Hey,
can we please get this fixed?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1606827
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/m2crypto/pull-request/2
Neal Gompa volunteered to maintain the package.
I've already tried to contact mitr privately a week ago, but no response.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone:
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bd4638e5a3
libmediainfo-18.12-3.el6
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-009f5f140b
php-horde-horde-5.2.21-1.el6
12
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/05/06/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.2-20190505git8046842.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sunday, May 5, 2019 3:43:02 PM EDT stan via devel wrote:
> On Sun, 5 May 2019 14:19:59 +0200
> Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > Hello, qrsBRWN.
> >
> > Sun, 05 May 2019 10:57:06 +0200 you wrote:
> >
> > > Exactly what platform did you have in mind?
> >
> > Discourse[1] for example. GTK
Awhile back, I mentioned that GCL was building in mock on my local
machine, but was segfaulting on the koji builders. By dint of much
experimentation, I now know what is going on. For the enlightenment
of anybody who cares:
- GCL is linked with libtirpc.
- libtirpc is linked with libselinux.
-
Chris Murphy writes:
In that case I expect that the rescue kernel+initramfs feature first
appeared in dracut in Fedora 19, so that's the first time it would
have noticed the pair are missing, and it would have created them at
that time. But that's just a guess.
This seems to be it. Two of my
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 5:08 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Chris Murphy writes:
>
> > If you see the rescue kernel+initramfs menu entry though, you do not
> > have the bug under discussion, and you don't need to run
> > 'grub2-install' - your GRUB is by definition functioning fine if you
> > see
Chris Murphy writes:
If you see the rescue kernel+initramfs menu entry though, you do not
have the bug under discussion, and you don't need to run
'grub2-install' - your GRUB is by definition functioning fine if you
see this menu entry.
I just inventoried my bricks. One, which has not been
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 8:22 AM Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> I just upgraded my machine from F29 to F30. Now, whenever I install a new
> kernel, the new kernel does not automatically become the default. In other
> words, when I reboot, the previous kernel is still chosen by grub2.
>
> I can
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 10:45 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Steve Grubb writes:
>
> > Rescue mode? I couldn't find it. All references I could find to a rescue
> > mode
> > date back to 2013 or later. I would have liked a rescue mode because makes
> > it
> > easy to just chroot into your actual
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 10:33 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> I am thinking that something could have been put into dnf system-upgrade
Impractical. That is a code change, it would need buy off from dnf
folks, it would need translations (probably), it would need a freeze
exception, it does not address
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 9:40 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Baring that, just having a reinstall bootloader option in rescue mode would
> go a long way to make this all less a PITA. Fedora has been doing
> incompatible bootloader changes every few years for as long as I remember
GRUB 2 does not
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 5:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 01:35:32PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > The reason why this bug exists in my opinion is because we're being
> > too accommodating to the technical users who want linux multiboot, and
> > want Fedora to
On Sun, 05 May 2019 12:45:00 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> It's been sitting in the grub menu ever since.
>
> I have a /boot/vmlinuz-0-rescue-f0fe67c2a80d43d2947358968ab5277e with
> a 2013 timestamp. No idea which kernel it is. It appears to be immune
> to installonly_limit.
From an old
On Sun, 5 May 2019 14:19:59 +0200
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Hello, qrsBRWN.
>
> Sun, 05 May 2019 10:57:06 +0200 you wrote:
>
> > Exactly what platform did you have in mind?
>
> Discourse[1] for example. GTK developers already testing it[2] as
> mailing lists replacement.
>
> 1:
On 5/5/19 2:04 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 10:22 AM Steven A. Falco wrote:
>>
>> I just upgraded my machine from F29 to F30. Now, whenever I install a new
>> kernel, the new kernel does not automatically become the default. In other
>> words, when I reboot, the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520948
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emman...@seyman.fr
External Bug
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 10:22 AM Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> I just upgraded my machine from F29 to F30. Now, whenever I install a new
> kernel, the new kernel does not automatically become the default. In other
> words, when I reboot, the previous kernel is still chosen by grub2.
>
> I can
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 7:49 AM Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>
> On 5/4/19 10:50 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > One of my bricks that will soon get Fedora 30 was originally installed
> with Fedora Core 4.
> >
> > Obviously a minority; but you'll be surprised to learn how many systems
> there are
Steve Grubb writes:
Rescue mode? I couldn't find it. All references I could find to a rescue mode
date back to 2013 or later. I would have liked a rescue mode because makes it
easy to just chroot into your actual system from the livecd. Seems like we've
lost something nice if its really been
On Sunday, May 5, 2019 11:39:50 AM EDT Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> It would be nice to have a robust upgradeable bootloader setup. I'm pretty
> sure that ranks before having a pretty flicker-free boot to Fedora users.
> Pretty boot has been a workstation priority for how many releases now?
It would be nice to have a robust upgradeable bootloader setup. I'm pretty sure
that ranks before having a pretty flicker-free boot to Fedora users. Pretty
boot has been a workstation priority for how many releases now?
Baring that, just having a reinstall bootloader option in rescue mode would
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:36 PM Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> patool FTBFS depends on Archmage, which is Python 2 only.
> I'm trying to convert it to Python 3.
>
> So far I have the dependency pychm converted:
>
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/146 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 396417
I just upgraded my machine from F29 to F30. Now, whenever I install a new
kernel, the new kernel does not automatically become the default. In other
words, when I reboot, the previous kernel is still chosen by grub2.
I can manually choose the new kernel in the grub2 menu, at which point it
On 5/4/19 11:04 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
That's why it's time to deprecate all mailing lists and switch to modern
Web 2.0 platforms.
I swear I've intended this as a joke, before reading replies
and realizing it was supposed to be serious.
Regards.
--
Roberto Ragusamail at
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190504.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190505.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 53
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 426.45 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hello, qrsBRWN.
Sun, 05 May 2019 10:57:06 +0200 you wrote:
> Exactly what platform did you have in mind?
Discourse[1] for example. GTK developers already testing it[2] as
mailing lists replacement.
1: https://github.com/discourse/discourse
2:
On 5/4/19 10:50 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> One of my bricks that will soon get Fedora 30 was originally installed with
Fedora Core 4.
>
> Obviously a minority; but you'll be surprised to learn how many systems there
are which have been running Fedora for a very long time. Fedora 20 is what,
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 31 Rawhide 20190505.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 01:35:32PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 12:31 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >
> > Chris Murphy writes:
> >
> > > Actually, that's a problem too. The stale bootloader problem goes back
> > > to an era where it was possible to install the bootloader into
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706016
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705273
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On May 4, 2019 11:04:51 PM GMT+02:00, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>Hello, Stephen J. Turnbull.
>
>Sun, 5 May 2019 05:58:48 +0900 you wrote:
>
>> As a Mailman developer, I
>> will strongly oppose turning on user choice by default because my
>> constituents are list owners, not subscribers.
34 matches
Mail list logo
