Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

John, What would be your advice for creating the git repos? Usual Git in US or gitbox? Jean-Louis -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > I knew there was

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

I knew there was something. Thanks for the gitbox info Le 13 févr. 2018 12:26, "John D. Ament" a écrit : On 2018/02/13 09:29:37, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > side note: we don't need to go through asf@incubator here, the vote passed > and the

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

On 2018/02/13 09:15:54, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > I'll create the tickets for infra so we have the repos ready. > No infra ticket required. Git repos are fully self serve: git-wip-us hosted repos are requested via https://selfserve.apache.org/ gitbox hosted

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Ok, iCLA is all set as everyone is asf committer. I guess the only thing missing is the IP paperwork. Jean-Louis, is there anything I can do to help us get this boring stuff ready? []s, Thiago. On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Yes, all the

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Yes, all the committers on those projects of course need to have an iCLA on file. And the PMC has to do an IP clearance. Once that's done it's fine to directly import it over here. LieGrue, strub PS: at OWB it was a bit different: with Meecrowave it was basically moving parts which existed

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Yes, this doesn't apply for *sub*projects. Karaf, OpenWebBeans, ... are examples doing that without any issues. Also the fact the license - even if not explicit with a LICENSE file but only headers - is asf v2 in all projects helps to smooth that procedure. So public donation+license+subproject =

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Are you sure we don't need the incubator? I know that Tomcat has multiple github repositories, but they are simple mirrors of the same svn repository on different branches (tc7, tc8 etc). >From https://incubator.apache.org/faq.html I get this... " 1.4. Someone has proposed that their

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

side note: we don't need to go through asf@incubator here, the vote passed and the project can be imported as soon as the repos are created by infra. The only thing to take care (and a lot) is to make clear tomitribe gives (donates) this code to asf. A public message on a list is generally good

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Yes, looking at the steps now. I will ping you later for more guidance. At first glance, It looks like a very complex process. It's a good learning opportunity. Thanks man. []s, Thiago On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:15 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > I'll create the

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

I'll create the tickets for infra so we have the repos ready. Can you look at the other steps? I'm not very familiar with the steps in case of code donation. So I'll need to document myself as well. Le 13 févr. 2018 10:10, "Thiago Veronezi" a écrit : > Awesome! > > Thanks

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Awesome! Thanks guys. Thanks Jean-Louis for sort this out that fast! Count me in for the incubator work. []s, Thiago. On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Hey Thiago. > > I have done all the change and prepared the donation. It needs some

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Hey Thiago. I have done all the change and prepared the donation. It needs some paperwork for IP clearance. I have followed the option where we have each in its own repo instead of the current TomEE repo. It appeared to be more flexible to me bit happy to change if the community thinks it's

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

technically now since TomEE is hosted in GIT we even _have to_ give them own repos. Because those components will likely _not_ share the same lifecycle nor version number than the TomEE app server, isn't? GIT is not SVN. You technically cannot do sparse releases from a GIT repo. It's always a

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Hmm, what does hurt letting them having their own repo? I see the benefit to release them more easily and let them have their own lifecycle. I also see the drawback of all the tomee project if we put them as submodules. However I fail to see what would be the advantages in this last case. What do

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Hi guys, I have some use for Chatterbox and I would like to contribute. Sheldon and Chatterbox are examples of awesome use of stack Java EE JCA, aren't they? What about creating a module "resource-adapters" and having these guys there? com.apache.tomee.rars chatterbox com.apache.tomee.rars

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

+1 for a new github repo and 1 per project. And we still need a name for this 'aggregator'. In Myfaces it was myfaces-ext-*But if you did your history lections then you would have noticed that keeping myfaces in the name was NOT a good idea.While CODI (myfaces-ext-cdi) did also run perfectly

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

One per project And no need of tomee in the name ;) we already have tomee.git so we can get sheldon.git and chatterbox.git 2018-02-05 14:38 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro : > I'm fine either way, do we want one per sub-project/sub-tool or one with > everything inside?

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

I'm fine either way, do we want one per sub-project/sub-tool or one with everything inside? If we go this path I'm tempted to say, one per contribution. That would make tomee git repo tomee-sheldon git repo tomee-chatterbox git repo Jean-Louis -- Jean-Louis Monteiro

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

just plain new git repos IMHO Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

In terms of source code, do we want something like this tomee/ (the main git project) ..tomee-server/ --> no idea what name would be the best from a user perspective ..sheldon/ ..chatterbox/ WDYT? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Feb 5,

Re: [RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Excellent. Happy to help with the process in any way I can. Jon On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Looks like David is busy, so I'll close the VOTE for him and proceed. > > The VOTE passes with > > +1: John D. Ament, Jonathan Gallimore, Mark

[RESULT] Accept Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Looks like David is busy, so I'll close the VOTE for him and proceed. The VOTE passes with +1: John D. Ament, Jonathan Gallimore, Mark Struberg, Andy Gumbrecht, David Blevins and Jean-Louis Monteiro No 0 and no -1 non-binding +1: Matthew Broadhead, Elder Moraes Thanks for voting Jean-Louis