Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

FYI here's my +1 w.r.t. the move. Best of luck On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 5:08 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > If it helps: the package is not a big deal for javax -> jakarta concerned > bundles but can be for the one already migrated. A note is that the OSGi > compliance should probable be kept

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

If it helps: the package is not a big deal for javax -> jakarta concerned bundles but can be for the one already migrated. A note is that the OSGi compliance should probable be kept inside tomee project since several consumers are OSGi ones but nothing crazy or not already done @tomee AFAIK.

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

Hi all, to summarize the current discussion: From the discussion, it looks like, that there are no real objections / blockers for a move? However, a move of the packages / project might confuse users and automated tools (like dependency update check tooling). We would need to communicate /

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

+1 Le dim. 19 juin 2022 à 16:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi, > > Activation, transaction and connector are used also in Aries, ActiveMQ, > Karaf. > > So, no problem for me as soon as we keep the "generic" aspect (not > TomEE too centric). > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

Hi, Activation, transaction and connector are used also in Aries, ActiveMQ, Karaf. So, no problem for me as soon as we keep the "generic" aspect (not TomEE too centric). Regards JB On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:29 PM David Blevins wrote: > > Jumping off of this thread, is there any openness to

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

> On Jun 17, 2022, at 11:23 AM, David Blevins wrote: > > >> On Jun 14, 2022, at 10:09 PM, David Jencks wrote: >> >> I think each impl. needs to be in its own git repo, I’m not sure which >> already are. > > Agree. Currently connector and txmanager are in the same git repo. > >> I

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 20:23, David Blevins a écrit : > > > On Jun 14, 2022, at 10:09 PM, David Jencks > wrote: > > > > I think each impl. needs to be in its own git repo, I’m not sure which > already are. > > Agree. Currently connector and txmanager are in the same git repo. > > > I believe

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

> On Jun 14, 2022, at 10:09 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > I think each impl. needs to be in its own git repo, I’m not sure which > already are. Agree. Currently connector and txmanager are in the same git repo. > I believe the tx manager is used in an OSGI spec impl in (I think) Aries. On >

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

Am Dienstag, dem 14.06.2022 um 22:09 -0700 schrieb David Jencks: > I believe the tx manager is used in an OSGI spec impl in (I think) > Aries. On the other hand they might have copied the implementation. > It might be confusing if the governing project and/or package names > change. I don’t know

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

No objection from my side. regards, François On 14/06/2022 18:29, David Blevins wrote: Jumping off of this thread, is there any openness to discussing moving this code over to TomEE? - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk/ -

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

I think each impl. needs to be in its own git repo, I’m not sure which already are. I believe the tx manager is used in an OSGI spec impl in (I think) Aries. On the other hand they might have copied the implementation. It might be confusing if the governing project and/or package names

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

No blocker from me (minor note being some are already on git so don't start back from svn ;)) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github |

Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

Jumping off of this thread, is there any openness to discussing moving this code over to TomEE? - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk/ - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-activation_2.0_spec/ -