Could someone tell me the correct ObjectName need to access the Deployer GBean?
I have a GBean in which I am trying to reference the Deployer GBean
(org.apache.geronimo.deployment.Deployer). However it seems as if I do
not have the name of the reference correct in by deployment plan as
deployment
I haven't tried but it should work. However since the minimal
assemblies only support web deployments, I'll probably need to define
a new runtime type (as a temp solution) to restrict applying the
minimal runtime to ejb projects, etc...
On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:39 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
On Jun 15, 2006, at 12:07 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I was talking to a set of folks that are looking at Geronimo and
one of the unique things they are interested in that Geronimo has
and others do not is the plugin support.
They're view of the world is that their developers use Eclipse as
So this could be currently done independent of project structure?
On Jun 15, 2006, at 12:21 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I assume the API approach would be best for Eclipse
integration -- there's a call to get the default metadata (including
dependencies gleaned from the module itself), a data
I think it would make life more difficult managing so many versions
and the compatibility between those version, however I think this
would be beneifical for updating the server at a more granulized level.
Another approach is to break out the server into components (multiple
modules making
I've just built against and posted a version of the eclipse plugin
that is compatible with castillo.
-sachin
http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/
On Jun 15, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Sachin Patel wrote:
I've just built against and posted a version of the eclipse plugin
that is compatible with castillo.
-sachin
Sachin,
Did you mean Callisto?
If so, where
server runtime types to support
all of the possible variations
Actually no you wouldn't. The web services facet is an extension to
the web facet. Thus having a geronimo runtime that only supports the
web facet will still allow web-services support.
Sachin Patel wrote:
I haven't tried
+1!
On Jun 15, 2006, at 6:18 PM, David Blevins wrote:
+1 from me!
-David
On Jun 15, 2006, at 8:02 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have created what I hope is the final release of Geronimo 1.1.
There has been a lot of work that has gone into this release
(please review the
+1
On Jun 16, 2006, at 6:19 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I put together a FAQ in the sandbox on the cwiki. I seeded it with
content from the main wiki on the Geronimo website and with some
content from a resent email I sent about accessing an MBean server
from a GBean.
This is just an
+1 G1.1
+1 specs
+1 daytrader
On Jun 19, 2006, at 2:21 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I originally sent this note about 3 hours ago. Not sure where the
bottleneck is so I'm trying again. Apologies if there are duplicates.
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Geronimo 1.1,
In recognition of his contributions to the Apache Geronimo community,
the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the committership of Joe Bohn.
Joe has contributed in many areas, including the console and as of
recent, the work on our minimal distributions.
His work shows initiative, concern
Yeah I think it would be somewhat cheesy as well.
On Jun 23, 2006, at 9:12 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I thought it was a funny comment, but it seems kind of cheesy to me
in practice.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 6/23/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few days ago I had made a comment about
So for next release, I was thinking about working on some
enhancements to the eclipse-plugin to provide some g-plugin/services
creation tools wizards that could do some basic things like
automatic codegeneration to provide stubbed out classes/methods. Do
people see any value in this? Are
(MyGBean.class);
GBEAN_INFO = infoFactory.getBeanInfo();
}
public static GBeanInfo getGBeanInfo() {
return GBEAN_INFO;
}
Paul
On 6/24/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So for next release, I was thinking about working on some
enhancements to the eclipse-plugin
+1 and congratulations!
On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:31 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Hey folks,
I want to update the contributors page of the geronimo.apache.org
site...
- trtd bgcolor=#f3f4f5Jeff Genender/td
td bgcolor=#f3f4f5Virtuas/td td
bgcolor=#f3f4f5---/td/tr
+
I agree
On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:25 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think that removing the m1 files is a good idea, as it will help
force us to get m2 to build... which really should not take that
long to get functional 100% of the time.
--jason
On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
So it looks like something is wrong with the mirrored jars on
ibiblio. If you take a look at any of the 1.1 jars Matt published to
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/geronimo/jars/ then
compare it to the ones on http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/geronimo/
jars/, at first glance, the 1.1
I think we need to keep it simple. Let deploy only allow a deploy,
and fail if the app exists, and kindly inform the user that a
redeploy should be invoked. Or even better and I think this may have
been brought up before, but perhaps we get rid of redeploy completely
and have a --force
+1
On Jun 27, 2006, at 6:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
+1
On Jun 27, 2006, at 3:31 PM, John Sisson wrote:
I noticed that the download page no longer has a KEYS link.
Yesterday (before the update to the site) the KEYS link at the
very bottom of the download page pointed to http://
All,
I have posted an RC1 candidate driver available for download at...
http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-
plugin-1.1-RC1.zip
-sachin
You have to invoke it manually as you've done. I haven't figured out
how to invoke a build+assembly in one step. As far as the file sizes
kevan saw the same problem, and we couldn't figure out why.
On Jun 30, 2006, at 5:15 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I just checked out Rev418113 of the
contribute to the
Eclipse plugin development. If you can point me to a few to-do
items of immediate interest, I would be more than happy to pick
them up and start working on them right away.
Thanks,
Shiva Kumar
On 7/1/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You have to
invoke it manually
in the assembly POM for the
assembly plugin to run during the install phase for example?
On Jul 3, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/1/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to invoke it manually as you've done. I haven't figured out
how to invoke a build+assembly in one step
Ok, please open a jira.
On Jul 5, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
Hi,
I am using http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/
g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-RC2.zip with Eclipse 3.1.2 and WTP 1.0.2
(build wtp-sdk-R-1.0.2-200604200208).
1) While defining a New Server, during
Can you retry using the callisto release (WTP 1.5, and Eclipse 3.2)?
This is what the plugin is built on and supports.
On Jul 5, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
Hi,
I am using http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/
g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-RC2.zip with Eclipse 3.1.2
I can reproduce this on a windows machine. I have no idea why this
is working on my mac.
Jacek/Jason if have 5 min could you take a look at the following
assembly descriptors and the projects pom
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/
'
--
- Shiva Kumar
On 7/5/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you retry
using the callisto release (WTP 1.5, and Eclipse 3.2)?
This is what the plugin is built on and supports.
On Jul 5, 2006
thread on them.
Meanwhile I will also see if I can fix some of the JIRAs in
GeronimoDevtools.
- Shiva
On 7/5/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Shiva,
On Jul 3, 2006, at 2:56 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
Hi Sachin,
I too am facing the same problem as Donald during the assembly
As far as the UI problem of the dialog size, can you open a JIRA and
attach the screen shot to it. Also since you're the SWT/JFace
expert :) if I point you to the code, would you be able to provide a
quick fix?
Thanks.
On Jul 6, 2006, at 10:08 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
On Jul 6, 2006
Is it better to have an separate assembly module that generates the
assemblies or is it better to have the assembly plugin configured in
the root pom? Currently in devtools I have it as a seperate module
and use dependencySets to specify what gets included in the binaries.
However as
then the dependencies get picked up and packaged.
I'm going to go and and fix this in the devtools assembly module by
changing the packaging to a jar, if anyone thinks this is wrong let
me know.
On Jul 6, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Is it better to have an separate assembly module
/
gshell-assemblies/gshell-complete-assembly/pom.xml
But, that assembly's pom can not depend on another pom with pom
packaging and expect to pick up all of the dependencies it has listed.
--jason
On Jul 6, 2006, at 11:04 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
So I'm not sure if this is a bug in Maven
This problem (thanks Jason) is now fixed. An mvn at the root will
build all modules and generate the assemblies in one shot.
On Jun 30, 2006, at 5:15 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I just checked out Rev418113 of the Eclipse plugin trunk, started
with a clean m2 repo and successfully got a mvn
Thats what I like to hear :)
On Jul 7, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
:) After using WTP 1.5 Eclipse 3.2, the dialog size problem
disappeared.
Also, tried launching Geronimo Console from within Eclipse using
1.1 RC3 plugin and it works.
- Shiva
On 7/6/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL
So to close out the 1.1 eclipse tooling release here is what I'm
planning to do...
RC3 is currently available to pull down and test. I still need to do
some sniff testing on the update-site distribution and making sure
existing 1.0 plugin users can update directly to 1.1. (Since plugins
Why do we have a branch and trunk for the website? Is the may2006
branch dead? If so can we move it out to a tags/may2006 dir?
-sachin
development features. Also, longer term it would be cool if I
could create a Geronimo based portal server using, say, Jetspeed or
Liferay in Eclipse and deploy portlets to it. I'm interested in
helping out if you like these ideas.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 7/7/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
The following distributions of the Geronimo Eclipse plugin are ready
to be voted on for final release. Since binding votes are needed,
each PMC member if possible, please cast your vote within 72 hours.
http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-
Resending to fix links.Begin forwarded message:From: Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: July 9, 2006 4:24:40 PM EDTTo: dev@geronimo.apache.orgSubject: [Vote] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin v1.1.0 The following distributions of the Geronimo Eclipse plugin are ready to be voted on for final release
On Jul 9, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/9/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following distributions of the Geronimo Eclipse plugin are readyto be voted on for final release. Since binding votes are needed,each PMC member if possible, please cast your vote within 72
I've started a eclipse plugin FAQ at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC11/Geronimo+Eclipse
+Plugin+FAQ
On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No critical reason, just a time frame on when I'll upload the driver to thedistribution size if no -1's have been casted. That's interesting...would that mean that if Geronimo 1.2 is about
Ok thanks for the correction. So what classifies a veto?On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No critical reason, just a time frame
guessis that you are getting the republish state from WTP framework when a changeis saved in my project but this can be confusing to the users.This feature is not yet implemented fully.Lin-Original Message-From: Sachin Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sachin PatelSent: Friday
in...--kevanOn Jul 9, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Sachin Patel wrote: The following distributions of the Geronimo Eclipse plugin are ready to be voted on for final release. Since binding votes are needed, each PMC member if possible, please cast your vote within 72 hours.http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo
Forget what I said... I'll add them.On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:41 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:Ok thanks, but a license is not needed for the update site zip as this is handled by the update manager. As far as the deployable plugin the licenses only need to be packaged within the features and not each
someone can chime in...--kevanOn Jul 9, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Sachin Patel wrote: The following distributions of the Geronimo Eclipse plugin are ready to be voted on for final release. Since binding votes are needed, each PMC member if possible, please cast your vote within 72 hours.http://people.apache.org
ne when I don't have thetwo checkboxes checked. I can see the servlet and jsp in the goodstructure in the repo. Lin-Original Message-----From: Sachin Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sachin PatelSent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 4:25 PMTo: dev@geronimo.apache.orgSubject: [Vote] Ger
strongest source of licensing info, that I've found...--kevanOn Jul 10, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:Fixed. Re-vote.http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-deployable-RC5.ziphttp://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-upda
thus the user will run it directly from the eclipseworkspace. Doesn't the second checkbox mean the same?Thanks, Lin-Original Message-From: Sachin Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sachin PatelSent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 8:37 PMTo: dev@geronimo.apache.orgSubject: Geronimo Eclipse
ssian implementation."But that's the strongest source of licensing info, that I've found...--kevanOn Jul 10, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:Fixed. Re-vote.http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-deployable-RC5.ziphttp://people.apache.org/dist/geroni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ok ignore rc6On Jul 11, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Sachin,At a minimum, you need to add:OpenEJB, MX4J, and XStream to the root LICENSE fileWhich root license file I you
+ geronimo/activemq-broker/1.1/car on geronimo/j2ee-system/1.1/car?ServiceModule=geronimo/j2ee-system/1.1/car,j2eeType=ConfigurationStore,name=Local… Thanks, Lin -Original Message-From: Sachin Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sachin PatelSent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 8:32 AMTo
nOn Jul 12, 2006, at 10:07 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:Can you boil this down to a few bullets of what changes you need to make (or be made for you)?-dainOn Jul 12, 2006, at 5:57 AM, Sachin Patel wrote: I've started a development roadmap on the Wiki for the eclipse-plugin.http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
Folks, its been almost a week and I still have 0 binding votes. Please vote.On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time software record on the number of release candidate drivers in one day
I agree.Is there a way to import a project into Continuum and only have a single project created using the root pom that does a full build, rather then one for every pom?On Jul 17, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Hey Jason,These paths were used by the Continuum builds on GBuild. For example
Great!On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:Hello Sachin,I now have the complete build setup for Geronimo Eclipse Plugin on my Windows machine (thanks to your article http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC11/Geronimo+Eclipse+Plugin+FAQ ).I am planning to get started on
The Geronimo Eclipse 1.1 plugin has been released. The update site should now be live. The plugin supports deployments to both G 1.0 and 1.1 and runs on WTP 1.5 on either a 1.4.x or 1.5 JRE. -sachin
,JohnSachin Patel wrote: Folks, its been almost a week and I still have 0 binding votes. Please vote.On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote: FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time software record on the number of release candidate
I noticed that the 1.1.1 JIRA list has filtered out JIRAs that are unassigned but contain patches. These should be pushed back into 1.1.1.On Jul 7, 2006, at 3:32 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:When did we want to push this out the door? I see a lot of work scheduled for this micro release. I think
Yes, woops forgot, will do it tonite.On Jul 18, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:Merge to trunk?--jasonOn Jul 18, 2006, at 12:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: sppatelDate: Tue Jul 18 12:58:06 2006New Revision: 423225URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=423225view=revLog:patch applied
I agree that the normal practice is to close a defect once its been applied to all affected branches. However, due to work being done in a single branch, I personally don't see a problem with closing out the subtasks to be able to get a much accurate indicator of m2 status. Are all of M2 tasks
As I've been working to get some of these patches applied to 1.1.1, I've noticed most of the patches are still months old and 90% of the time when a patch is applied thats the end of the defect thread and no comments on the patches are provided. This I'm sure is very frustrating and surely it has
Actually I've been able close out about 7 of them, there are still 15 patches currently targeted for 1.1.1 which need to be looked at. (2 of them for openejb)On Jul 21, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:All,I am attempting to get some vacation time in this week so I haven't been too active
I think this query needs to be modified to just all open jira's containing patches. As "unassigned" filters many out.On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Project: Apache GeronimoStatus: OpenAssignee: UnassignedGeronimo Info: Patch AvailableTotal: 25 items DATE UPDATED KEY
There is a slight error, the XBean link disappears if you click on Subprojects.On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:What I meant was that something needs to be included in the left-handside menu about our subprojects - not pages per se, but references toappropriate home pages of these
Also the Subprojects link in the left hand side menu still exists when you click the Subprojects up top which I guess there are two copies of the left-hand side menu, and if so, why? On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:33 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:There is a slight error, the XBean link disappears if you click
As the Geronimo user base grows, it is important that we be able to distinguish between JIRAs open during a development cycle to those that are being hit in the field or requested by companies who either use Geronimo or build products and or plugins on top of it. So I suggest we provide a
On Jul 25, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:I guess this would be different than the reporter? Is this different than interested parties or voting for JIRAs?Yes Yes. This would be just an additional field just like "patch available". I don't think voting would address this. If there are
us in jira for an open source project. Does one need to give more priority to an issue from IBM than an issue submitted by joe user? I don't think so... at least not based on that critical alone.--jasonOn Jul 25, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:As the Geronimo user base grows, it is importa
congrats!On Jul 31, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:The PMC would like to welcome David Jencks as the newest member of the PMC. Please join us in welcoming David.Matt -sachin
I agree, I think its easier to just cd into it.On Aug 1, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:Maybe... but only at the top-level, and not too many different types of groupings.Lemme think about it more.I personally prefer to `cd module mvn`.Also keep in mind that we will be reorganizing
On Aug 2, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Fine...I prefer a field in JIRA so I can execute a single query. I'll assume the patches are in JIRA anyway and its a great place for comments too :)+1Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1People have been
I would like an RTC for the following change in devtools trunkhttp://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93?page=allthx -sachin
+1On Aug 7, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:ken for several days now and no one has noticed. Here is my v -sachin
congratulations kevan!On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Please welcome Kevan Miller as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. Kevan recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. As such we now have an additional set of eyes to help with reviews as well as other PMC oversight
So one of the big things we need to improve is our integration with our tooling and the runtime. If anyone had gotten a chance to read the section Geronimo Runtime Requirements in the following cwiki page it gives an overview of one of the problems we need to
Thx,Shiva On 7/18/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great!On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:Hello Sachin,I now have the complete build setup for Geronimo Eclipse Plugin on my Windows machine (thanks to your article http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC11/Geronim
So does anyone have any ideas on an agreeable solution to this JIRA? I don't think David's comments in the JIRA as an alternate solution don't fully address the problem.(1) Need to be able to provide external individual jar entries to the shared library(2) Need to be able to add additional
se Global Technology Infrastructure Phone: (614) 244-2564 Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] omTo Sent by: Sachin dev@geronimo.apache.org Patel
On Aug 17, 2006, at 1:04 PM, System Architect wrote:On 8/17/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:46 AM, System Architect wrote:I feel strongly that is should be stated: Testing is not a "relatively specific use case" but a natural stage in a lifecycle of an a
+1On Aug 18, 2006, at 1:36 PM, David Blevins wrote:I personally don't know why we bother to regenerate that tree on every build as those schemas are not going to change. Let's just build them once, publish the jars, delete the schemas and be done with it.-DavidOn Aug 18, 2006, at 9:45 AM, David
I'm running into the following build error...INFO] [INFO] Building Geronimo Configs :: JavaMail[INFO] task-segment: [install][INFO] [INFO]
+1On Aug 18, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Given that we are close to completing the M2 conversion and have some disruptive changes to make to trunk this vote is to capture the communities input on the structure of the Geronimo repository.Given that this is about our build environment and
Thank you, will fix shortly.On Aug 21, 2006, at 2:18 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:In the Welcome page for Geronimo Development Tools: http://geronimo.apache.org/devtools.html , the Prerequisites for Eclipse Plugin are still mentioned as "WebTools Platform Runtime 1.01 driver". Please update this to
For the following JIRA, where all the module builders assume a jar file, what if we change all methods that take a JarFile to something like the following?public interface IDeployableModule { public String getURI(); public File getRoot(); public File[] getResourceFolders(); public File[]
On Aug 21, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:Minus the "I" prefix... seems okay. What about using URLs instead of Files?Yep, agree.--jasonOn Aug 21, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:For the following JIRA, where all the module builders assume a jar file, what if we change a
to do.-dainOn Aug 21, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Sachin Patel wrote: For the following JIRA, where all the module builders assume a jar file, what if we change all methods that take a JarFile to something like the following?public interface IDeployableModule { public String getURI(); public File getRoot
for all nested modules.I find the method name isBinary confusing. Can we use something like isArchived instead?Certainly.-dainOn Aug 21, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Sachin Patel wrote: Doh, sorry, guess some javadoc would help :)... So basically the idea is to be able to represent a deployable object, that can
Ok thanks for the clarification.On Aug 21, 2006, at 8:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:On Aug 21, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Sachin Patel wrote: On Aug 21, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Thanks. I have a few questions/issues...Why the separation between resources and classes. Don't we need to add
Hi I'm confused as what you're asking. The Eclipse plugins do build purely with Maven.All you need to do is checkout the source...https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/Then run "mvn install".And thats it. Then you can import the projects into your Eclipse
See the FAQ on the wiki for additional details...http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-faq.htmlOn Aug 22, 2006, at 3:59 AM, Conrad O'Dea wrote:Hi,I've a massive pain in my head trying to incorporate the building of Eclipse plugins into a Maven build system. It would be much
Jason, is there a way I can retarget my local trees as I have pending changes?On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:59 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:Just a brief reminder... in about 24 hours trunk, branches and tags will be moved to: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server--jason -sachin
and simply have if/else statements all over the place? On Aug 22, 2006, at 8:14 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:Ok thanks for the clarification.On Aug 21, 2006, at 8:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:On Aug 21, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Sachin Patel wrote: On Aug 21, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Thanks. I have
congrats and welcome!On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that is joining Apache as an
earContext.}rather then be able to use getResources() on the deployableModule regardless of wether its an archive or something else. Hope that helps.So if this is acceptable, I can proceed. On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 8/23/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I'
I'm thinking we need a geronimo top level root pom so the g-
subprojects (devtools) can inherit from iy. Theres too much duplicate
information between the devtools root pom and the server root pom.
Would it make sense to push some of the common elements up into
another POM?
- sachin
and there could be more to come. These I think could be shared
geronimo-wide, perhaps even some properties as well.
- sachin
On Mar 7, 2006, at 1:11 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/3/7, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm thinking we need a geronimo top level root pom so the g-
subprojects
I'm already doing this on importing applications. Non-qualified plans can be imported, and I run the conversion to make it a valid doc so that the EMF models can process it. Once its processed and the namespaces have been entered from that point forward you have to use qualified elements if
1 - 100 of 1227 matches
Mail list logo
