Re: [VOTE] Apache Giraph 1.2.0 RC1

2016-10-18 Thread Maja Kabiljo
1b3MUw&r=70jRDqS1TgwYK0kwXqlG2wyrzJDvH1bm4B3mynUQPGE&m=be_cHeTDFl6onllF5gqZZLeEIXEyouhEQsSxvSLgle8&s=cK7a4D_MjmPorMJfXSbSW9Gw1914KdY4QMu0U3YkzZM&e= >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This release contains multiple new features. Among the most important >&

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-11 Thread Maja Kabiljo
+1 On 1/11/19, 10:13 AM, "Dionysios Logothetis" wrote: +1 on migrating. On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 5:19 AM Apache Infrastructure Team < infrastruct...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello, giraph folks. > As stated earlier in 2018, all git repositories must be migrated from

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-372: Write worker addresses to Zookeeper; move addresses and resolution to NettyClient

2012-10-17 Thread Maja Kabiljo
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/SaslConnectionTest.java 1399356 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7610/diff/ Testing --- Passes mvn verify Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-372: Write worker addresses to Zookeeper; move addresses and resolution to NettyClient

2012-10-17 Thread Maja Kabiljo
here. - Maja --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7610/#review12540 --- On Oct. 17, 2012, 9:52 p.m., Maja

Review Request: Remove aggregator handling from Zookeeper

2012-10-19 Thread Maja Kabiljo
ous amount of aggregators and wokrers. Tested on fb application which uses a lot of big aggregators, also tested it with multithreading. Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: Remove aggregator handling from Zookeeper

2012-10-25 Thread Maja Kabiljo
application which uses a lot of big aggregators, also tested it with multithreading. Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Review Request: Improve the way we keep outgoing messages

2012-10-29 Thread Maja Kabiljo
/browse/GIRAPH-388?focusedCommentId=13484591 Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-390: MasterCompute postApplication callback.

2012-10-29 Thread Maja Kabiljo
pulled out counters to separate classes. But why do you use static instances of these classes, can't you have them as fields of BspServiceMaster/MasterThread? Also, it would be nicer if postApplication wasn't called from inside cleanup. - Maja Kabiljo On Oct. 29, 2012, 5:20 p.m., Nitay J

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-390: MasterCompute postApplication callback.

2012-11-02 Thread Maja Kabiljo
> On Nov. 2, 2012, 4:36 a.m., Alessandro Presta wrote: > > I'm not sure how I feel about using MasterCompute for something other than > > computation. I guess it gets the job done but I wonder if we should have a > > better place for this sort of code (like a MasterContext or whatever). It's >

Review Request: More SendMessageCache improvements

2012-11-05 Thread Maja Kabiljo
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7883/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean verify, pseudo-distributed tests PageRankBenchmark (results above) Tried it out with a real application Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: More SendMessageCache improvements

2012-11-05 Thread Maja Kabiljo
h/comm/RequestTest.java 1405925 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7883/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean verify, pseudo-distributed tests PageRankBenchmark (results above) Tried it out with a real application Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: More SendMessageCache improvements

2012-11-06 Thread Maja Kabiljo
rg/r/7883/#review13115 --- On Nov. 5, 2012, 10:59 p.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://revi

Re: Review Request: More SendMessageCache improvements

2012-11-06 Thread Maja Kabiljo
li Reisman mailto:apache.mail...@gmail.com>> Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 10:44 AM To: "dev@giraph.apache.org<mailto:dev@giraph.apache.org>" mailto:dev@giraph.apache.org>>, Maja Kabiljo mailto:majakabi...@fb.com>> Subject: Re: Review Request: More SendMessageCache

Review Request: Create MasterInfo and WorkerInfo, fix giraph.SplitMasterWorker=false

2012-11-06 Thread Maja Kabiljo
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7911/diff/ Testing (updated) --- mvn clean verify Run benchmarks on cluster with both values for giraph.splitMasterWorker Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Review Request: Create BinaryCombiner ands specialized message store for it

2012-11-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
rstep time 55s->45s 6 compute threads, superstep time 28s->15s 12 compute threads, 1 netty server thread, superstep time 185s->112s Our internal application Similar speedup as Page Rank Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: Create BinaryCombiner ands specialized message store for it

2012-11-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
akes sense to have some empty Combiner interface, and then BinaryCombiner and MultiCombiner both extend it, and we can use that interface on these problematic places? I am also going to change all current combiners to BinaryCombiners. - Maja Kabiljo On Nov. 8, 2012, 10:56 p.m., Maja Kab

Re: Review Request: Create BinaryCombiner ands specialized message store for it

2012-11-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
28s->15s 12 compute threads, 1 netty server thread, superstep time 185s->112s Our internal application Similar speedup as Page Rank Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-416: MasterObserver for user post-application customization

2012-11-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
ostSuperstep, like in WorkerContext? A lso, I think MasterObserver should at least be Configurable, or have a GraphState in there, so we could access application state from implementing classes. - Maja Kabiljo On Nov. 9, 2012, 12:29 a.m., Nitay

Re: Review Request: Create BinaryCombiner ands specialized message store for it

2012-11-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
iews.apache.org/r/7975/diff/1/?file=187393#file187393line92> > > > > Shouldn't you change the "vertex combiner" terminology to "multi > > combiner" across the board? As I said in my comment, I haven't cleaned everything up because I am not s

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-416: MasterObserver for user post-application customization

2012-11-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7981/#review13283 --- Ship it! Thanks Nitay, +1. - Maja Kabiljo On Nov. 9, 2012, 3:09

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-415: Refactor / cleanup Hadoop Counters

2012-11-09 Thread Maja Kabiljo
java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7980/#comment28560> You can use setValue here giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/graph/Vertex.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7980/#comment28559> Nice refactoring. - Maja Kabiljo On Nov. 9, 2012, 12:07

Re: Review Request: Create BinaryCombiner ands specialized message store for it

2012-11-09 Thread Maja Kabiljo
etty server thread, superstep time 185s->112s Our internal application Similar speedup as Page Rank Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: Create BinaryCombiner ands specialized message store for it

2012-11-09 Thread Maja Kabiljo
intuitive interface. > > > > I'm also suggesting that the vertex index is not needed. I see the > > parallel with the key in a MapReduce Reducer, but I'm not sure how it would > > help here to know just the vertex id but not the value. > >

Re: Review Request: Create BinaryCombiner ands specialized message store for it

2012-11-12 Thread Maja Kabiljo
uperstep time 28s->15s 12 compute threads, 1 netty server thread, superstep time 185s->112s Our internal application Similar speedup as Page Rank Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-415: Refactor / cleanup Hadoop Counters

2012-11-12 Thread Maja Kabiljo
> On Nov. 9, 2012, 7:03 p.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote: > > giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/graph/BspServiceMaster.java, line 769 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7980/diff/1/?file=187462#file187462line769> > > > > You can use setValue here > >

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-415: Refactor / cleanup Hadoop Counters

2012-11-12 Thread Maja Kabiljo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7980/#review13368 --- Ship it! +1, thanks Nitay. - Maja Kabiljo On Nov. 12, 2012, 6:59

Re: Review Request: Create BinaryCombiner ands specialized message store for it

2012-11-12 Thread Maja Kabiljo
e 28s->15s 12 compute threads, 1 netty server thread, superstep time 185s->112s Our internal application Similar speedup as Page Rank Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: Create MasterInfo and WorkerInfo, fix giraph.SplitMasterWorker=false

2012-11-13 Thread Maja Kabiljo
sting --- mvn clean verify Run benchmarks on cluster with both values for giraph.splitMasterWorker Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-417: Serialize the graph/message cache into byte[] for improving memory usage and compute speed

2012-11-13 Thread Maja Kabiljo
org/apache/giraph/utils/WritableUtils.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7990/#comment28632> Why do we always write -1 here and ignore the first int value when reading? - Maja Kabiljo On Nov. 14, 2012, 12:43 a.m., Avery Ching wrote: > > ---

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-417: Serialize the graph/message cache into byte[] for improving memory usage and compute speed

2012-11-15 Thread Maja Kabiljo
improvements on this field! - Maja Kabiljo On Nov. 14, 2012, 3:06 a.m., Avery Ching wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apach

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-421: Aggregate metrics up to master

2012-11-16 Thread Maja Kabiljo
.apache.org/r/8042/#comment29021> Revisit the comments - Maja Kabiljo On Nov. 16, 2012, 8:18 p.m., Nitay Joffe wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-421: Aggregate metrics up to master

2012-11-19 Thread Maja Kabiljo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8042/#review13602 --- Looks good now. - Maja Kabiljo On Nov. 20, 2012, 12:08 a.m

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-435: Serialize server messages for memory and less GC

2012-11-20 Thread Maja Kabiljo
omm/messages/SequentialFileMessageStore.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/8140/#comment29258> Write the number of messages? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/graph/ComputeCallable.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/8140/#comm

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-435: Serialize server messages for memory and less GC

2012-11-21 Thread Maja Kabiljo
Can we do better? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/utils/CollectionUtils.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/8140/#comment29319> Probably not important, but this won't work correctly if we have duplicates in the iterable. Maybe

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-435: Serialize server messages for memory and less GC

2012-11-27 Thread Maja Kabiljo
repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/netty/NettyWorkerServer.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/8140/#comment29453> Change to ByteArrayMessagesPerVertexStore - Maja Kabiljo On Nov. 27, 2012, 7:52 a.m., Avery

Review Request: GIRAPH-437: Missing progress calls when stopping Netty server

2012-11-29 Thread Maja Kabiljo
giraph/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/RequestTest.java 1415035 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/SaslConnectionTest.java 1415035 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8286/diff/ Testing --- mvn verify Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-437: Missing progress calls when stopping Netty server

2012-11-30 Thread Maja Kabiljo
It's also nicer this way for WaitableWithoutResult. - Maja --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8286/#review13886 ---------

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-437: Missing progress calls when stopping Netty server

2012-11-30 Thread Maja Kabiljo
pache.org/r/8286/#review13885 --- On Nov. 29, 2012, 11:59 p.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://revi

Review Request: Properly size netty buffers when encoding requests

2012-12-05 Thread Maja Kabiljo
sting --- Using this patch, here is the performance gain on one of our large applications: - about 10% of overall superstep time - about 25% of compute time - about 10% less GC Passes mvn verify. Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: Properly size netty buffers when encoding requests

2012-12-05 Thread Maja Kabiljo
view14061 --- On Dec. 5, 2012, 8:05 p.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://revi

Review Request: Max message request size in bytes, initialize buffers to expected size

2012-12-07 Thread Maja Kabiljo
/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/netty/NettyWorkerClientRequestProcessor.java 1417645 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8407/diff/ Testing --- mvn verify Large application run on a cluster Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-446: Add a proper timeout for waiting for workers to join a superstep

2012-12-07 Thread Maja Kabiljo
omment. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/graph/BspServiceMaster.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/8417/#comment30297> Maybe rename this variable - it's the moment in which we want to give up, not the number of msecs left. - Maja

Re: Review Request: Max message request size in bytes, initialize buffers to expected size

2012-12-10 Thread Maja Kabiljo
n run on a cluster Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: Max message request size in bytes, initialize buffers to expected size

2012-12-10 Thread Maja Kabiljo
it: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8407/#review14208 --- On Dec. 10, 2012, 6:07 p.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://revi

Review Request: GIRAPH-498: We should check input splits status from zookeeeper once per worker, not once per split thread

2013-02-04 Thread Maja Kabiljo
patch - about 310s for input split threads to finish, 500s for input superstep Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-498: We should check input splits status from zookeeeper once per worker, not once per split thread

2013-02-05 Thread Maja Kabiljo
this patch - about 310s for input split threads to finish, 500s for input superstep Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Review Request: GIRAPH-508: Increase the limit on the number of partitions

2013-02-07 Thread Maja Kabiljo
/giraph/partition/PartitionOwner.java a886d79 giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/partition/RangePartitionOwner.java 1ecedb8 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9370/diff/ Testing --- Run on real application with 200 workers and 40k partitions mvn clean verify Thanks, Maja

Review Request: GIRAPH-504: Create PartitionContext

2013-02-07 Thread Maja Kabiljo
/test/java/org/apache/giraph/TestPartitionContext.java PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9372/diff/ Testing --- Added test for PartitionContext mvn clean verify Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-504: Create PartitionContext

2013-02-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
/giraph/BspCase.java 6aab533 giraph-core/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/TestPartitionContext.java PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9372/diff/ Testing --- Added test for PartitionContext mvn clean verify Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-504: Create PartitionContext

2013-02-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/9372/#review16347 ------- On Feb. 8, 2013, 5:30 p.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail.

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-504: Create PartitionContext

2013-02-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
tions. - Maja --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9372/#review16349 --- On Feb. 8, 2013, 5:30 p.m., Maj

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-515: More efficient and flexible edge-based input

2013-02-14 Thread Maja Kabiljo
copy of SendMessageCache, replacing M with E and ByteArrayVertexIdMessages with ByteArrayVertexIdEdges (which are also very similar). - Maja Kabiljo On Feb. 14, 2013, 6:34 p.m., Alessandro Presta wrote: > > --- > This is an

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-515: More efficient and flexible edge-based input

2013-02-15 Thread Maja Kabiljo
/org/apache/giraph/comm/requests/SendWorkerMessagesRequest.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9449/#comment35348> In order to avoid casts like this, you can make SendWorkerDataRequest> - Maja Kabiljo On Feb. 15, 2013, 6:17 p.m., Alessandro Pre

Re: more concurrency issues with requests management?

2013-02-19 Thread Maja Kabiljo
Also you can try decreasing giraph.maxRequestMilliseconds and see what happens when requests get resent. If you have a problem on the worker they won't arrive again, if it is some concurrency issue then they should arrive on second try. On 2/19/13 3:18 PM, "Avery Ching" wrote: >Try these to star

Re: more concurrency issues with requests management?

2013-02-19 Thread Maja Kabiljo
Sebastian, how many input splits do you have? What is the last line you see in the logs? We had some problems with zookeeper whit a lot of input splits (order of 10k), which we fixed by increasing the heap size for zookeeper (changing giraph.zkJavaOpts). You can try doing that and see if it helps.

Re: more concurrency issues with requests management?

2013-02-21 Thread Maja Kabiljo
Yeah, that's exactly what I told you. We have one ExtendedDataOutput per vertex. And the limit is about (2^30)/4, since you will have double of the size allocated at some point. What do you mean you don't want to use a combiner for evaluation reasons? On 2/21/13 5:38 AM, "Claudio Martella" wrote:

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-453: Pure Hive I/O (nitay)

2013-02-21 Thread Maja Kabiljo
giraph/hive/input/edge/HiveEdgeReader.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/8611/#comment35800> Could we have an option to reuse edge objects here? - Maja Kabiljo On Feb. 21, 2013, 6:17 p.m., Nitay Joffe wrote: > > --- >

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-453: Pure Hive I/O (nitay)

2013-02-21 Thread Maja Kabiljo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8611/#review16868 --- Ship it! Forgot to say, I'm +1 on this :-) - Maja Kabiljo O

Review Request: Fix log messages produced by aggregators

2013-03-19 Thread Maja Kabiljo
a/org/apache/giraph/worker/WorkerAggregatorHandler.java 001cf59 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10029/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean install AggregatorsBenchmark Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: Fix log messages produced by aggregators

2013-03-19 Thread Maja Kabiljo
then we are not going to receive any aggregator request from them, and will see this kind of log. - Maja --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10029/#review18105 --- On March 19, 201

Re: Review Request: Fix log messages produced by aggregators

2013-03-19 Thread Maja Kabiljo
.java PRE-CREATION giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/worker/WorkerAggregatorHandler.java 001cf59 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10029/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean install AggregatorsBenchmark Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: Fix log messages produced by aggregators

2013-03-19 Thread Maja Kabiljo
waiting on, when they fall under a certain > > number (like we do with other requests), since we can't see that in the > > master status anymore. > > Maja Kabiljo wrote: > I understood that, it's what this patch is providing :-) > Here is the

Re: Review Request: Fix log messages produced by aggregators

2013-03-19 Thread Maja Kabiljo
.java PRE-CREATION giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/worker/WorkerAggregatorHandler.java 001cf59 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10029/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean install AggregatorsBenchmark Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: Fix log messages produced by aggregators

2013-03-19 Thread Maja Kabiljo
waiting on, when they fall under a certain > > number (like we do with other requests), since we can't see that in the > > master status anymore. > > Maja Kabiljo wrote: > I understood that, it's what this patch is providing :-) > Here is the

Review Request: GIRAPH-588: More flexible Hive input

2013-03-25 Thread Maja Kabiljo
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10126/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-588: More flexible Hive input

2013-03-27 Thread Maja Kabiljo
org/apache/giraph/hive/output/AbstractVertexToHive.java 8e3f1ca Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10126/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-588: More flexible Hive input

2013-03-27 Thread Maja Kabiljo
impleNoEdgesHiveToVertex is for the cases when we have no edges. - Maja ------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10126/#review18414 ---

Re: Review Request: Update Hive IO

2013-03-27 Thread Maja Kabiljo
dges in edge input, so you can clean up this part (though no need if GIRAPH-588 is going to get in :-)) - Maja Kabiljo On March 27, 2013, 7:14 a.m., Nitay Joffe wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To

Re: Review Request: Auto-set Hive reusing objects options

2013-03-27 Thread Maja Kabiljo
always reuse edge objects in edge input. But for vertex input (currently HiveToVertexEdges) we want to have this infromation, right? - Maja Kabiljo On March 27, 2013, 7:12 a.m., Nitay Joffe wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically

Re: Review Request: Add ReuseObjectsPartition

2013-03-27 Thread Maja Kabiljo
reuse, but with vertex input currently we can't, right? So SimpleHiveToVertex needs this option. I can fix it, or you can put it back as part of this patch, let me know either way. - Maja Kabiljo On March 28, 2013, 4:03 a.m., Nitay Joffe

Review Request: GIRAPH-600: Create an option to do output during computation

2013-03-29 Thread Maja Kabiljo
--- mvn clean install Real application using SynchronizedSuperstepOutput Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-600: Create an option to do output during computation

2013-03-29 Thread Maja Kabiljo
-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/worker/BspServiceWorker.java 74c1f87 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10201/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean install Real application using SynchronizedSuperstepOutput Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-600: Create an option to do output during computation

2013-03-29 Thread Maja Kabiljo
eview! - Maja --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10201/#review18537 --- On March 30, 2013, 2:11 a.m., Maj

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-600: Create an option to do output during computation

2013-03-30 Thread Maja Kabiljo
option to dump these output files per superstep. - Maja --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10201/#review18554 -------

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/trunk to da2a687

2013-03-30 Thread Maja Kabiljo
asf/giraph/tree/da2a6870 >> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/diff/da2a6870 >> >> Branch: refs/heads/trunk >> Commit: da2a68708b69d984a3f91710cc6445845cc086b2 >> Parents: 0e04147 >> Author: M

Review Request: GIRAPH-589: Remove unnecessary generics from input formats

2013-04-02 Thread Maja Kabiljo
iraph-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/hive/input/vertex/SimpleNoEdgesHiveToVertex.java ca427a0 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10248/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean install Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-589: Remove unnecessary generics from input formats

2013-04-02 Thread Maja Kabiljo
.apache.org/r/10248/#review18631 --- On April 3, 2013, 3:51 a.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, vi

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-589: Remove unnecessary generics from input formats

2013-04-03 Thread Maja Kabiljo
.java ca427a0 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10248/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean install Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Review Request: GIRAPH-604: Clean up benchmarks

2013-04-04 Thread Maja Kabiljo
/RandomMessageBenchmark.java ff65ab9 giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/benchmark/ShortestPathsBenchmark.java c3c714e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10285/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean install, run a few benchmarks Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Review Request: PageRankBenchmark -> WeightedPageRankBenchmark and create FastPageRankBenchmark

2013-04-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
ormat.java 0117ce9 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10343/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: PageRankBenchmark -> WeightedPageRankBenchmark and create FastPageRankBenchmark

2013-04-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
ank runs on Giraph. I'll put in the locality. - Maja --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10343/#review18791 ---------

Re: Review Request: PageRankBenchmark -> WeightedPageRankBenchmark and create FastPageRankBenchmark

2013-04-08 Thread Maja Kabiljo
a 0117ce9 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10343/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Review Request: GIRAPH-615: Add support for multithreaded output

2013-04-09 Thread Maja Kabiljo
/r/10389/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean install Tested on real application with all options (set number of output threads with an without thread safe output), using giraph-hive. Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-615: Add support for multithreaded output

2013-04-10 Thread Maja Kabiljo
n automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10389/#review18960 --- On April 10, 2013, 12:47 a.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote: > > --- > This is an a

Re: Review Request: PageRankBenchmark -> WeightedPageRankBenchmark and create FastPageRankBenchmark

2013-04-10 Thread Maja Kabiljo
ph/io/formats/PseudoRandomVertexInputFormat.java dca0271 giraph-core/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/io/TestJsonBase64Format.java 0117ce9 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10343/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: PageRankBenchmark supports VertexOutputFormat but not Output path

2013-04-11 Thread Maja Kabiljo
There is still the output in WeightedPageRankBenchmark, I guess for the case Alessandro mentioned. Tried to keep PageRankBenchmark as simple as possible. On 4/11/13 4:12 PM, "Alessandro Presta" wrote: >As far as I know, benchmarks never supported output. What's the use case? >Comparing the outpu

Review Request: GIRAPH-639: Add support for multiple Vertex/Edge inputs

2013-04-16 Thread Maja Kabiljo
476cd Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10564/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean verify Run application with two edge input tables - verified results. Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-639: Add support for multiple Vertex/Edge inputs

2013-04-16 Thread Maja Kabiljo
a c482cf0 giraph-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/hive/input/edge/HiveEdgeReader.java 09476cd Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10564/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean verify Run application with two edge input tables - verified results. Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-639: Add support for multiple Vertex/Edge inputs

2013-04-16 Thread Maja Kabiljo
ally generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10564/#review19285 --- On April 17, 2013, 4:19 a.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote: > > --- > This is an autom

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-639: Add support for multiple Vertex/Edge inputs

2013-04-17 Thread Maja Kabiljo
. - Maja --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10564/#review19322 --- On April 17, 2013, 4:19 a.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote: >

Review Request: GIRAPH-636: Initialize compute OutEdges directly from input OutEdges

2013-04-17 Thread Maja Kabiljo
/apache/giraph/edge/LongNullHashSetEdges.java ef0302c Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10598/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean verify Application run which requires this kind of initialization Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-636: Initialize compute OutEdges directly from input OutEdges

2013-04-18 Thread Maja Kabiljo
a/org/apache/giraph/edge/LongNullHashSetEdges.java ef0302c giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/utils/EdgeIterables.java e945d7b Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10598/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean verify Application run which requires this kind of initialization Thanks,

Review Request: GIRAPH-648: Allow IO formats to add parameters to Configuration

2013-04-21 Thread Maja Kabiljo
e/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/hive/output/HiveVertexOutputFormat.java 45c9ca3 giraph-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/hive/output/HiveVertexWriter.java 0215428 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10690/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean verify Real application run with hive io Thanks,

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-639: Add support for multiple Vertex/Edge inputs

2013-04-24 Thread Maja Kabiljo
/worker/EdgeInputSplitsCallable.java de1e774 giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/worker/EdgeInputSplitsCallableFactory.java 4a1705b giraph-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/hive/HiveGiraphRunner.java 8d67c1d Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10564/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean verify Run application with two edge input tables - verified results. Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-639: Add support for multiple Vertex/Edge inputs

2013-04-30 Thread Maja Kabiljo
iraph-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/hive/HiveGiraphRunner.java 8d67c1d Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10564/diff/ Testing --- mvn clean verify Run application with two edge input tables - verified results. Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Review Request: GIRAPH-656: Input from multiple tables doesn't work with multithreading

2013-05-06 Thread Maja Kabiljo
/WrappedVertexReader.java PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10958/diff/ Testing --- Job run with 20 threads Thanks, Maja Kabiljo

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-560: input filtering

2013-05-06 Thread Maja Kabiljo
tices' instead of 'vertexes'. giraph-core/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/worker/VertexInputSplitsCallable.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10937/#comment41465> Add the leftover in inputSplitVerticesFiltered in the end? - Maja Kabiljo On May 3, 2013, 10:

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-621

2013-05-06 Thread Maja Kabiljo
er than'? 'a couple OF lines'? - Maja Kabiljo On May 6, 2013, 9:22 p.m., Avery Ching wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-621

2013-05-06 Thread Maja Kabiljo
960/#comment41543> One more thing: the way I see it the first paragraph of the landing page should be something simpler and not go into background details that much. What do you think? - Maja Kabiljo On May 6, 2013, 10:04 p.m., Avery Ching

Re: Review Request: GIRAPH-666 : Netty execs threads and metrics threads don't get cleaned up properly

2013-05-13 Thread Maja Kabiljo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11107/#review20502 --- Ship it! Good find, +1! - Maja Kabiljo On May 13, 2013, 8:24

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >