I'm going to sign up to be a co-maintainer for rubygem-rhc, and
rubygem-json-pure (a new dependancy for rhc).
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 11/30/2011 07:07 PM, seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:25:25 -0600
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I've been creating rpm packages for Fermi Linux for over 10 years, and
Scientific Linux 8 years, but I never had time to do anything for
Fedora and EPEL. Now that I'm
on bringing it into Fedora 16, Fedora 17,
EPEL6 and EPEL5?
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
It is currently going through the normal channels for rawhide and Fedora 18.
10gen has a very good track record for being backwards compatible.
According to their documentation When upgrading
On 10/09/2012 06:23 AM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Dan Horák wrote:
Troy Dawson píše v Po 08. 10. 2012 v 14:48 -0500:
On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
It is currently going through the normal channels for rawhide and
Fedora 18
On 10/09/2012 09:51 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 10/08/2012 09:48 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
It is currently going through the normal channels for rawhide and Fedora 18.
10gen has a very good
On 10/09/2012 10:18 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
On 10/09/2012 09:51 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 10/08/2012 09:48 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
It is currently going through the normal channels
' is ambiguous?
Thanks
Troy Dawson
[1] http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1540/5951540/build.log
[2] http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1545/5951545/build.log
[3] http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2733/5952733/build.log
[4] http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks
On 09/18/2013 06:45 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:29:19PM -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
What is a good way to track down a solution to error: reference to
'uint32_t' is ambiguous?
Sorry for the multiple mails but after looking at the source I think I
see the actual problem. So
On 05/09/2012 03:07 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
I know I've said this before, but: we should break the CD size
barrier
precisely so people can't burn things to CDs. If you must burn to
optical media, do yourself a favor and burn a DVD, the reduced seek
time
is entirely worth it.
I'd like
me know.
Thanks
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 02/08/2013 11:54 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
A couple of months back I asked about updating MongoDB from 2.0.7 to
2.2.0 in EPEL6 and Fedora 17.
Although it is backwards compatible, there were several bugs brought up
that people wanted fixed in Mongodb 2.2.x before we moved
Hi Jaroslav,
I had updated our page to say that we were 95% complete, and I thought
we were. But our first tests found a major cgroups bug, that has been
fixed in our latest release, that just was finished yesterday.
In short, yes, we are complete, but there is going to be a major update
of
, and so forth. At the third
level of dependencies, I figured there had to be a more official way.
If I missed a Fedora web page on it, or it was in the recent hardening
discussion, feel free to point me to it.
Thanks
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 06/06/2013 03:36 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi,
Is there an official Fedora way for telling is something is hardened
correctly?
I'm working on hardening mongodb, and I think I have it right, but I'd
really like to check.
I was given a couple of scripts, which had dependencies not in Fedora
On 07/15/2013 04:26 PM, Jonathan Masters wrote:
On Jul 15, 2013, at 5:11, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/15/2013 10:44 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: No Default Syslog =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog
Change owner(s): Lennart
.
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
?
--- Is there an easy to find option to turn them off/on?
Thanks
Troy Dawson
[1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074600
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 06/27/2014 09:17 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
The fact that Fedora practically forces people to use delta rpm's has
rattled my cage for quite a while.
[Snipped]
--- Does it force you to do them like yum does
On 06/27/2014 10:45 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
It is a hidden default that is not in any man page or documentation.
Yes, I used a poor choice of words.
man yum.conf
deltarpm
When non-zero, delta
rubygem-openshift-origin-dns-bind
rubygem-openshift-origin-dns-nsupdate
rubygem-openshift-origin-msg-broker-mcollective
rubygem-openshift-origin-node
I will also go through and make sure any pending review requests are
closed as well.
Please let me know if there are any questions.
Thanks
Troy Dawson
Hi,
I will be taking ownership of html2text on EPEL6.
I am already the maintainer for EPEL7, but I missed the notification
that the EPEL6 version was being orphaned because of filters.
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On 01/09/2015 02:41 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi,
I will be taking ownership of html2text on EPEL6.
I am already the maintainer for EPEL7, but I missed the notification
that the EPEL6 version was being orphaned because of filters.
Troy Dawson
Hi All,
This has turned out to be much more
On 02/25/2015 10:23 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 25.2.2015 v 17:18 Troy Dawson napsal(a):
On 01/09/2015 02:41 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi,
I will be taking ownership of html2text on EPEL6.
I am already the maintainer for EPEL7, but I missed the notification
that the EPEL6 version was being
and then make one tweek [2] to the spec file
to get it to build on RHEL7.
I have uploaded my built packages incase others want to try them on
rhel7. [1]
One feature that I think would be nice, would be to make it easy to
find, setup and connect to localhost connections.
Keep up the good work.
Troy Dawson
Hello,
Python3 will be in the next major RHEL release. I don't mean RHEL
7.6, but with numbers higher than 7.
There are many, many packages with something like the following
if 0%{?fedora}
%define with_python3 1
%endif
If you have something like that, please change it to something like
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Panu Matilainen <pmati...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/12/2018 06:08 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-01-11 01:02 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Python3 will be in the next major RHEL release. I
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:40 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 16.08.2019 6:22, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I assume this is because LibRaw is available in RHEL but only for x86_64
> > and ppc64le?
>
> The same as Pidgin and lots of other apps/libs. You need to add
> "ExclusiveArch: x86_64
in container needs to add a user, then
systemd is pulled in and that container grows by up to 60M.[2]
Minimizing containers, both in the short term and long term, are
important to the minimization team. We have opened an issue for
this.[3]
Any ideas on what we recommend to users?
Troy Dawson
[1
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:34 AM Daniel Walsh wrote:
>
> On 9/17/19 8:04 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019, at 12:45 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >> systemd-sysusers seeks to unify user creation[1]. It also has the
> >> benefit of
oing EPEL stuff), but I feel it would fit in
with my RHEL9 and Fedora IoT efforts. Plus, I'm always trying to get
installs and systems as small as possible.
Troy Dawson
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:44 AM Pablo Sebastián Greco
wrote:
>
>
> El 7/8/19 a las 12:30, Stephen John Smoogen escribió:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 10:52, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all.
>>
>> While building my Fedora packages for EPEL8, got a very strange error on
>>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 6:56 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 06:38:45AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 6:11 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 03:01:25PM +0200, Remi Collet
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 6:11 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 03:01:25PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> > Le 26/09/2019 à 11:36, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
> > > Here is what the vision we came to and that we would like to discuss:
> > >
> > > ○ Every changes to dist-git is
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:48 AM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Pierre-Yves Chibon writes:
>
> > Here is what the vision we came to and that we would like to discuss:
> >
> > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests
> > ○ Pull-requests are automatically tested
> > ○ Every commit to
All of the ones I've requested, I waited a few days to see if the
maintainer would pick it up. And after that I asked if they would
mind if I maintained it in EPEL8. About half of those the maintainer
was fine with me maintaining the package in EPEL8.
So, to answer your question, yes you can.
laps with the Fedora Minimization efforts.[6]
Square 1 hopes to utilize, rather than duplicate, their efforts. And
maybe some tools created for Square 1 can help the minimization
efforts.
Thoughts?
Ideas?
Comments?
Troy Dawson
[1] - Square 1 is at the heart of Ring Zero
[2] - This has nothing to
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:58 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 8:00 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> > I would like to introduce a plan I call Square 1 [1][2]
> >
> > There are two goals to Square 1.
> > The first is to get, and keep, the c
ub.com/fedora-modularity/depchase?
> That basically does what you are doing and with some small changes it
> can perform much more things.
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 3:27 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:58 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> > >
>
giflib-devel is a sub-package of giflib.
It is already in RHEL8 and Centos8, just not in the BaseOS or AppStream repo's.
For CentOS 8 it is in the PowerTools repo
dnf config-manager --enable PowerTools
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 1:29 PM Mateo wrote:
>
> Hi EPEL developers.
>
> I am using Centos
tment it deserve for the next 6 to 9 months. With EPEL-8 still
> ramping up and the various opportunities with modularity, I do
> not think it is a fair that EPEL suffers from this lack of time.
>
> As such, I would like to step down as chair/member of the steering
> committee and no
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:22 AM Leon Fauster wrote:
>
> Am 17.04.20 um 17:00 schrieb Troy Dawson:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 7:07 AM Leon Fauster
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I am unsure if this is something for RHEL8 or EPEL8:
> >>
> >> The
On a RHEL8 machine, doing a
dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-lockfile
dnf repoquery --whatrequires python2-lockfile
Shows that the following depend on it
duplicity
python3-fedora
pungi-legacy
I haven't checked EPEL7 yet.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:46 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 6:15 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 13:09 +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova a écrit :
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:48 PM Miro Hrončok
> > wrote:
> > As I mentioned in the previous mail, branching goes against the
> > purpose of the effort.
>
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:52 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 06:11:28PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 29 March 2020 at 15:59, Mattia Verga wrote:
> > > Is there a way to get the package list and their version available in
> > > RHEL8? For
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 10:49 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/1/20 1:10 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >> Generally speaking (I can make this a separate thread if that helps) - do
> >> we
> >> expect every package
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 12:10 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Michel Alexandre Salim writes:
>
> > * Have an expedited flow where this SIG can request EPEL branches and
> > admin access to packages if there are no response from package
> > maintainers for a set period (3 days? 1 week?)
> > *
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:07:24PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I've noticed at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.9 that the latest
> > ELN release of python3.9 is behind Fedora.
> >
> > I've assumed the build has
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:19 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:07:24PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > I've noticed at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rp
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:32 AM Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 8/3/2020 9:42 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:32 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:15 PM Richard Hughes
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Most of
python-nnpy
mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-node
mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-python
Outside of themselves, there is nothing that depends on these packages.
Troy Dawson
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel
on them.
Troy Dawson
[1] - https://github.com/mozilla-iot/gateway/releases
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:52 AM James Cassell
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > For Nodejs, Fedora should only package:
> > * The interpreter, development
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == How To Test ==
> >
> > * Install all nodejs libraries in Fedora 33. Try to update to Fedora 34.
>
> What is the plan wrt Obsoletes of the removed packages?
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
We do not
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:42 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 9:56 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>> == How To Test ==
> >>>
> >&g
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> >
> > ...
> > * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
> Should there be an update of:
>
>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 2:07 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 10 December 2020 at 00:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> > >
> > > ...
> > > * Policies and
nage project-level installations (NPM, yarn, etc.).
> > * Packages that provide binaries that users would want to use in their
> > shell.
> > * compiled/binary nodejs modules (for now)
> >
> > == Owner ==
> >
> > * Name: [[User:tdawson| Troy Dawson]]
>
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:19 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> > >
> > > ...
>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 9:32 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:18 AM Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this does not seem to be self-contained, since it seems to affect people
> > outside the SIG (it states that this is also affec
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:45 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Scope ==
> > * Proposal owners:
> > We will go through the Fedora release and determine what nodejs
> > packages Fedora should package. We will implement nodejs library
> > bundling on those we
The following "applications" source rpm's start with nodejs, and have
a binary in /usr/bin/ They have either had their dependencies
bundled, or did not have any nodejs library dependencies.
nodejs-buble nodejs-linefix nodejs-nodemon
nodejs-replace-require-self nodejs-shelljs
I wrote the following script a while ago to check on the ELN
composes.[1][2] It's not fancy, and the webpage it outputs isn't fancy,[3]
but it works. It's a good starting point for checking ELN Composes.
I thought I'd share it before the ELN meeting tomorrow so people would have
a chance to
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 2:00 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 02:30:42PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
> > I have started the process to update userspace-rcu to 0.13 in rawhide
> which
> > implies a soname bump to 8.
> >
> > From what I understand, the following packages
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:21 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
> rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedback to help identify potential issues
> with this proposed
First, it looks like the ELN composes have been broken for a while.
It's failing on "Cant locate template for uri 'runtime-install.tmpl'"[1]
but lorax-templates-generic is installed.[2]
I'm at a loss on this one.
Second, I thought we were shifting ELN Composes to just be once a day. It
looks
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
> > that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
> > in Fedora and not
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:25 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> I'm sending this out now so I don't have to say all this in this
> week's ELN meeting.
>
> Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
> that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that ar
I'm sending this out now so I don't have to say all this in this
week's ELN meeting.
Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
in Fedora and not ELN.
Solution: Create ELN Extra for those extra
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:49 AM Davide Cavalca via devel
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit
> > agenda topics by replying to this email. Currently the agenda
>
> One thing I'd be interested
This might not warrant a meeting, but it's something that just came up.
ELN-Extra
I never went beyond the Content Resolver initial setup, because there
weren't any real requests.
But now I am getting one.
Will the new ELN build implementation be able to do ELN Extra?
It would need to pull from the
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 12:20 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> I am the maintainer of rubygem-liquid package in Fedora. Every now and
> then is receive notification that this package has been built and
> updated for eln, for example [1,2].
>
> I have been trying to understand why this package is
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 8:23 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 6:42 AM Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 12:26 AM Benson Muite
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If there is a build failure for a package on ELN, does anyt
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 6:42 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 12:26 AM Benson Muite
> wrote:
>
>> If there is a build failure for a package on ELN, does anything need to
>> be added to a package spec file? Currently
>
>
> It varies wildly from package to package.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 10:05 AM Sergey Mende wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 8:23 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> > What package(s) are you having problems with?
> Troy,
>
> the package in question is libClipper2 [0] that undergoes the review
> presently. It is not go-related
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:42 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> == Open Questions ==
> 1) For the "canary" Fedora ELN rebuild, we have two choices on how to
> select the git hash to be built for each package in the ELN list:
>
> Approach 1 (Rawhide-style):
> 1. Clone each package
> 2. Check for the
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:01 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 24. 01. 24 v 10:51 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
> >
> > All other milestones remain the same at this time and the published
> schedule[4] has been updated to reflect these changes.
>
>
Troy Dawson
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
On 09/22/2013 07:27 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Hello,
I have got the following notification message from the buildsystem.
Because I'm wondering about this message, I would ask, which action is
required to avoid this message.
Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt
- Forwarded message from
Hello,
I only had positive tests from everyone, so I have marked
mongodb-2.4.6-1.el6 as stable.
It usually takes a few days for it to make it into the repo and pushed
out to the mirrors. So expect it within a week.
Thank You
Troy Dawson
On 09/23/2013 03:49 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello
Hi,
I'm going through the lists of EPEL7 packages that are not able to be
installed on RHEL 7.6, and opening bugzilla's for them. I am keeping
track of all those bugs with a tracker bug.[1]
My apologies to the epel-release maintainers for using their package
for the tracker.
I've only created 6
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm going through the lists of EPEL7 packages that are not able to be
> installed on RHEL 7.6, and opening bugzilla's for them. I am keeping
> track of all those bugs with a tracker bug.[1]
> My apologies t
bug.cgi?id=1647581
- No Comment
xfce4-vala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647569
- Rebuilt - On QA
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:35 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm going through the lists o
There are a set of packages in EPEL7 that have been obsoleted by other
packages (mostly) in EPEL7. Many have been obsoleted for several
years. I would like permission to remove these obsoleted packages,
similar in the way that I cleaned up many of the failed to install
packages.
I will open a
My apologies for delaying my work on this.
Priorities got shifted so I'm starting this work today.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:50 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 13:00, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> > Here are the list of packages with bad dependenc
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:00 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 11/17/18 4:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> > I'm afraid I'm still very unfamiliar with modules, but it does seem like
> > this will be very central to how we deliver packages to EPEL-8. My
> > initial questions are:
>
> Yeah, I don't
Yes.
There are several of us that are KDE users (Well, I am, and I assume
there are others).
It will probably be a case of figuring out who is the maintainer or if
we do it as a group.
There are a few of us who have rebuilt it already for RHEL8 Beta. As
far as I know, I am the only one who is
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 9:56 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> The epel7 python rebuild has finished. All of the resulting packages
> are now in Bohdi updates.
> They will remain in updates until at least April 2.
> They have not made it into epel-testing yet.
> Due to a Bohdi bug [1
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 8:19 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 3/9/19 7:16 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 9:47 AM Benjamin Pereto
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I saw that you rebuilt borgbackup (
> >> ht
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 8:16 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 3/9/19 7:15 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Hello,
> > There are a few questions I have, and since I'm not positive who all
> > of the correct people ask are, I'm sending to the epel-devel list.
> >
> > Bef
The epel7 python rebuild has finished. All of the resulting packages
are now in Bohdi updates.
They will remain in updates until at least April 2.
They have not made it into epel-testing yet.
Due to a Bohdi bug [1], we had to break up the updates. So we now
have 6 updates, that we will treat as
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:42 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 11. 03. 19 15:54, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 8:16 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/9/19 7:15 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> There are a fe
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 9:47 AM Benjamin Pereto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I saw that you rebuilt borgbackup (
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/borgbackup) for python3.6.
>
> thanks for that!
>
> Now I wanted to build a new package with the new upstream release and ran in
> some issues to deploy.
Hello,
There are a few questions I have, and since I'm not positive who all
of the correct people ask are, I'm sending to the epel-devel list.
Before I start the questions, thank you to everyone who helped out in
getting the build failures working. Thank you. thank you. thank you.
We have all
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:34 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 09:39, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> > I want to make sure I'm reading this right.
> > A packager puts a package into EPEL.
> > If the user does nothing, that package continues to be i
I want to make sure I'm reading this right.
A packager puts a package into EPEL.
If the user does nothing, that package continues to be in EPEL.
If the user wishes to end support, they sent off and email, compose
one final build (if it can compose), wait for it to land, then send
off another
tdisco-1.1-1.el6"]
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-4742
2011-12-31 19:07:08 ["trac-peerreview-plugin-0.11-5.svn11062.el6"]
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-0004
Troy Dawson
epel-list-2012
Description: Binary data
epel-list-2014
Des
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 6:50 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said:
> > RHEL-8 was built with various packages which are not shipped in
> > BaseOS/AppStream/CRB. Some like screen are in the buildroot for the
> > packages which depend on them but were decided not
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:18 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > As discussed in the EPEL SIG meeting yesterday, I've written up my
> > thoughts on how to handle epel8 branches.
>
> TLDR: I like it. ;)
>
> > # Considerations
> > * The process must be simple for a Fedora packager to adapt to
> > * It
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 12:38 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 5/8/19 4:09 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:03 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >>
> >> I have uploaded my build to my fedora people area. Unfortunately the
> >> source rpm's w
1 - 100 of 517 matches
Mail list logo
