Le jeudi 2 août 2012, martin.jo...@nokia.com a écrit :
We just found out yesterday. We haven’t had a chance to discuss
continuation of QML/QtQuick, but we have passionate developers here who
will continue contributing if possible.
Qtquick was the main point of qt5...
If your company
On Thursday 02 August 2012 07:53:25 ext gunnar.sle...@nokia.com wrote:
On Aug 1, 2012, at 6:37 PM, ext Stephen Kelly wrote:
Hi there,
Given that https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,31387 has been
merged, can you post any more information that will last until the
QColorProfile
Hi all,
I'm trying to view http://www.youtube.com/leanback using QTWebKit in
Qt4.8.1(configure with -plugin-gfx-directfb option).
There are some images in the web page seems that Qt4.8 isn't able to
render them correctly.
If I use Qt4.7.4 with directfb, all images are rendered
On Thursday 02 August 2012 10:03:15 Paul Olav Tvete wrote:
On Thursday 02 August 2012 07:53:25 ext gunnar.sle...@nokia.com wrote:
On Aug 1, 2012, at 6:37 PM, ext Stephen Kelly wrote:
Hi there,
Given that https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,31387 has been
merged, can you post
I'm sure QML/QtQuick will live on - only Brisbane is affected.
I'm not sure if/how we, the Brisbane developers, will continue to contribute,
however.
Br,
Martin.
From: ext qtnext [qtn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 2 August 2012 4:46 PM
To: Jones Martin
On Thursday 02 August 2012 10:31:59 ext Olivier Goffart wrote:
If that's only a documentation problem, we can workaround that with some
macro magic.
Very good point. For some reason I thought we would have to hack on qdoc
itself,
but creative use of \fn and \internal should be enough.
On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:58 AM, ext Paul Olav Tvete wrote:
On Thursday 02 August 2012 10:31:59 ext Olivier Goffart wrote:
If that's only a documentation problem, we can workaround that with some
macro magic.
Very good point. For some reason I thought we would have to hack on qdoc
itself,
Hi,
From the Qt build system, does any file decide the QtGui depending on the
PlatformSupport lib ?
Any information is appreciated ;)
Thanks,
Song
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
QtGui should not depend on platform support. If it does it's a bug.
Cheers,
Lars
On Aug 2, 2012, at 11:47 AM, ext
song.7@nokia.commailto:song.7@nokia.com
song.7@nokia.commailto:song.7@nokia.com wrote:
Hi,
From the Qt build system, does any file decide the QtGui depending on
I reverted the patch as requested. The change id is :
Ic4a420d6ad0995810ed61d31edd28e7b603cca5e
I also created a clone of qtbase repository on gitorious. the link for that is
https://qt.gitorious.org/~alexandrosdermenakis/qt/qtbase-colorprofiles
Alex
Hi everybody,
as one of the first consequences of the situation in Brisbane, I'd like to do
some changes to our list of essential modules. You can see the current list at
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Essentials-Modules .
I intend to move both Qt 3D and Qt Location out of the essentials list
I talked a bit with the team in Brisbane this morning. Obviously the mood there
is somewhat grim.
Talking for me, it's really sad to see this happen. There are a lot of bright
engineers working in that office and I have been working with many of them for
quite some time now. I really hope that
I talked a bit with the team in Brisbane this morning. Obviously the mood there
is somewhat grim.
Talking for me, it's really sad to see this happen. There are a lot of bright
engineers working in that office and I have been working with many of them for
quite some time now. I really hope that
Hi,
On 2 August 2012 15:02, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
For Qt as a product, it is now really important to remember that we do have
the Qt project and a live and active community around it. This might make
some things a bit more difficult in the short term, but we will find ways to
deal with
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:09 PM, a.gra...@gmail.com a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 2 August 2012 15:02, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
For Qt as a product, it is now really important to remember that we do have
the Qt project and a live and active community around it. This might make
some
Thanks, Alan -- very rich email that helps me think about
declarative-model-instance-handling.
Alan spaketh:
snip, What is QML declarative-best-practice for models?
Reusable components/delegates, where data propagates in one direction, is
the
best-practices pattern that obviates this need.
On 2 August 2012 15:15, Dmytro Poplavskiy dmytro.poplavs...@gmail.com wrote:
It's possible to use LGPL Qt in the commercial products,
it's only necessary to open changes done to the Qt itself if any.
I will try to be more specific with my question :)
What kind of license is using RIM for their
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 12.02.45, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
as one of the first consequences of the situation in Brisbane, I'd like to
do some changes to our list of essential modules. You can see the current
list at
I already sent this to the qt3d mailing list, but nobody reacts on this list
(maybe due to the Bisbane situation):
qglsection.cpp contains the following lines in the method
QGLSectionPrivate::mapVertex:
static bool seeded = false;
if (!seeded)
qsrand(31415);
This
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:02:14 +0200, C. Bergström
cbergst...@pathscale.com wrote:
For the companies reading this (RIM) - step up and post a job to get
this thread back on track.
We do have a job open for a skilled Qt and QML platform developer.
It is in Germany though:
Greetings all,
first of all let me express a deep and warm feeling for all those writing
so nice code since so long and rewarded in such manner...
Le 02/08/2012 14:26, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
[...]
Qt3D might be quite mature, actually, since it's been around for longer and
has no
Agree with Thiago:
For 3D and Location, I have a feeling it's a little premature, but I can't
blame you for it. Especially in Location's case, with lots of plugins to be
kept in working order, it might be tricky in the current situation.
Qt3D might be quite mature, actually, since it's been
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:23:06PM +0300, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 August 2012 15:15, Dmytro Poplavskiy dmytro.poplavs...@gmail.com wrote:
It's possible to use LGPL Qt in the commercial products,
it's only necessary to open changes done to the Qt itself if any.
I will try to be more
Hi,
On 2 August 2012 15:40, Rafael Roquetto rafael.roque...@kdab.com wrote:
RIM is using Qt open source (LGPL).
so happy for this :) I'm happy because:
1) RIM is able to continue using Qt without any restriction
2) RIM must patch upstream any improvement and Qt will benefit from this
To be
same feeling about QT3D : we can't compare QT3D Feature to for example
ogre3D, but for simple things I use Qt3D since two years and it works fine
for all my needs ... without bugs
2012/8/2 Charley Bay charleyb...@gmail.com
Agree with Thiago:
For 3D and Location, I have a feeling it's a
I'd like to propose we add Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT to many methods in our API.
We already took the decision to turn exception off in most modules, except
QtCore and where exceptions were used, like QtXmlPatterns. This is the next
step.
The Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT macro expands to noexcept, which is a new
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 15.23.06, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 August 2012 15:15, Dmytro Poplavskiy dmytro.poplavs...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's possible to use LGPL Qt in the commercial products,
it's only necessary to open changes done to the Qt itself if any.
I will try to be
* Done: Qthttps://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG/
QTBUG-26744https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-26744
Best regards
Helmut
Von: mitch.cur...@nokia.com [mailto:mitch.cur...@nokia.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. August 2012 14:46
An: Mülner, Helmut
Betreff: RE: qsrand(31415)
Hi,
On 2 August 2012 15:36, Peter Rullmann peter.rullm...@barco.com wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:02:14 +0200, C. Bergström
cbergst...@pathscale.com wrote:
For the companies reading this (RIM) - step up and post a job to get
this thread back on track.
We do have a job open for a skilled Qt
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 15.48.19, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
2) RIM must patch upstream any improvement and Qt will benefit from this
I'm not sure if you meant upstream in the way that I understand it. So let's
be clear:
Any user of LGPL must make their modifications available to
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 14.39.02, Yves Bailly wrote:
For what is worthes, here we're hardly waiting for Qt3D, delaying an
internal long-term project which would have been quite similar. That said
we're not the ones doing the job on Qt3D, so any decision you make will be
seen as
I'd say go ahead. Since adding it shouldn't change the ABI/name mangling, we
can introduce this gradually anyway.
Cheers,
Lars
On Aug 2, 2012, at 2:50 PM, ext Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org
wrote:
I'd like to propose we add Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT to many methods in our API.
We already took the
On 2 August 2012 15:56, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 15.48.19, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
2) RIM must patch upstream any improvement and Qt will benefit from this
I'm not sure if you meant upstream in the way that I understand it. So
Thiago spaketh:
I'd like to propose we add Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT to many methods in our API.
We already took the decision to turn exception off in most modules, except
QtCore and where exceptions were used, like QtXmlPatterns. This is the next
step.
The Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT macro expands to noexcept,
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 13.00.22, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
I'd say go ahead. Since adding it shouldn't change the ABI/name mangling, we
can introduce this gradually anyway.
By the way, let's be conservative instead of doing it throughout.
Once added, the noexcept keyword cannot
Hi Thiago,
On Thursday August 2 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote:
I'd like to propose we add Q_DECL_NOEXCEPT to many methods in our API.
+1 from me, too.
[Though it doesn't seem to help with the problem that move constructors can't
be inline if the class uses smart pointers. It still wants to call
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 16.02.43, Marc Mutz wrote:
Need to be careful with templates. Can't use add the unrestricted noexcept
there, need to use noexcept(noexcept(expr)), which is even uglier
templatetypename T inline uint qHash(const T t, uint seed)
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Alan Alpert alan.alp...@nokia.com wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:59:08 ext Charley Bay wrote:
Mark spaketh:
Sadly, QML 1 doesn't have id in dynamically generated id. That is a
real big pain if you want to drag/drop something since then you
need... an id!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 02.08.2012 14:56, schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 15.48.19, a.gra...@gmail.com
wrote:
2) RIM must patch upstream any improvement and Qt will benefit
from this
I'm not sure if you meant upstream in the way that I
But i still don't fully understand how to make a component draggable
when it's being created dynamically through a Repeater.. Don't you
just need an id for that to work?
You can use the delegate id to do the dragging.
Take a look in this [1] example, maybe it fits for your case.
[1] -
Hi,
On Thursday 02 August 2012 15:27:03 Thiago Macieira wrote:
For example, in when I was just now adding it to qHash for QDateTime, I
realised it does complex operations. Right now, none of those operations
allocate memory, but it's actually very close to doing that. QDateTime has
a d
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.55.54, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 02 August 2012 15:27:03 Thiago Macieira wrote:
For example, in when I was just now adding it to qHash for QDateTime, I
realised it does complex operations. Right now, none of those operations
allocate
On 02/08/2012 07:50, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
The macro expands to nothing in C++98 mode. That means code using the
API so marked and compiling in C++98 mode will simply not gain the
benefits of the keyword, but should see no side effects.
The presence of the keyword does not affect binary
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.15.26, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com
wrote:
So, perhaps we can identify the cases where they are similar and use
that with MSVC until proper noexcept()/noexcept(type) support is provided?
Yes. I can identify where they are similar: nowhere.
If you add
On 02/08/2012 12:19, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.15.26, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com
wrote:
So, perhaps we can identify the cases where they are similar and use
that with MSVC until proper noexcept()/noexcept(type) support is provided?
Yes. I can
On 02/08/2012 12:32, ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote:
On 02/08/2012 12:19, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.15.26, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com
wrote:
So, perhaps we can identify the cases where they are similar and use
that with MSVC until proper
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.32.36, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com
wrote:
the compiler can eliminate the mechanics of tracking the lifetime of
certain unwindable objects in such a function, and significantly reduce
the code size.
That's in the caller.
The problem is in the callee.
On Thursday 02 August 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.55.54, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
Where is qHash(QDateTime) defined? It doesn't seem to be where I
expected it (qhash.* or qdatetime.*).
qdatetime.{h,cpp}
Ok, found it - had the wrong branch checked
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 19.25.31, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com
wrote:
Anyways, I see that LLVM/libc++
(http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/include/__config) defines
it like this:
#if (__has_feature(cxx_noexcept))
# define _NOEXCEPT noexcept
# define
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 19.47.46, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com
wrote:
This tells me that MSVC's implementation of throw() == noexcept(true)
for all intents and purposes, and we can use that in Qt.
Ah, that changes everything. But we can just use __declspec(nothrow) then, to
be on
On 02/08/2012, at 10:02 PM, lars.kn...@nokia.com lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
I talked a bit with the team in Brisbane this morning. Obviously the mood
there is somewhat grim.
Grim yes, but at least we now know what is happening with our jobs in respect
to Nokia.
Talking for me, it's
On Thursday August 2 2012, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
On Thursday 02 August 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 17.55.54, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
Where is qHash(QDateTime) defined? It doesn't seem to be where I
expected it (qhash.* or qdatetime.*).
Hi Thiago,
On Thursday August 2 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote:
The benefits are:
- callers do not need to emit exception handlers around such functions
- the compiler may assume that no exception unexpectedly happens inside
that function body, foregoing exception handlers inside it as well.
On sexta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2012, às 00.25.04, you wrote:
AFAIU, the compiler needs to make sure that std::terminate is called if an
unexpected exception is thrown, which would require the equivalent of a
function-try-catch block where the catch block calls std::terminate().
Do you have a
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 23.57.58, Marc Mutz wrote:
noexcept(std::declvalObject().f()) should work.
Unfortunately, while the C++11 compiler support seems to be going fine, the
library support is lagging WAY behind. Add to that the fact that some
compilers are being used with
55 matches
Mail list logo
