Re: Building with Java 11

gt; shortanswer I see is that it's a work in progress. > > > El jue., 25 abr. 2019 a las 0:53, Zowalla, Richard (< > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>) escribió: > Hi, > any updates on the Java 11 compatibility? Is someone currently > working onthis? > Ubuntu recentl

Re: Idea of an M3

Hi again, we would be very happy to see a M3 release in time, so we can continue testing w/ J11 :) Best,Richard Am Montag, den 06.05.2019, 20:57 -0700 schrieb David Blevins: > Just shot a note about doing some MP-JWT cleanup. If we're ok > waiting a few days for me to sneak that in, I can try to

Re: Building with Java 11

Hi, any updates on the Java 11 compatibility? Is someone currently working on this? Ubuntu recently rolled out the Java 11 binaries, so I think, we have to move on with it. Best, Richard smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

TOMEE-2565 - PR available

Hi, can someone move forward with https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/534 ? Details can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2565 Best, Richard -- Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics Hochschule Heilbronn – University of

Re: TOMEE-2565 - PR available

Thanks for merging! :) Am Dienstag, den 20.08.2019, 11:09 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > Thanks Richard.All merged. Ticket marked as resolved. > --Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:0

[GitHub] asf-ci posts the same message multiple times?

Hi, why does "asf-ci" post multiple times inside certain PRs, i.e. https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/541 I dont think, that I can report this directly to infrastructure? Bestg, Richard -- Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics Hochschule Heilbronn

TOMEE-2419 - Web Server Configuration for TomEE Website - Easy fix available?

Hi, I think TOMEE-2419 can be fixed easiliy. https://tomee.apache.org/ is reachable via a valid certificate but there is no permanent redirect from plain http to https. I think this would be a benefit (also in terms of search engine rankings) Can we change this easily ? Or who is in charge for

Re: Yank Polling application example

Hi, I did a quick scan of the module. From an outside point of view: I have no idea, what is going on in this example.The biggest point is the missing documentation / explanation. I see two options: (a) add explanation / documentation and rework the example (b) remove it Best,Richard Am

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.0 (take 3)

+1 from my side. Additional Notes from previous vote: I tested an existing application, which is currently run with 8.0.0-M3, with the release artifacts. It includes an EAR bundle, some web-services and batchee. Everything worked fine. A sidenote: "batchee-jbatch" uses xbean-reflect in version

AW: TOMEE-2419 - Web Server Configuration for TomEE Website - Easy fix available?

on INFRA would be the better way to solve the issue. I can do that and link it to your ticket if you want. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com<http://www.tomitribe.com/> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 4:40 AM Zowalla, Richard mailto:richard.zowa

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-2

+1 Am Freitag, den 06.09.2019, 10:42 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO: > Hi, > > Here we go. Here is an updated API jar. > > There will be some more iteration to get the jar fully Jakarta EE 8 > compliant. > See ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2620 for the > identified gaps.

Re: New committer Cesar Hernandez

congrats! :) Am Donnerstag, den 05.09.2019, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko: > congrats! > Am Do., 5. Sept. 2019 um 09:53 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache TomEE has invited > Cesartobecome a committer and we

Re: 7.1.x and 7.0.x releases

Hi Jonathan, current 7.1.1-SNAPSHOT branch is on ActiveMQ 5.15.10 This update was conducted due to several CVE's related to its transient jackson-databind dependency. But, if I am right, you are still on 7.0.x - which has not been updated yet :) Best,Richard Am Dienstag, den 24.09.2019, 10:57

TOMEE-2736 - Please check PR 607

Hi, please check https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/607 and the related JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE/issues/TOMEE-2736 Would be great, if this could be included in 8.0.1 as this is a blocker for my colleague mawiesne, who consumed a ton of coffee over this bug.

Re: JIRA about CVEs

y with a different PR > but I don't have the extra cycles to do it again today. > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 7:07 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > Sounds reasonable to me. If I can assist in upgrading, let me know. > > > > However, we

Re: JIRA about CVEs

schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Alright, I will proceed :) > Best,Richard > Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 07:52 -0600 schrieb Richard Monson- > Haefel: > > If you don't mind, Richard, can you do the upgrades and create a > > PR? We can let it run overnight and see how it goes. >

Re: JIRA about CVEs

Sounds reasonable to me. If I can assist in upgrading, let me know. However, we should publish the link to the ASF CI somewhere, so we can better monitor the current build status. Best,Richard Z Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 07:00 -0600 schrieb Richard Monson-Haefel: > Is this a matter of upgrading

Re: TomEE GraalVM native image

Hi Jon, personally, I agree with your view: +1 Richard Z Am Donnerstag, den 14.11.2019, 09:39 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > If we're to roll an 8.0.1 any day now, its unlikely it'll have > aMicroProfile update, as there's a number of dependencies that get > pulled infor that functionality.

Re: JIRA about CVEs

Did not find anything with the owasp plugin profile. Should be fine (for now). Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 08:25 -0600 schrieb Richard Monson-Haefel: > Excellent! Thanks, Richard! > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 8:18 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-3

+1 Am Montag, den 09.12.2019, 16:10 -0600 schrieb Richard Monson-Haefel: > +1 > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 4:09 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > This is a vote for an updated Java EE spec jar, with one single > change overjavaee-api:8.0-2: > TOMEE-2690 make sure

Re: Revert back change from TomEEJohnzonProvider to TomEEJsonbProvider in 7.1.x

ing addition of MicroProfile > and raising the minimum Javalevel to Java SE 8. It looks like > TomEEJsonbProvider isn't a thing in theTomEE 7.x branch at first > glance. > Jon > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > Hi Jo

Re: Revert back change from TomEEJohnzonProvider to TomEEJsonbProvider in 7.1.x

Hi Jon, the related issue was https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2565 with a lot of comments documenting the issues, which were fixed with this commit. The original change was conducted in 2018: https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/4302acab62bb64c2d77cce3a66b92ae7e9cff7c5 and already

Re: Fwd: CDI Principal injection: object is not an instance of declaring class

Hi, I tested the attached WAR with M2,M3 and RELEASE, results below: - M2: works as stated by the user- M3: Exception as stated below by the user- Release: same as M3 (exception as stated below). Source-code would be beneficial for debug purpose :) Best,Richard Am Montag, den 14.10.2019, 06:11

Re: Fwd: CDI Principal injection: object is not an instance of declaring class

I opened a JIRA for it for further investigation: https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2709 If it is not a bug or something else, we can simply close it and keep track on this. Best,Richard Am Montag, den 14.10.2019, 11:43 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi, > I tested the attach

Re: Fwd: CDI Principal injection: object is not an instance of declaring class

> > http://tomee.apache.org/mailing-lists.html > > You can always unsubscribe after if you want. > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 6:44 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I tested the attached WAR with M2,M3 and

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.1

Hi, +1 from my side. I tested the 8.0.1-RELEASE with an EAR deployment containing a JSF webapp and some JAX-RS web services + a lot of unit / integration tests Everything worked fine. Thanks, John for your time / work in preparing this release artifact :) Best,Richard (Z) Am Donnerstag, den

Re: TOMEE-2770

ns.xml with bean-discovery-mode="all". > Then perform several GET calls with a browser and you will the number > of dynamicProducer increase (1 per call). > Best Regards. > -Original Message-From: Zowalla, Richard [mailto: > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de] Sent: lundi 10 février 2

AW: TOMEE-2770

Hi Francois, it would be beneficial, if you could provide a little sample project, which can reproduce the issue. With this in hands, it will be much easier to dig into this issue. Best Richard Von: COURTAULT Francois

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.1

Hi, +1 from my side. I tested the re-rolled 8.0.1-RELEASE with our fullstack EAR app. Thanks, John for your time / work in preparing this release artifact :) Best, Richard (Z) Am Mittwoch, den 08.01.2020, 15:32 -0600 schrieb Cesar Hernandez: > +1 > El mié., 8 ene. 2020 a las 14:14, Daniel

Re: Spring Boot Persistence Context

I agree with you 100%. I had the same "pain" in legacy Web applications. We even had the (business) need for mixing the technology stack (legacy). I used the term "fancy" as Spring(Boot) is (over)hyped at the moment :) A lot of people will find and use it. You can see the (bad) questions on

Re: Spring Boot Persistence Context

Hi Jon, thanks. Our students tend to use SpringBoot as it is "fancy" ;) I think, that a example would be useful. Richard Am Mittwoch, den 08.04.2020, 13:31 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Thanks for the follow up! I did get this working. I'm thinking a > little > Spring Boot example for

Re: CVE-2020-8840 on TomEE 8.0.1

Hi, I think the explanation is here http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Why-jackson-and-jonhzon-shipped-with-latest-TomEE-td4689451.html Best, Richard Am Freitag, den 13.03.2020, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Alex The Rocker: > Hello, > > I fully agree with Mark's remark : why would TomEE ever

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.2

Hi Jon, I am getting a 404 - Repository "orgapachetomee-1167 (staging: open)" [id=orgapachetomee-1167] exists but is not exposed. Repository "orgapachetomee-1167 (staging: open)" [id=orgapachetomee- 1167] exists but is not exposed. for the Maven repo. Best, Richard Am Mittwoch, den

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.2

Hi, tested it with my (EAR) applications. Works fine: +1 Thanks, Jon! Best, Richard Am Mittwoch, den 13.05.2020, 15:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > > Here's a second attempt at releasing of TomEE 8.0.2. Please can you > take a > careful look, review, test and provide

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.2

Hi, tested it again with my (EAR) applications. Works fine: +1 Best, Richard Am Donnerstag, den 14.05.2020, 14:27 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > > Here's a third attempt at releasing of TomEE 8.0.2. Please can you > take a > careful look, review, test and provide feedback. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-4

+1 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.2

The release log is a bit strange: - update javaee-api to 8.0-3- SNAPSHOT (it actually includes 8.0-4) - johnzon / cxf upgrade is not contained However, tested it with my (EAR) applications. Works fine: +1 Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2020, 11:10 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.2

Thanks, Jon. Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2020, 13:16 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > I've (hopefully) fixed those issues in the release notes. If there's > tickets I've missed, please shout. > > Jon > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 1:10 PM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa..

Re: Your project's website

We did such migrations in our university a few years ago. I digged into our documentation, which provided a link to https://blokspeed.net/blog/2010/09/converting-from-subversion-to-git The required authors list can be found here https://infra.apache.org/svn-to-git-migration.html Hope this

Re: [VOTE] Move javaee-api to Git.

It seems, INFRA tells us, that it is a self-service with svn2git migration. Richard Am Mittwoch, den 20.05.2020, 10:55 -0700 schrieb David Blevins: > Here we go: > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20287 > > > > -David > > > > > > On May 19, 2020, at 8:10 PM, David Blevins > >

AW: TomEE 8.0.4 - Webprofile - Download Link broken?

like it was missed from the VOTE directory. We might need a vote to get that extra binary up. Do any other committers know what we might need to do here? Jon On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:22 AM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > Hi, > > did we miss the "web

Java Mail 1.4 in TomEE 8

Hi, Martin (Wiesner) and I were working on our SMTP server configuration. As a consequence, we found, that TomEE 8 includes a rather old version of javamail, which does not want to talkt to SMTP servers configured with modern TLS versions (1.2, 1.3). My questions are: Are there any reasons, why

Re: Java Mail 1.4 in TomEE 8

to bring Geronimo mail up to date, and it > looks > like we're potentially close. > > Jon > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, 13:34 Zowalla, Richard, < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Martin (Wiesner) and I were working on

Re: [VOTE] Missing artifact - TomEE 8.0.4

+1 Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2020, 09:58 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > > We're missing an artifact on our download page for TomEE 8.0.4 > Webprofile > (thanks Richard Zowalla for pointing this out). > > This is already in Maven: >

TomEE 8.0.4 - Webprofile - Download Link broken?

Hi, did we miss the "webprofile" TomEE 8.0.4 package in the latest release? The links on https://tomee.apache.org/download-ng.html target https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/tomee/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-8.0.4-webprofile.zip

Re: Follow-Up: ORB Dependencies and Java 11

Thanks for your insights & opinion, @David Jencks & David Blevins. It is very intersting from my point of view. I got this quote from the mailing list archive [1] by @dblevins > I know we don't support Corba itself, so we'd probably have to figure out> how we're tied to those classes and what to

Re: Follow-Up: ORB Dependencies and Java 11

give it a try. Never did something with ASM, but happy to dig into it :D Best,Richard Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2020, 11:23 -0700 schrieb David Blevins: > Hi Richard! > > On Jul 7, 2020, at 11:54 PM, Zowalla, Richard < > > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > &g

Follow-Up: ORB Dependencies and Java 11

Hi, I was digging around the GitHub Repo and noticed PR 664 [1], which tries to prepare TomEE to be build with JDK 11 but CORBA was removed in JDK 11. There was a disucssion 2 years ago about removing CORBA related access [2]. There even exist a JIRA (TOMEE-2324) for it [3]. If we want to

Re: Follow-Up: ORB Dependencies and Java 11

a & JCP Member > GitHub: https://github.com/Daniel-Dos > Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/danieldiasjava > Twitter: http://twitter.com/danieldiasjava > > > Em ter., 7 de jul. de 2020 às 05:48, Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> escreveu: > > &

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

Hi Jon, thanks for the explanation. The artifacts for 9.0.0-M2 seem to be missing in the Maven staging repository? Is this known/planned in this way? I just wanted to build our project (which works fine with 8.0.4) with the 9.0.0-M2 artifacts. Thanks, Richard Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020,

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

do this, butit comes unstuck where various libraries inspect > classes for annotations,and none of them actually *load* the class to > do that (so it doesn't gettranslated, and subsequently fails). > Unfortunately, the renaming meanswe'll all need to make changes to > our applications

Re: [VOTE] Release TomEE 8.0.4 and 9.0.0-M2

Hi, tested it with my (EAR) applications (primarily web services, JSF) on Linux with OpenJDK 11. +1 (8.0.4) Best, Richard Am Mittwoch, den 22.07.2020, 15:34 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and Apache > TomEE > 8.0.4. >

Re: CI job for tomee-7.0.x

Hi Cesar, i will give > The second failing test trowed a: [Fatal Error] :8:23: Invalid byte 2 > of2-byte UTF-8 sequence. error. >

Re: [TCK] JPA issue

lt; > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > Thanks Richard for the feedback. > > I created https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/issues/580 > > andupdated TomEE ticket for tracking--Jean-Louis Monteirohttp://tw > > itter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitrib

Re: Master build on CI

il-at-end clean install -Pall- > adapters > For OWASP: mvn -U --show-version --fail-at-end clean install -Powasp- > check > -DskipTests > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2

Re: Java 11, Corba Dependencies & Questions related to the build itself

e > and > great contribution for the future. > I would encourage you to also join the discussion on the Jakarta EE > 9.1 and > the Corba thing if you want. > > And of course, if you have some spare cycles, join the TCK fun ;-) > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro >

Re: Java 11, Corba Dependencies & Questions related to the build itself

or something and it can still wait some time, but the discussion would bring us some steps into the direction to build with jdk 11. Gruss Richard Z Am Samstag, den 28.11.2020, 10:48 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi all, > > I was yesterday working on TOMEE-2324 in order to prepare

Re: CI job for tomee-7.0.x

Just a friendly reminder. The PRs for this are still pending: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/720 https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/722 Am Dienstag, den 01.12.2020, 08:02 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi, > > forgot to send an eMail to the list. The related PRs are

Java 11, Corba Dependencies & Questions related to the build itself

Hi all, I was yesterday working on TOMEE-2324 in order to prepare the code base to be build with Java 11, which is currently impossible as CORBA- related dependencies were removed. We had a discussion on this on the mailing list a few months ago [1]. First, I went the road doing bytecode

Re: CI job for tomee-7.0.x

Hi, forgot to send an eMail to the list. The related PRs are available: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/720https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/722 BestRichard Z Am Freitag, den 27.11.2020, 13:09 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Will also check the third one :) - will create a related J

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.5 and 9.0.0-M3

+1 I only tested 8.0.5 (EAR, JSF, REST, ...) on Linux, each under OpenJDK 11 (latest). => no show stoppers found. Richard Z Am Dienstag, den 17.11.2020, 22:11 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE > 9.0.0-M3and Apache TomEE

Re: Master build on CI

Hi Jon, the module order shown on the start page does not necessarily reflect the build order. We are building TomEE Master from GitHub on our university Jenkins CI infrastructure as well. Afaik, the module order is hidden in the CI log files: CI University:

Re: Master build on CI

s for the pointers. Its too bad that > > Jenkins > > shows the modules in a weird order though. Things like that add to > > my > > frustration with it. > > > > Jon > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 9:06 AM Zowalla, Richard < > > richa

Re: [TCK] EJB 3.2 timers

Hi, I think it is a bit odd in this tck test case, that the creation of a timer with an end time before the start time should even be possible, but nevermind :) I do not quite understand the reason why this behaviour was chosen in the first place. I might miss something as I am not long enough

Re: Follow-Up: ORB Dependencies and Java 11

Hi all, I found some time creating the classes via ASM, see PR https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/713 Happy to retrieve feedback on it. Best Richard Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2020, 18:56 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi David, > > thanks for the in-depth explanation & opinio

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE javaee-api-8.0.5

+1 (and I like the "ladies" intro :)) Am Montag, den 19.10.2020, 22:30 +0200 schrieb Mark Struberg: > Hi ladies! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on Apache TomEE javaee-api-8.0.5. > > This mostly contains updates to newer bugfix releases of some spec > jars. Including an important hasCode glitch in

AW: Releases?

Hi, great idea - no objections from my side Gruss Richard Von: Jonathan Gallimore [jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 14:15 An: dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: Releases? Hi All, Any objections if I kick off a 8.0.6 release? I

Re: [TCK] EJB 3.2 timers

ink it should be a tested requirement in TCK. > > > > If using endTime before startTime is the only way to specify a > > > > timer > > > > never expires, something is wrong to me. > > > > > > > > I'll go ahead and see if I can adjust and at the same time

Re: TOMEE-2958 TOMEE-2959 Tomcat and jackson update

Yup, ActiveMQ has a compile dependency towards jackson. There was a discussion in 2019 [1] about it on the mailing list. [1] http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Why-jackson-and-jonhzon-shipped-with-latest-TomEE-td4689451.html Am Montag, den 18.01.2021, 22:43 + schrieb Jonathan

Re: TOMEE-2958 TOMEE-2959 Tomcat and jackson update

/AMQ/issues/AMQ-7072?filter=allopenissues Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2021, 12:08 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Yup, ActiveMQ has a compile dependency towards jackson. There was a > discussion in 2019 [1] about it on the mailing list. > > [1] > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.

Re: [TCK] Building the TCK?

with > > a > > README enhancement. > > Sure, go ahead. Thank you! > > El mié, 13 ene 2021 a las 10:15, Zowalla, Richard (< > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>) escribió: > > > Just a short update: The build using [1] went fine. It produced a > >

Re: [TCK] Building the TCK?

/twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:24 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > Hi Cesar, > > > > thanks for the fast response and the hint! > > > > Finally, I was able to

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: TomEE » master-owasp-check #20

Hi, i adjusted the jenkins config. Mails are now sent to comm...@tomee.apache.org Gruss Richard Am Freitag, den 15.01.2021, 09:35 -0800 schrieb David Blevins: > Can we get the Jenkins notifications sent to commits@tomee.a.o ? > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: TomEE » master-owasp-check #20

Seems, that I have missed the PR job. Have adjusted this job configuration too... Am Samstag, den 16.01.2021, 08:45 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi, > > i adjusted the jenkins config. > > Mails are now sent to comm...@tomee.apache.org > > Gruss > Richard > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.6

Hi, +1 from my side. I tested the 8.0.6 plus artifact with our fullstack EAR app. Thanks, John for your time / work in preparing this release artifact :) Gruss Richard Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2021, 16:05 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > > This is a first attempt at a vote for a

Re: [TCK] Building the TCK?

-8.0.2.zip [3] https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck/pull/12 Am Mittwoch, den 13.01.2021, 14:43 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi all, > > today, I had some time and tried to setup the TomEE-TCK on my machine > as I was curios on running the TCK locally. > > From previous m

[TCK] Building the TCK?

Hi all, today, I had some time and tried to setup the TomEE-TCK on my machine as I was curios on running the TCK locally. From previous mails, I identified the related repository on GitHub [1] and cloned it. The documentation states: 1. Download the TCK & Unzip it [2] 2. Set some env variables

Re: [ANN] Welcome new Apache TomEE Committer Richard Zowalla

Thanks to all of you for your kind words and for this opportunity! TomEE has a very welcoming community. My journey started in 2015 (with TomEE 1.7.x), when my colleague, Martin W., urged me (hehe, sorry for the wording :-P) to join the dev@tomee.apache.org list to monitor potential

Re: TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any thoughts?

27.01.2021, 17:25 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > Hi all, > > a few days ago, I had a (virtual) coffee discussion with my colleguae > Martin W. about moving some of our research projects towards pure > JUnit > 5. > > The missing thing: An openejb-junit module, which comes witho

TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any thoughts?

Hi all, a few days ago, I had a (virtual) coffee discussion with my colleguae Martin W. about moving some of our research projects towards pure JUnit 5. The missing thing: An openejb-junit module, which comes without a transient compile dependency towards junit4. Today, I had some time and

Re: TOMEE-2967 - Translate to Spanish: examples/xa-datasource/

I have assigned it to you. Thank you! Gruss Richard Am Donnerstag, den 28.01.2021, 23:13 -0300 schrieb Evaldo Junior: > I created the issue on the JIRA [1] to translate to spanish of the > document > examples/xa-datasource/. > Can some of the JIRA admins please assign the ticket to my >

AW: TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any thoughts?

org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest.org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest.org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest El lun, 1 feb 2021 a las 3:12, Zowalla, Richard (< richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>) escribió: > I went ahead with it and merged it. This shouldn't influence anything > on the master as it is just a new module. > > Howeve

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

pushing shortly some more changes. > > We'll see. But websocket issues should be fixed now. > > > > > > Le mer. 2 juin 2021 à 17:00, Zowalla, Richard < > > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit : > > > > > Thanks. Images are blocked on the list,

Re: How can I Help?

Hi Luis, welcome! The basic process is: 1.) Create fork of https://github.com/apache/tomee on GitHub 2.) Check the examples: https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/examples for untranslated ones (you can also look at translated ones to get an idea). 3.) Check

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:48 PM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > I pushed a workaround, so the failing test shouldn't be a problem > > anymore. > > > > _All_ tests are pass

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

to look at it > > > > I'm trying to get some TCK results > > > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:08 PM Zowalla, Richard < > >

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

... Am Freitag, den 11.06.2021, 07:13 + schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > It looks like, that we have only one failing test left, which is > unrelated to the actual TCK work: > > - ReloadableEntityManagerFactoryTest > > fails after the upgrade to OpenJPA 3.2.0 (TOMEE-375

AW: Converting "release-tools" from svn to git

Sounds good. Thanks! Von: David Blevins Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Mai 2021 00:50:26 An: dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: Converting "release-tools" from svn to git We have some tools to help with release tasks in svn here: -

Re: The wrong way to close PRs

We re-created some (newer) PRs, which were not older than January 2021, linked the related JIRA as well as the original PR to preserve discussions. Sadly, it was not possible to get GitHub to refresh a closed PR (even though the source branch was updated and a "new" PR works). I guess, we can

Re: Potential new home page

Hi, looks good :) I like the new clean download page with the information about runtime, certification, namespaces and EE level. I have some (really, really minor) comments related to the staging website and some questions regarding the workflow. ## Staging Website Comments: - Documentation

Re: Automatic website publishing

Great news :) - definitly an important improvement for website / doc contributions! Am Mittwoch, den 19.05.2021, 20:36 -0700 schrieb David Blevins: > Thanks, David and Cesar! > > The Jenkins part is working. My tests runs that pushed to `asf-site` > all worked and since the last email I've

TOMEE-3740 - The CompBean - What is it?

Hi all, I took a quick look at our failing openejb-core tests. Most of them seem to fail due to this change [1] (TOMEE-3740,[2]), in which we decided to always deploy the CompBean. AFAIK, we did this on purpose as the TCK expected the CompBean to be present in its test. Can someone explain me

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

Hi, thanks for the work! Hopefully, we are soon green again and can go for 8.0.8 Can you provide more information, which tests might not be relevant? Looks like, that it isn't possible to disable the johnzon provider via "org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.johnzon.TomEEJohnzonProvider.activate

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

the last one. > Trying to understand the async-servlet related issues. For the 2 last > cxf-rs, I'd need David's input > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:56 AM Zowalla, Richa

Re: Updated website content

May 22, 2021, at 11:08 AM, Zowalla, Richard < > > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > > (b) Remove the usage of Google Analytics according to [1] > > Sounds like there are a couple recommendations we could put in place > and still use Google Analyt

Re: Updated website content

ny content > overhauls. > > Richard, answering some of your questions here just so we're all > clear that the `new-front-page` branch isn't proposing content > changes aside form the front-page. > > > On May 20, 2021, at 1:00 AM, Zowalla, Richard < > > richard

Re: TomEE build work to make it stable

Zowalla, Richard: > Hi all, > > we managed to get the quick build to be "green" again. > > The full build had memory issues in tomee-cdi, didn't complete and > timed out after 8 hours. I increased the heap space for the related > module - the build is running now

Re: Problems with master branch in Windows 10

Hi, I can reproduce it on Windows with current master. Given the fact, that most devs probably use OSX or Linux (and the CI is Linux too), it seems to be plattform specific. Maybe the patch plugin cannot use paths in Windows properly? Gruss Richard Am Mittwoch, den 07.07.2021, 15:40 -0300

Re: Problems with master branch in Windows 10

omitribe.com > > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 9:34 AM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I can reproduce it on Windows with current master. Given the fact, > > that > > most devs probably use OSX

AW: Problems with master branch in Windows 10

; I am checking that problem on my machine. In few minutes I am going to > create a ticket and he assigned it to me. > > No problem, I see the bug. > > If you could create the ticket and assign it to me, I would appreciate it. > My user is lvsmix in Jira. > > El jue., 8 de jul

  1   2   3   4   >