[Test-Announce] 2017-01-09 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 26 Blocker Review

# F26 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2017-01-09 # Time: 17:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We currently have 4 proposed Alpha blockers, 1 proposed Beta blocker and 1 proposed Final blocker to review, so it seems like a good time to have the first Fedora 26

[Test-Announce] 2017-01-09 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2017-01-09 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's time for the first meeting of 2017 tomorrow! Let's check in on all our current work areas as we

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Golang 1.8

Brilliant! I was thinking about creating a proof of concept a posting it as a change myself. However, I'm really busy with other projects, so I might miss F26. Brad's suggestion made me happy, that's why I close the issue. Though, I would not name the flag 'abrt' but 'tracebackcrash' or

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

Matthew Miller wrote: > But if that's *all* we do, we're going to be a footnote in history. I don't buy this sort of alarmist bulldung that keeps being claimed with no evidence whatsoever to justify radical changes to what Fedora is all about, such as: * promoting proprietary drivers (making

[Bug 1410277] perl-Net-HTTP-6.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410277 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-HTTP-6.12-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1410162] perl-PDL-2.17.0-1.fc26 FTBFS: tests segfaut on 64-bit PowerPC

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410162 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PDL-2.16.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 789 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849 sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 432 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-edbea40516 mcollective-2.8.4-1.el5 404

[Bug 1410962] perl-TestML-0.53 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410962 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1238142 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1238142=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1410962] perl-TestML-0.53 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410962 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1410962] perl-TestML-0.53 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410962 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-TestML-0.52 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1410962] New: perl-TestML-0.53 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410962 Bug ID: 1410962 Summary: perl-TestML-0.53 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-TestML Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1410277] perl-Net-HTTP-6.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410277 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1410279] perl-RDF-Trine-1.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410279 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1410162] perl-PDL-2.17.0-1.fc26 FTBFS: tests segfaut on 64-bit PowerPC

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410162 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1410641] perl-XXX-0.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410641 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: Changing default "docker" storage to to Overlay2 in Fedora 26

Hi! Is there a local convention that discussion about containers is using top-posting? "Curious" --alec On 06/01/17 23:12, Vivek Goyal wrote: There is more conversation on this issue here. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/186 I wished there was a single thread of conversation on this

Re: Changing default "docker" storage to to Overlay2 in Fedora 26

There is more conversation on this issue here. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/186 I wished there was a single thread of conversation on this instead of separate conversation for per product variant. Thanks Vivek On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:05:49PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Upstream

Re: Changing default "docker" storage to to Overlay2 in Fedora 26

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DockerOverlay2 Thanks! Note, that you will need to send it for wrangler. > > > On 01/06/2017 02:27 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Shouldn't this be submitted as a change? > > This would

Re: Fedora Linux subsystem on Windows machine

Nice!! On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:47 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 6.1.2017 v 10:03 Martin Bříza napsal(a): > > On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 10:01:01 +0100, Vít Ondruch > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Dne 5.1.2017 v 20:11 M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a): > >>> >

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > This is a good point; we're already pretty much awful on this point, > > and let's not make it worse. (On the other hand, modularity has the > > potential to help significantly on this point, as you should't need > > detailed

Re: Changing default "docker" storage to to Overlay2 in Fedora 26

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DockerOverlay2 On 01/06/2017 02:27 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Shouldn't this be submitted as a change? > > This would bring much more visibility to users of Fedora and even outside. > > -Igor Gnatenko > > On Jan 6, 2017 8:13 PM, "Daniel J Walsh"

Re: Changing default "docker" storage to to Overlay2 in Fedora 26

Shouldn't this be submitted as a change? This would bring much more visibility to users of Fedora and even outside. -Igor Gnatenko On Jan 6, 2017 8:13 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" wrote: > Upstream docker is moving to overlay2 by default for its storage. We > plan on following

Re: Applications with AppData and not visible in the software center

On 6 January 2017 at 02:16, Ben Rosser wrote: > It turns out that I am very silly, and, when writing the appstream > file for tilp2, never changed "comical.desktop" in the template here > [1] to "tilp.desktop". > ...whoops! I can, uh, fix that. :) > However, interestingly,

Re: Changing default "docker" storage to to Overlay2 in Fedora 26

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:05:49PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Upstream docker is moving to overlay2 by default for its storage. We > plan on following suit. Their are some performance advantages of > overlay2 over devicemapper in memory sharing, which we would like to > take advantage of.

Changing default "docker" storage to to Overlay2 in Fedora 26

Upstream docker is moving to overlay2 by default for its storage. We plan on following suit. Their are some performance advantages of overlay2 over devicemapper in memory sharing, which we would like to take advantage of. We now have SELinux support for Overlay file systems, so the security

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On 01/06/2017 08:14 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: [snip] Much of what I would have said has been said by Oron (some of this I've said in earlier parts of this thread, as well). But the bigger thing is that it makes it much easier to bootstrap new architectures for Fedora, too, as we can start from

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

Matthew Miller wrote: > This is a good point; we're already pretty much awful on this point, > and let's not make it worse. (On the other hand, modularity has the > potential to help significantly on this point, as you should't need > detailed metadata about what's _inside_ a module at runtime in

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

Stephen Gallagher wrote: > As Bill pointed out, things "just work" for users right now and that's > something we'd like to avoid breaking. However, that does *not* mean that > it is trivial to do on the build side. We're currently building out an > entirely new infrastructure to support modules;

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

Oron Peled wrote: > * With old, non-multiarch scheme: >- Library packages compiled natively on ARM would be under /usr/lib. >- But they cannot be installed on the build machine, so I can > cross-compile applications against them. >- The workaround was to unpack them, relocate the

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

Neal Gompa wrote: > I'd be happier if we just moved 32-bit libraries into /usr/lib32. That > way /usr/lib can be only noarch libs (like noarch Python things, and > stuff). Noarch stuff should NOT be in /usr/lib to begin with! True noarch stuff should be in /usr/share. Arch-colored binaries

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On 06/01/17 13:33, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 01/06/2017 08:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:08:21PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: For anyone who isn't familiar with this topic, you might find Debian's documentation useful: https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch One could

ZoneMinder retired from Fedora, moving to RPM Fusion.

I have now retired zoneminder in master and fixed the depencency bug for F25. The zmrepo maintainer has joined Fedora and RPM Fusion and will be maintaining the package in RPM Fusion. Review requests and relevent bugs here: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393

Re: Packages seeking new point of contact

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > rpms/php-pear-OLE -- Package for reading and writing OLE containers ( > master f25 f24 el6 el5 ) > > > kevin > > ___ > devel mailing list --

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2017-01-06)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-01-06) === Meeting started by jwb at 16:00:18 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-01-06/fesco.2017-01-06-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Packages seeking new point of contact

Greetings. Per: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1657 there's a number of packages that are looking for a new maintainer now: rpms/blktap -- Blktap Userspace Tools + Library ( el6 ) rpms/ehcache-parent -- Ehcache Parent ( master f25 f24 ) rpms/ehcache-sizeof-agent -- Ehcache Size Of

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On Jan 6, 2017 5:16 PM, "Neal Gompa" wrote: On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Oron Peled wrote: > On Friday, 6 January 2017 03:51:42 IST Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> ... > >> * I do not see any practical advantage of Debian multiarch over FHS > >> multilib. > >

[Bug 1410774] perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-3.fc26 FTBFS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410774 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 119740 -- You

[Bug 1410774] perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-3.fc26 FTBFS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410774 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- It happens even if I disable GSL support in PDL that is problematic on PowerPC. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: 2017-01-05 @ 18:00 UTC - Outage for qadevel.cloud replacement (for real this time)

On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 18:07:10 -0700 Tim Flink wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:42:09 -0700 > Tim Flink wrote: > > > I realize this is a little last minute but persona has been > > completely shut down now (so auth is no longer possible) and the > > last issue

[Bug 1410774] perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-3.fc26 FTBFS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410774 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- This is the minimal reproducer: use PDL; use PDL::Config; use PDL::Graphics::PLplot; my $dev = 'xfig'; # Test shade plotting (low level interface) plsdev ($dev); plsfnam

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Oron Peled wrote: > On Friday, 6 January 2017 03:51:42 IST Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> ... > >> * I do not see any practical advantage of Debian multiarch over FHS > >> multilib. > > > > Good question, multiarch is a huge win for *embedded*

[Bug 1410774] perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-3.fc26 FTBFS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410774 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- It does not crash when running under gdb or when executed from vim. Maybe some kind of a race condition. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1410774] perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-3.fc26 FTBFS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410774 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- The t/plplot.t crashes when executing "3D color plot, low level interface" test when calling plshades() Perl subroutine: #0 pltr1 (x=19.590623970008657, y=1, tx=0x3fffe3c621e8,

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support

On 5 January 2017 at 19:29, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Japheth Cleaver > wrote: >> On 1/5/2017 9:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> >>> On 05/01/17 09:56 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: Teamviewer comes in an i686

Re: Best practices for getting CFLAGS/LDFLAGS etc.

On Friday, January 6, 2017 3:24:46 PM CET Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/06/2017 03:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Friday, January 6, 2017 3:02:22 PM CET Florian Weimer wrote: > >>> Wouldn't it suffice to put PYTHON= at the end? autotools' configure > >>> scripts accept such assignments (and

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On Friday, 6 January 2017 03:51:42 IST Kevin Kofler wrote: > ... > * I do not see any practical advantage of Debian multiarch over FHS > multilib. Good question, multiarch is a huge win for *embedded* developers. Let me give real life example from my $day job: * We build stuff for arm and

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20170106.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20170105.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20170106.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 89 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 53.09 MiB Size of dropped packages

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket 49055 - Refactor create_test.py

Hi team, please, review my new patch for ds. https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49055 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49055/0001-Ticket-49055-Refactor-create_test.py.patch Thanks, Simon signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-Socket-SSL (perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.043-1.fc26). "Update to 2.043 (..more)"

From 6a30f8ffc4824bb1233527a394d3003b4def97a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:34:50 + Subject: Update to 2.043 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - New upstream release 2.043 -

pghmcfc uploaded IO-Socket-SSL-2.043.tar.gz for perl-IO-Socket-SSL

91a49211c8aea107bdcfd886b276e3329f3e62fccce94c1700cd881d2282236b1f5714263dd4a9a3192c9f0bac0b73e11a0e19d18949855252994ed400462886 IO-Socket-SSL-2.043.tar.gz

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-Socket-SSL (master). "Update to 2.043 (..more)"

From 6a30f8ffc4824bb1233527a394d3003b4def97a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:34:50 + Subject: Update to 2.043 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - New upstream release 2.043 -

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl requires libuno_cppu.so.3 perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl requires libuno_cppu.so.3(LIBO_UDK_4.4) perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On armhfp: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires

Re: Best practices for getting CFLAGS/LDFLAGS etc.

On 01/06/2017 03:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Friday, January 6, 2017 3:02:22 PM CET Florian Weimer wrote: Wouldn't it suffice to put PYTHON= at the end? autotools' configure scripts accept such assignments (and even remember them in config.status etc). Indeed, this looks like a reasonable

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core

Re: Best practices for getting CFLAGS/LDFLAGS etc.

On Friday, January 6, 2017 3:02:22 PM CET Florian Weimer wrote: > > Wouldn't it suffice to put PYTHON= at the end? autotools' configure > > scripts accept such assignments (and even remember them in > > config.status etc). > > Indeed, this looks like a reasonable solution. Is %configure only for

Re: Best practices for getting CFLAGS/LDFLAGS etc.

On 01/06/2017 01:59 PM, Thomas Moschny wrote: 2017-01-05 14:01 GMT+01:00 Florian Weimer : On 01/05/2017 11:58 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 00:58:00 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: It would also be nice if: PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3 %configure didn't

stevetraylen changed xavierb's 'commit' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (el6) to 'Approved'

stevetraylen changed xavierb's 'commit' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (el6) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

stevetraylen changed xavierb's 'commit' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (master) to 'Approved'

stevetraylen changed xavierb's 'commit' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

stevetraylen changed xavierb's 'commit' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (epel7) to 'Approved'

stevetraylen changed xavierb's 'commit' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (epel7) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

stevetraylen changed xavierb's 'commit' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (f25) to 'Approved'

stevetraylen changed xavierb's 'commit' permission on perl-Crypt-SMIME (f25) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-SMIME/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:45:15PM +0100, drago01 wrote: > because out of sync repositories. + Minor annoyances like additional > (duplicated) meta data that you have to deal with (bandwidth, time to > install packages / updates). This is a good point; we're already pretty much awful on this

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On 01/06/2017 08:45 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 01/06/2017 08:07 AM, drago01 wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher >>> wrote: On 01/06/2017 01:08 AM, drago01 wrote:

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 01/06/2017 08:07 AM, drago01 wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher >> wrote: >>> On 01/06/2017 01:08 AM, drago01 wrote: Two suggestions were raised as

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On 01/06/2017 08:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:08:21PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: >> On 01/05/2017 02:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> [snip] >>> == multi-arch layout == >>> * Moving the locations of all of the system libraries would potentially >>> still >>> break

Re: Debugging random suspend?

On 01/04/2017 06:55 AM, John Reiser wrote: > One of the causes of Suspend is the hardware generating the signal for > "the laptop lid has been closed." Look at the boot messages ("dmesg" > or "journalctl -b") for info on the power switch, the lid switch, etc. > Or low battery level. If the

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On 01/06/2017 08:07 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 01/06/2017 01:08 AM, drago01 wrote: >>> >>> Two suggestions were raised as alternatives to the container approach: >>> >>> * Switch to using the Debian style of

Re: Build of asgp failed since update to libclaw-1.7.4-16.fc25

don't know if this output is importend ? [root@fc25 tmp]# claw-config --libs -L/usr/lib64/ [root@fc25 tmp]# claw-config application --libs -L/usr/lib64/ -lclaw_application -lclaw_logger [root@fc25 tmp]# claw-config dynamic_library --libs -L/usr/lib64/ -lclaw_dynamic_library -ldl [root@fc25

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 01/06/2017 01:08 AM, drago01 wrote: >> >> Two suggestions were raised as alternatives to the container approach: >> >> * Switch to using the Debian style of multi-arch layout, which instead of >>

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support

On 01/06/2017 07:33 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 05/01/17 14:42 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: >> On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 17:02 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> Which definitely changes how software is built. >> >> Containers also change the way software must be written in some cases, >> since they

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:08:21PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: >> On 01/05/2017 02:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> [snip] >> > == multi-arch layout == >> > * Moving the locations of all of the system libraries would

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:08:21PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 01/05/2017 02:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > [snip] > > == multi-arch layout == > > * Moving the locations of all of the system libraries would potentially > > still > > break third-party applications that were compiled to

Re: Best practices for getting CFLAGS/LDFLAGS etc.

2017-01-05 14:01 GMT+01:00 Florian Weimer : > On 01/05/2017 11:58 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >> On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 00:58:00 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >>> It would also be nice if: >>> >>> PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3 %configure >>> >>> didn't (silently) do the wrong

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On 01/06/2017 01:08 AM, drago01 wrote: > > Two suggestions were raised as alternatives to the container approach: > > * Switch to using the Debian style of multi-arch layout, which instead of > /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 uses /usr/lib/$ARCH-linux-gnu. Benefits to this > would >

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

On 01/05/2017 10:35 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said: >> The main reason for this is trying to simplify the module-building process. >> We >> really don't want to attempt to build both arches within the same buildroot >> for >> most of the reasons we've

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support

- Original Message - > On 05/01/17 14:42 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: > >On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 17:02 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> Which definitely changes how software is built. > > > >Containers also change the way software must be written in some cases, > >since they expect there

[Bug 1410774] New: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-3.fc26 FTBFS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410774 Bug ID: 1410774 Summary: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-3.fc26 FTBFS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support

On 05/01/17 14:42 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 17:02 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Which definitely changes how software is built. Containers also change the way software must be written in some cases, since they expect there to be one main process and don't expect that

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mouse (perl-Mouse-2.4.6-1.fc26). "Update to 2.4.6 (..more)"

From cbbd5570812fde303db0131813f04f92f8450ecb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:31:36 + Subject: Update to 2.4.6 - New upstream release 2.4.6 - Fix test for older Perls (GH#68) - Define macros for older Visual Studio compiler (GH#66)

[Bug 1410723] perl-Mouse-2.4.6 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410723 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mouse (master). "Update to 2.4.6 (..more)"

From cbbd5570812fde303db0131813f04f92f8450ecb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:31:36 + Subject: Update to 2.4.6 - New upstream release 2.4.6 - Fix test for older Perls (GH#68) - Define macros for older Visual Studio compiler (GH#66)

pghmcfc uploaded Mouse-v2.4.6.tar.gz for perl-Mouse

3427891a5249f701768342e97af4db6c6b2c1fd186f5286f13a585647581e7d3d27bd13507db00153d5446d278ada3f7bbcbeae862dc304f6094b5358c75e96f Mouse-v2.4.6.tar.gz

Re: Build of asgp failed since update to libclaw-1.7.4-16.fc25

On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 09:07:55 -, Martin Gansser wrote: > See koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17175933 > > An update of libclaw had to be done because of a problem with mock, see >

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-Module-Install-DOAPChangeSets

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-Module-Install-DOAPChangeSets https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Install-DOAPChangeSets/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

ppisar pushed to perl (master). "Remove bundled Math-BigRat"

From 9338edd12693f7f8f9e4f4fcb96cce23a72d2710 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:27:13 +0100 Subject: Remove bundled Math-BigRat --- perl.spec | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

ppisar pushed to perl (master). "Remove bundled bignum"

From 98fe061fe3378d1ef708824df7846dbe4a5b7a06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:36:37 +0100 Subject: Remove bundled bignum --- perl.spec | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git

ppisar pushed to perl (master). "Remove bundled Math-BigInt-FastCalc"

From 260c5ba45cd2b048ce00aeb2bfe0fd40257a3c13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:15:16 +0100 Subject: Remove bundled Math-BigInt-FastCalc --- perl.spec | 12 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Re: Fedora Linux subsystem on Windows machine

Dne 6.1.2017 v 10:03 Martin Bříza napsal(a): > On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 10:01:01 +0100, Vít Ondruch > wrote: > >> >> >> Dne 5.1.2017 v 20:11 M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a): >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> And speaking of Wine, how come the Windows 10 Linux subsystem only >>> runs Ubuntu?

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-bignum (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-bignum (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-bignum/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-bignum (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-bignum (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-bignum/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-bignum (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-bignum (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-bignum/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-bignum (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-bignum (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-bignum/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

ppisar pushed to perl-Math-BigRat (master). "Correct a typo in a comment"

From 73e5c9e78708fb2c74a6600a013796f9798e1571 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:21:37 +0100 Subject: Correct a typo in a comment --- perl-Math-BigRat.spec | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Math-BigRat (master). "Import"

From 3ec52e43e9f010178aae0ee31aef2d3d019ef24c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:20:25 +0100 Subject: Import --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Math-BigRat.spec | 64

ppisar uploaded Math-BigRat-0.2611.tar.gz for perl-Math-BigRat

11e9b3dabeb196db835d58fec10fdb9d5d2c3a0498377d25645cdab1720682933aecbe516579cbfc0acee28bfcb930a3f7468af979987d9c3d6984dfa8f1584a Math-BigRat-0.2611.tar.gz

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Math-BigRat (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Math-BigRat (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Math-BigRat/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Math-BigRat (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Math-BigRat (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Math-BigRat/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

  1   2   >