Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

t; -Original Message- > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 7:34 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status > > Hey Steffen, thanks for allowing a little extra time to merge PRs

RE: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

7:34 AM To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status Hey Steffen, thanks for allowing a little extra time to merge PRs. All my PRs are in. #13905 looks good to me, but we may want someone a little more familiar to MKLDNN / the ndarray.h file review as well

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

; > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I added a section F in the document that explained the > current > >> > > > > > > static-linked dependencies we used for official release. As > >> there > >> >

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

t; > > > > > > release. Please take a look and leave any concerns you may >> have. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > Qing >> > > > > > > >> > >

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

, "kellen sunderland" < > > > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I see two quick options that should cut down on the > > > dep

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

ses > > > > > > required for TRT in the source release. > > > > > > > > > > > > 1: We can simply remove in the release package the submodules > > for > > > > > onnx > > > > > > in > > &g

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

can simply remove in the release package the submodules > for > > > > onnx > > > > > in > > > > > folder > > > > > > incubator-mxnet/3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt/third_party/onnx/third_party. > > > > > None of those depe

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

system and ensure we only > > > > checkout > > > > the required files when TRT builds are enabled (similar to the > > > current > > > > mkl-ml setup). > > > > > > > > I'd suggest option 1 for this release, and that we

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

ed checkout system and ensure we only > > > checkout > > > the required files when TRT builds are enabled (similar to the > > current > > > mkl-ml setup). > > > > > > I'd suggest option 1 for this release, and that we support option

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

r the double headers in > > 3rdparty/mkldnn/src/cpu/xbyak/? > > > > > > -tao > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:51

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

> > > -tao > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:51 AM > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

tao > > -Original Message- > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:51 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status > > Kellen and Tao -

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

uary 8, 2019 10:51 AM > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status > > Kellen and Tao - > yes, the understanding is that dependencies need to be considered and all > licences referenced to include in top level LICENSE file. > Appreciate your help w

RE: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

What should I do for the double headers in 3rdparty/mkldnn/src/cpu/xbyak/? -tao -Original Message- From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:51 AM To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status Kellen and

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Kellen and Tao - yes, the understanding is that dependencies need to be considered and all licences referenced to include in top level LICENSE file. Appreciate your help with it. Steffen On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:39 PM kellen sunderland < kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry to hear about t

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Sorry to hear about the licensing issues. I was following the general vote but I'm still lacking some clarity around what licenses in the onnx-trt repo need to be surfaced. I believe onnx-trt is MIT licensed, but it includes Onnx as a third party repo which then brings in dependencies with a vari

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Hi All, For some more context, these were the last emails I sent on the dev and legal lists requesting help on the open questions – 1. Question on legal about the CC-By-2.5

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Dear MXNet community - as you should have seen in previous email, voting for v1.4.0.rc0 has been cancelled. We received a -1 vote due to outstanding license issues. Please help to update https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+Licenses and resolve outstanding issues. I would

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Dear MXNet community - I hope you have seen that voting for v1.4.0.rc0 has started and will continue until December 27th noon. So far two binding +1 votes. I suggesting the following schedule to account for holidays and of course depending on voting feedback. Vote on dev@ until 12/27 Vote on gene

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Hi Steffen, Aston and I would like to bring this PR to your attention: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13686, where Zhi fixed the num_worker argument of DataLoader on windows. Without this fix, using DataLoader with num_worker > 0 would result in crash on Windows. Bringing this PR t

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Hi Steffen Added some notes in your PR for the release notes. In particular, I'm a bit concerned about the status of topology aware communication, since it has open issues and is not being tested in CI. (The tests also fail). I think we should anounce it when it's working properly and it's well t

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Dear MXNet community - all issues beside one have been addressed. I suggest to document the last remaining issue as known problem and move forward with the release. Please communicate if you have concerns of know about critical issues to be a

Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Hi Pedro - this are indeed the draft release notes for v1.4.0. Please add description as you suggested. All - please have a look at the release notes and provide feedback and suggestions.. Steffen On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 3:30 AM Zhao, Patric wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > I saw the draft of 1.4 release

RE: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Hi Steffen, I saw the draft of 1.4 release notes in here (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes). Is this near the final version? I'd like to add some descriptions of new quantization features enabled in 1.4. Is it OK? Thanks, --