On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 19:10:50 UTC, bauss wrote:
See:
https://github.com/mysql-d/mysql-native/issues/100
There's also reported issues like this one:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15183
Walter said somewhere that submitting objs should be enough.
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 06:24:38 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
It has nothing to do with lazyness. If you're behind a proxy
that abomination of a installer of Visual Studio doesn't work.
I tried several times, offline and online setup, read the
Studio forums. Studio 2017 installer
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 06:24:38 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 20:44:57 UTC, Jerry wrote:
It's amazing how many people are so lazy to download Visual
Studio, and some of the stupidest reason for not wanting to
download it to boot.
It has nothing to do
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 07:33:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Nobody is obliged to work on any platform they don't want to
work on. And nobody is entitled to berate anyone for working on
any platform they want to.
Yeah...right on..!
btw. Windows XP is still the best o/s I ever 'owned'.
On 11/1/2017 11:42 AM, Bo wrote:
And
frankly, Walter or whoever, there needed to have been put a stop to this anti
Windows bullshit several days ago. As long as people use this level of
disrespect towards community members because they are not using the "right"
platform.
Don't worry,
On 11/1/2017 11:59 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Windows 32 bit is the special one - it is the ONLY platform where D works out of
the box without additional downloads. That's one reason why I advocate it for
just playing around - it just works.
Yay Digital Mars C++ :-)
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 08:33:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
The vast majority of users would be covered by 5-10 GBs of
available storage, which is why the lowest tier of even the
luxury iPhone was 16 GBs until last year. Every time I talk to
normal people, ie non-techies unlike us, and ask
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 20:44:57 UTC, Jerry wrote:
It's amazing how many people are so lazy to download Visual
Studio, and some of the stupidest reason for not wanting to
download it to boot.
It has nothing to do with lazyness. If you're behind a proxy that
abomination of a installer
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 23:04:09 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 20:44:57 UTC, Jerry wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 19:10:50 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:59:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 20:44:57 UTC, Jerry wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 19:10:50 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:59:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo wrote:
There is a issue with Windows. The whole attacking
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 19:10:50 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:59:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo wrote:
There is a issue with Windows. The whole attacking the
messenger, the whole idiotic argumentation's that
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:59:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo wrote:
There is a issue with Windows. The whole attacking the
messenger, the whole idiotic argumentation's that Windows is
dying, it is all pure useless trolling the people who
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 13:59:26 UTC, codephantom wrote:
But I think what really made it take off so fast and
unexpectadly, was the convergence of mobile devices, mobile
communication technology (i.e wifi, gps and stuff), and of
course the internet... as well as the ability to find
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 14:33:28 UTC, Joakim wrote:
similarity of APIs between macOS and iOS, but obviously there
are significant developer and IDE differences in targeting a
mobile OS versus a desktop OS, even if iOS was initially forked
from macOS.
Not in my experience… There are
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 14:33:28 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Hopefully that means we'll see more competition in
mobile than just android/iOS in the future.
Watch out for the MINIX3/NetBSD combo...a microkernel coupled
with a BSD-unix that can run on pretty much anything.
It may well be the
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 14:43:14 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
The CPU-architecture generations follow a tic-toc pattern where
the tics mean you have a new architecture and the toc means you
have an improved manufacturing process. I don't think that has
something to do with Xeon.
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 14:03:31 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
The way I think of it is that Xeon's get all the newest and
greatest features, with them slowly trickling down to the
i-series. Invest in the Xeon production line one generation and
in next use it for i7's ext. Basically R
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 11:12:19 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 08:53:46 UTC, Joakim wrote:
No, the reason they don't improve is consumers don't need the
performance.
I don't agree. Consumers would welcome more performance - and
many of us 'need' it too.
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 13:59:26 UTC, codephantom wrote:
Microsoft had the vision though, and they had it earlier than
perhaps anyone else. But the vision was too far ahead of its
time, and, around the early 2000's they refused to lose any
more money, put it on the back burner, and
On 07/11/2017 1:48 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 13:29:19 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 07/11/2017 12:58 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 11:31:03 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
I am quite surprised that Intel even created i9
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 08:33:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Also, nobody saw mobile growing so gigantic, so fast, not even
Jobs by all indications. Mobile has really been a tidal wave
over the last decade. Funny how all you hear is bitching and
whining from a bunch of devs on proggit/HN about
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 13:29:19 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 07/11/2017 12:58 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 11:31:03 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
I am quite surprised that Intel even created i9 actually, it
just wasn't required.
AMD Ryzen
On 07/11/2017 12:58 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 11:31:03 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
I am quite surprised that Intel even created i9 actually, it just
wasn't required.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
I do not trust
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 11:31:03 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
I am quite surprised that Intel even created i9 actually, it
just wasn't required.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 08:53:46 UTC, Joakim wrote:
One is a touch-first mobile OS that heavily restricts what you
can do in the background and didn't even have a file manager
until this year, while the other is a classic desktop OS, so
there are significant differences.
Yes, there
On 07/11/2017 11:12 AM, codephantom wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 08:53:46 UTC, Joakim wrote:
No, the reason they don't improve is consumers don't need the
performance.
I don't agree. Consumers would welcome more performance - and many of us
'need' it too.
But cpu's have hit the
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 08:53:46 UTC, Joakim wrote:
No, the reason they don't improve is consumers don't need the
performance.
I don't agree. Consumers would welcome more performance - and
many of us 'need' it too.
But cpu's have hit the heat barrier, and so manufacturers tend to
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 07:57:11 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 08:33:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Sure, they took existing IDEs and refocused them towards
mobile development. XCode better be focused on iOS, as that's
pretty much all that devs are using it for
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 08:33:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Sure, they took existing IDEs and refocused them towards mobile
development. XCode better be focused on iOS, as that's pretty
much all that devs are using it for these days.
iOS has always been mostly a subset of OS-X. There are some
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 02:33:35 UTC, Computermatronic
wrote:
I, like many other windows users, want to be able to compile
64bit binaries in windows, without having to download and
install the bloated and time consuming to download and install
Visual Studio.
I do most of my
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 06:37:52 UTC, Tony wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:12:56 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't know why you're so obsessed with storage when even
midrange smartphones come with 32 GBs nowadays, expandable to
much more with an SD card. My tablet has only 16 GBs of
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:12:56 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't know why you're so obsessed with storage when even
midrange smartphones come with 32 GBs nowadays, expandable to
much more with an SD card. My tablet has only 16 GBs of
storage, with only 10-12 actually accessible, but I've
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 02:33:35 UTC, Computermatronic
wrote:
Can we please get back on topic please?
Umm... we haven't been 'on topic' since about 210 threads ago ;-)
When...Adam decided to claim that "..the few that don't will have
little trouble understanding why they need it
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 18:26:54 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 18:08:54 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 17:25:26 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Most programmers will one day be coding on mobile devices,
though I admit I'm in a small, early-adopting minority
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 21:33:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Sure you can, with the right adapter:
https://www.lifewire.com/how-to-connect-usb-devices-to-ipad-1999862
I routinely transfer HD video from my Android devices to a
couple TB external slim HDs.
I'm not disputing Android. Just saying
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 20:36:57 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 20:05:52 UTC, Joakim wrote:
5) I can easily move my data, etc. to another device if I
decide to.
Check, mobile devices usually support such transfer better
than PCs.
"mobile devices" meaning Android
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 20:05:52 UTC, Joakim wrote:
5) I can easily move my data, etc. to another device if I
decide to.
Check, mobile devices usually support such transfer better than
PCs.
"mobile devices" meaning Android devices. I can't stick a USB
flash drive in a iPad.
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 19:23:51 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 18:26:54 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 18:08:54 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 17:25:26 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Most programmers will one day be coding on
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 18:26:54 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 18:08:54 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 17:25:26 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Most programmers will one day be coding on mobile devices,
though I admit I'm in a small, early-adopting minority
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 18:08:54 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 17:25:26 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Most programmers will one day be coding on mobile devices,
though I admit I'm in a small, early-adopting minority now:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:29:27 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
You want to be able to compile D programs that go on a smart
phone because that's where the growth of computer users is
coming from.
That's not all that obvious. I think a lot of the adults who got
computers in the mid 90s did so to
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 17:25:26 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Most programmers will one day be coding on mobile devices,
though I admit I'm in a small, early-adopting minority now:
http://bergie.iki.fi/blog/six-weeks-working-android/
A blog post is not evidence that the majority of
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:29:27 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:12:56 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[snip]
But that established PC userbase shrinking is not what you
should be worried about. I've talked to multiple middle-class
consumers in developing markets- they would be
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:12:56 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[snip]
But that established PC userbase shrinking is not what you
should be worried about. I've talked to multiple middle-class
consumers in developing markets- they would be considered poor
in the US if you converted their income to
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 11:57:58 UTC, Tony wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 09:16:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Why do predictions about the future matter when at the
present Windows dominates the desktop and is also strong in
the server space?
Because that desktop market matters much
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 09:16:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Why do predictions about the future matter when at the
present Windows dominates the desktop and is also strong in
the server space?
Because that desktop market matters much less than it did
before, see the current mobile dominance,
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 05:13:42 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
One thing is clear, though: claiming that Windows is "dead" is,
frankly, ridiculous. Even a non-Windows person like me who
rarely has any reason to notice things Windows-related, can see
enough circumstantial evidence around me
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 08:49:05 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 00:16:19 UTC, Mengu wrote:
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 13:32:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't know how intense your data analysis is, but I
replaced a Win7 ultrabook that had a dual-core i5 and 4 GBs
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 11:38:21AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 02/11/17 07:13, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > There is another side to this argument, though. How many times have
> > *you* reviewed the source code of the software that you use on a
> > daily basis? Do you really
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 08:53:07AM +, Patrick Schluter via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 05:13:42 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> And that's a nice argument for D (dmd, phobos) as it is quite compact and
> relatively well written so that it can be reviewed by mere
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:16:02AM +, Dave Jones via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 08:59:05 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
> > On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 06:28:52 UTC, codephantom wrote:
> > >
> > > But Ken Thompson summed it all up nicely: "You can't trust code
>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 07:08:51AM +, codephantom via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo wrote:
> > Linux as a market that is so fragmented on the desktop level.
>
> This demonstrates an all to often misunderstanding of the purpose of
> Linux, and open
On 02/11/17 07:13, H. S. Teoh wrote:
There is another side to this argument, though. How many times have
*you* reviewed the source code of the software that you use on a daily
basis? Do you really*trust* the code that you theoretically*can*
review, but haven't actually reviewed? Do you
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 08:59:05 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 06:28:52 UTC, codephantom wrote:
But Ken Thompson summed it all up nicely: "You can't trust
code that you did not totally create yourself."
Even that is wrong. You can trust code you create
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 06:28:52 UTC, codephantom wrote:
But Ken Thompson summed it all up nicely: "You can't trust code
that you did not totally create yourself."
Even that is wrong. You can trust code you create yourself only
if it was reviewed by others as involved as you. I do
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 05:13:42 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 04:13:39AM +, codephantom via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo wrote:
> /Signed: A pissed off Windows user
I think you've summed it all up right there ;-)
But
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo wrote:
Linux as a market that is so fragmented on the desktop level.
This demonstrates an all to often misunderstanding of the purpose
of Linux, and open source in general (depending on what licence
is used).
Fragmentation is an important,
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 06:28:52 UTC, codephantom wrote:
Linus gave a great talk about this important principle back in
2001:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVTWCPoUt8w
btw. 36:12 is a good starting point in the video, it's where Ken
Thompson (yes, the one and only) asks Linus a
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 05:13:42 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
There is another side to this argument, though. How many times
have *you* reviewed the source code of the software that you
use on a daily basis? Do you really *trust* the code that you
theoretically *can* review, but haven't
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 04:13:39AM +, codephantom via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo wrote:
> > /Signed: A pissed off Windows user
>
> I think you've summed it all up right there ;-)
>
> But seriously, Windows rightly has its place... and for good
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo wrote:
/Signed: A pissed off Windows user
I think you've summed it all up right there ;-)
But seriously, Windows rightly has its place... and for good
reasons.
Most importantly, it provided the ease of installation along with
a easy to use
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 21:55:56 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[snip] I'm not sure anybody cares about these market share
arguments anyway.
Ha, fair enough.
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 21:19:55 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 19:49:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
As for saying Windows is dying, that is a factual examination
of the data
When you say it is dying, I (and perhaps most others) would
assume the argument you are making
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 21:19:55 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
When you say it is dying, I (and perhaps most others) would
assume the argument you are making is that not only is Windows
in decline, but also that it is about to no longer exist as a
meaningful platform for programmers to code
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 19:49:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
As for saying Windows is dying, that is a factual examination
of the data
When you say it is dying, I (and perhaps most others) would
assume the argument you are making is that not only is Windows in
decline, but also that it is
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo wrote:
For a dying platform as so many advocate here, it seems to be
doing fairly well.
Maybe i am too old but the whole dying platform gig has been
doing all the way to Windows ME and Vista and 8 and ...
The reality is, for any user that
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:59:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
Windows 32 bit is the special one - it is the ONLY platform
where D works out of the box without additional downloads.
That's one reason why I advocate it for just playing around -
it just works.
On ALL other platforms for
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo wrote:
There is a issue with Windows. The whole attacking the
messenger, the whole idiotic argumentation's that Windows is
dying, it is all pure useless trolling the people who ask a
simple questions: How to solve the D 64bit issue so that like
For a dying platform as so many advocate here, it seems to be
doing fairly well.
Maybe i am too old but the whole dying platform gig has been
doing all the way to Windows ME and Vista and 8 and ...
The reality is, for any user that wants to be productive Windows
is hard to beat. The only
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 09:24:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't propose ignoring it, but I suggest not to invest too
much more into it, like all the work it would take to get VS or
other Windows IDE support up to the level where Windows devs
seem to want.
I'm not sure how much work
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 08:49:05 UTC, Joakim wrote:
If your point is that the 1% of PC users who do such things
will stick with PCs and the remaining 99% will switch to
mobile, I agree with you. :)
You leave only 0% for DeX :)
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 09:14:22 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 29/10/17 23:21, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 20:58:45 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 18:52:06 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
What makes you think that windows is a "dying platform"!?
On 29/10/17 23:21, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 20:58:45 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 18:52:06 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
What makes you think that windows is a "dying platform"!? There is no
evidence to suggest this.
Take a look at the links in the
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 00:16:19 UTC, Mengu wrote:
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 13:32:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't know how intense your data analysis is, but I replaced
a Win7 ultrabook that had a dual-core i5 and 4 GBs of RAM with
an Android tablet that has a quad-core ARMv7 and
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 13:32:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't know how intense your data analysis is, but I replaced
a Win7 ultrabook that had a dual-core i5 and 4 GBs of RAM with
an Android tablet that has a quad-core ARMv7 and 3 GBs of RAM
as my daily driver a couple years ago, without
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 13:32:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
There will always be a few Windows cockroaches that survive the
mobile nuclear blast, but we're talking about the majority who
won't.
Why do predictions about the future matter when at the present
Windows dominates the desktop
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 13:32:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't know how intense your data analysis is, but I replaced
a Win7 ultrabook that had a dual-core i5 and 4 GBs of RAM with
an Android tablet that has a quad-core ARMv7 and 3 GBs of RAM
as my daily driver a couple years ago, without
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 16:50:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
Do those Python/Numpy users have the level of VS or other
Windows IDE support that D currently doesn't? Either way, math
modeling is such a small niche that I'm not sure it makes a
difference, though I'm glad Ilya and others are
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 17:35:51 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 16:50:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[snip]
No, it happens when they streamline and automate their entire
workflow much more, to the point where they aren't using
antiquated document systems anymore:
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 16:50:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[snip]
No, it happens when they streamline and automate their entire
workflow much more, to the point where they aren't using
antiquated document systems anymore:
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 15:46:56 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 13:32:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
The decline itself doesn't imply a collapse, the collapse is
coming because the mobile market is looking for new growth
avenues and releasing mobile accessories like Samsung's
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 13:32:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
The decline itself doesn't imply a collapse, the collapse is
coming because the mobile market is looking for new growth
avenues and releasing mobile accessories like Samsung's DeX
dock or laptop replacements like the iPad Pro or this
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 12:30:12 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 08:21:56 UTC, Joakim wrote:
That's funny, because you're the only one using that routine.
I've linked to extensive data showing that Windows is already
dying in the thread that I gave you, specifically my
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 08:21:56 UTC, Joakim wrote:
That's funny, because you're the only one using that routine.
I've linked to extensive data showing that Windows is already
dying in the thread that I gave you, specifically my first and
last posts in that thread. You seem not to be
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 01:51:33 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 23:01:37 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I'd argue you need to improve on understanding things.
Specifically, just as WordStar once dominated the market and
is now dead, the same is happening to Word and Windows
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 23:01:37 UTC, Joakim wrote:
It has not been fully replaced _yet_, but that is precisely
what is about to happen.
You got to try harder then the "because I say so" routine.
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 23:01:37 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I'd argue you need to improve on understanding things.
Specifically, just as WordStar once dominated the market and is
now dead, the same is happening to Word and Windows now.
It has not been fully replaced _yet_, but that is
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 22:48:56 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 22:36:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 22:29:01 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 22:22:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I suggest you read up on some computing history,
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 22:36:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 22:29:01 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 22:22:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I suggest you read up on some computing history, start with
WordStar:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordStar
I
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 22:29:01 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 22:22:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I suggest you read up on some computing history, start with
WordStar:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordStar
I fail to see how Wordstar is relevant.
Perhaps that's why
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 22:22:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I suggest you read up on some computing history, start with
WordStar:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordStar
I fail to see how Wordstar is relevant. Regardless people are not
going to use mobile in the work place. You crusade
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 21:59:36 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 21:36:50 UTC, Joakim wrote:
pointed out there, mobiles are coming after the desktop and
laptop markets, and will likely kill off Wintel in the coming
years.
No, they are not "coming after the
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 21:36:50 UTC, Joakim wrote:
pointed out there, mobiles are coming after the desktop and
laptop markets, and will likely kill off Wintel in the coming
years.
No, they are not "coming after the desktop and markets", that's a
ridiculous claim to make. You know
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 21:30:06 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 21:21:58 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 20:58:45 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 18:52:06 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
What makes you think that windows is a
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 21:21:58 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 20:58:45 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 18:52:06 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
What makes you think that windows is a "dying platform"!?
There is no evidence to suggest this.
Take a
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 20:58:45 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 18:52:06 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
What makes you think that windows is a "dying platform"!? There
is no evidence to suggest this.
Take a look at the links in the thread I linked you, which show
PC
96 matches
Mail list logo
