On Fri, 26.11.10 16:18, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Sorry for not responding earlier to this, I have been travelling the
last few weeks with little access to the internet.
I tried it
amtu.service - Abstract Machine Tests
Loaded: loaded
On Mon, 06.12.10 12:30, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) said:
If systemd will allow us to do that, sure.
What's the point here? For example, this doesn't cut down on the number
of listening ports, obviously, nor on the requirements
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Socket activation is not mandatory or even a benefit in all cases. Just
because we have a patch doesn't mean it is the right one. Upstream might
have the foresight and the knowledge to see problems with patches we might
not. There might be security implications. It
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Socket activation is not mandatory or even a benefit in all cases. Just
because we have a patch doesn't mean it is the right one. Upstream might
have the foresight and the knowledge to see problems with patches
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Right. To do this in systemd implies that you're patching openssh to
do socket-based activation... hence why I asked about upstream's opinion
on it.
Why would we care?
It's our goal to have ALL network daemons be socket-activated eventually.
This is a distribution-wide
Chris Adams wrote:
The only thing you need a firewall by default for is to prevent services
that are listening on the network from being accessible. The better
solution is to stop having services listen on the network by default.
FWIW, this is what Ubuntu has been doing for ages (they call it
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Right. To do this in systemd implies that you're patching openssh to
do socket-based activation... hence why I asked about upstream's opinion
on it.
Why would we care?
It's our goal to
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:08 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com said:
On most laptops, however, which are the most common types of system sold
today, a firewall is very definitely needed when you're connecting to
hotel networks, public wifi
Once upon a time, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com said:
In the cups case might be probably reasonable to default to localhost.
However for rpcbind it is clearly not so - what's the point of starting
things that are mostly needed for NFS when you would be able to mount
only NFS provided by the
2010/12/7 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:08 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com said:
On most laptops, however, which are the most common types of system sold
today, a firewall is very definitely needed when you're connecting
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:08:49PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com said:
On most laptops, however, which are the most common types of system sold
today, a firewall is very definitely needed when you're connecting to
hotel networks, public wifi
Hi,
On 12/06/2010 06:34 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
W dniu 3 grudnia 2010 09:14 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
[..]
What services are installed by default when installong form Live
GNOME/KDE/etc and DVD?
Ok, let's ask the question differently - what
W dniu 6 grudnia 2010 10:43 użytkownik Hans de Goede
hdego...@redhat.com napisał:
Hi,
On 12/06/2010 06:34 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
W dniu 3 grudnia 2010 09:14 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
[..]
What services are installed by default when installong form
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 06:34:45 +0100
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
W dniu 3 grudnia 2010 09:14 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
[..]
What services are installed by default when installong form Live
GNOME/KDE/etc and DVD?
Ok, let's ask the question
Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said:
IMO ssh can be off by default and should be started only if user tries
to connect over port 22.
If systemd will allow us to do that, sure.
What's the point here? For example, this doesn't cut down on the number
of listening ports, obviously, nor on the
W dniu 6 grudnia 2010 18:01 użytkownik Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com napisał:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 06:34:45 +0100
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
W dniu 3 grudnia 2010 09:14 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
[..]
What services are installed by default
2010/12/6 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com:
Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said:
IMO ssh can be off by default and should be started only if user tries
to connect over port 22.
If systemd will allow us to do that, sure.
What's the point here? For example, this doesn't cut down on the
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:17:51 +0100
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 6 grudnia 2010 18:01 użytkownik Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
napisał:
...snip...
What are you trying to do?
I'm trying to convert sysvinit scripts to systemd services (as many
as possible)
If you're
W dniu 6 grudnia 2010 18:43 użytkownik Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com napisał:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:17:51 +0100
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 6 grudnia 2010 18:01 użytkownik Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
napisał:
...snip...
What are you trying to do?
I'm trying to
Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) said:
If systemd will allow us to do that, sure.
What's the point here? For example, this doesn't cut down on the number
of listening ports, obviously, nor on the requirements for root passwords
and potential root login. And if it's started in
2010/12/6 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com:
Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) said:
If systemd will allow us to do that, sure.
What's the point here? For example, this doesn't cut down on the number
of listening ports, obviously, nor on the requirements for root passwords
and
Michał Piotrowski píše v Po 06. 12. 2010 v 20:22 +0100:
2010/12/6 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com:
Does openssh stands out something special between other demons?
Actually, it does - for remote installations (sometimes the only option)
ssh needs to be running after installation so that the
I wonder why my server rejected my previous email?
-- Wiadomość przekazana dalej --
Od: Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com
Data: 6 grudnia 2010 20:46
Temat: Re: Fedora default services (was: Re: F15 Feature - convert as
many service init files as possible to the native SystemD
Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) said:
We are talking here about the case when ssh server is started when
user connect to 22 port (or other configured). From my POV everything
should work as expected.
Right. To do this in systemd implies that you're patching openssh to
do socket-based
2010/12/6 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com:
Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) said:
We are talking here about the case when ssh server is started when
user connect to 22 port (or other configured). From my POV everything
should work as expected.
Right. To do this in systemd implies
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:55:20PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 6 grudnia 2010 18:43 użytkownik Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com napisał:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:17:51 +0100
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 6 grudnia 2010 18:01 użytkownik Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
2010/12/7 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:55:20PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 6 grudnia 2010 18:43 użytkownik Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com napisał:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:17:51 +0100
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 6 grudnia 2010
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 00:38 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Cron - but should be activated only when cron files exist
It seems to me that the list:
- ssh
- Dbus
- syslog
- iptables
- ip6tables
- auditd
- restorecond
is an absolute minimum to get working system.
I don't agree that ssh
2010/12/7 Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 00:38 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Cron - but should be activated only when cron files exist
It seems to me that the list:
- ssh
- Dbus
- syslog
- iptables
- ip6tables
- auditd
- restorecond
is an absolute
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:38:07AM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/12/7 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
Those might be
able to start defining a category of things needed to run a desktop
session or something.
iptables,
no chance to disable this
I'd be more inclined to ask
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 01:07 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/12/7 Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 00:38 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Cron - but should be activated only when cron files exist
It seems to me that the list:
- ssh
- Dbus
- syslog
-
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 10:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
There are no stupid questions :)
On most desktop systems firewall is not needed. Many users do not even
know how to configure it. In fact I disable it in most of my systems,
because there is no real use for it. So I asked a simple
Adam Williamson píše v Po 06. 12. 2010 v 17:57 -0800:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 10:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
There are no stupid questions :)
On most desktop systems firewall is not needed. Many users do not even
know how to configure it. In fact I disable it in most of my
On 12/06/2010 05:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On most laptops, however, which are the most common types of system sold
today, a firewall is very definitely needed when you're connecting to
hotel networks, public wifi access points...
Please explain why. What actual service is the firewall
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 17:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 10:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
There are no stupid questions :)
On most desktop systems firewall is not needed. Many users do not even
know how to configure it. In fact I disable it in most of my
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com said:
On most laptops, however, which are the most common types of system sold
today, a firewall is very definitely needed when you're connecting to
hotel networks, public wifi access points...
The only thing you need a firewall by default
2010/12/7 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:38:07AM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/12/7 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
Those might be
able to start defining a category of things needed to run a desktop
session or something.
iptables,
no chance
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:14:16AM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/12/7 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:38:07AM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/12/7 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
Those might be
able to start defining a category of things
Hi,
W dniu 3 grudnia 2010 09:14 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
[..]
What services are installed by default when installong form Live
GNOME/KDE/etc and DVD?
Ok, let's ask the question differently - what services should be run
by default to provide working system for
Hi,
What services are installed by default when installong form Live
GNOME/KDE/etc and DVD?
--
Best regards,
Michal
Sent from my iToaster
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:14:26 +0100
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What services are installed by default when installong form Live
GNOME/KDE/etc and DVD?
Varies? :)
I don't know that anyone has a list... it should be pretty easy to do
some installs and run 'chkconfig --list
2010/12/4 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:14:26 +0100
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What services are installed by default when installong form Live
GNOME/KDE/etc and DVD?
Varies? :)
I don't know that anyone has a list... it should be pretty easy to do
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 02:07 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Lennart Poettering píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 01:27 +0100:
On Thu, 25.11.10 17:33, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
And also, cron does a couple of really nasty things. For example it
wakes up in regular intervals to check if a job
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 03:05 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 26.11.10 02:07, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
Lennart Poettering píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 01:27 +0100:
On Thu, 25.11.10 17:33, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
And also, cron does a couple of really nasty
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 23:11 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 11/25/2010 11:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said:
Well, I actually believe we should design an OS here, not just a set of
independent tools. And that means I think closer
Hi,
How to start things that really are not demons?
Amtu seemed to be a simple service to convert
[Unit]
Description=Abstract Machine Tests
After=syslog.target
[Service]
EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/amtu
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/amtu $EXTRAOPTIONS
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
sudo
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:42:33PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
How to start things that really are not demons?
Amtu seemed to be a simple service to convert
[Unit]
Description=Abstract Machine Tests
After=syslog.target
[Service]
EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/amtu
2010/11/26 Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:42:33PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
How to start things that really are not demons?
Amtu seemed to be a simple service to convert
[Unit]
Description=Abstract Machine Tests
After=syslog.target
[Service]
Miloslav =?UTF-8?Q?Trma=C4=8D?= m...@volny.cz writes:
[...] If the system integrates everything into one process, the
only remaining troubleshooting mechanisms are integrated logging
[...], debugger [...] and systemtap (only a little better than a
debugger, and not available for most
2010/11/25 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 21:56 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
That's the point of the .path unit. i.e. you can list dirs to watch. If
a user then drop a file into one of those dirs cron gets automatically
started.
Basically, in your .path unit you'd
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 09:31 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/11/25 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 21:56 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
That's the point of the .path unit. i.e. you can list dirs to watch. If
a user then drop a file into one of those dirs cron gets
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 09:31 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/11/25 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 21:56 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
That's the point of the .path unit. i.e. you can list dirs to watch. If
a user then drop a file into one of those dirs cron gets
W dniu 25 listopada 2010 17:33 użytkownik Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com napisał:
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 09:31 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Actually it's true, but in the near future all standard cron jobs
might be runned by systemd
http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.timer.html
On Thu, 25.11.10 08:39, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
That's the point of the .path unit. i.e. you can list dirs to watch. If
a user then drop a file into one of those dirs cron gets automatically
started.
Basically, in your .path unit you'd write something like this:
On Thu, 25.11.10 17:33, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
Actually it's true, but in the near future all standard cron jobs
might be runned by systemd
http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.timer.html
It's not 100 % cron replacement now, but who knows what the future holds
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 01:15:04 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
The only contents of /etc/crontab and /etc/cron.d is the lines to
handle /etc/cron.daily and friends. As mentioned we can easily run
On RHEL/CentOS (and it's likely only a matter of time before systemd
fillers through to them)
Although I can't be the only one who puts various cron jobs
under /etc/cron.d that get run at various times.
Andrew
Almost every administrative cron here is in a cron.d crontab file .. we
need control over exactly what time certain things happen. So please
keep the functionality.
If
Lennart Poettering píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 01:27 +0100:
And also, cron does a couple of really nasty things. For example it
wakes up in regular intervals to check if a job is ready to run. It does
so to deal with wallclock time changes/suspends. In systemd we are
working on a different way to
Lennart Poettering píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 01:27 +0100:
On Thu, 25.11.10 17:33, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
And also, cron does a couple of really nasty things. For example it
wakes up in regular intervals to check if a job is ready to run. It does
so to deal with wallclock time
On Fri, 26.11.10 02:07, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
Lennart Poettering píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 01:27 +0100:
On Thu, 25.11.10 17:33, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
And also, cron does a couple of really nasty things. For example it
wakes up in regular intervals to check if
On Thu, 25.11.10 19:57, Genes MailLists (li...@sapience.com) wrote:
Although I can't be the only one who puts various cron jobs
under /etc/cron.d that get run at various times.
Andrew
Almost every administrative cron here is in a cron.d crontab file .. we
need control over
On 11/25/2010 09:08 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 25.11.10 19:57, Genes MailLists (li...@sapience.com) wrote:
keep the functionality.
Hey, as I made explcitily clear I have no plans of taking away anything
from you. No need to be defensive...
Actually that was after I posted but ok
On 11/25/2010 09:19 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 11/25/2010 09:08 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 25.11.10 19:57, Genes MailLists (li...@sapience.com) wrote:
keep the functionality.
Hey, as I made explcitily clear I have no plans of taking away anything
from you. No need to be
Lennart Poettering píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 03:05 +0100:
On Fri, 26.11.10 02:07, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
Lennart Poettering píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 01:27 +0100:
On Thu, 25.11.10 17:33, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
And also, cron does a couple of really nasty things.
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said:
Well, I actually believe we should design an OS here, not just a set of
independent tools. And that means I think closer integration is good and
only has benefits.
But this is a Unix-like OS, where each tool does one (or few)
On 11/25/2010 11:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said:
Well, I actually believe we should design an OS here, not just a set of
independent tools. And that means I think closer integration is good and
only has benefits.
But this is a
On 11/26/2010 01:27 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 25.11.10 17:33, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
Actually it's true, but in the near future all standard cron jobs
might be runned by systemd
http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.timer.html
It's not 100 % cron
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 07:42 +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I'm just curious, how many programmes would stay in Fedora after
you finish systemd ;-) /sarcasm.
and do we run systemd in emacs, or emacs from systemd?!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk:
2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Sun, 21.11.10 00:46, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
action should be coordinated.
Comments, thoughts?
I would certainly welcome any work in this
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:41:49PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Sun, 21.11.10 00:46, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
action should be
On 11/24/2010 01:41 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Sun, 21.11.10 00:46, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
action should be coordinated.
Comments, thoughts?
2010/11/24 Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:41:49PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Sun, 21.11.10 00:46, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I would like to help with scripts conversion.
2010/11/24 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 11/24/2010 01:41 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Sun, 21.11.10 00:46, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
On Wed, 24.11.10 13:59, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
2010/11/24 Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:41:49PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Sun, 21.11.10 00:46, Michał Piotrowski
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
BTW, regarding at and cron: what I was thinking of but never check
ehwther it is feasible is to make cron/at autostart a soon as some job
is scheduled. I.e. use .path trigger to check whether /etc/crontab and
user jobs exist, and start cron only
2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Wed, 24.11.10 13:59, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
2010/11/24 Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:41:49PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 10:19 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 17:18:44 +0100,
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
2010/11/24 Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
BTW, regarding at and cron: what I was thinking of but never check
ehwther it is feasible is to make cron/at autostart a soon as some job
is scheduled. I.e. use .path trigger to check whether
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:30:03PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/11/24 Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
BTW, regarding at and cron: what I was thinking of but never check
ehwther it is feasible is to make cron/at autostart a soon as
W dniu 24 listopada 2010 21:34 użytkownik Tomasz Torcz
to...@pipebreaker.pl napisał:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:30:03PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/11/24 Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
BTW, regarding at and cron: what I was thinking
On Wed, 24.11.10 15:22, Paul Wouters (p...@xelerance.com) wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
BTW, regarding at and cron: what I was thinking of but never check
ehwther it is feasible is to make cron/at autostart a soon as some job
is scheduled. I.e. use .path trigger
On Wed, 24.11.10 21:30, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
2010/11/24 Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
BTW, regarding at and cron: what I was thinking of but never check
ehwther it is feasible is to make cron/at autostart a soon
Someone uses cherokee web server? Please check this service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657085
Kind regards,
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 24.11.10 22:08, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Someone uses cherokee web server? Please check this service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657085
Looks good (haven't tested it though, and don't really know
cherokee). In this case however, I think it would
I wanted to convert httpd, and I saw that it's already converted and
it uses socket
httpd.socket
ListenStream=80
What if administrator want to change port to other? Let's say, that
I've got configured three servers:
80 - cherokee
81 - apache
82 - nginx
In this enviroment httpd.socket should
On Wed, 24.11.10 22:32, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
I wanted to convert httpd, and I saw that it's already converted and
it uses socket
httpd.socket
ListenStream=80
Where do I find this? Its not in the pkg git tree nor in bugzilla?
What if administrator want to change
2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Wed, 24.11.10 22:08, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Someone uses cherokee web server? Please check this service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657085
Looks good (haven't tested it though, and don't really know
2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Wed, 24.11.10 22:32, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
I wanted to convert httpd, and I saw that it's already converted and
it uses socket
httpd.socket
ListenStream=80
Where do I find this? Its not in the pkg git tree nor
On Wed, 24.11.10 21:25, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
BTW, regarding at and cron: what I was thinking of but never check
ehwther it is feasible is to make cron/at autostart a soon as some job
is scheduled. I.e. use .path trigger to check whether /etc/crontab and
user jobs
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 21:56 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 24.11.10 15:22, Paul Wouters (p...@xelerance.com) wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
BTW, regarding at and cron: what I was thinking of but never check
ehwther it is feasible is to make
W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
convert scripts themselves.
How can I get information about all packages that provides init
MP == Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com writes:
MP How can I get information about all packages that provides init
MP scripts?
repoquery --whatprovides '/etc/init.d/*'
- J
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/11/23 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
convert scripts themselves.
How can I
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:18:44 +0100 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
How can I get information about all packages that provides init
scripts?
When I do
rpm -qf /etc/init.d/*
I get only information about already installed packages. Any magic
switch to get informations about all packages from rpm
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 17:18:44 +0100,
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
On 11/20/2010 11:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
action should be coordinated.
Comments, thoughts?
Kind regards,
Michal
I created this a while back so just take your pick from there fill it
with a link to the new file
2010/11/23 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu:
MP == Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com writes:
MP How can I get information about all packages that provides init
MP scripts?
repoquery --whatprovides '/etc/init.d/*'
It seems to me that too little packages was returned
- J
--
2010/11/23 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 11/20/2010 11:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I would like to help with scripts conversion. IMO the conversion
action should be coordinated.
Comments, thoughts?
Kind regards,
Michal
I created this a while back so just take
2010/11/23 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
maintainers of individual packages would indicate that they want to
convert scripts themselves.
I'll try to do
W dniu 23 listopada 2010 18:35 użytkownik philippe makowski
makowski.fed...@gmail.com napisał:
2010/11/23 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
W dniu 21 listopada 2010 12:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
We can create a list of all scripts in wiki and
maintainers of
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
