I verified:
- Release commits
- Artifact signatures & checksums
- Images built successfully
- Components work successfully
+1 (binding)
-Riley
On 2023/10/27 04:23:57 Stepheny Perez wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is the vote to approve Apache SDAP (incubating) release candidate rc2
>
I verified:
- Release commits
- Artifact signatures & checksums
- Images built successfully
- Collection manager and Webapp work successfully*
Unfortunately, a change made to nexusproto (and the way the GI image is built
in this release) causes the granule ingester to break. Thankfully, this
Hi everyone,
As mentioned during yesterday's meeting, the versioning strategy for
new/infrequently released components needs discussion/finalization.
Components such as NEXUS and ingester are updated frequently enough that this
isn't an issue for them. However, nexusproto and potentially new
Hi everyone,
I currently have PRs open for Nexus (#265) and Ingester (#86) to overhaul the
data-access component of SDAP to support analysis-ready datasets in other
formats without the need to ingest NetCDF files into our own format (data
duplication). This support would be useful for users
These changes have been extensively tested and improved through the Cloud-Based
Data Matchup Service project's SDAP deployment and have been working like a
charm. Queries that were previously infeasible due to their size & computation
time are now able to be handled with ease.
I will say that
Hello everyone,
This vote has been cancelled in favor of the vote on 1.0.0-rc2.
Thank you,
Riley
ted; please let me know if I am mistaken.
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> Julian
> >>>>
> >>>> PS Riley: Yes, you definitely can vote. RMs usually add the following
> >>>> line to their
So the vote for rc2 passed. What are our next steps? Do I push the .tar.gz and
.asc files to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/incubator/sdap ?
On 2022/12/14 20:04:29 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> I verified, built and tested the release tarballs in the same manner I did
> before and it passe
Vote passes with 5 votes.
Stepheny Perez
Riley Kuttruff
Julian Hyde
Thomas Loubrieu
Thomas Huang
Thank you,
Riley
cases for the issues I noted during the vote. The IPMC
> > tends to be lenient for the first release, especially if the podling is
> > learning and improving.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> >> On Dec 22, 2022, at 11:44, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >>
I understand. Jira cases have been created and the general@ thread has been
made as well.
On 2022/12/23 00:12:17 Julian Hyde wrote:
> Yes. I didn’t want to use the word “issue” twice in one sentence.
>
> Julian
>
> > On Dec 22, 2022, at 15:51, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
>
Hello everyone,
The IPMC vote has turned up a couple issues with our release:
- The presence of a precompiled jar (gradle-wrapper.jar) in the nexusproto
release [1]
- Our project organization is 'awkward' and 'cumbersome' [2]
- The copyright line in our NOTICE files is now out of date
Hello everyone,
The vote has passed with 3 +1 votes.
- Riley Kuttruff
- Julian Hyde
- Stepheny Perez
Thank you,
Riley
Hello everyone,
This is the vote to approve Apache SDAP (incubating) release candidate rc3 for
version 1.0.0.
Changes made between previous candidate (rc2) and this one (rc3) are as
follows:
- Switched to DISCLAIMER-WIP
- Removed Gradle wrapper from nexusproto source distribution & updated
- Validated rc3 artifacts
- Successfully built and ran the release
- Tested SDAP ingest successfully
- Tested the following SDAP endpoints:
-/match_spark
-/cdmssubset
-/domsresults
-/domslist
-/list
-/apidocs
-/timeSeriesSpark
+1 (binding)
On 2023/01/04 21:52:36 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> He
I've been looking into better structuring our release artifacts and was
wondering if anyone had any opinions on how I've updated it:
> (sdap-nexus) rileykk@MT-110978 apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc3 % tar -tf
> apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src-incubating.tar.gz
>
wrote:
> Makes sense to me.
>
> - Frank
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 1:16 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
>
> > I've been looking into better structuring our release artifacts and was
> > wondering if anyone had any opinions on how I've updated it:
> >
> >
> &
Another issue that was pointed out is the climatology directory containing
improperly(?) licensed code [1]. Are we using anything in there? Should it be
excluded from releases?
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/brr31mjz13xrgwf6h6fdnnl30tvr4hzy
On 2023/01/03 02:36:14 Riley Kuttruff wrote
nymore so maybe we just remove it entirely?
>
> - Frank
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:04 AM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
>
> > Another issue that was pointed out is the climatology directory containing
> > improperly(?) licensed code [1]. Are we using anything in there? S
bo9m0n ?
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 7:21 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
>
> > I understand. Jira cases have been created and the general@ thread has
> > been made as well.
> >
> > On 2022/12/23 00:12:17 Julian Hyde wrote:
> > > Yes. I didn’t want to use the word “
thread/8h5fw3cpx81w7nmm385hlx261sbo9m0n ?
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 7:21 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
>
> > I understand. Jira cases have been created and the general@ thread has
> > been made as well.
> >
> > On 2022/12/23 00:12:17 Julian Hyde wrote:
> > > Yes. I didn’t wa
t release manager can
> > follow
> > > your steps, and add it to the source code when you’re done. And
> > maybe one
> > > or two shell scripts.
> > >
> > > I also recommend that you create a bug with the title ‘Release SDAP
>
Not sure if it's appropriate to reply here, but is it possible to designate an
interim release manager to kick off the next vote as Nga is out of the country
and will be until 1/16?
On 2022/12/18 06:31:15 Julian Hyde wrote:
> I downloaded the artifacts using svn, checked signatures (.asc
Hello everyone,
This is the second attempt to approve Apache SDAP (incubating) release
candidate rc2 for version 1.0.0.
There were no changes to the code between this and the previous attempt to
release rc2.
Changes made between previous candidate (rc1) and this one (rc2) are as
follows:
-
+1 from me too if I can.
Riley
On 2022/12/19 19:05:43 Stepheny Perez wrote:
> +1
>
> Stepheny
>
> On 2022/12/19 18:58:47 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > This is the second attempt to approve Apache SDAP (incubating) release
&g
files.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now, how to write to dist.apache.org? That web server is a
> > view
> > > > > onto an
> > > > > > ASF
> > > > > > source code rep
Successfully verified, built and tested.
+1
On 2022/12/13 19:10:28 Nga Chung wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the second release candidate of Apache SDAP (incubating) version
> 1.0.0.
>
> Changes made between previous candidate (rc1) and this one (rc2) are as
> follows:
> - Added README
> - Added
All release files have been verified, built and tested successfully; however,
they are missing some required files (DISCLAIMER).
-1 (binding) from me
On 2022/12/08 22:33:25 Nga Chung wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the first release candidate of Apache SDAP (incubating) version
> 1.0.0
>
>
So it looks like the IPMC vote passed. I'm assuming the next/final steps are 1)
moving the release artifacts to the dist/release area and 2) sending an
announcement, correct?
- Riley
On 2023/01/17 17:46:31 Nga Chung wrote:
> This was announced in the DISCUSS thread here [1] so maybe it was
ding email templates so we're all prepared on that front. I'll
share the link when it's finished.
On 2023/01/18 02:47:45 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> We'll get right on that!
>
> On 2023/01/18 02:44:35 Julian Hyde wrote:
> > Congratulations to SDAP on getting
ing a downloads page to the site,
> update the team page [2], and a link to Slack.
>
> 10. Make another release in 2 months, to prove that the muscle still works.
>
> Julian
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/list?annou...@apache.org
>
> [2] https://sdap.apache.org/tea
Update: I added a note of this to the build guide with instructions to fix the
issue which I will link to in the announcement.
On 2023/01/20 22:45:32 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> It appears that the build for the nexus-webapp docker image has somehow begun
> failing even though we have not a
It appears that the build for the nexus-webapp docker image has somehow begun
failing even though we have not altered the dockerfile. This would prevent
building the image from the release. Would this be a blocker for release? We
have identified a temporary fix for it.
More info: The error
months, to prove that the muscle still works.
>
> Julian
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/list?annou...@apache.org
>
> [2] https://sdap.apache.org/team
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 6:36 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
> > So it looks like the IPMC vote passe
Dear ASF community,
The SDAP community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache SDAP (incubating) version 1.0.0.
About SDAP:
The Earth and Space Science Informatics community has a
long history of building many innovative solutions. With
a quick search on the web we can find various tools
at you decide to be the release date.
>
> Julian
>
> [1] https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?incubator-sdap
>
>
> > On Jan 18, 2023, at 2:38 PM, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
> > Julain,
> >
> > I'm attempting to register the release with
urprising - a little bit of caching on client and/or server side.
>
> That old saying about British weather equally applies to ASF
> infrastructure: if you don't like it, just wait five minutes. :)
>
> Julian
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 3:12 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
>
lient and/or server side.
> >
> > That old saying about British weather equally applies to ASF
> > infrastructure: if you don't like it, just wait five minutes. :)
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 3:12 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> > >
Hi everyone,
It's about time we should start thinking about SDAP's next release.
Some things we should discuss:
- Who would like to manage the next release
- Any blockers for release (I have one: see SDAP-434)
- The climatology directory (I think this one should be safe to remove; I may
start
Hi everyone,
We've been running into major performance issues with loading swath formatted
tiles due to how SDAP transforms them to work with the existing algorithm
implementations. I estimate that it wastes memory on the order of n^4 based on
the tile size. Stepheny proposed a solution to
- Verified commits
- Verified checksums and signatures
- Successfully built all images
- Successfully ingested test data
- Started webapp
- Ran the following tests successfully:
- Jupyter notebook
- Subset validation
- Endpoints:
- /list
- /timeSeriesSpark
- /list
-
Hey Julian,
It looks like this was sent to the dev@ thread and not the general@ thread. Not
sure what happened there, Nga's email appeared to go to both.
On 2023/05/01 23:39:37 Julian Hyde wrote:
> (I am a mentor of SDAP but was too late to vote in the thread on dev@sdap.)
>
> +1 (binding)
>
We currently have 3 release artifacts. In the event that we make a new release
but one of the artifacts is unchanged, do we re-release that artifact with a
bumped version?
For example: The nexusproto repository is unlikely to be changed soon. Should
we not have it in future release cycles but
Hey everyone,
It completely slipped my mind send this link to this list so I apologize for
that.
Here is the link for the expanded guide I developed from Nga's instructions for
building SDAP v1.0.0's early RC's.
https://gist.github.com/RKuttruff/f418f37d2424d32c05995c9027e832c2
Please don't
Disregard that last comment; I neglected to read the section header.
On 2023/08/01 17:41:04 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Looks pretty good. Though I think we mentioned adding Jason as a committer in
> our last report.
>
> On 2023/08/01 17:36:44 Nga Chung wrote:
> > Hi everyone
Looks pretty good. Though I think we mentioned adding Jason as a committer in
our last report.
On 2023/08/01 17:36:44 Nga Chung wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> A draft of SDAP status report has been added to the wiki:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/August2023#sdap
>
> Please
I'm looking into getting our components migrated away from DISCLAIMER-WIP in
preparation for graduation. One of the components (ingester) has some data for
tests [1] that comes from NASA which is freely and openly available without (I
believe) copyright. [2] Would it be required/recommended to
Hi all,
As we've implemented an improved branching strategy in the Nexus repo [1], I
think we should implement the same in the Ingester [2] and nexusproto [3] repos
as well.
This would require:
- Setting the default branch for Nexus to be develop.
- Renaming the dev branch in ingester to
Apologies, I forgot to include links:
[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexus
[2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester
[3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexusproto
On 2024/02/20 23:37:11 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As we've implemented an
long way and have
> > learned to follow the Apache Way for software releases. We're also in
> > the process of deciding on an official SDAP logo!
> >
> > Best,
> > Nga
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:00 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
&g
e
- Joseph C. Jacob
- Jason Kang
- Jörn Kottmann
- Riley Kuttruff
- Thomas G Loubrieu
- Kevin Marlis
- Lewis John McGibbney
- Stepheny Perez
- Wai Linn Phyo
- Elizabeth Yam
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Nga Thien Chung
be appointed to the office of Vice President, A
I've heard from all but 5 of the current PPMC members about their choices for
PMC membership. I'll give about another 24 hours before finalizing our
graduation resolution and proceeding with a vote.
Riley
On 2023/12/13 15:08:31 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> In light of the finished PMC Chair vote
Cram
- Frank Greguska
- Thomas Huang
- Julian Hyde
- Joseph C. Jacob
- Jason Kang
- Riley Kuttruff
- Thomas G Loubrieu
- Kevin Marlis
- Stepheny Perez
- Wai Linn Phyo
All final requirements listed in our DISCUSS thread [1][2][3] (The threading on
the
site broke) have been addressed successfully
+1 (binding)
I think we are ready!
On 2023/12/21 20:07:22 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> After a little over 6 years in the ASF Incubator, we now would like to ask
> the community
> to vote on graduating SDAP to a Top Level Project.
>
> The following 13 people
Hi everyone,
The vote has passed with 8 binding +1 votes from PPMC members and no other
votes.
The +1 votes:
- Julian Hyde
- Jason Kang
- Stepheny Perez
- Thomas Huang
- Riley Kuttruff
- Nga Chung
- Joseph Jacob
- Wai Linn Phyo
With this done, we will bring this to the Incubator PMC
I'll also request that if you wish to explicitly opt-in to PMC membership,
please
reply here as well.
I'll also record here that I do intend to join the PMC upon graduation.
On 2023/12/13 15:08:31 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> In light of the finished PMC Chair vote [1], here's the updated dr
Hi all,
While working through the maturity model, I noticed SDAP doesn't seem to have a
documented, formal process for adding committers or PMC members (at least, none
that I could find). I think we should make an effort to establish and ratify a
process for this. I think the one outlined here
experience, once there has been a good discussion, the voting
> process is very straightforward.
>
> SDAP should also set a policy (if it doesn't have one) about whether
> it is possible to be a committer without being a PMC member.
>
> Julian
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 202
I don't think 2FA will be an issue for us, so long as everyone already has it
set up.
On 2024/01/16 20:46:27 "Huang, Thomas (US 398F)" wrote:
> Sorry, I won't be able to join today's meeting. I guess we should discuss
> about graduation status and PMC process.
>
> Public GitHub will be
ing about future
> committers / PMC members.
>
> What is the pro / con of having committers who are not also a PMC member?
>
> Thanks,
> Nga
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 7:13 AM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
> > Hi Julian,
> >
> > That makes a lot of se
lso like the DISCUSS thread example for talking about future
> > committers / PMC members.
> >
> > What is the pro / con of having committers who are not also a PMC member?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nga
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 7:13 AM Riley Kuttruff wrote
Just dropping in to second the GitFlow strategy. I think it fits quite well
with what we want to do.
On 2024/01/17 00:17:23 Stepheny Perez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose we discuss and stick to a version control management practice
> across all SDAP repos moving forward. Currently, our
I was performing a more thorough check of our dependencies in preparation of
opening graduation discussions with the Incubator PMC and found at least one
package that, while not directly used in the code, is installed as a dependency
of multiple top-level dependencies that is LGPL licensed. The
s. For other languages my knowledge is
> near zero.
>
> This would be a good question to ask on the incubator list.
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Jan 9, 2024, at 10:11 AM, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
> > I was performing a more thorough check of our dependencies in
Hi everyone,
We've received 9 votes, with option B winning 6 to 3.
Votes for A:
- Stepheny Perez
- Jason Kang
- Kevin Marlis
Votes for B:
- Wai Linn Phyo
- Riley Kuttruff
- Joseph C. Jacob
- Julian Hyde
- Thomas Loubrieu
- Thomas Huang [1]
With the final concept chosen, all that's left
I verified:
- Release commits
- Artifacts have incubating in names
- Artifact signatures & checksums
- Images built successfully
- chardet is not present in any of the images
- Components work successfully locally and in cloud deployment
+1 (binding)
-Riley
On 2023/11/28 00:11:15 Stepheny
Hi everyone,
Here's the current agenda for today's upcoming meeting:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SDAP/2023-11-28+Meeting+notes
Join from the meeting link
https://jpl.webex.com/jpl/j.php?MTID=m6d205ee391099975ab22ae1b4a65df53
Join by meeting number
Meeting number (access
> > Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
> > (818) 354-2747
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2023, at 1:07 PM, Nga Chung wrote:
> >
> > I think we're ready to graduate. We've come a long way and have
> > learned to follow the Apache Way for soft
th here versus science in general? Understandably, there isn't
> anything preventing SDAP from being used outside of the Earth Science
> domain, but emphasizing Earth science may make SDAP stand out from
> other data analytics solutions.
>
> Best,
> Nga
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 202
ung wrote:
> >
> > I think we're ready to graduate. We've come a long way and have
> > learned to follow the Apache Way for software releases. We're also in
> > the process of deciding on an official SDAP logo!
> >
> > Best,
> > Nga
> >
> >
&g
lpful here.
Thanks,
Riley
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/sdap.xml
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/mb2srl1yqopw06k5rqcjgzvrhb93kxjw
On 2023/12/05 20:00:31 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Hey Julian,
>
> So it appears we haven't done the IP c
out the logo was excellent. Let’s have more of that.
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Nov 29, 2023, at 8:20 AM, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Here is a summary of the topics discussed in yesterday's meeting:
> >
> > - Graduation
e’ (BDFL).
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Nov 29, 2023, at 6:59 AM, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
> > At today's monthly meeting, there were 2 questions brought up regarding the
> > role of PMC chair upon graduation:
> >
> > 1. What is the process for
At today's monthly meeting, there were 2 questions brought up regarding the
role of PMC chair upon graduation:
1. What is the process for selecting the proposed chair? Is it a vote held on
the mailing list or is it a position volunteered for by anyone on the PPMC?
2. What role /
Hi everyone,
Here is a summary of the topics discussed in yesterday's meeting:
- Graduation: DISCUSS thread needs more engagement
- QUESTION: When it's time to graduate, how do we select a PMC chair & what
are their responsibilities?
- 1.2.0 release status: rc2 failed IPMC vote due to
I vote B as well.
On 2023/11/22 18:25:17 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> After the discussion, we have 2 clear front-runners: 5 and 3.
>
> So now we will start the final vote on which to choose.
>
> The candidates are here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/se
Ok! Looks like we got some clear favorites!
Starting a vote now!
On 2023/11/21 17:20:03 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Here are the current candidates for SDAP's logo. Please respond to this
> thread with your top choices starting with your most preferred:
>
Hi everyone,
After the discussion, we have 2 clear front-runners: 5 and 3.
So now we will start the final vote on which to choose.
The candidates are here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13064618/sdap_logo_finalists.png
Please vote in this thread for the logo you wish to be
marketing, but it might be a good idea to update the official website.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Thomas
> >>
> >>
> >> Thomas Huang
> >> Group Supervisor, Data Product Generation Software
> >> Instrument Software an
lp get this to
> approval. SDAP is an unusual name, so it’s no surprise to me that there are
> few clashes.
>
> > On Dec 4, 2023, at 9:08 AM, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
> > Hey Julian,
> >
> > I'm also starting up with a Podling Name Search, though I'm havi
The sites seem to have been rebuilt but the red flags are still there...
@Julian, did I miss something?
On 2023/12/04 22:10:20 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Ok I updated sdap.xml to reflect the project's status as best I could.
>
> - Added releases to the News section
> - Updated table
graduate. We've come a long way and have
> > learned to follow the Apache Way for software releases. We're also in
> > the process of deciding on an official SDAP logo!
> >
> > Best,
> > Nga
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:00 PM Riley Kuttruff w
t;
> > On Nov 17, 2023, at 1:07 PM, Nga Chung wrote:
> >
> > I think we're ready to graduate. We've come a long way and have
> > learned to follow the Apache Way for software releases. We're also in
> > the process of deciding on an official SDAP logo!
> >
&
o NOT want to join
> the PMC) and initial PMC chair.
>
> > On Dec 4, 2023, at 3:59 PM, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
> > Ok, I've cleared all the red flags.
> >
> > I used today's date for dates I didn't know. I don't know if that's ok.
> >
> > Still wa
o cents (wearing my marketing hat).
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Dec 4, 2023, at 4:08 PM, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> >
> > Already done! (Pending PMC choices)
> >
> > ---
> >
> > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
47
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2023, at 1:07 PM, Nga Chung wrote:
> >
> > I think we're ready to graduate. We've come a long way and have
> > learned to follow the Apache Way for software releases. We're also in
> > the process of deciding on an official SDAP logo!
&g
I wanted to check if we're clear with the IP Clearance tasks in regards to the
main body of SDAP code. The documentation on Incubator's website [1] has me a
little confused as to if this process is necessary/the correct one for the
initial codebase, as opposed to contributing additional large
; On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 4:25 PM Julian Hyde > <mailto:jh...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for the slack invite, Riley.
> >>
> >> I see the logo is now attached to the Jira case:
> >> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/se
There was a discussion thread in July that only had one reply [1]. I think the
plan was to kick off the whole discussion process after the 1.2.0 release. I'll
start a thread now.
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/odgj3nmvkkyrq6srkfjkg3lwzsb9gbkw
On 2023/11/16 19:34:26 Julian Hyde wrote:
> I
As we work on the 1.2.0 release, I think we should begin our discussion of
graduating SDAP in earnest.
Over the past year or so, we've:
- Successfully ran through the release process twice
- Improved our code to be compliant with ASF rules, and now, hopefully, we
should be free of any licensing
Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
> (818) 354-2747
>
>
>
>
> On 11/16/23, 3:33 PM, "Riley Kuttruff" <mailto:r...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>
> Hey Thomas,
>
>
> The image isn't displaying for me on any of my devic
l was marked as invalid on the SDAP list. Reattached.
> >
> >
> > Thomas.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thomas Huang
> > Group Supervisor, Data Product Generation Software
> > Instrument Software and Science Da
Hey Thomas,
The image isn't displaying for me on any of my devices.
-Riley
On 2023/11/16 23:29:21 "Huang, Thomas (US 398F)" wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> SDAP is a parallel data management and analysis platform. When talking about
> parallel systems, I always use a beehive as an analogy (Riley
;
> Thomas Huang
> Group Supervisor, Data Product Generation Software
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems
> Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
> (818) 354-2747
>
>
>
>
> On 11/16/23, 3:33 PM, "Riley Kuttruff" <m
Hi everyone,
Here are the current candidates for SDAP's logo. Please respond to this thread
with your top choices starting with your most preferred:
1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13064497/SDAP%20logo%20Apache%20TM.png
2:
For clarification on 3, 4, 5 as they are all in the same image:
3 = a
4 = b
5 = c
On 2023/11/21 17:20:03 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Here are the current candidates for SDAP's logo. Please respond to this
> thread with your top choices starting with your most prefe
old with Apache TM:
> >> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13064496/SDAP
> >>
> >> <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13064496/SDAP>
> >>
> >> <https://url
Hi all,
I've started the graduation discussion in general@incubator
Here's the link if you want to follow:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/pv21d9kf05166hkj89lv11s65oyvbdrk
We currently use conda/mamba to install dependencies for the granule ingester
and Nexus components in both local dev environments and for building Docker
images. This seems to have unwanted consequences as Docker appears to be
forcing inclusion of some GPL-licensed tools and libraries that we
Hey everyone,
Just wanted to bump this thread as I think we should have a bit more engagement
on this
topic before I take it to infra.
-Riley
On 2024/02/20 23:37:11 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As we've implemented an improved branching strategy in the Nexus repo [1], I
&
1 - 100 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
