On Wednesday, 15 August 2012 13:46:59 UTC+12, pedb...@gmail.com wrote:
Linus Torvalds flamed C++.
- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/57918
Paul Graham said his company moved faster than its competition, because his
company used Lisp.
-
Oops, here's the benchmark site:
http://www.robohornet.org/
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On Tuesday, 25 September 2012 17:42:00 UTC+12, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:22 PM, wrote:
So there's a new benchmark out, seemingly from google.
It is designed to test performance in web app bottlenecks, especially DOM,
canvas API methods, SVG.
I am not sure if this is the right avenue to raise concern (again) over not
requiring a prompt. It seems that user action here implies that a user
intended on having their clipboard destroyed intentionally. (Like requesting a
SHA from GitHub).
However, I created a very basic demo here:
Is there any intent at Mozilla to fix this privacy flaw?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=959893
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Telemetry results. In terms of perf
measurements we'd probably need to completely ignore everything from
non-release builds as the results might differ heavily for some use
cases.
- Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https
it wouldn't be particularly
well-tested.
Yes, if we don't distribute PGO builds at all we'd see a one-time bump
and Telemetry is then a non-issue. I was misguided by the thread's
title. If we turn it off for testing we can't ship it.
- Tim
___
dev
1) abandon generating nsIDOMSimpleGestureEvents on Windows for both
backends
when processing touch input from touch input displays.*
This would mean that if the desktop front end wants to do something with
pinch or zoom, it would have to process W3C touch events instead. Note
that
we could
The metro/WinRT widget backend can take advantage of native gesture
recognition, so maybe in the future we would want to implement the
ability to opt-out of front-end gesture recognition. I don't think we
should do this in the immediate term, but as backends get better and
better native
to maintain a shadow tree as
Johnathan mentioned. I would suggest we talk to Ehsan as he has
experience in doing this successfully.
- Tim
On 05/22/2013 03:40 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
Opening Bug 874817 to add that kill switch.
Just for clarification: we might kill add-ons that specifically
in Firefox), or get them
all working. We shouldn't persecute Windows users in particular (even if
they did make a bad choice :P).
Ben
___
dev-b2g mailing list
dev-...@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
--
Tim Guan-tin
actual
changes from minor changes that don't need build peer review by scanning
for certain keywords?
- Tim
On 07/18/2013 02:00 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
Traditionally, it's been very difficult for the build peers to keep on
top of changes in the build config because changes are occurring on bug
On 07/18/2013 02:45 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 7/18/2013 2:43 AM, Tim Taubert wrote:
The proposal sounds good to me but I guess you wouldn't want to be
notified of every small addition/change to Makefiles in test
directories? I suppose you're targeting actual changes to dependencies
etc
Sadly, mercurial doesn't support having multiple working directories
from a single clone, which would be useful to avoid wasting so much
disk space on .hg.
I'm 85% sure that Mercurial, on filesystems that support it, creates
hardlinks instead of copies if you hg clone mozilla-central
Separating and summarizing a little, it sounds like:
For alert/prompt/confirm, we're all (mostly?) agreed that the prevent this
page from creating additional dialogs checkbox should have its meaning changed
from rate limit future alert/prompt/confirm to prevent future
alert/prompt/confirm. In
I wrote a reply which I then accidentally sent only to Mark. In any case, we
chatted in #developers about this.
I'm going to do the following:
1. Update the patch in bug 856977 (dialogs shouldn't be possible during
beforeunload) so that it doesn't affect the behavior of the checkbox
2. Put
I hope this change makes you happy!
It most certainly does! I'm a huge proponent of code cleanup and organization,
and this looks like a beautiful example of those.
Finally, the root class, WidgetEvent, has As*Event class. The *
doesn't include the prefix. I.e., for WidgetMouseEvent, the
to achieve and
why? Is there any add-on code we could take a look at? Maybe we can
together find a different and better solution to your problem.
- Tim
Cheers,
Matt
On Oct 25, 2013, at 11:40 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller dtel...@mozilla.com
wrote:
We have partial handling of private
Somebody stop me if this already exists...
I'm envisioning a central location, probably a wiki page at
https://wiki.mozilla.org/BrokenBuilds or similar, where people can find the
answers to these questions:
1. Given my current build configuration, why did my last build fail?
2. What bugs
I like where you are coming from.
Yay!
However, if we know what build bustage is known, it should be codified
in the tree and the build should abort or you should see a giant
warning. If we put this information anywhere else, I fear it will become
out of date very quickly or filled with
Somebody stop me if this already exists...
I'm envisioning a central location, probably a wiki page at
https://wiki.mozilla.org/BrokenBuilds or similar, where people can find
the answers to these questions:
1. Given my current build configuration, why did my last build fail?
2.
Somebody stop me if this already exists...
I'm envisioning a central location, probably a wiki page at
https://wiki.mozilla.org/BrokenBuilds or similar, where people can find
the answers to these questions:
1. Given my current build configuration, why did my last build fail?
2.
I would favour a whiteboard tag or keyword on the bug tracking the build
failure. It should be easy enough to create a query for all open bugs
with this tag. Usually you want to get to the bug anyway for the latest
workaround and/or info on what to back out locally.
I'm not opposed to a
Possible compromise: have this info live in the tree as part of the
in-tree docs under build/docs. You need build peer review to update
those docs and they are versioned with the tree. That addresses my
accuracy and versioning concerns.
This sounds reasonable to me! The docs would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The chromium IPC code is ours now, so we can mdify it as needed.
Not sure about the Chromium sandbox code.
The Chromium sandbox code lives at security/sanbox in the tree.
AIUI, we wanted to be able to pull upstream changes easily so we've
avoided
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Build took 41:02 with these options:
ac_add_options --enable-chrome-format=flat
ac_add_options --disable-optimize
ac_add_options --enable-debug-symbols
ac_add_options --disable-crashreporter
ac_add_options --disable-updates
ac_add_options
want to and will do that
anyway we should at least provide a way that has less disadvantages for
the user.
- Tim
--
Tim Taubert
Engineering Manager, Firefox
@ttaubert
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org
make websites just fall back to the same bad behavior that we
currently have. Ensuring this feature works as expected would surely
drive adoption a lot better.
- Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org
, and
without a way to notice this is happening. And with all the current
performance impacts.
- Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Curtis Koenig wrote:
Would this be disabled in Private Browsing? If not that might be perceived as
negating one of the reasons users have for using that particular feature.
Are sync XHRs and HTTP redirects disabled in private browsing? :)
- Tim
because
they would break the web.
- Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
.
- Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
me know if there are concerns regarding this change.
Thanks!
Tim
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985252
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThOTzAAoJENMT71e+7HCHrkkP
=989393#c20
- Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
amount of I/O that you dislike? If yes, why? Have
you taken a look at all the other I/O caused by places, cache, etc. and
how that compares?
- Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev
answered why the amount
of I/O you say you're seeing is a problem for you. Instead of
re-iterating your proposal and what you think we should be doing it
would be great if you could tell us why the current behavior is a
problem for you.
- Tim
___
dev
sessionstore data on write will not buy you
much as we write a lot when Firefox is running. This is the problem
we're tackling in the long run and band-aid fixes won't help here.
- Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https
Tobias Besemer wrote:
Am Samstag, 28. Juni 2014 14:25:35 UTC+2 schrieb Tim Taubert:
Tobias Besemer wrote:
The amount of I/O is always a problem! E.g. for Notebooks in battery use.
Yes, of course. That is a known problem and we're working on it by
increasing the write interval when running
is finalized.
We thus propose to enable the WebCrypto API by default for all platforms
to get some more feedback from developers and give them the opportunity
to use new functionality.
- Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
by default anyway.
Other parts we're missing is import/export for some formats (e.g. PKCS8
for ECDH/DH) and we're missing a few algorithms completely. We only need
more time to implement those but that wouldn't break any existing code
either.
- Tim
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1037892
with hardware token support
Not sure what exactly what you are referring to here but I don't know of
any current plans to extend the WebCrypto API beyond what the spec says.
- Tim
(which, is going to be discussed nexr 10th September)
Regards.
___
dev
a nice list of algorithms [1] we support and the
Firefox version they were introduced. A similar list [2] exists for
Chromium, but I can't tell how up-to-date that is. Judging from their
list of tests [3] this seems to indeed list of all of the available
algorithms.
- Tim
[1]
https
algorithms as well?
- Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
.
Thoughts ?
[0] : https://etherpad.mozilla.org/svg-guidelines
[1] : https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160771
Tim Nguyen [:ntim]
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Ben Kelly wrote:
Can we just reduce the accuracy of the API? Only give battery level at
certain broad breakpoints?
The authors of the cited paper [1] filed a bug report and we fixed that
for 38 [2].
- Tim
[1] http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/616.pdf
[2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi
*Summary*:
The *HTML element* represents a dialog box or other interactive
component, such as an inspector or window.
It will initially be implemented behind a pref.
*Bug*: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=840640
*Link to standard*:
, i.e. it modal dialogs should make all
UI elements except the current dialog inert.
Tim
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Justin Dolske <dol...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> What's the expected experience if chrome code uses this feature? (In a
> chrome window, interaction with a content
Summary: The WebCrypto spec [1] states that window.crypto.subtle
should only be usable from a secure origin (i.e. on a domain being
served over HTTPS). Currently Gecko's implementation works on insecure
origins (i.e. sites served over unencrypted HTTP). To bring our
implementation in line with the
has been
opened for tackling this issue.
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/
> ___
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
--
Tim Huang
Mozilla Taiwan
email:tihu...@mozilla.com
phone:+886-2-8786-1100#402
___
://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1379050
[2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/VideoPlaybackQuality
[3] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/15757
--
Tim Huang
Mozilla Taiwan
email:tihu...@mozilla.com
phone:+886-2-8786-1100#402
similar feature.
> Thanks,
>
> --Jet
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Tim Huang <tihu...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> > I intent to unship the support of moz*Frames of HTMLVideoElement
> including
> > * HTMLVideoElement.mozPa
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Jonathan Kingston <j...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Hey Tim,
>
> The only questions I have about this our are difference in implementation
> over Chrome the more we increase the use of [SecureContext] the greater risk
> we put on co
+1
A separate channel sounds like a great idea. And it will help
dealing with two very different kinds of information.
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Simon Sapin wrote:
> On 04/11/17 17:21, Zibi Braniecki wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> The only thing I'd like to see from pulsebot
for this.
[1]
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/browsing-the-web.html#hand-off-to-external-software
--
Tim Huang
Mozilla
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
an element to the latter won’t break its
children).
Please reach out if you have questions or concerns about this change.
Cheers,
Tim
[0]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1580012
[1]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1520625
[2]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi
of which ignores the `-moz-stack-sizing` property,
so it made sense to remove it.
[0]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1576946
[1]: https://i.imgur.com/8hUDUDS.png
[2]:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=-moz-stack-sizing=false=false=
Cheers,
Tim
Summary: CSS conic-gradients allow developers to specify gradients that
start from a certain angle where color stops are placed around the
circumference of a circle centered around a specified point.
Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=conic-gradients
Standard:
observed exactly one
load of a page containing mfenced across the entire telemetry-enabled
Firefox release population. [1]
Cheers,
Tim
[1] https://sql.telemetry.mozilla.org/queries/67235/source (mozilla
LDAP required)
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-p
ug.cgi?id=1632451>.
Thanks to everyone who reviewed my grid removal patches and to Daniel
Holbert and Emilio Cobos Àlvarez for the platform work that made this
possible!
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Cheers,
Tim
___
dev-plat
.
Is this feature enabled by default in sandboxed iframes?: Yes
Best,
Tim,
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Summary: CSS conic-gradients allow developers to specify gradients that
start from a certain angle where color stops are placed around the
circumference of a circle centered around a specified point.
Thanks to my friend Mohamed's work on Direct2D
://privacycg.github.io/storage-partitioning/
[3]:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/NUR-gpWxSZ4/m/9boB-VrlBwAJ
[4]:
https://github.com/shivanigithub/http-cache-partitioning#impact-on-metrics
Best,
Tim Huang,
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform
d or HTML
tables.
Please let me know if you have any concerns or questions.
Cheers,
Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
by default.
Thanks,
Tim
[1]: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2021/02/introducing-state-partitioning/
[2]: https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2021/02/23/total-cookie-protection/
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
People using Git for Gecko development can also try a new workflow that
doesn't involve gecko-dev at all.
http://glandium.org/blog/?page_id=3438
Mike
This sure look promising!
Any support for Level 1 people for creating
How about the risk of having API users intentionally creating local
APIs? For example, people can implement support for meta
apple-touch-icon just in Gaia.
I was told this is a concern back in B2G v1.0.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Andrew Sutherland
asutherl...@asutherland.org wrote:
Are there any plans to surface the contents of
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 7/9/15 4:48 AM, Tim Guan-tin Chien wrote:
In this case, I modified the manifest object passed from mozApp API,
and the object was subsequently removed by the platform, so did my
modifications. Fabrice said I should
expose a structure like this?
Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Will either js-ctypes or child process-calling add-on passes AMO
review? With signing requirement those add-ons would not be allow to
run in Firefox without signing from AMO at all right?
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Benjamin Smedberg
benja...@smedbergs.us wrote:
On 8/28/2015 10:25 AM,
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Tim Guan-tin Chien
timdr...@mozilla.com wrote:
It seems a potential future for that which works within the web's
security model is FIDO, see
https://fidoalliance.org/
https://support.google.com/accounts/topic/6103521
Indeed, banks in Taiwan are slowly
Thanks for the note.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Tim Guan-tin Chien
timdr...@mozilla.com wrote:
It's also worthy to point out many nation-state deploys Smart Card
identifications (despite the privacy concern
,
Tim
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_and_taxes_%28idiom%29
[2]
https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6%E4%BA%BA%E6%86%91%E8%AD%89%E7%B6%B2%E8%B7%AF%E5%A0%B1%E7%A8%85-%E5%86%8D%E5%89%B5%E6%96%B0%E9%AB%98-093200374.html
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:39 PM, helpcrypto helpcrypto
helpcry
ard Ekr's opinion in this case. The way hardware
vendors divide their works also prevent the actual chip vendor (OEM)
from providing end user support (by at least host a driver).
Thanks,
Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Tim Guan-tin Chien <timdr...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Robert O'Callahan <rob...@ocallahan.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
>>
>&
What prevents you from using ? Is it because the parent
frame is (X)HTML?
I don't know what prevents browser-element from being enabled on desktop
though -- it's tests are running on desktop, and the actual feature is
hidden behind a permission so we won't expose it to the web content even if
we
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Ben Kelly wrote:
> fxos:
> 24) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=999675
I've just disabled this test.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
The Gecko JavaScript is also littered with #ifdef and # is really not a
token for comment in JS... is there any plan to migrate that away since
there is ESLint present?
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Vivien Nicolas
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 2:30 PM, David Bruant
g 1150859 and friends.
>
> ~ Gijs
>
> On 30/11/2015 09:05, Tim Guan-tin Chien wrote:
>
>> The Gecko JavaScript is also littered with #ifdef and # is really not a
>> token for comment in JS... is there any plan to migrate that away since
>> there is ESLint present?
>
This implies the Gaia System app, which is framed by shell.html (a
chrome document), will switch cookie jar when the default is changed,
no?
(I am for simplying cookie jar shenanigans -- we have been workaround
that in Gaia for too long!)
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Jonas Sicking
I am confused. In your proposal, are you referring to the chrome
*user/embedder* of (e.g. shell.html), or a chrome
*embedded* page (I am not aware of any example).
Tim
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Tim Guan-
Thanks for the pointer! I ended up re-do the cloning from hg instead.
I would recommend the mozreview docs points to these document and explicit
states the origin of local clone mozreview is supposedly to work with.
Tim
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Ting-Yu Lin <t...@mozilla.com>
you recommend how I should debug this? All repo was cloned yesterday
and git/mercurial are all up-to-date from Homebrew
$ git --version
git version 2.7.2
$ hg --version
Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 3.7.1)
Thanks!
Tim
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Wander Lairson Costa <
Any conclusions out of the discussion here? Try is getting slower as we
speak...
I would opt to less disruptive way at first, per what Brian Grinstead said.
We don't even have to implement interactive prompt first. If that makes
people cancel old Try runs more, great, if not, we could consider
I wonder if there is any use cases to do multiple Try pushes of different
changesets but with the same bug number. Should we automatically cancel the
old ones when there is a new one?
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Ryan VanderMeulen <
rvandermeu...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I'm sure most of you
I didn't file the bug because I don't know if it make sense to rewrite on
the source tree (instead of implementing the rewrite). Feel free to file.
Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Mike Hoye <mh...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 2016-07-06 1:46 AM, Tim Guan-tin Chien wrote:
>
>
This looks really great until I realized it did not print dirty state.
There is probably no way to get the state without, say, `git status
--porcelain --u=no`, right?
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> I use Facebook's scm-prompt.sh from
>
nks,
Tim
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Dave Townsend <dtowns...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> One of the things I've been investigating since moving back to the desktop
> team is how we can remove XUL from the application as much as possible. The
> benefits for doing this are varied, som
t; > Normally rename a header shouldn't cause too much trouble, however this
> > > rename is only changing the case so you might experience some problems
> > > on case insensitive filesystem.
> > >
> > > As pointed out by Tim in
> > > https://bugzill
According to Alexa top 100 Taiwan sites and quick spot checks, I can only
see the following two sites encoded in Big5:
http://www.ruten.com.tw/
https://www.momoshop.com.tw/
Both are shopping sites (eBay-like and Amazon-like) so you get the idea how
forms are used there.
Mike reminded me to
57.
If it goes well we should ship this in Release 58.
Tim
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
I have triggered autoland in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1419277 to ship this to
release.
Also, as we only support macOS >= 10.9, I've removed a few
old/duplicated old font names from the default font list for zh
locales as well.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Tim Guan-
Hi,
While working on other bugs, I realized if add_task() function calls are
scattered in multiple JS files or theologically multiple inline
That's great! Definitely lower the barrier of entry for people new to Gecko
C++.
Just curious — what's the historical significance between nsIDocument and
nsDocument? I know "ns" stood for Netscape but what did "I" mean?
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 3:56 PM Bobby Holley wrote:
> This is awesome -
94 matches
Mail list logo