You could always create a branch if you really wanted to do something dramatic.
On 3/2/08, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Igor,
Anyone in particular we should consult / inform / coordinate about
(major) changes we are planning?
Not that i have something in mind, just
You need to login to the site first to change your password:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352group_id=1#1204842227
On 3/7/08, lars vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to commit code for wicket-contrib-jamon project but I am
not able anymore. Yesterday I
Yes, I heard about this this morning on another email list.
On 3/7/08, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dammit you beat me by half a minute :)
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:47 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to login to the site first to change your password
No problem. When you change your password via the site, make sure you
wait a little bit before trying svn again. It takes a few seconds
(like 30 or so I think).
On 3/7/08, lars vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the quick response.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:50 PM, James Carman
Your RAT report shows JavaScript files without license headers.
Shouldn't they have them?
On 3/9/08, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my
p.a.oaccount:
Distribution:
in? I'm just curious.
On 3/9/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your RAT report shows JavaScript files without license headers.
Shouldn't they have them?
On 3/9/08, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have build our second bug-fix release for 1.3. It's uploaded to my
Nino and I are working on a sort of jumpstart maven archetype for
working with wicket/spring/hibernate (or another ORM solution). Can I
have karma granted on wicket-stuff? My username is jwcarman at
SourceForge.
Thank you,
James Carman
The Javadoc accessible from the Wicket site says 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT in the
title. Shouldn't that be updated with the 1.3.1 stuff at least (since
that's what the site says is the latest release)? Or, I'd probably
just go ahead and replace it with the 1.3.2 stuff since it has already
been released.
/index.html
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:57 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Javadoc accessible from the Wicket site says 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT in the
title. Shouldn't that be updated with the 1.3.1 stuff at least (since
that's what the site says is the latest release)? Or, I'd
On 3/14/08, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not binding. But still have an oppion:)
Id say go for 2.0 if it includes generics, it'll leave space for
maintenance releases on the 1.3 branch. And clearly signal that
something big has happend, namely that you
On 3/14/08, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I definitely don't have any votes in this, but I have several production apps
running with Wicket, and use 1.5 / generics in all of them. Has there been
any discussion of a faster release that ONLY includes generics? Last I
remember,
On 3/15/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
move everything to trunk. There is no need for a separate directory
structure. Let's not make things more complicated than necessary. The
current structure is already difficult for some users - flattening
will alleviate that.
+1 on the
On 3/16/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's in the book :-)
I didn't get to that part yet! I'm working my way through it. It's a
very nice read so far. I can't wait for the hard copy. I don't like
reading PDFs on a computer.
On 3/16/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my thought on this is to deprecate PageLink entirely, or at least the
entire IPageLink deal in case someone wants to have a add(new
PageLink(link, mypageinstance) construct.
pagelink itself provides very little value, nothing a
On 3/17/08, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is something that i think is called a printer ;)
I thought about that, but I get update emails when the MEAP version is
updated. I'd hate to miss out on the new editions. :) Plus 373 pages
would cost quite a bit to print. I'll wait
On 3/20/08, Ritz123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Trying to build Wicket from svn trunk - tried mvn eclipse:eclipse and mvn
install - keep getting mojo descriptors not found error.
[INFO] Building Wicket Quickstart Archetype
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
On 3/20/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't use the plugin plugin, so why should we lock it down? Do we
need to know all the versions of all the plugins of maven that exist?
You use it because you have an archetype. Archetypes are maven
plugins. Unfortunately, you do need
On 3/20/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought they were locking down the plugins in the master pom? Did
that ever fly?
I'm not aware of a master pom. I'm not a maven expert by any means.
I just happened to run into this bug yesterday in our build system and
had to run it
On 3/21/08, Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And other than that, I seriously doubt it's the VCS that's the issue,
but rather it's supporting 3 (or more) different branches, testing that
the patches work accross all branches, making different patches for
those that don't etc.
NumberFormat objects are cloneable. So, maybe you could use the
format passed in to setNumberFormat() as a prototype to create one
for the current thread/invocation (I don't know if you use thread
locals for this or not)?
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm for 1.3 i will test it that i will always just give a cloned version
Then we can keep the map and the method just fine.
That fix is fine by me then
That sounds like it will work. I don't know what would be
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:13 PM, lars vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Exception is only logged (as ERROR) if something is not serializable, so
it will only complain in your logfile. See Objects.objectToByteArray()
method.
I don't think page serialization is done in a seperate Thread
and
concurrency issues when we serialized the page in separate thread.
-Matej
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:15 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:13 PM, lars vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Exception is only logged (as ERROR) if something
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent idea, but it might be hard to convince apache to move to git
so maybe we should consider leaving apache.
Nah, just let everyone have their own repository. Then, right before
release time, everyone emails their
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Antoine Angenieux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've checked all the logs many times, and i just went through a few of them
a few minutes ago... checking all errors logged, and no trace of
serialization issues...
Can you put together a Quickstart which exhibits this
the application is destroyed, so
technically there shouldn't be anything stopping class gc that i can
think off.
Maurice
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:45 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
first of all
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a vote to update our servlet API dependency to 2.5 (since we
require Java 5, there is little use to stay with 2.3 iiuc)
[ ] servletapi 2.5 ftw!
[ ] servletapi 2.4 ftw!
[ ] servletapi 2.3 ftw!
[x]
Shouldn't the profile have been used to create this release candidate?
Or was it?
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:36 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't there be a release candidate profile
Are you using JDK6 by chance? The test cases fail under JDK6 from
what I remember. It had something to do with the order of the
attributes in the output.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Bruno Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are some of the tests that have failed:
When I was reading the discussion about session.dirty
(http://www.nabble.com/What-is-session.dirty%28%29-for--td17021032.html#a17021032)
on the users list, I came up with an idea. Perhaps we could come up
with a set of reusable AspectJ aspects for these sort of cases. For
this particular case,
Should I just go ahead and file a JIRA for this so that it doesn't get lost?
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:40 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I couldn't find anything like this in the current codebase, but it is
very helpful to me in our current project and I thought I'd propose
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Doug Donohoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) Use Annotations to handle mounting. Instead of putting all mount logic
in the Application class, you could annotate your pages with something like
@Mount( strategy=foo.class, params=x,y,z ). Then upon initialization,
it anywhere/anyhow...
if asf had a buildserver we would use it, but it doesnt. at least not
that we know of.
-igor
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 5:37 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are we using a non-ASF build server (not meaning not an ASF
product, but not hosted
We could try out running a build agent on my server if you want.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another option would be to obtain some additional server that has java
6 available and run a build agent on it. TC supports build agents...
Martijn
of a project should use Java4 or
Java5
johan
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:52 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can also set up JAVA_HOME as an environment variable through your
run configuration in TeamCity.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have code that records a property invocation chain and bundles it
up into an object that can be replayed on a root object again (using
Commons Proxy's invocation recorder feature, not yet released). It
has bindings for MVEL (which is the fastest currently), OGNL, Java
reflection, etc. I don't
Are you using wicket:link with parent-relative links? If so, check out:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1428
for more information on why resources URLs don't work. If you're not,
then please disregard. :)
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Doug Donohoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's fairly straightforward to include this. We added to the Apache
Commons parent pom.xml.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fine by me. i assume the plugin will export every package?
-igor
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL
Oops, hit send too early:
...and it didn't really impact any of our normal settings. It was
quite seamless.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:20 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's fairly straightforward to include this. We added to the Apache
Commons parent pom.xml.
On Fri, May 16
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 or 3. There are some sites that I'd like to run outside examples and
the 'production' instances. For example the teatime application will
receive some loving care soon and need some restarts. I'd like to do
that
crontab? Are you running linux? Wouldn't you just add entries
(symbolic links) to your runlevel's init scripts?
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a power failure, which caused the wicket-stuff server to reboot.
Unfortunately when it comes
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
freebsd I think. But for runlevel entries you need root acccess, which
Sebastiaan doesn't hand out (at least not without physical threats).
That's a good policy!
I was just saying that's not necessarily the solution to
Well, in the model you can still get to the locale by going through
the RequestCycle:
RequestCycle.get().getRequest().getLocale()
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Doug Donohoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could probably do that. I used converters because the infrastructure was
there ... I
I think this approach is a nice compromise between the two camps.
Perhaps we should put the results of our disucssion(s) on the wiki
outlining the pros/cons of each approach and our justification for
choosing one over the other. If folks want to have generified panels
or whatever, it'd be trivial
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes! Of course some tests fail during maven build but that is not unusual for
trunk.
Checking in broken code should be unusual, especially for trunk. I
can see where you would do so on a branch or something, but the trunk
Is 1.4 even worth doing if we can't break the API? I thought we
decided that the best way to do generics was to get rid of the
default model and rethink that coupling. So, do we drop back and
punt on 1.4? Or, do we just genericize IModel for 1.4? What's the
plan, now?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've created and uploaded a release candidate for 1.4-m3 to my p.a.o
space. I'm a little time constrained, so I didn't test the release in
a container. I do think that a 1.4-m3 release is due, because we need
feedback
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No particular reason other then that we are trying to make the
migration from wicket 1.3 to wicket 1.4 as small as possible.
There has not been an official vote on this yet but the plan is to
integrate it in wicket 1.5
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Guðmundur Bjarni Ólafsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cooked up a small API that does just this. Simply put, it's just an
implementation of a HiveFactory which acts as a Builder. I plan to publish
some time in the near future but there are several small issues
Clirr is what we use at Apache Commons to check binary compatibility.
It has worked well for us.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't toyed with it, but this maven plugin sounds like something
we could use for our builds on the 1.3.x branch:
Isn't there a static wrapper method on Model that takes a List?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey all,
Last night I was migrating some old code away from Wicket 2.0 over to Wicket
1.4-m3 and had to change my backing API slightly.
I had a Model
I mentioned something on #wicket about perhaps renaming
wicket-security to be called simply Maurice or Marrink. Thoughts?
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is with great sadness that we must report the staggering loss of our
good friend and
correctly, Maurice was quite satisfied that he came up
with Swarm and Wasp - I think that took longer than writing the actual
code :)
That said, his nick was mrmean, which sounds like a great name for a
security package.
Martijn
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:48 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED
I don't think I've seen this on our server before, but I got this
today (we're 1.4-m2, since I haven't had time to upgrade us to m3):
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/wicket/util/lang/PropertyResolver
at org.apache.wicket.Application.internalDestroy(Application.java:905)
Wicket doesn't create those objects. You'd need an aspect for that.
Why not inject the object that's creating the data provider or LDM and
pass your reference into the constructor.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Korbinian Bachl - privat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is there a reason that
That's pretty cool. Unfortunately, I haven't been that impressed with
the latest releases of IDEA. I'm having terrible memory consumption
problems and hanging issues.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is this stuff currently? I'm interested in doing some DnD stuff
with Dojo and if there's better stuff out there than what's currently
in wicketstuff-dojo, I'd love to take a look at it (not saying it's
bad now, but if it could be better...).
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Michael Sparer
I'll do it for €1999 per day. ;)
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I really want to help you implement what you want. My daily rate is
€2000 excluding tax. I would like to receive the first three days in
advance.
While waiting for the wire
All,
There's a project called Olio attempting to enter incubation here at
Apache (some of you may already know). From the proposal:
Olio defines an example web 2.0 application (the initial
implementation uses an events site somewhat like yahoo.com/upcoming)
and provides three implementations:
with writing the Wicket Olio implementation.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have they entered the incubator already?
-igor
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:12 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
There's a project called Olio attempting to enter
, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i wouldnt mind writing the olio integration also, it will probably be
a good example of a full featured wicket app. does their sample app
include db access?
-igor
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:23 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Locke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1
i'm sick of new version control systems. i want simple eclipse integration
and since SVN finally works for me i wish people would stick with it.
Agreed! The git vs. svn discussion had been done before in different
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Locke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i dislike swing's event listener style. an interface per event is ugly and
tedious to maintain. a better system is to parameterize a single event
listener interface on the event type. i've done this before and it works
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Antony Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you familiar with Git?What Git means by tracking, is that when you know
there have been new commits to the branch you're tracking, you simply pull
those new commits into your tree and that's it. there's no polling any
to do anyway.
2008/10/10 Thijs Vonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Carman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Locke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1
i'm sick of new version control systems. i want simple eclipse
integration
and since SVN finally works for me i wish people would stick
to hi-jack this thread, but there are multitudes of reasons
why Git SVN.
I'm kind of surprised by your comments Jonathan as the person who started
Wicket after all :)
2008/10/10 James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Locke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1
I'm trying to write my own DynamicImageMap component. However, the
way the current ImageMap component works is that it uses Link.getURL()
to generate the area elements. That method is protected (ImageMap
is in the same package as Link, so it can see it). Is there any way
we can open this up a
String urlfor(areaid) {
return urlfor(ILinkListener.INTERFACE)+areaid=+areaid;
}
public final onClick() {
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:38 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to write my own DynamicImageMap component. However, the
way the current ImageMap
at 11:37 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not talking about a callback URL, necessarily. What about a
bookmarkable page link? How would you rewrite ImageMap?
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gah, sent too early...
class dynimagemap
);
}
}
i dont see any special logic
-igor
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:43 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, there is logic in the getURL() methods on Link and
BookmarkablePageLink that does some special logic. So, it's not as
simple as calling urlFor() to get
BookmarkablePageLink does.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:09 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Ok, so how do I get the same thing that getURL() returns for a
BookmarkablePageLink? I need a line of code that gives me the proper
URL to set on my area
A, sorry.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's for Ajax...
I'm talking about the attribute 'autocomplete' that browsers handle by
themselves.
On Nov 12, 2008 11:11am, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried using AutoCompleteTextField
Have you tried using AutoCompleteTextField?
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm finding myself coding the same code over and over, on different projects
(for different customers), having to provide a subclass of TextField with an
option to setAutocomplete(boolean)
I've created a JIRA with an attached implementation of a new
client-side image map.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1936
Basically what it does is it borrows some ideas from the VelocityPanel
class, in that it generates its own markup. So, it's able to attach
the AbstractLink
I'd say -1. This would be a nightmare on existing codebases.
2008/11/17 Bruno Cesar Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This might sound crazy, but what about dropping the support for the tag
wicket:link ? :-)
People are starting to use it frequently, and because of that, features will
be
, but still requiring to add the component. This way,
only Java code would need to sufer from changes. Then, on a future release,
definitely drop the support of wicket:link
I say +1
[]'s
Bruno Borges
-Mensagem original-
De: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: segunda
There is support for this now. It doesn't work for resources very
well, but for page links it works.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And another thing it could make autolink parser able to look in other
packages aswell for pages...
The issue is that it polls the SVN server, right? Switching to
another polling CI server wouldn't help, really.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive my ignorance in this since I haven't been paying a lotof attention
to all the TeamCity
When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't
inherit correctly, though. Right?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms
correctly? Then it is just a matter of
The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the
SCM links get messed up when you do that.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tough to be sure - we could experiment.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED
the parent pom
like it looks up any other dependency. If you had a relative path, like
wicket does to its parent pom, then it would mess up.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
The problem is that the entire
Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I'm talking about the SCM url itself. It needs to change in the child
when a branch/tag is created (because it now lives in a different
place). Of course it would be able to find
The markup parser has to know how to deal with it I would think. That
would be quite an undertaking to split that functionality out and make
it able to be plugged back in.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Rodolfo Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, what about moving it to an optional package?
, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:29 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The markup parser has to know how to deal with it I would think. That
would be quite an undertaking to split that functionality out and make
it able to be plugged back in.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Rodolfo Hansen [EMAIL
it - or am I missing something important here?
Am 18.11.2008 um 22:12 schrieb James Carman:
Would the user have to register the plugin manually or would it be
picked up merely by the jar being on the classpath?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
+1
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
I wholeheartedly agree - I'd like to see us svn rm any such files. Some
projects also have .cvsignore which could also be deleted.
I did some of these when I was doing the reorg - feel free to go ahead
Any chance we can get some background on this proposal? Like, what
exactly does that do? Was there another thread discussion going on
that relates to this vote proposal?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
in trunk of course..
Can we use some creative readResolve/writeReplace logic to serialize
the page references? So, when you write out the page reference, you
spit out one of Igor's Pageid objects? Then, on the readResolve()
method, it will use the page id to lookup the actual page reference.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at
How do I deploy artifacts to the wicketstuff maven repository? I
would like to add in the OpenWebBeans jars so that I can check in my
webbeans plugin.
The dependencies in the main wicketstuff-core are scoped for stuff
like slf4j and jetty to be provided. This totally screwed me up
when I was trying to write an example application (the log4j stuff
wasn't showing up because it was marked as provided by the parent
pom). Does anyone care if I
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Pointbreak
pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote:
I can see why you want to remove the provided scope from slf4j-api.
But slf4j-log4j12, and log4j should have the provided scope (it is up to
the containing project to choose a different logger). Wicketstuff
...@ml1.netpointbreak%2bwicketst...@ml1.net
wrote:
Yes I now see you are overriding the scope in child projects that use
those dependencies. Nice work.
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:41 -0400, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: On Sun, Mar...
into the official wicketstuff repo so
that they are easy for everyone to be able to use. But I never received an
answer on that, either.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:25 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
How do I deploy artifacts
should upgrade maven, java and other system libraries, and
perhaps install git as well to provide access to github and git.sf.net
Martijn
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:25 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
How do I deploy artifacts to the wicketstuff maven repository? I
would like
Got it. Thanks. Now I know who ThaDon is. :)
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Craig Tataryn crai...@tataryn.net wrote:
James, no I never did comment out your stuff. Go for it.
Craig.
On 17-Apr-09, at 9:45 PM, James Carman wrote:
I believe my stuff is going to be commented out
If anyone has an IDEA license and would be willing to donate their
TeamCity license to the cause, this is a non-issue. The license you
get with IDEA will allow for unlimited build configurations.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
I've mentioned
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
I very much doubt that it was teamcity that has those problems
I think it was the network itself
I'm with Johan on this one. I don't think TeamCity is the source of
our SVN troubles. Have we contacted infra@ to ask if
+1 (non-binding), release wicket-1.4-rc4
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
I've created a release for Wicket 1.4-rc4. Until it is officially
released, you can download from the following locations:
SVN Tag:
at 2:12 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
That sounds familiar.
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
not really, we just deprecate @SpringBean and use @Inject instead.
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Martijn Dashorst
Always a day late and a dollar short :(
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, too bad you are not trying to make a jsr out of it :)
-igor
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:18 PM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I meant it sounds familiar
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
