Re: Java 16 via 8.0.7-SNAPSHOT - JVM Crash - Any Thoughts?

Richard Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2021, 11:55 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > A minimal example would be a big help, thank you! > > Jon > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:00 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > Hi Jon, > > &

Re: Java 16 via 8.0.7-SNAPSHOT - JVM Crash - Any Thoughts?

> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:07 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am doing some bleeding edge testing related to JDK/JRE 16 with > > the > > latest TomEE 8.0.7-SNAPSHOT as we have included some 3rd party >

Jenkins PR builder issues

Hi, it seems, that we have lost the Jenkins PR Builder support for PRs by people, who are not in the committer group? - [1],[2],[3] are PRs for which the PR Builder via Jenkins did _not_ run. - [4] was a test PR by myself for which the PR Builder did actually run. Did something change on the

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE on Jakarta EE Compatible Products page

+1 for A (same reasons as already mentioned) Gruss Richard Am Mittwoch, den 07.04.2021, 20:29 -0300 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos: > Hello everyone, > > I also vote +1 for option A, I believe it will be a great opportunity > to > have TomEE as a compatible product. > > > Em ter., 6 de abr.

Re: TCK debugging tips

Thanks for the detailed explanation! It is indeed very helpful. Might be worth adding this introduction to a README.adoc or a separate HOW-TO-DEBUG.adoc to the "tomee-tck" repository (and link it from the README.adoc) ? Gruss Richard Am Mittwoch, den 07.04.2021, 14:49 -0700 schrieb David

Re: Permanently Fixing examples after library upgrades - help wanted

elf-hosted Jira Server instance. I do not know, if ASF is using the cloud-hosted approach offered by Atlassian... (c) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3001 Gruss Richard Am Mittwoch, den 07.04.2021, 17:05 -0700 schrieb David Blevins: > > On Apr 6, 2021, at 10:37 AM,

Java 16 via 8.0.7-SNAPSHOT - JVM Crash - Any Thoughts?

Hi, I am doing some bleeding edge testing related to JDK/JRE 16 with the latest TomEE 8.0.7-SNAPSHOT as we have included some 3rd party patches, which should support JDK/JRE 16. One remaining thing is OpenJPA, which will support J16 with 3.1.3-SNAPSHOT (so I have patched it in my test). I get

Re: SHA files

Hi, I think this is the way the ASF parent POM configuration is generating the SHA512 hashes during a release process (at least it seems to be the same for other ASF projects (Maven, ...) as well). I am using a this way of checking the checksums in our automation processes (docker ci envs):

Re: Permanently Fixing examples after library upgrades - help wanted

tps://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/97f7e4b5038216891b711506689e144d4eae47ae > > > > > > > > > > Now we just need help updating all the examples like this. > > > > > > > > > > Vicente, would you be open to updating the examples that > > > > > broke after the > >

Re: Permanently Fixing examples after library upgrades

Hi David, thanks for the this thread! I like the idea of using the generated BOMs in our examples rather than adding libraries by hand (and updating them all the time). Sometimes it will be necassary to still add some additional libs in the examples, but overall it will make it easier to

Re: Release related Issues created by INFRA

Hi, thanks for the feedback. It is very welcome! Gruss Richard Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2021, 19:53 -0700 schrieb David Blevins: > > On Mar 25, 2021, at 7:53 AM, Zowalla, Richard < > > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > > Hi David, Hi Jon, &g

Re: Download page improvements/rework (was Re: Release related Issues created by INFRA)

Hi, I am totally with you. We should automate the release-related tooling, the creation of the related notes as well as the download pages. However, we should keep in mind, that we had some Antorra-based website rework. I do not remember the current status but I guess it is also .adoc based -

Re: Release related Issues created by INFRA

Hi David, Hi Jon, thanks for your replies. I just pushed some (short term) fixes to the tomee-site-generator: (a) Added an (experimental) generator to create the download page based on downloads.apache.org or archive.apache.org (rather than using repo.maven.apache.org), so we can be sure, that

Re: JUnit5 Jupiter support with Arquillian

Hi all, I went ahead and merged the changes. We are now capable of running JUnit 5 tests via @RunWithApplicationComposer with some modes to specify (container for each test method, for each test class, per jvm or based on the JUnit 5 test instance lifecycle). Usage example can be found in [1] and

Re: CI Build Environment ISO-8859-1 versus UTF-8

021, 12:37 +0000 schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Yup, will do. > > Am Donnerstag, den 04.03.2021, 12:05 + schrieb Jonathan > Gallimore: > > Sounds good. Are you able to change it? > > > > Jon > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:35 AM Zowalla, Richard < &g

Re: CI Build Environment ISO-8859-1 versus UTF-8

Yup, will do. Am Donnerstag, den 04.03.2021, 12:05 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Sounds good. Are you able to change it? > > Jon > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:35 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > &

CI Build Environment ISO-8859-1 versus UTF-8

Hi, it seems our CI environments suffers from using the default platform encoding 'ISO-8859-1': [ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] TomEEJsonbProviderTest.run:82 expected:<{"date":"M[�]r- 2021","fieldAccess...> but was:<{"date":"M[ä]r-2021","fieldAccess...> The failing test 'TomEEJsonbProviderTest'

Re: TOMEE-2968

Ok, I found PropertyPlaceHolderTest, which demonstrates the intention behind the suffix / prefix notation for property values. I created a related PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/763 Gruss Richard Am Dienstag, den 23.02.2021, 09:00 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi, >

TOMEE-2968

Hi, I was looking at TOMEE-2968 [1]. The user has a special character "}" within the password used for the data source configuration. I replicated the behaviour described in TOMEE-2968 in a unit test [2]. Debugging the code boils down to PropertyPlaceHolderHelper [3], in which we are stripping

Re: TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any thoughts?

* > [java] keytool -genkeypair [OPTION]... > > > El lun, 8 feb 2021 a las 0:30, Jean-Louis Monteiro (< > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>) escribió: > > > I agree. > > Would be awesome to have something more stable. It's better than it > > was. > >

Re: [TCK] EJB 30 Interceptor test in embedded mode

Hi, I would like to help, so I was lurking around some time in the related code (i even found there the @AroundConstruct annotations are processed, although this is the first time I heard about them :D) but - as I am too new to the code base - have no idea how to start digging on this one. Gruss

AW: TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any thoughts?

org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest.org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest.org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest El lun, 1 feb 2021 a las 3:12, Zowalla, Richard (< richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>) escribió: > I went ahead with it and merged it. This shouldn't influence anything > on the master as it is just a new module. > > Howeve

Re: TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any thoughts?

27.01.2021, 17:25 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi all, > > a few days ago, I had a (virtual) coffee discussion with my colleguae > Martin W. about moving some of our research projects towards pure > JUnit > 5. > > The missing thing: An openejb-junit module, which comes witho

Re: TOMEE-2967 - Translate to Spanish: examples/xa-datasource/

I have assigned it to you. Thank you! Gruss Richard Am Donnerstag, den 28.01.2021, 23:13 -0300 schrieb Evaldo Junior: > I created the issue on the JIRA [1] to translate to spanish of the > document > examples/xa-datasource/. > Can some of the JIRA admins please assign the ticket to my >

TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any thoughts?

Hi all, a few days ago, I had a (virtual) coffee discussion with my colleguae Martin W. about moving some of our research projects towards pure JUnit 5. The missing thing: An openejb-junit module, which comes without a transient compile dependency towards junit4. Today, I had some time and

Re: TOMEE-2958 TOMEE-2959 Tomcat and jackson update

/AMQ/issues/AMQ-7072?filter=allopenissues Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2021, 12:08 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Yup, ActiveMQ has a compile dependency towards jackson. There was a > discussion in 2019 [1] about it on the mailing list. > > [1] > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.

Re: TOMEE-2958 TOMEE-2959 Tomcat and jackson update

Yup, ActiveMQ has a compile dependency towards jackson. There was a discussion in 2019 [1] about it on the mailing list. [1] http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Why-jackson-and-jonhzon-shipped-with-latest-TomEE-td4689451.html Am Montag, den 18.01.2021, 22:43 + schrieb Jonathan

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: TomEE » master-owasp-check #20

Seems, that I have missed the PR job. Have adjusted this job configuration too... Am Samstag, den 16.01.2021, 08:45 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi, > > i adjusted the jenkins config. > > Mails are now sent to comm...@tomee.apache.org > > Gruss > Richard > &

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: TomEE » master-owasp-check #20

Hi, i adjusted the jenkins config. Mails are now sent to comm...@tomee.apache.org Gruss Richard Am Freitag, den 15.01.2021, 09:35 -0800 schrieb David Blevins: > Can we get the Jenkins notifications sent to commits@tomee.a.o ? > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins >

Re: [TCK] EJB 3.2 timers

ink it should be a tested requirement in TCK. > > > > If using endTime before startTime is the only way to specify a > > > > timer > > > > never expires, something is wrong to me. > > > > > > > > I'll go ahead and see if I can adjust and at the same time

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.6

Hi, +1 from my side. I tested the 8.0.6 plus artifact with our fullstack EAR app. Thanks, John for your time / work in preparing this release artifact :) Gruss Richard Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2021, 16:05 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > > This is a first attempt at a vote for a

Re: [TCK] Building the TCK?

/twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:24 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > Hi Cesar, > > > > thanks for the fast response and the hint! > > > > Finally, I was able to

Re: [TCK] Building the TCK?

with > > a > > README enhancement. > > Sure, go ahead. Thank you! > > El mié, 13 ene 2021 a las 10:15, Zowalla, Richard (< > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>) escribió: > > > Just a short update: The build using [1] went fine. It produced a > >

Re: [TCK] Building the TCK?

-8.0.2.zip [3] https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck/pull/12 Am Mittwoch, den 13.01.2021, 14:43 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi all, > > today, I had some time and tried to setup the TomEE-TCK on my machine > as I was curios on running the TCK locally. > > From previous m

Re: [ANN] Welcome new Apache TomEE Committer Richard Zowalla

Thanks to all of you for your kind words and for this opportunity! TomEE has a very welcoming community. My journey started in 2015 (with TomEE 1.7.x), when my colleague, Martin W., urged me (hehe, sorry for the wording :-P) to join the dev@tomee.apache.org list to monitor potential

[TCK] Building the TCK?

Hi all, today, I had some time and tried to setup the TomEE-TCK on my machine as I was curios on running the TCK locally. From previous mails, I identified the related repository on GitHub [1] and cloned it. The documentation states: 1. Download the TCK & Unzip it [2] 2. Set some env variables

AW: Releases?

Hi, great idea - no objections from my side Gruss Richard Von: Jonathan Gallimore [jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 14:15 An: dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: Releases? Hi All, Any objections if I kick off a 8.0.6 release? I

Re: Java 11, Corba Dependencies & Questions related to the build itself

e > and > great contribution for the future. > I would encourage you to also join the discussion on the Jakarta EE > 9.1 and > the Corba thing if you want. > > And of course, if you have some spare cycles, join the TCK fun ;-) > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro >

Re: Java 11, Corba Dependencies & Questions related to the build itself

or something and it can still wait some time, but the discussion would bring us some steps into the direction to build with jdk 11. Gruss Richard Z Am Samstag, den 28.11.2020, 10:48 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi all, > > I was yesterday working on TOMEE-2324 in order to prepare

Re: CI job for tomee-7.0.x

Just a friendly reminder. The PRs for this are still pending: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/720 https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/722 Am Dienstag, den 01.12.2020, 08:02 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi, > > forgot to send an eMail to the list. The related PRs are

Re: Master build on CI

il-at-end clean install -Pall- > adapters > For OWASP: mvn -U --show-version --fail-at-end clean install -Powasp- > check > -DskipTests > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2

Re: CI job for tomee-7.0.x

Hi, forgot to send an eMail to the list. The related PRs are available: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/720https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/722 BestRichard Z Am Freitag, den 27.11.2020, 13:09 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Will also check the third one :) - will create a related J

Re: [TCK] JPA issue

lt; > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > Thanks Richard for the feedback. > > I created https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/issues/580 > > andupdated TomEE ticket for tracking--Jean-Louis Monteirohttp://tw > > itter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitrib

Java 11, Corba Dependencies & Questions related to the build itself

Hi all, I was yesterday working on TOMEE-2324 in order to prepare the code base to be build with Java 11, which is currently impossible as CORBA- related dependencies were removed. We had a discussion on this on the mailing list a few months ago [1]. First, I went the road doing bytecode

Re: CI job for tomee-7.0.x

Hi Cesar, i will give > The second failing test trowed a: [Fatal Error] :8:23: Invalid byte 2 > of2-byte UTF-8 sequence. error. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.5 and 9.0.0-M3

+1 I only tested 8.0.5 (EAR, JSF, REST, ...) on Linux, each under OpenJDK 11 (latest). => no show stoppers found. Richard Z Am Dienstag, den 17.11.2020, 22:11 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE > 9.0.0-M3and Apache TomEE

Re: [TCK] EJB 3.2 timers

Hi, I think it is a bit odd in this tck test case, that the creation of a timer with an end time before the start time should even be possible, but nevermind :) I do not quite understand the reason why this behaviour was chosen in the first place. I might miss something as I am not long enough

Re: Master build on CI

s for the pointers. Its too bad that > > Jenkins > > shows the modules in a weird order though. Things like that add to > > my > > frustration with it. > > > > Jon > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 9:06 AM Zowalla, Richard < > > richa

Re: Master build on CI

Hi Jon, the module order shown on the start page does not necessarily reflect the build order. We are building TomEE Master from GitHub on our university Jenkins CI infrastructure as well. Afaik, the module order is hidden in the CI log files: CI University:

Re: Follow-Up: ORB Dependencies and Java 11

Hi all, I found some time creating the classes via ASM, see PR https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/713 Happy to retrieve feedback on it. Best Richard Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2020, 18:56 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi David, > > thanks for the in-depth explanation & opinio

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE javaee-api-8.0.5

+1 (and I like the "ladies" intro :)) Am Montag, den 19.10.2020, 22:30 +0200 schrieb Mark Struberg: > Hi ladies! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on Apache TomEE javaee-api-8.0.5. > > This mostly contains updates to newer bugfix releases of some spec > jars. Including an important hasCode glitch in

Re: Your project's website

We did such migrations in our university a few years ago. I digged into our documentation, which provided a link to https://blokspeed.net/blog/2010/09/converting-from-subversion-to-git The required authors list can be found here https://infra.apache.org/svn-to-git-migration.html Hope this

Re: Java Mail 1.4 in TomEE 8

to bring Geronimo mail up to date, and it > looks > like we're potentially close. > > Jon > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, 13:34 Zowalla, Richard, < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Martin (Wiesner) and I were working on

Java Mail 1.4 in TomEE 8

Hi, Martin (Wiesner) and I were working on our SMTP server configuration. As a consequence, we found, that TomEE 8 includes a rather old version of javamail, which does not want to talkt to SMTP servers configured with modern TLS versions (1.2, 1.3). My questions are: Are there any reasons, why

Re: [VOTE] Missing artifact - TomEE 8.0.4

+1 Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2020, 09:58 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > > We're missing an artifact on our download page for TomEE 8.0.4 > Webprofile > (thanks Richard Zowalla for pointing this out). > > This is already in Maven: >

AW: TomEE 8.0.4 - Webprofile - Download Link broken?

like it was missed from the VOTE directory. We might need a vote to get that extra binary up. Do any other committers know what we might need to do here? Jon On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:22 AM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > Hi, > > did we miss the "web

TomEE 8.0.4 - Webprofile - Download Link broken?

Hi, did we miss the "webprofile" TomEE 8.0.4 package in the latest release? The links on https://tomee.apache.org/download-ng.html target https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/tomee/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-8.0.4-webprofile.zip

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

do this, butit comes unstuck where various libraries inspect > classes for annotations,and none of them actually *load* the class to > do that (so it doesn't gettranslated, and subsequently fails). > Unfortunately, the renaming meanswe'll all need to make changes to > our applications

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

Hi Jon, thanks for the explanation. The artifacts for 9.0.0-M2 seem to be missing in the Maven staging repository? Is this known/planned in this way? I just wanted to build our project (which works fine with 8.0.4) with the 9.0.0-M2 artifacts. Thanks, Richard Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020,

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

Hi, tested it with my (EAR) applications (primarily web services, JSF) on Linux with OpenJDK 11. +1 (8.0.4) Best, Richard Am Mittwoch, den 22.07.2020, 15:34 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache > TomEE > 8.0.4. >

Re: Follow-Up: ORB Dependencies and Java 11

give it a try. Never did something with ASM, but happy to dig into it :D Best,Richard Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2020, 11:23 -0700 schrieb David Blevins: > Hi Richard! > > On Jul 7, 2020, at 11:54 PM, Zowalla, Richard < > > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > &g

Re: Follow-Up: ORB Dependencies and Java 11

Thanks for your insights & opinion, @David Jencks & David Blevins. It is very intersting from my point of view. I got this quote from the mailing list archive [1] by @dblevins > I know we don't support Corba itself, so we'd probably have to figure out> how we're tied to those classes and what to

Re: Follow-Up: ORB Dependencies and Java 11

a & JCP Member > GitHub: https://github.com/Daniel-Dos > Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/danieldiasjava > Twitter: http://twitter.com/danieldiasjava > > > Em ter., 7 de jul. de 2020 às 05:48, Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> escreveu: > > &

Follow-Up: ORB Dependencies and Java 11

Hi, I was digging around the GitHub Repo and noticed PR 664 [1], which tries to prepare TomEE to be build with JDK 11 but CORBA was removed in JDK 11. There was a disucssion 2 years ago about removing CORBA related access [2]. There even exist a JIRA (TOMEE-2324) for it [3]. If we want to

Re: [VOTE] Move javaee-api to Git.

It seems, INFRA tells us, that it is a self-service with svn2git migration. Richard Am Mittwoch, den 20.05.2020, 10:55 -0700 schrieb David Blevins: > Here we go: > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20287 > > > > -David > > > > > > On May 19, 2020, at 8:10 PM, David Blevins > >

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.2

Hi, tested it again with my (EAR) applications. Works fine: +1 Best, Richard Am Donnerstag, den 14.05.2020, 14:27 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > > Here's a third attempt at releasing of TomEE 8.0.2. Please can you > take a > careful look, review, test and provide feedback. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.2

Hi, tested it with my (EAR) applications. Works fine: +1 Thanks, Jon! Best, Richard Am Mittwoch, den 13.05.2020, 15:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > > Here's a second attempt at releasing of TomEE 8.0.2. Please can you > take a > careful look, review, test and provide

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.2

Hi Jon, I am getting a 404 - Repository "orgapachetomee-1167 (staging: open)" [id=orgapachetomee-1167] exists but is not exposed. Repository "orgapachetomee-1167 (staging: open)" [id=orgapachetomee- 1167] exists but is not exposed. for the Maven repo. Best, Richard Am Mittwoch, den

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.2

Thanks, Jon. Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2020, 13:16 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > I've (hopefully) fixed those issues in the release notes. If there's > tickets I've missed, please shout. > > Jon > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 1:10 PM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa..

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.2

The release log is a bit strange: - update javaee-api to 8.0-3- SNAPSHOT (it actually includes 8.0-4) - johnzon / cxf upgrade is not contained However, tested it with my (EAR) applications. Works fine: +1 Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2020, 11:10 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > >

Re: Spring Boot Persistence Context

I agree with you 100%. I had the same "pain" in legacy Web applications. We even had the (business) need for mixing the technology stack (legacy). I used the term "fancy" as Spring(Boot) is (over)hyped at the moment :) A lot of people will find and use it. You can see the (bad) questions on

Re: Spring Boot Persistence Context

Hi Jon, thanks. Our students tend to use SpringBoot as it is "fancy" ;) I think, that a example would be useful. Richard Am Mittwoch, den 08.04.2020, 13:31 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Thanks for the follow up! I did get this working. I'm thinking a > little > Spring Boot example for

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-4

+1 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: CVE-2020-8840 on TomEE 8.0.1

Hi, I think the explanation is here http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Why-jackson-and-jonhzon-shipped-with-latest-TomEE-td4689451.html Best, Richard Am Freitag, den 13.03.2020, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Alex The Rocker: > Hello, > > I fully agree with Mark's remark : why would TomEE ever

Re: TOMEE-2770

ns.xml with bean-discovery-mode="all". > Then perform several GET calls with a browser and you will the number > of dynamicProducer increase (1 per call). > Best Regards. > -Original Message-From: Zowalla, Richard [mailto: > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de] Sent: lundi 10 février 2

AW: TOMEE-2770

Hi Francois, it would be beneficial, if you could provide a little sample project, which can reproduce the issue. With this in hands, it will be much easier to dig into this issue. Best Richard Von: COURTAULT Francois

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.1

Hi, +1 from my side. I tested the re-rolled 8.0.1-RELEASE with our fullstack EAR app. Thanks, John for your time / work in preparing this release artifact :) Best, Richard (Z) Am Mittwoch, den 08.01.2020, 15:32 -0600 schrieb Cesar Hernandez: > +1 > El mié., 8 ene. 2020 a las 14:14, Daniel

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.1

Hi, +1 from my side. I tested the 8.0.1-RELEASE with an EAR deployment containing a JSF webapp and some JAX-RS web services + a lot of unit / integration tests Everything worked fine. Thanks, John for your time / work in preparing this release artifact :) Best,Richard (Z) Am Donnerstag, den

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-3

+1 Am Montag, den 09.12.2019, 16:10 -0600 schrieb Richard Monson-Haefel: > +1 > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 4:09 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > This is a vote for an updated Java EE spec jar, with one single > change overjavaee-api:8.0-2: > TOMEE-2690 make sure

Re: Revert back change from TomEEJohnzonProvider to TomEEJsonbProvider in 7.1.x

ing addition of MicroProfile > and raising the minimum Javalevel to Java SE 8. It looks like > TomEEJsonbProvider isn't a thing in theTomEE 7.x branch at first > glance. > Jon > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > Hi Jo

Re: Revert back change from TomEEJohnzonProvider to TomEEJsonbProvider in 7.1.x

Hi Jon, the related issue was https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2565 with a lot of comments documenting the issues, which were fixed with this commit. The original change was conducted in 2018: https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/4302acab62bb64c2d77cce3a66b92ae7e9cff7c5 and already

Re: JIRA about CVEs

Did not find anything with the owasp plugin profile. Should be fine (for now). Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 08:25 -0600 schrieb Richard Monson-Haefel: > Excellent! Thanks, Richard! > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 8:18 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote

Re: TomEE GraalVM native image

Hi Jon, personally, I agree with your view: +1 Richard Z Am Donnerstag, den 14.11.2019, 09:39 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > If we're to roll an 8.0.1 any day now, its unlikely it'll have > aMicroProfile update, as there's a number of dependencies that get > pulled infor that functionality.

Re: JIRA about CVEs

schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Alright, I will proceed :) > Best,Richard > Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 07:52 -0600 schrieb Richard Monson- > Haefel: > > If you don't mind, Richard, can you do the upgrades and create a > > PR? We can let it run overnight and see how it goes. >

Re: JIRA about CVEs

y with a different PR > but I don't have the extra cycles to do it again today. > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 7:07 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > Sounds reasonable to me. If I can assist in upgrading, let me know. > > > > However, we

Re: JIRA about CVEs

Sounds reasonable to me. If I can assist in upgrading, let me know. However, we should publish the link to the ASF CI somewhere, so we can better monitor the current build status. Best,Richard Z Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 07:00 -0600 schrieb Richard Monson-Haefel: > Is this a matter of upgrading

TOMEE-2736 - Please check PR 607

Hi, please check https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/607 and the related JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE/issues/TOMEE-2736 Would be great, if this could be included in 8.0.1 as this is a blocker for my colleague mawiesne, who consumed a ton of coffee over this bug.

Re: Fwd: CDI Principal injection: object is not an instance of declaring class

I opened a JIRA for it for further investigation: https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2709 If it is not a bug or something else, we can simply close it and keep track on this. Best,Richard Am Montag, den 14.10.2019, 11:43 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi, > I tested the attach

Re: Fwd: CDI Principal injection: object is not an instance of declaring class

> > http://tomee.apache.org/mailing-lists.html > > You can always unsubscribe after if you want. > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 6:44 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I tested the attached WAR with M2,M3 and

Re: Fwd: CDI Principal injection: object is not an instance of declaring class

Hi, I tested the attached WAR with M2,M3 and RELEASE, results below: - M2: works as stated by the user- M3: Exception as stated below by the user- Release: same as M3 (exception as stated below). Source-code would be beneficial for debug purpose :) Best,Richard Am Montag, den 14.10.2019, 06:11

Re: 7.1.x and 7.0.x releases

Hi Jonathan, current 7.1.1-SNAPSHOT branch is on ActiveMQ 5.15.10 This update was conducted due to several CVE's related to its transient jackson-databind dependency. But, if I am right, you are still on 7.0.x - which has not been updated yet :) Best,Richard Am Dienstag, den 24.09.2019, 10:57

AW: TOMEE-2419 - Web Server Configuration for TomEE Website - Easy fix available?

on INFRA would be the better way to solve the issue. I can do that and link it to your ticket if you want. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com<http://www.tomitribe.com/> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 4:40 AM Zowalla, Richard mailto:richard.zowa

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.0 (take 3)

+1 from my side. Additional Notes from previous vote: I tested an existing application, which is currently run with 8.0.0-M3, with the release artifacts. It includes an EAR bundle, some web-services and batchee. Everything worked fine. A sidenote: "batchee-jbatch" uses xbean-reflect in version

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-2

+1 Am Freitag, den 06.09.2019, 10:42 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO: > Hi, > > Here we go. Here is an updated API jar. > > There will be some more iteration to get the jar fully Jakarta EE 8 > compliant. > See ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2620 for the > identified gaps.

Re: New committer Cesar Hernandez

congrats! :) Am Donnerstag, den 05.09.2019, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko: > congrats! > Am Do., 5. Sept. 2019 um 09:53 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache TomEE has invited > Cesartobecome a committer and we

Re: Yank Polling application example

Hi, I did a quick scan of the module. From an outside point of view: I have no idea, what is going on in this example.The biggest point is the missing documentation / explanation. I see two options: (a) add explanation / documentation and rework the example (b) remove it Best,Richard Am

[GitHub] asf-ci posts the same message multiple times?

Hi, why does "asf-ci" post multiple times inside certain PRs, i.e. https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/541 I dont think, that I can report this directly to infrastructure? Bestg, Richard -- Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics Hochschule Heilbronn

TOMEE-2419 - Web Server Configuration for TomEE Website - Easy fix available?

Hi, I think TOMEE-2419 can be fixed easiliy. https://tomee.apache.org/ is reachable via a valid certificate but there is no permanent redirect from plain http to https. I think this would be a benefit (also in terms of search engine rankings) Can we change this easily ? Or who is in charge for

Re: TOMEE-2565 - PR available

Thanks for merging! :) Am Dienstag, den 20.08.2019, 11:09 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > Thanks Richard.All merged. Ticket marked as resolved. > --Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:0

TOMEE-2565 - PR available

Hi, can someone move forward with https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/534 ? Details can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2565 Best, Richard -- Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics Hochschule Heilbronn – University of

<    1   2   3   4   >