Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 RC1

Please note that I will be traveling for the next few days. In any case I will be waiting for the artifacts to be propagated through the mirrors before pushing a FlexJS npm release. Hopefully the timelines will coincide. Worst case, there will be a bit of a lag for the npm release. Thanks, Om

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 RC2

I am trying to test the release artifacts, but there is no mention of maven build in the README. Are there instructions somewhere? Thanks, Om On Jun 23, 2017 12:29 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > I wrote this up recently [1]. It would be great if you can give it a try. > Let me know if you have qu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.8.0 RC2

Gah, I give up. The Adobe AIR SDK download kept failing several times :-( Thanks, Om On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Vote passed with 4 +1 votes. > > On 6/20/17, 10:55 PM, "piotrz" wrote: > > >Voting again, cause I did mistake and examined last nightly builds not > >RC2:

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.8.0 Released

I will get it done in the next 24 hours. Do we want to wait 3 days to announce so that the mirrors can catch up? Thanks, Om On Jun 26, 2017 8:37 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: Please comment on the draft below. We need Om or someone to publish the npm module. --- The Apache Flex community i

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 RC2

I tried the installer.xml via ant. It was failing. I was downloading the AIR sdk via the browser when the vote results were announced. In any case, I will give all this a spin when I get release of the npm package out. Thanks, Om On Jun 26, 2017 8:25 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: I updated the MD5

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.8.0 Released

; > I will wait until I hear that you have the NPM ready before sending the > announcement. Working on it now. Thanks, Om > I think only Olaf suggested any changes. Anybody else? > > -Alex > > On 6/26/17, 9:27 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala&

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.8.0 Released

FlexJS 0.8 has been published to npm. Please test using: npm install flexjs -g Thanks, Om On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:46 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Alex Harui > wrote: > >> I think the mirrors are mostly caught up. I am goi

Re: Installer Problems

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 4:43 PM, piotrz wrote: > Do we have some alternative to provide users where we can download by SDK > with all dependencies ? > Yes, it is as simple as: *npm install flexjs -g* Thanks, Om > > > - > Apache Flex PMC > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > -- > View this message

Theme for FlexJS

On Jul 28, 2017 7:10 AM, "piotrz" wrote: Om, That would be awesome, cause I will go on vacation next week and have a feeling that will not provide asap some resources at that time if will be required for Angelo and Trevor. If you could look from time to time to this o related thread will be grea

Re: Theme for FlexJS

send me a direct email. P. S. I will be removing us...@flex.apache.org going forward. So those who are interested in this, please subscribe to the dev@flex.apache.org mailing list. Thanks, Om Angelo El vie., 28 jul. 2017 a las 16:42, OmPrakash Muppirala (< bigosma...@gmail.com>) escrib

Re: Debugger statement

+1 I so used to doing this nowadays. Also, this is very useful when we want to debug Node.js applications. There is no good way to setup debug points the first time with Node.js applications. Thanks, Om On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > If there are no objections in the

Re: [MAVEN-BUILD] FlexJS Framework (maven) - Build # 1167 - Fixed

Thanks for taking care of this, Piotr! Regards, Om On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Yes! Finally it's working! > > Chris Lambertus on infra HipChat helped me giving a tip to setup specific > version of Maven in configuration! I setup 3.3.9 (Windows). > > Piotr > > 2017-0

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

Olaf, I think you should do what you feel comfortable given that you are putting most of the work 😊 That said, if you plan to migrate it to the Apache Flex project at a future point, it will be easier if you add an Apache V2 license to your repo right away. Thanks, Om On Aug 13, 2017 12:17 PM,

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

I think Github is a better way to crowd-source documentation than asking folks to write to a Wiki page. It enables anyone to start working on documentation and then send a PR. That said, Olaf, since you are already a committer, you can simply check in the docs into the flex-asjs git repo and conti

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

Ah, I see that Apache org on Github has disabled wiki pages. Sorry for the noise :-( Thanks, Om On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:17 AM, piotrz wrote: > Om, > > What do you mean by check in those doc to flexjs source ? Do you mean > create > in our FlexJS repo [1] similar wiki tab as it is currently

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

release artifacts. > > > > Cryptography > > > > Apache FlexJS does not currently distribute cryptography code other than > > an MD5 hash algorithm. > > > > Required Resources > > > > Mailing Lists > > > > -private@ > > -dev@

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork. Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix. You know what that means :-) Thanks, Om

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

n Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs wrote: > > > > Well, Phoenix is already a thing: > > http://phoenixframework.org/ <http://phoenixframework.org/> > > > > Not sure about trademark issues… > > > >> On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala

RE: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

ivate@ > -dev@ > -commits@ > -users@ > -issues@ > > Version Control > > We would like to use GitBox if it is practical to convert the current git > repos listed above. We want to explore using GitHub's wiki and > documentation tools. > > Issue Tracking >

FlexJS installation - Installer vs. npm

I am trying to debug a problem with Visual Studio Code integration. The FlexJS 0.8.0 SDK that I installed with `npm install flexjs -g` does not work with VSCode. It fails with this error: Error: Missing builtin type Object (1,1) More details here: https://github.com/BowlerHatLLC/vscode-nextgenas

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

This is a big big deal. Thanks for getting this done. I would be very interested in the non-installer, simple zip file download. I dont care much for Ant as a requirement, I would rather continue maintaining the npm FlexJS package for AIR download + setup. Thoughts? Thanks, Om On Thu, Sep 7,

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

playerglobal.swc maybe it will also work > > with Moonshine. I will try to do same operation as you did and see > whether > > I will not have previous errors. > > > > Thanks! > > Piotr > > > > 2017-09-07 18:43 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

I prefer a name change away from FlexJS. I would like to concentrate more on getting new developers to the fold as opposed concentrating on existing Flex developers. The term FlexXX has a dated feel to it. Maybe a new name will get folks to check it out at which point they will feel like stickin

RE: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

On Sep 13, 2017 9:39 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: My main concern was with the JS suffix. If we can create new products without the JS suffix that’s fine with me. On the other hand, if Carlos or someone else feels passionate about a name change and volunteers to deal with the overhead I wouldn’t go

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

will get confused. Unless we market it as Apache Bend. Is that what you mean? Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 9/13/17, 10:57 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > wrote: > > >On Sep 13, 2017 9:39 AM, "Yishay Weiss"

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

We could always structure the VOTE like this: 1. Royale 2. XXX 3. YYY 4. FlexJS One vote should answer both questions. Thanks, Om On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not change the > name and Alex is right. -

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

No (binding) On Sep 14, 2017 8:37 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS? [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS. [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be discussed. [ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked pr

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

In my view, the biggest reason for a fork is to get away from the name Flex. In terms of familiarity, show a few lines of MXML code to current Flex developers, they will immediately recognize it. The same way that I recognize JQuery if I see the $ symbol or AngularJS when I see ng-something. My

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

On Sep 15, 2017 8:37 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: It is funny, but actually, as we we've been thinking about adding suffixes for target runtimes like Bend -> BendJS, it did occur to me that we would have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target called "Dover" Hahaha. Took me a whi

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting vote > YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his own > name idea and others can give him +1. > There were several suggestions, some of which we cou

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

se reply to > this > > post with that name. Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe or > > not. > > > > Thanks, > > -Alex > > > > On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" > > wrote: > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

One point of clarification. The Beads concept comes into play only in the FlexJS SDK and not in the Flex Falcon or FalconJX compiler. Some day it could be FalconWebAssemby or FalconIOS. Naming the Apache project as Beads means that we are highlighting only the SDK and not the cross-compilers. A

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

Abstain (binding) On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: > I am abstaining for now. > > > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS > > project. > > > > LIST: > > > > Royale > > Boja

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

Boja is one name I really dislike. Sorry Piotr😕 Also I dont know how to pronounce it. Is it Bo-ha, or boo-ha or bo-ja, etc? On Sep 19, 2017 10:09 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: > Reading Alex in VOTE thread and how many times we are mentioning Boja - I > will change my VOTE. Limbr is a bit danger

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

site regardless of which name is > >> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)? > >> > >> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber? After reading this > >> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber. The spell checker > redirect > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

19, 2017 2:20 PM > > >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >>>> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork > > >>>> > > >>>> Ick… > > >>>> > > >>>> Why do these things h

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

> > >> > > >> > > "Braid" also brings to mind "Helix". I haven't looked to see if there >> are >> > > any projects that use "Helix" which I'm sure there are. And if so, >> maybe >> > > "Felix" to give a nod back to Flex along with the helix. >> > > >> > > —peter >> > I love Helix. It actually desc

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

anguage. This makes it a challenge to refer to > >> the > >>>> product to anyone who does not already use it. > >>>> > >>>> *bodja, booya, boha. > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Building the brand for Royale

I would stay away from WordPress just because of all the security issues and maintenance required. Github pages should be a better place. Thanks, Om On Sep 20, 2017 10:26 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Hmm. > > I think if we grab a domain and donate it to the ASF, that it can't be > hosted on non-A

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

Github has a wiki feature. Although I haven't seen any other Apache project use it. I hope we can use it as part of the Gitbox workflow. The good thing is that this would make it easier for anyone to add stuff onto the wiki without having deal with confluence, karma etc. Thanks, Om On Sep 21,

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

fluence wiki or github wiki? I think we need to explicitly ask for github wiki. Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 9/21/17, 9:26 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > wrote: > > >Github has a wiki feature. Although I haven't seen an

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

royale-tourjs > >royale-typedefs > >royale-compiler > > > > I will request Git website instead of SVN. > > > > I will not request a wiki at this time. > > > > Thanks, > > -Alex > > > > On 9/21/17, 9:26 AM, "omup...@g

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki [3] https://pages.github.com/ Thanks, Piotr Okay, in that case we might need to explicitly ask for Github wiki and Github pages in our request to Infra Thanks, Om 2017-09-21 19:01 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > I'm confused. > Confluence Wiki, G

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

gt; >> royale-asjs > >> royale-tourjs > >> royale-typedefs > >> royale-compiler > >> > >> I will request Git website instead of SVN. > >> > >> I will not request a wiki at this time. > >> > >> Thanks, &

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

to 30 minutes for the sync to happen. It took a while for me after I added the 2FA in Github. Thanks, Om > -Alex > > On 9/21/17, 12:00 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > wrote: > > >Also, we all need to go here and finish the 3 step

Re: Royale website and domain registration

I vote for royale.io. I can put in at least $100 towards the purchase of the domain. Others are free to chip in as much as they would like. Thanks, Om On Sep 22, 2017 8:35 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > AIUI, royale.io is owned by a squatter and the price STARTS at $199. I > haven't tried to buy

Re: Royale website and domain registration

On Sep 22, 2017 2:22 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: How about I grab 'royalesdk.org' and we take it from there? EdB +1 On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > I agree that is a game we should not play. Even if we can get the domain > for $200, I still don't like

Re: Royale website and domain registration

I don't think you have to wait. It would be nice > to > >have that domain no matter what. > > > >-Alex > > > >On 9/22/17, 2:57 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > > wrote: > > > >>On Sep 22, 2017 2:22 PM, &q

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

gt; >> > >> I logged out of GitHub and did something else for a while. Then when I > >> tried again, it asked for the 2nd factor and then the MFA box said > >> "write-access granted" and now I think it is working. > >> > >> -Alex > >&

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

which is nothing but a repo for holding Issues. Thanks, Om > > Harbs > > > On Sep 24, 2017, at 8:57 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala > wrote: > > > > Let's just use Github Issues, please. > > One place for everything. This makes it easier to refer to commits that &

Re: Royale Logo

I really like it. Is it possible to see this with the Apache Flex logo colors? The colors could provide a continuity for the two project names. Great work, Carlos! Thanks, Om On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working this week end on a logo for Royale

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex and Apache Flex Installer

+1 please go ahead. I can help testing. I think the process for the Installer release are a bit looser. You can start the VOTE thread as soon as possible. Especially since this issue has been around for a while. Thanks, Om On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Hi Folks,

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1

Piotr, sorry for the annoyance, but in Gmail, these two threads show up merged. In the past, we usually add a few extra characters like *** to force separate threads. Otherwise this will quickly lead to confusion :-) Thanks, Om On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Hi Folks,

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1*

Testing on Windows 10. I am seeing this error: Installer version 3.3.0 (windows) Using Locale: en_US Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI. SDK version Apache Flex SDK 4.16.0 AIR version 23.0 Flash Player version 23.0 Creating Apache Flex home Creating temporary directory Downloading A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1

+0 I checked the signature, rat report, etc. everything looks good. But when I try to build the source package, for some reason ant cannot download the osmf.swc. Although, I can simply curl the url without any issues: === osmf-downloa

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Par Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Alex, > it is called "Open SOURCE" and not "Binary with link to Source" for a > reason. Apache Software Foundation official only promise SOURCE releases. > Any convenience binaries are not required/expected. It is not kosher to so > c

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

Piotr, I can confirm that Installer 3.3 can successfully download the Flex SDK 4.16.1 with Air 27. This is on Windows 10. Great job!! Thanks, Om On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Hi Zach, > > Unfortunately during work on that issue I have found that we have also > issue

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

On Nov 22, 2017 9:18 AM, "piotrz" wrote: Hi Alex, I tested it before and just tried again. 1) I have installed 3.2 version 2) Try install 3.3 version and got this error Piotr This happens if the new ve

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

On Nov 22, 2017 9:54 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: I followed those directions as well, but I wonder if one of us made a mistake somewhere and we just didn't notice. I'm not sure how to verify what certificate was used. Maybe Om knows. One way I can think of is to re create the binaries with the

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

Alex Harui wrote: > In my experience, SWFs never recompile and match. I think there is a > time-stamp in the SWF. > > -Alex > > On 11/22/17, 10:15 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" wrote: > > >On Nov 22, 2017 9:54 AM, "Alex Ha

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:51 PM, piotrz wrote: > Guys, > > Something is totally wrong. I just installed Installer 3.2 and check > whether > it has digital sign and it's not. For the comparison I've checked "Adobe > Extension Manager CS6" and properties looks like that: > >

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

; > > Have you checked the previous releases? > > 2017-11-22 23:02 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:51 PM, piotrz > > wrote: > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > Something is totally wrong. I just installed Insta

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

te, then the OS can verify the signature of the Installer binary. In our case, there is a good chance that our certificate has expired. Can you send it to me privately so I can try to check its validity? Thanks, Om Thanks, Piotr 2017-11-22 23:13 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > On Wed, No

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Om, > > Thanks for explanation. I sent you certificates. > > Piotr > > 2017-11-23 8:16 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > > > On Nov 22, 2017 10:13 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" > > wrote: > > > > Hi Om, &

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC1*

Piotr, I just tried this on Windows and I am getting the same error: The application cannot be installed due to a certificate problem. The > certificate does not match the installed application certificate, does not > support application upgrades, or is invalid. Please contact the > application

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC1*

are not the right one. Sorry about that. I will cut > another RC! :/ > > Thanks, > Piotr > > 2018-04-17 8:04 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > > > Piotr, > > > > I just tried this on Windows and I am getting the same error: > > > > The app

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

I was able to install the app fine. The SDK was downloaded fine as well, but it looks like Adobe AIR took a very long time to load. Thanks, Om On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:14 PM, alexp wrote: > I have had Flash Builder, Flash Professional, Animate 2015 and Animate > 2017, > and AIR on this machi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2

+1 Binding On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > +1 > > Although I wish we had updated the RELEASE_NOTES. > > -Alex > > On 4/17/18, 12:01 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: > > > Alex, > > > >I've answered you in discussion thread. > > > >Thanks, > >Piotr > > > >2018-04-17 20:41 GMT+02:

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

Alex, Justin, Before you go any further into this discussion, please remember that technically we don't even need to release the source for this. No one is going to download the source artifacts for the Installer. The Installer is a convenience application we provide to our users so that they ca

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3

+1 Binding On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > +1 (Binding) > > - I was able to build from sources > - Downloading newest version of SDK went well on Mac and Windows > > Thanks, > Piotr > > 2018-04-19 16:05 GMT+02:00 Fréderic Cox : > > > +1 | installer is working for me on

Re: Installer is Timing Out.

Rawgit might be a good option for us: https://rawgit.com/ If no one has objections, I can set this up. Thanks, Om On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 5:12 PM Alex Harui wrote: > Also, I think if we can find a volunteer to host the entire binary folder > (and thus pay the bandwidth costs) that will solve the

MDL - possible different approach?

All (especially Carols and Alex), I have been following the conversations in the other thread about the approach to bring Material Design Lite (MDL) theme to FlexJS. I was browsing through the Button.js class in MDL's implementation [1] My first instinct was to simply mimic how the implementatio

Re: MDL - possible different approach?

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:17 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > All (especially Carols and Alex), > I am very sorry, I meant Carlos. Auto-correct :-( > > I have been following the conversations in the other thread about the > approach to bring Material Design Lite (MDL) them

Re: [FlexJS] CSS (was Re: [FlexJS] Mobile Apps)

+1 for implementing it based on beads. mdl:DefaultMDLButton would look like this: We could simply use DefaultMDLButton in our code instead of having to write out all the beads, if the user so chooses. Thanks, Om On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Josh Tynjala wrot

Re: [FlexJS] CSS (was Re: [FlexJS] Mobile Apps)

etter, we would go that way...but for me > at least, seems not the right way. > > Thanks > > just my 2... > > C. > > > > > > 2016-10-24 22:09 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > > > +1 for implementing it based on beads. > > > > mdl:DefaultM

Re: Flex news site and rss feed

The best aggregator for Flex and Flash I have seen, that is still active is: http://flashdaily.net/ All the latest news about FlexJS is also covered. Thanks, Om On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Adobe back in the day had a blog aggregator [1] which was a copy of

Re: MDL Tweet

Done! On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Please, retweet to make some noise out there! :) > > https://twitter.com/carlosrovira/status/791379921746690049 > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira >

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

I can take this work up. Depending on how much work this would take and amy available bandwidth, this could take a while. Do you know what exactly needs to be done here? Thanks, Om On Nov 3, 2016 8:54 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Hi, > > The Adobe AIR SDK 24 is available in beta form at [1] and

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

I still see the zip file available here https://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashruntimes/air/AdobeAIRSDK.zip On Nov 3, 2016 9:54 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > On 11/3/16, 9:35 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > wrote: > > &

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

And I still see the adl.exe inside the zip file: https://snag.gy/uSrbL5.jpg On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:10 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I still see the zip file available here > > https://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashruntimes/ > air/AdobeAIRSDK.zip > > On Nov 3, 2

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

and tar will go away or may not be the latest. > > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > -- Original message-- > *From: *OmPrakash Muppirala > *Date: *Thu, Nov 3, 2016 10:10 AM > *To: *dev@flex.apache.org; > *Subject:*Re: Installer.xml changes nee

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

- Josh > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:13 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala > > wrote: > > > Hmm, I see a dmg for mac and a zip for windows (in the Flex Developers > > section) > > Was there any announcement about this change? > > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:11 AM,

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

quot;Alex Harui" wrote: > > >I thought there were symlinks for Mac. Maybe it doesn't matter for what > >we use it for. > > > >Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > > >-- Original message-- > >From: OmPrakash Muppirala >

Re: FlexJS -- we really need to get bugs into JIRA

Justin, There is no reason for us to not file JIRA tickets. And, if someone in your company finds a bug, they should go ahead and file a JIRA ticket. And for good measure, bring it up on the list and if possible suggest some possible fixes. I agree that having issues documented in JIRA is defin

Re: AW: 4.16 SDK release

On Nov 6, 2016 6:35 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > Om has already started on this. Interestingly, he was able to "unzip" the > DMG. Not sure what that means. > > I'm told that there is an hdiutil tool that unpacks DMG files, but I > haven't tried it. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 11/6/16, 3:44 AM, "Chris

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > We’re getting closer to making a release candidate for the next Flex SDK > release. > > Currently the two things holding up this release are there two JIRAs: > [1] FLEX-34880 Place Sort and SortField state setters behind mx_internal >

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Help with MDL

That sounds awesome, Josh. If you can take a look at the windows build, that would be great as well. I would like to get into some MD action myself :-) I have some ideas on the Table component that I would like to make it into the library. Thanks, Om On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Josh Tynjal

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Update: I have figured out the changes required to the Ant script to make this work. I just need to integrate the new script with the installer.xml to make this work. I am hoping to get that working over the weekend. Thanks, Om On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 9:49 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Help with MDL

Ms, and the extension runs > correctly in all of them. > > - Josh > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala < > bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > That sounds awesome, Josh. If you can take a look at the windows build, > > that would be great

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Help with MDL

It would be nice to get a wiki page going to keep track of all the components. Thanks, Om On Nov 19, 2016 11:05 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: > Hi Piotrz, I was thinking in maybe go with MDL List...and Om goes with > Table. > > If you want to start with something easy, maybe you could try a Switch

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Okay, I updated the installer.xml in the flex-sdk repository. Here is the commit diff. For some reason, the changes are not being highlighted - the who file is being shown as modified. https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/commit/dec79b57835810f94d cf0d11e5d1cdd09e86d862?diff=split#diff-f51338f41f24

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

And oh yes, the installer config has been pushed to staging. Please do not publish the site without pushing a new release of the sdk. Otherwise the Apache Flex Installer app will be broken for AIR 24.0 beta. Thanks, Om On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:52 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Okay

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

On Nov 21, 2016 12:15 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 11/20/16, 10:52 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" wrote: > > >Okay, I updated the installer.xml in the flex-sdk repository. > > > >Here is the commit diff. F

Re: [FALCON][FALCONJX} org.json replacement

Is there a link to the announcement? Or any other source for more details? Thanks, Om On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi, > > Today, Apache's VP Legal announced that ASF projects can no longer use > org.json due to licensing issues. Apparently, there are replacements such

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

? Thanks, Om On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/21/16, 6:16 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > wrote: > >>>1. In sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml, for the new SDK entries, I don't > >know > >

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

; > -Alex > > [1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/properties.html#if+unless > > On 11/25/16, 12:32 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > > > >On 11/24/16, 11:50 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > >Muppirala" wrote: > > > >>I m

Re: [FlexJS] className manipulation

Looks like this polyfill could be useful. https://github.com/eligrey/classList.js/ Thanks, Om On Nov 26, 2016 9:43 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Seems like if we could implement ClassList as a utility class. I can > think of lots of apps that are less dynamic that won't need this > capability. I

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

I had a similar issue when I tried to set up. Looks like the individual files are not downloadable from google code anymore. I just downloaded the full zip file and copied over the required files. On Nov 27, 2016 9:54 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > So I just tried this out but ant_on_air

Re: [FlexJS] get rid of inline styles (was Re: [FlexJS]Layout problems)

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > I wish I could agree, but I don't think I can. IMO, some component > > features can only be implemented by setting style properties. In the > > example above, to keep Label as single-line (so you don't have to us >   > > and can just use

Re: [FlexJS] Team Page

Looks great! Eating our own dog food :-) BTW, this looks like a great use case for an MDL-Card component [1] as a container for each team member. If no one gets to it before me, I will take a shot at it! [1] https://getmdl.io/components/#cards-section Regards, Om On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:56

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >