Re: Your project's website

2020-08-23 Thread sblack...@apache.org
Hi Andrew, buildbot and CMS have been irrelevant to streams for some time. We adopted jenkins and git-pages as a substitute and have fully cut over, nothing to miss from the retirement i believe. On Aug 23, 2020, 9:17 AM -0500, Andrew Wetmore , wrote: > Hi: > > I wrote to you two weeks ago

DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE changes for apache-streams

2020-07-01 Thread sblack...@apache.org
is and is not present in NOTICE for a handful of peer projects. Steve Blackmon On Apr 28, 2020, 5:38 PM -0500, sblack...@apache.org , wrote: > Justin, > > Thanks for your comment and offer to help. > > We are very interested in cleaning these items up sufficiently to begin >

Re: DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE changes for apache-streams

2020-07-16 Thread sblack...@apache.org
. On Jul 1, 2020, 1:15 PM -0500, sblack...@apache.org , wrote: > Hello team.  After some delay I’ve got some follow-up on this: > > I have opened a PR for STREAMS-663: Fix DISCLAIMER that I believe removes > final traces of incubating references. > https://github.com/apache/s

Re: [DISCUSS] Thoughts on Streams dev and community, project ideas

2021-09-03 Thread sblack...@apache.org
image(s), along with a new JSON-LD ActivityPub-style API, that anyone could run and build their own social apps on top of.  A lot of work, but worthwhile. sblack...@apache.org On Aug 27, 2021, 4:15 PM -0500, Joey Frazee , wrote: > Hey, I don’t think it’s any secret that we’ve been a lit

Re: [DISCUSS] Thoughts on Streams dev and community, project ideas

2021-10-10 Thread sblack...@apache.org
And pyflink (auto-correct) On Oct 10, 2021, 2:38 PM -0500, sblack...@apache.org , wrote: > I think this would be great. I have written a lot of code that binds Streams > provider and processor modules in spark and flink in Scala nd it would be > great to be able to do the same wit

Re: [DISCUSS] Thoughts on Streams dev and community, project ideas

2021-10-10 Thread sblack...@apache.org
I've been working on some Python bindings for Mahout- I could probably use > that knowledge and do the same for Streams. > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:44 PM sblack...@apache.org > wrote: > > > Joey, thanks for posting to start discussion. > > > > I woul

Re: Any interest in a joint talk in Spring?

2021-12-14 Thread sblack...@apache.org
Trevor, I’m game to work on a Streams presentation together.  Completing a proof-of-concept for the python bindings and discussing how it was done might be a good topic If anyone is interested, including a link to the Streams-related presentations from ApacheCon 2021 Federated Data Track:

Draft January 2021 Board Report

2022-01-11 Thread sblack...@apache.org
Hello, I’ve created a Draft October 2018 Board Report and invite any suggested changes.  TL;DR not much activity. Report is due tomorrow Jan 12. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STREAMS/Board+Report+-+January+2021+Draft Thanks, Sblackmon

Draft Board Report for July

2022-07-13 Thread sblack...@apache.org
the project. - We need to be willing to evolve the project toward new use cases if necessary  to expand the community. sblack...@apache.org

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Streams 0.7.0 Release Candidate

2024-01-22 Thread sblack...@apache.org
72 hours have passed and the vote passes with 3 in favor and 0 against. PMC Members Steve Blackmon, Trevor Grant, and Brian Hodge voted +1 (binding). I will undertake the remaining release steps this evening. Steve Blackmon sblack...@apache.org --- PMC Chair, Apache Streams PMC Member

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Streams 0.7.0 Release Candidate

2024-02-09 Thread sblack...@apache.org
Update - this is done.  I checked and the files are available through maven central as well. Steve On Jan 22, 2024 at 3:25 PM -0600, sblack...@apache.org , wrote: > 72 hours have passed and the vote passes with 3 in favor and 0 against. > > PMC Members Steve Blackmon, Trevor Grant,

ActivityPub Server repo!

2024-02-10 Thread sblack...@apache.org
It took a while, but I pushed an initial commit on this new initiative.  Apache Software Foundation supports projects having multiple repos.  A fresh repo seemed appropriate in this case. • apache-streams has a deep transitive dependency tree, most of which may not ever be of benefit and

ActivityPub Server graph db pull request

2024-02-18 Thread sblack...@apache.org
Good evening, I wrapped up and opened a PR that backs up the web finger API endpoint with a jena (fuseki specifically) RDF database and sparql queries as the bridge between the graph database and the api responses. This seems so far to be the appropriate data model for this project. Please

New Initiative

2023-12-03 Thread sblack...@apache.org
Hello dev@streams.a.o, This list has been very quiet for a very long time.  I’m hoping to change that, and generate some momentum toward a worth-while initiative right in-line with Streams founding goals. The project founding proposal [1] includes the following goals: • Publication of

Re: [VOTE] Apache Streams 0.7.0 Release Candidate

2024-01-19 Thread sblack...@apache.org
My vote is +1 (binding) On Jan 19, 2024, 3:01 PM -0600, sblack...@apache.org , wrote: > I've created an apache-streams 0.7.0 release candidate, with the > following artifacts up for a vote: > > apache-streams source tag (apache-streams-0.7.0-rc1): > https://github.com/apache

[VOTE] Apache Streams 0.7.0 Release Candidate

2024-01-19 Thread sblack...@apache.org
  disapprove (and reason why) Steve Blackmon sblack...@apache.org --- PMC Chair, Apache Streams PMC Member, Apache Juneau PMC Member, Apache Incubator

Re: Publishing multiple artifacts for compatibility

2024-01-21 Thread sblack...@apache.org
I decided instead of publishing multiple artifacts, to set up profiles so that builds which use earlier versions generate and install artifacts with classifiers ‘jdk8’ or ‘jdk11’. Steve On Jan 11, 2024 at 10:37 AM -0600, Steve Blackmon , wrote: > Hi team, > > I'm getting starting on a release

[DISCUSS] Apache Streams 0.7.0 Release Candidate

2024-01-19 Thread sblack...@apache.org
For those who may be curious, highlights of this source release include:  - Elimination of virtually all known vulnerable dependencies  - A number of new contrib data providers and processors  - Upgrades to several core libraries  - Accommodates ASF Infra changes to Jenkins and Gitbox  - Support