Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Just a note that SOLR-12395 (SignificantTermsQParserPlugin) probably does not need to be mentioned in the Upgrade Notes section, as that particular QParserPlugin is not actually documented or even supposed to be end-user visible (it is backing the stream component). See SOLR-12569 for the full

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

We don't enforce anything but out-of-order releases introduce blind spots for backward compatibility testing of the index format. For instance if we release 7.4.1 after 7.5.0, there is no test that checked whether 7.5.0 could read indices created with 7.4.1 since the release process only tested

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hi Jim, > On Sep 17, 2018, at 10:07 AM, jim ferenczi wrote: > > Unless we cancel 7.5 there is no need to backport to 7.4 since we cannot > publish 7.4.1 after 7.5.0. I’m not sure what you mean? Point releases can be published at any time. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Thanks Andrzej and Simon. Unless we cancel 7.5 there is no need to backport to 7.4 since we cannot publish 7.4.1 after 7.5.0. I created the draft release notes for the wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote75 https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote75 I picked some items from Solr's

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

SOLR-12765 has been committed now to master, branch_7x, branch_7_5 and branch_7_4. Thanks! > On 17 Sep 2018, at 14:14, jim ferenczi wrote: > > Hi, > > Andrzej, there is another issue in the queue (LUCENE-8502) so I'll wait one > more day to build the first RC., please backport the fix for

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

LUCENE-8502 is in and backported On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:14 PM jim ferenczi wrote: > Hi, > > Andrzej, there is another issue in the queue (LUCENE-8502) so I'll wait > one more day to build the first RC., please backport the fix for the JMX > beans. Cassandra, I backported the Tika version

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hi, Andrzej, there is another issue in the queue (LUCENE-8502) so I'll wait one more day to build the first RC., please backport the fix for the JMX beans. Cassandra, I backported the Tika version change in the docs, if SOLR-12771 is merged today I'll include it in the RC tomorrow. Le lun. 17

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hi Jim, I’d like to commit a fix for SOLR-12765 where a side-effect from other issue changed the format of some JMX beans. > On 14 Sep 2018, at 23:25, jim ferenczi wrote: > > Sorry for the late reply. I built the first RC earlier today and had some > issues to pass the smoke tests. Most of

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Sorry for the late reply. I built the first RC earlier today and had some issues to pass the smoke tests. Most of the issue were on my end but I had to open https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8500 to fix an actual bug. SCassandra, the issue is in the smoke tester so I don't know if we

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hi Jim, I put the Solr ref guide edits Cassandra referred to in a patch on SOLR-12771, but as I mentioned in a comment there, I’d like to get Hoss’ss input before I commit, and he’s taking today off, so it’ll probably be Monday before he’ll have a chance to look at it. So in short, please

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hi Jim, Are you working on the RC now? Overnight I discovered two really minor things: first, there's an error in CHANGES.txt regarding the Tika version that I mentioned in SOLR-12551 - Erick told me offline to go ahead and fix it. Second, Steve has some edits he'd like to get in for the Solr Ref

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Sure you can backport Tomás, the first RC is planned for tomorrow. Le jeu. 13 sept. 2018 à 00:10, Tomás Fernández Löbbe a écrit : > Hi Jim, > I'd like to commit SOLR-12766 to 7.5. SOLR-11881 added retries for > internal requests, but the backoff time in cases with multiple updates can > become

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hi Jim, I'd like to commit SOLR-12766 to 7.5. SOLR-11881 added retries for internal requests, but the backoff time in cases with multiple updates can become big, and cause clients to timeout. The change is minimal, just backoff once for a retry batch instead of for every doc. I'm testing a patch

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Thanks ! Le mer. 12 sept. 2018 à 11:49, Adrien Grand a écrit : > Hey Jim, > > I added you to the hudson-jobadmin group so that you can do it next time. > > Steve, thanks for taking care of setting up the builds! > > Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 à 17:32, jim ferenczi a > écrit : > >> No worries at all

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hey Jim, I added you to the hudson-jobadmin group so that you can do it next time. Steve, thanks for taking care of setting up the builds! Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 à 17:32, jim ferenczi a écrit : > No worries at all Cassandra. What do you think of building the first RC on > Friday and start the

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Jim, I just committed the last part of LUCENE-5143 regarding build changes related to KEYS file. Feel free to test the buildAndPushRelease.py and smokeTestRelease.py scripts locally before the RC on friday, to check that they work on your computer as well :) I'll update ReleaseTodo accordingly.

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hi Jim, You beat me to it :) Yeah after looking at Joel's comments there might be some more work involved. So no point rushing it in 7.5 . On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 1:16 PM jim ferenczi wrote: > Sorry but this was just committed to master and branch_7x and I see some > discussions regarding the

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Perfect, thanks Cassandra ! Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 à 22:35, Cassandra Targett a écrit : > Jim, your suggestion of Friday for the RC & vote on Monday sounds great. > > I'm done with my major reviews/edits. I still have the smaller typos I > look for to do - I can skip those if I have to, but

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Jim, your suggestion of Friday for the RC & vote on Monday sounds great. I'm done with my major reviews/edits. I still have the smaller typos I look for to do - I can skip those if I have to, but realistically I can probably get them done tomorrow. Cassandra On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:16 PM jim

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Sorry but this was just committed to master and branch_7x and I see some discussions regarding the implication of this change. Is it really safe to include it in 7.5 ? Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 à 21:43, Varun Thacker a écrit : > Hi Jim, > > I'd like to backport SOLR-11836 if that's okay with you.

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hi Jim, I'd like to backport SOLR-11836 if that's okay with you. It's a trivial fix which I committed to master and branch_7x a little while ago. On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:09 AM jim ferenczi wrote: > Thanks Steve! > > Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 à 18:02, Steve Rowe a écrit : > >> Hi Jim, >> >> > On

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Thanks Steve! Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 à 18:02, Steve Rowe a écrit : > Hi Jim, > > > On Sep 11, 2018, at 11:32 AM, jim ferenczi > wrote: > > > > Could someone help to setup the Jenkins releases build ? It seems that I > cannot create jobs with my account. > > > Each project's PMC Chair is

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hi Jim, > On Sep 11, 2018, at 11:32 AM, jim ferenczi wrote: > > Could someone help to setup the Jenkins releases build ? It seems that I > cannot create jobs with my account. Each project's PMC Chair is responsible for granting job creation/modification permissions on Jenkins:

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

No worries at all Cassandra. What do you think of building the first RC on Friday and start the vote on Monday next week ? This will leave some room to finish the missing bits. Could someone help to setup the Jenkins releases build ? It seems that I cannot create jobs with my account. Le mar. 11

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Sorry, Jim, I should have replied yesterday about the state of things with the Ref Guide - it's close. I'm doing the last bit of big review I need to do and am nearly done with that, then I have a couple more small things done (including SOLR-12763 which I just created since I forgot to do it

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

I just fixed the invalid version (7.5.1) that I added in master and 7x. The next version on these branches should be 7.6.0, sorry for the noise. Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 09:26, jim ferenczi a écrit : > Hi, > > Feature freeze for 7.5 has started, I just created a branch_7_5.: > > * No new

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Hi, Feature freeze for 7.5 has started, I just created a branch_7_5.: * No new features may be committed to the branch. * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you want to commit to Jira first to give

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Great, thanks! On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:44 AM jim ferenczi wrote: > > Sure it can wait a few days. Let's cut the branch next Monday and we can sync > with Cassandra to create the first RC when the ref guide is ready. > > Le mer. 5 sept. 2018 à 17:27, Erick Erickson a > écrit : >> >> Jim: >> >>

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Sure it can wait a few days. Let's cut the branch next Monday and we can sync with Cassandra to create the first RC when the ref guide is ready. Le mer. 5 sept. 2018 à 17:27, Erick Erickson a écrit : > Jim: > > I know it's the 11th hour, but WDYT about cutting the branch next > Monday? We see a

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

I need to fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12117 for 7.5 On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 1:27 AM Erick Erickson wrote: > > Jim: > > I know it's the 11th hour, but WDYT about cutting the branch next > Monday? We see a flurry of activity (announcing a release does > that) and waiting to

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Jim: I know it's the 11th hour, but WDYT about cutting the branch next Monday? We see a flurry of activity (announcing a release does that) and waiting to cut the branch might be easiest all 'round. Up to you of course, I can backport the test fixes I'd like for instance and I'd like to get

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

It's not so much the building of the RC as giving the content a detailed editorial review. The build/release process itself is well-documented and published with every Ref Guide: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/how-to-contribute.html#building-publishing-the-guide. It was designed from the

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Thanks for explaining the situation Cassandra. I was planning to build the first RC beginning of next week to give people a week to discover blockers. I can certainly slow down things but I don't think that the timing differs from other releases. I am not aware of the operations that are required

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

I'm not objecting per se, but I feel like we used to propose a version and then give people a week before the branch was cut. Maybe that was just RM choice? From a personal perspective, I much prefer that model because the Ref Guide requires A LOT of my attention and my work there kicks into high

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

+1, I'll likely be adding some Solr RefGuide changes later in the week to the 7.5 branch but I'll make sure they don't effect the build. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 10:52 AM jim ferenczi wrote: > Thanks all, > since there are no objections I am

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Thanks all, since there are no objections I am planning to cut the branch for 7.5 tomorrow. I'll build the first RC early next week so there will be some room to merge important bug fixes later this week. All blockers except SOLR-12727 seem to be merged/resolved, I'll watch the remaining solr

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Sure Jan, this is a nice cleanup, +1 to backport in 7x. Le mar. 4 sept. 2018 à 10:16, Jan Høydahl a écrit : > Jim, we have some release process improvements in LUCENE-5143. Basically, > we'll only have one KEYS file instead of three plus those in the versioned > folders that we have today. And

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

Jim, we have some release process improvements in LUCENE-5143. Basically, we'll only have one KEYS file instead of three plus those in the versioned folders that we have today. And the release py script will start checking that the RM's key is present in the KEYS file. Would you be ok with that

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

+1 Erick - ZK 3.4.13 looks like a BugFix release and was released on July 15th. So based on those facts +1 to upgrade if you plan on tackling this. On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 2:43 AM jim ferenczi wrote: > Hi all, > > 7.4 has been released two months ago on June 29th and we have new > features,

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

I'm working on "SOLR-12727: Upgrade ZooKeeper dependency to 3.4.13... will make the ZK client re-resolve the server hostnames when a connection fails. This will fix issues where a failed ZK container is replaced with a new one that has a different IP address and DNS gets updated with the new

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

+1 too Alan, I just left comments on LUCENE-8422. Le lun. 3 sept. 2018 à 10:50, Alan Woodward a écrit : > +1 > > I’d like to get Matches added to intervals, if anybody feels like > reviewing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8422 before the > branch is cut. > > > On 3 Sep 2018, at

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.5

+1 I’d like to get Matches added to intervals, if anybody feels like reviewing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8422 before the branch is cut. > On 3 Sep 2018, at 09:42, jim ferenczi > wrote: > >