it “makes sense” with the limited

[DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

We've seen a lot of good fixes/optimizations to 3.1.3 and 3.2.1 and I wonder if we shouldn't exercise our new found TLP powers to do a release and get rid of the "-incubating" at the end of our "current" distributions and artifacts. thoughts?

Re: [DISCUSS] Oldest open PR

; Daniel > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > We have this old PR that's just been hanging about: > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/71 > > > > It's about a year o

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.1 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 6 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (Stephen Mallette, Dylan Millikin, Daniel Kuppitz, Hadrian Zbarcea, Ted Wilmes) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (Pieter Martin) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Stephen On Thu, Jul

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.3/3.2.1

been published to the Apache snapshots repo. Will follow up with more updates on the master branch soon. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've set up version 3.1.4 and 3.2.2 in JIRA and migrated all old issues in > those lines to

Re: [DISCUSS] interrupt

he stack and gets handled > appropriately. > > On 21/07/2016 18:47, Stephen Mallette wrote: > > thanks for all that pieter. the primary reason for traversal interruption > > in the first place was so that gremlin server would have a chance to kill > > traversals that were r

Re: [DISCUSS] Returning Side Effects

ion. > I enquired a while back about the ability to treat elements as detached > from the graph in order to do the above without the transaction handling. > But I never followed up. > > I figured I would put this out there as another case where non-Java > languages struggle. > > On Thu

[DISCUSS] Download Page

I think it might be a good idea to include a "Download Page" on our web site. It would let us better list the versions we have out there and would get us better in line with Apache Infrastructure - for example: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1255 I'm also seeing that we yet have

TinkerPop 3.1.3 Released: A 187 On The Undercover Gremlinz

Hello, TinkerPop 3.1.3 has just been released - the first release of the 3.1.x line outside of Apache Incubator! Like the previous release, this is a bit more than just a maintenance release on the "Undercover Gremlinz" release line and has some neat features to get into. This release should be

TinkerPop 3.2.1 Released: Nine Inch Gremlins

Hello, On the back of TinkerPop 3.1.3 comes TinkerPop 3.2.1. Yes - another dual release! This was previously described by yours truly as an "unprecedented and daring move" for release of 3.1.2-incubating/3.2.0-incubating but nowwellkinda meh. I suppose we will just do this all the time

Re: [DISCUSS] List of branches scheduled for deletion

is TINKERPOP3-432 still valid for any reason? 1300+ commits behind master. we might also think about dropping TINKERPOP3-781-local-aggregation-should-not-destroy-path - 2400+ commits behind master and seems to dead-end in JIRA. Not sure that this was every deemed as a good change On Mon, Jul 25,

Re: [DISCUSS] Returning Side Effects

ltiline byteCode feature. But I digress > that's not what this thread is about. > > In the spirit of GLVs returning side effects how would your original > proposition stream over the network? Would you get all data first and then > SE? I'm guessing you would want to stream the SEs

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.3 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 4 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (X -- Stephen Mallette, Daniel Kuppitz, Dylan Millikin, Ted Wilmes) 0 (0) -1 (0) I will wait to officially release 3.1.3 to go alongside the close of vote on 3.2.1 tomorrow. Thank you very

Re: [DISCUSS] Download Page

I assume everyone is cool with making the Download Page live at this point as there's been no other feedback in the last few days. I'll probably make some adjustments to the web site tomorrow to bring it online publicly. On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.

[DISCUSS] Traversal with Java Serialization Removal

I just created this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1391 As part of TINKERPOP-1278, I'd went ahead with deprecating the old method of sending a Traversal to the server. The approach taken there was to use java serialization to ship the Traversal to the server. The more I

Re: [2/2] tinkerpop git commit: Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/tp31'

ommit: 3135c30fbef0f04964f8bef56cbdace925f2ab01 > > Parents: 2f2b373 4b9212e > > Author: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com> > > Authored: Wed Jul 27 06:38:52 2016 -0400 > > Committer: Stephen Mallette <sp...@genoprime.com> > > Committed: Wed Jul

Re: [DISCUSS] Download Page

Dale <robd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there a git repo for this and the main website? I would like to > make pull requests to fix some things. > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The download page is now "l

Re: [DISCUSS] Time Frames for 3.2.2 and 3.1.4

t makes good sense. > > Thanks, > Ted > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > When we went through vote on 3.1.3/3.2.1, we'd discussed releasing > > 3.2.2/3.1.4 on a shorter release period than normal. A short

Re: [DISCUSS] Download Page

Published the 3.2.2-SNAPSHOT docs: http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.2-SNAPSHOT/reference/ On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > ah - gotcha. yes - we bind the documentation to a release. typically we > wouldn't go back and update t

Re: Adding IBM Graph to the providers list

might need to ship it some other way - dev list doesn't like attachments i don't think. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hi Alaa, > > I don’t think the logo came through, can you please reattach? > > Thank you, > Marko. > >

[DISCUSS] TinkerPop Doc Index on TINKERPOP-989

A while back on TINKERPOP-989 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-989 I'd suggested we add a index page to be a sort of a landing page for all TinkerPop documentation. I took a quick swipe at this for 3.1.4-SNAPSHOT: http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.4-SNAPSHOT/ While we

[DISCUSS] Deprecating registry() on Io.Builder

This is really low-level IO stuff so unless you are a Graph Provider you can probably largely ignore this. If you were following along on JIRA you probably already know what this post is about: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1402 Basically, there is no way for a Graph

Re: [DISCUSS] Download Page

Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > yes - static html/css and it sucks a bit because we don't have any re-use > > going on there. so if we have to change a menu or something it means > > changing it on every page in the site. w

Re: Adding IBM Graph to the providers list

p://markorodriguez.com > > > > > On Aug 11, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Alaa Mahmoud <alaa1em...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Here a link to the logo that I looked up pretty quickly. it'll do the job > > :-) > > http://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ &g

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

rs to do the right thing for vertex IDs and > properties. It treats all types, primitive or object, from byte to > long, double, float as numbers. This is pretty standard behavior in > SQL, JDBC drivers, and other NoSQL technologies. > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:30 AM

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

p uses String ids. Sqlg uses Long ids. > > > > Seems fair enough that we can compare ids as numeric by checking the > > graph.features() for supportsNumericIds(). One complication would be > graphs > > that allow multiple id types. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 20

Re: [DISCUSS] interrupt

I don't recall all the issues with doing traversal interruption with a flag. I suppose it could work in the same way that thread interruption works now. I will say that I'm hesitant to say that we should change this on the basis of this being a problem general to databases as we've only seen in so

Re: [DISCUSS] interrupt

new TraversalInterruptedException(); > > will also reset the interrupt flag potentially making someone else's > Thread.interrupted() check fail. > > > All that said I do not have a solution for GremlinServer not having > access to the traversal. > > Thanks > Pieter > >

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.3/3.2.1

have a ton of time to look at everything manually). I'll commit these changes to the repo after release is all settled. On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > Having some trouble with release. Some of the trouble is a bit out of my > co

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.3 Release

Hello, We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.1.3 is ready for release - note the lack of "-incubating" everywhere. :) The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.1.3/ The source distribution is provided by:

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.3/3.2.1

t; > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > On Jul 15, 2016, at 4:39 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Everything looks good to do a vote for 3.1.3 and 3.1.2 on Monday. I'm > going > > to publish the final SNAPSHOT docs over the

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.1 Release

Hello, We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.1 is ready for release - note the lack of "-incubating" everywhere. :) The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.1/ The source distribution is provided by:

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.3/3.2.1

that the CHANGELOG should have "invalid" issues listed in it. The release branches will remain frozen during our vote period. I'll post back here when everything is opened back up again. Thanks, Stephen On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x code line

houghts on a support roadmap (when 3.1, 3.2 > are EOL) and future release roadmap, timelines? > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > It sounds like we have general consensus on going with 3.1.x for bug > fixes > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, gallardo.kev...@gmail.com < > gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 2016-07-15 16:25 (+0100), "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com"< > > gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

> > Otherwise looks good! > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, gallardo.kev...@gmail.com > > <gallardo.kev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2016-07-15 16:25 (+0100), "gallardo.kev...@gmail.com"

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

ah - sorry - didn't follow that. that makes sense to me. inVLabel and outVLabel are kinda awkward. +1 from me on that one. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.1 Release

of which also fails. > Jason has already proposed a fix for this here > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1379>. > > vote -1 > > Thanks > Pieter > > > > On 19/07/2016 15:20, Stephen Mallette wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We

Re: [DISCUSS] Community Survey

> It might be a good chance to reflect and get some feedback on how the TinkerPop community is shaping up with a survey. Jason, I think you need to elaborate here. Get feedback from who? Do you literally mean the "community" or the software project or something else? Do other open source projects

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

(and reason) because it only leads to confusion. Java is > > one of the few, if not only, brain-damaged languages where 5 != 5 != > > 5. In Java, number objects must be coerced into like form for > > comparison. The other ID managers do this coercion. Saner languages >

Re: [DISCUSS] Gremlin Language variants in the Gremlin console

- gremlin-renjin (with gremlin-r representation in it) [ > http://www.renjin.org/ <http://www.renjin.org/> cool!] > > - etc. > > > > Thoughts?, > > Marko. > > > > http://markorodriguez.com <http://markorodriguez.com/> > > &g

[DISCUSS] ASF Board Draft Report - July 2016

## Description: Apache TinkerPop is a graph computing framework for both graph databases (OLTP) and graph analytic systems (OLAP). It was reported last month that TinkerPop had still not completely transferred from incubator infrastructure. Since that time, Apache Infrastructure has

Re: [DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

gt; >> that if the code/design is good, then there won’t be any hiccups on > merge. > >> > >> *** Also, benchmarks that dropping paths is “good” will be very > important > >> so hopefully you have that coming too. > >> > >> T

Re: [DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

tomorrow morning > for 1254. > > Thanks, > Ted > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks for the update Ted. We may need an extra day or two to clear up > some > > other discussion on some of the ot

[DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

With all the work on GLVs and the recent work on GraphSON 2.0, I think it's important that we have a solid, efficient, programming language neutral, lossless serialization format. Right now that format is GraphSON and it works for that purpose (ever more so with 2.0). Given some discussion on the

Re: [DISCUSS] ASF Board Draft Report - July 2016

The board report has been submitted for July 2016. On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks good, thanks Stephen. > > --Ted > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >

[DISCUSS] Gremlin-enabled ScriptEngine and GLV

I've been doing a bit of work on the TINKERPOP-1278 branch and have been mostly focused on generalizing/expanding the ScriptEngine infrastructure to gremlin-core. Seems like a weird place for ScriptEngine stuff to live as we've largely relegated such things to gremlin-groovy, but now that there

[DISCUSS] ASF Board Draft Report - August 2016

## Description: Apache TinkerPop is a graph computing framework for both graph databases (OLTP) and graph analytic systems (OLAP). ## Activity: As discussed in the previous report, TinkerPop was preparing for the first releases outside of incubation. Those releases were voted on positively by

Re: [DISCUSS] driver for gremlin-python

eep them as separate > projects. > > If I completely missed the original intent of the thread also do let me > know. > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I mentioned this thread to David Brown and

Re: [DISCUSS] driver for gremlin-python

dency > management systems easier (it's actually mandatory for php composer). > If you don't I can always bring it up with infra. > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Let me first address this piece: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] ASF Board Draft Report - August 2016

The board report has been submitted On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > ## Description: > Apache TinkerPop is a graph computing framework for both graph databases > (OLTP) and graph analytic systems (OLAP). > > ## Acti

Re: [DISCUSS] Returning Side Effects

used for return of results of keys/gather as is used for bytecode (which is all the same as returning results from Standard/SessionOpProcessor). On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a rough cut of "returning side-effects"

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.3/3.2.1

resolved.sucky On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > The master branch has been bumped to 3.2.2 and is now re-opened. the > initial 3.2.2-SNAPSHOT has been deployed to the Apache snapshots repo. I > couldn't deploy the initial docs for

Re: [DISCUSS] Returning Side Effects

t;)*.fold().project("data", > "se").by().by(cap("names"))* > ==>[data:[v[1], v[2], v[4]], se:[marko, vadas, josh]] > > I'm not saying it would be bad to have Gremlin Server handle that for you, > just wanted to show that it's actually pretty easy

[DISCUSS] Time Frames for 3.2.2 and 3.1.4

When we went through vote on 3.1.3/3.2.1, we'd discussed releasing 3.2.2/3.1.4 on a shorter release period than normal. A shorter release cycle for these two versions would allow us to quickly address a bug or two found late in code freeze. Perhaps longer term, shorter release cycles might help

[DISCUSS] GraphSON 2.0

Note that a PR for GraphSON 2.0 has been submitted: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/351 While I haven't reviewed in full myself yet, I think that this is a very nice set of changes. Given past discussions on this list in relation to this issue, I think we should all be happy with what

Re: [TinkerPop] Re: Traversal ByteCode and Translators (The TINKERPOP-1278 Saga)

We're pretty close to getting GraphSON 2.0 merged for 3.2.1 on TINKERPOP-1274: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/351 2.0 ensures full typing, makes it easier for non-jvm languages to generate/consume it and has a smaller byte size footprint. It would be interesting to see how the JSON for

Re: [DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

> On Jun 28, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I would like to get TinkerPop-1254 in before code freeze. Shooting for > > > finishing it up by end of this week but I'll drop a note if it looks > > like I > > > won't

[DISCUSS] Gremlin Console Usability

There's a handful of semi-related JIRA issues for Gremlin Console out there - I say "semi-related" because they all largely revolve around usability. Most recently is the discussion again about return of "null" for void returns: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1409 We've had that

Re: [DISCUSS] Gremlin Console Usability

ok like in the >>> output? >> >> >> Something like this (I hope the screenshot will make it to the mailing >> list): >> >> [image: Inline image 1] >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Steph

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.6 Release

Hey Ted - You're a little early as we agreed a while back to let two weekends pass from code freeze to VOTE day (maybe release docs need to be updated to reflect that). Not a big deal imo as I doubt there are many folks still testing on 3.1.6 at this point, so I'm fine to VOTE from here if

[DISCUSS] JanusGraph in Provider Index

There was recently a request from Alexander Patrikalakis in JIRA (that issues is now closed in favor of this thread) to add JanusGraph to the provider index of the TinkerPop home page. I think that makes sense, though at this time JanusGraph hasn't made a release yet that I'm aware of which

Re: Code Freeze 3.2.4

We still need one more vote to get https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548 - any committers free to handle that so we can get that merged? On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jason Plurad wrote: > We are now under code freeze for 3.2.4. > > There are still 2 outstanding

Re: Code Freeze 3.2.4

With the vote from kuppitz 548 is done. I just merged it. On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > We still need one more vote to get https://github.com/apache/ > tinkerpop/pull/548 - any committers free to handle that so we can get &

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.6 Release

and everything is good. > > > > VOTE +1 from me!! > > > > Cheers. > > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I can't remember the error I got, but I think it makes sense to test &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

, please? > > > > Marko. > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > > > On Jan 23, 2017, at 7:57 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > It's been a while since we've had a release (Octob

[DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

It's been a while since we've had a release (October 2016) and given the importance of the recent critical security fix from Groovy 2.4.8 I think it's worth getting some new versions out there. I'm not sure what everyone is working on or has concerns about, but after the PRs that are out there for

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

com> wrote: > Is CloseableIterator only in the 3.3 branch? > > -Paul > > > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 9:58 AM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 a

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

irements: > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/master/docs/ > src/dev/developer/release.asciidoc > > --Ted > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > sure - please put that in the prefix of the PR title so it

Re: lazy iteration semantics

; > > > The unspecified semantics is with bothE(), both sides done immediately > > like Neo4j and TinkerPop, or out and in done lazily as with Sqlg. > > If lazily which side first as if affects the semantics. > > > > Another caveat is if barrier steps are injected and then

Re: [GitHub] tinkerpop issue #548: TINKERPOP-1589 Re-introduced CloseableIterator

yeah - github picks up your changes on the branch automatically. we'll work on reviewing. On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Paul A. Jackson wrote: > I am git illiterate. > I committed to my repo. > It looks like that's all I have to do. > Travis build tells me to hang tight.

Re: gremlin-python test SimpleAuthenticator

If i remember correctly Marko had wanted to have the two instances configured with the idea that we would test gremlin-python against both. I think that remains a work in progress. David Brown has some changes coming in a PR to tp32 that make some improvements to the tests over there. Perhaps we

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

gt; > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:58 PM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 > > in his case, it should go to tp32. > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

t; -Original Message- > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 5:07 PM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 > > Being as close as we are to our code freeze/test week, I'd say that

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

<paul.jack...@pb.com> wrote: > OK, that's done, as you can no doubt see. Hoping this can make it into > 3.2.4. > > Thanks. > > -Paul > > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 6:

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

in his case, it should go to tp32. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Paul A. Jackson <paul.jack...@pb.com> wrote: > For what branch should a pull request be submitted? > > > -Original Message----- > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesda

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

January 24, 2017 3:01 PM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6 > > Great. I'll try it out. > > -Paul > > > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 2:54 PM

Re: Site organization, including links to recipes and various tutorials

hTraversal at this point on the tp32/mastter branch. I still have a little ways to go with GraphTraversal to get that all javadoc'd - i suspect I might finish a rough pass at it all by end of day tomorrow. On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: >

[DISCUSS] P.not and __.not

P.not and __.not unfortunately tangle with each other when using static imports. I think we allowed the console to dictate to us that P.not is the lucky one that gets to be used without its qualifying prefix. I'm not sure there was any conscious decision to do it that way. Indeed, I think i would

Re: [DISCUSS] P.not and __.not

ersal counterparts. If there is some random component, we should fix > it, but we should always give precedence to P so we are backwards > compatible. > > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com&g

kerberos implementation

There's a pull request out there right now from Marc of HadoopMarc fame (I think I have the name cross referenced properly) that adds a kerberos implementation to Gremlin Server for 3.3.0. It has nice tests and some good documentation. It's also been reviewed by Mike Adamson who did the early good

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

Unless I'm missing something, HasStep hasn't changed in 4 months and HasContainer hasn't changed in 3 months. The only update that went in after 2/2 that I can think of that would have any bearing for graph providers who tested before/after that date would be the AutoCloseable stuff:

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

s, no +0s and no -1s. The > results are: > > BINDING VOTES: > > +1 (4 -- Daniel Kuppitz, Stephen Mallette, Jason Plurad, Ted Wilmes) > 0 (0) > -1 (0) > > NON-BINDING VOTES: > > +1 (4 -- David Brown, Robert Dale, Paul Jackson, Pieter Martin) > 0 (0) > -1 (0) > > Thank you very much, > Jason Plurad >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.6 Release

gt; +1 (5 -- Ted Wilmes, Stephen Mallette, Daniel Kuppitz, Dylan Millikin, > Jason Plurad) > 0 (0) > -1 (0) > > NON-BINDING VOTES: > > +1 (1 -- David Brown) > 0 (0) > -1 (0) > > Thank you very much, > Ted Wilmes >

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

s to test Sqlg. In principle, you > > should VOTE on every PR by building and testing the changes against Sqlg. > > That is where you can make a huge contribution. > > > > > >> So I am not voting negative just requesting a weekend, if possible, to > >

Re: Site organization, including links to recipes and various tutorials

One idea I've had is to better cross reference our docs. More links between the different documents we have would be helpful. For example, when we mention a particular step somewhere in a recpie or tutorial, do a link to the step in the reference docs. For each step in the reference docs have a

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

phen, I'd like to volunteer to learn the process for 3.2.4. > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks Ted - any takers for 3.2.4? I'd be happy to do it with someone if > > there is interest in learning the process

Re: [DISCUSS] Bump to Groovy 2.4.8

The bump to 2.4.8 is done now - I've published fresh SNAPSHOTs from 3.1.x on up the line. On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > Groovy 2.4.8 just released. It has a lot of bug fixes, a couple of which > are important to TinkerPo

Re: [DISCUSS] Download Page

back, but they all seemed like they did too much. maybe i didn't know what to look for. On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Dylan Millikin <dylan.milli...@gmail.com> wrote: > How is the current site structured? Is it just HTML and CSS files? > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Stephen Ma

[DISCUSS] Add ChronoGraph to Provider Index

ChronoGraph was announced on Gremlin Users a day or so ago: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/gremlin-users/sWFUMYtY1t0 That project now has an official release on Maven Central http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22com.github.martinhaeusler%22 which I think allows it to meet

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >