[Issue 15957] Disabled postblit + template mixin break opAssign with confusing error message

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15957 --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright --- (In reply to Dicebot from comment #4) > Interesting. Why does it need to create opAssign when post-blit is disabled? The @disable has no effect on the logic. An opAssign is always

Re: Proposed: start DConf days one hour later

On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well. Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly concerned about folks who need to take off

Re: Spurious thought…

On 4/27/2016 9:25 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote: Has anyone made the: Foundation Foundation and Empire Second Foundation joke as yet? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwIyClDuBgo=youtu.be=11

Re: With statement extension

On 04/28/16 10:28, Adrian Matoga via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:34:18 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote: >> [...] >> >>ref Ex1() { return e1.someProperties.someModulusX; } > > Unless any of the properties is an enum or, well, a @property, and I'd expect > both in

Re: Commercial video processing app in D (experience report)

On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 12:42:05 UTC, thedeemon wrote: Hi, I just wanted to share some experience of using D in industry. Recently my little company released version 2.0 of our flagship product Video Enhancer, a video processing application for Windows, and this time it's written in D.

Re: Computer Vision Library in D

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 11:32:25 UTC, Michael wrote: And I would also like to see some more scientific libraries make it into D. Though I understand that including it in the standard library can cause issues, it would be nice to at least get some Linear Algebra libraries in experimental

Re: Commercial video processing app in D (experience report)

On 2016-04-28 01:53, Walter Bright wrote: Wonderful, thanks for taking the time to write this up. I'm especially pleased that you found great uses for a couple features that were a bit speculative because they are unusual - the user defined attributes, and the file binary data imports. I'm

Re: Some questions on latest work

On 4/26/2016 2:49 PM, Bill Hicks wrote: [...] Criticizing D is fine here. Personal attacks are not welcome.

Re: LZ4 decompression at CTFE

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 06:03:46 UTC, Marco Leise wrote: There exist some comparisons for the C++ implementations (zlib's DEFLATE being a variation of lz77): http://catchchallenger.first-world.info//wiki/Quick_Benchmark:_Gzip_vs_Bzip2_vs_LZMA_vs_XZ_vs_LZ4_vs_LZO

Inheritance of mixin

I'm running into a set of problems where both inheritance and mixin-added functionality really lend a hand to my project. Unfortunately, they don't necessarily work well together, as certain mixins need to be restated for each inheritor. As a toy example, if I wanted to mixin some

Re: With statement extension

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 11:10:21 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote: On 04/28/16 10:28, Adrian Matoga via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:34:18 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote: [...] ref Ex1() { return e1.someProperties.someModulusX; } Unless any of the properties is an

Re: Walter's Famous German Language Essentials Guide

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 06:43:52 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 27 April 2016 at 13:25, Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d wrote: Am Wed, 27 Apr 2016 03:59:04 + schrieb Seb : nitpick: Wo ist _das_ WC? In German WC we have definite articles and as

Re: Commercial video processing app in D (experience report)

On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 12:42:05 UTC, thedeemon wrote: Cerealed This compile-time-introspection-based serializaition lib is really great: powerful and easy to use. We're probably using an old version, haven't updated for some time, and the version we use sometimes had problems

relative benefit of .reserve and .length

I timed some code recently and found that .reserve made almost no improvement when appending. It appears that the actual change to the length by the append had a very high overhead of something over 200 instructions executed, regardless if the .reserve was done. This was a simple append to

Re: Walter's Famous German Language Essentials Guide

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 06:51:04 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 04/26/2016 07:57 PM, Walter Bright wrote: To prepare for a week in Berlin, a few German phrases is all you'll need to fit in, get around, and have a great time: 1. Ein Bier bitte! 2. Noch ein Bier bitte! 3. Wo ist der WC! The

[Issue 15920] std.traits.MemberFunctionsTuple gives a wrong result

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15920 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/26f3eb9b1f2d3c2574d627e6b5dd6a1db12fe1b6 Fix issue 15920 - std.traits.MemberFunctionsTuple gives

Re: Automatically enforce Phobos's styleguide

On 04/28/2016 09:50 AM, Seb wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 13:46:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/27/2016 11:41 PM, Seb wrote: Just a quick update that #4243 is in and the linting bot is now running. As I mentioned earlier there are still many trivial flags of Dscanner's static

[Issue 15957] Disabled postblit + template mixin break opAssign with confusing error message

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15957 --- Comment #6 from Dicebot --- This is rather far from what I'd call "documented somewhere" :) Sorry if this semantics may seem intuitive to you, but they are in fact highly confusing, at least with existing error messages. I

Re: Walter's Famous German Language Essentials Guide

On 28.04.2016 11:15, Chris wrote: Except when it corresponds to the natural gender, i.e. der Mann, die Frau. It's interesting that the word for child is neuter (das Kind). Looks like children are not yet considered to be of any sex, which makes a lot of sense. Then again Mädchen (girl) is

[Issue 15954] std.experimental.logger repeats wstring message

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15954 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Issue 9082] Add "interleave" function

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9082 Jack Stouffer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 15925] [REG 2.071] Import declaration from mixin templates are ignored

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15925 Dicebot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pub...@dicebot.lv --

Re: Inheritance of mixin

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 10:21:34 UTC, Andrew Benton wrote: I'm running into a set of problems where both inheritance and mixin-added functionality really lend a hand to my project. Unfortunately, they don't necessarily work well together, as certain mixins need to be restated for each

Re: Inheritance of mixin

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 12:41:57 UTC, Basile B. wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 10:21:34 UTC, Andrew Benton wrote: [...] This is a common error with mixin template. The static things gets only evaluated once. If you want to be evaluated in each class type you need a true template

Re: Automatically enforce Phobos's styleguide

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 13:46:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/27/2016 11:41 PM, Seb wrote: Just a quick update that #4243 is in and the linting bot is now running. As I mentioned earlier there are still many trivial flags of Dscanner's static analysis that could be enabled. I

Re: relative benefit of .reserve and .length

On 4/28/16 9:09 AM, Basile B. wrote: Out of an appender I believe .reserve can be used to force page creation if you know that several pages will be allocated. For example for an ubyte[] when .length goes from 16 to 17 the memory block *really* allocated by realloc goes from 16 to 4096. Hm...

Re: relative benefit of .reserve and .length

On 4/28/16 8:56 AM, Jay Norwood wrote: I timed some code recently and found that .reserve made almost no improvement when appending. It appears that the actual change to the length by the append had a very high overhead of something over 200 instructions executed, regardless if the .reserve was

Re: Computer Vision Library in D

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 11:50:55 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 11:32:25 UTC, Michael wrote: And I would also like to see some more scientific libraries make it into D. Though I understand that including it in the standard library can cause issues, it would

Re: Inheritance of mixin

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 10:21:34 UTC, Andrew Benton wrote: So to the point: Is there an easier way to do this that I'm missing? Is there a language-design reason that mixed in templates can't inherit? It seems like an intuitive use of mixin. Mixins are (mostly) just a convenient way

Re: relative benefit of .reserve and .length

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 12:56:24 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote: I timed some code recently and found that .reserve made almost no improvement when appending. It appears that the actual change to the length by the append had a very high overhead of something over 200 instructions executed,

Re: Walter's Famous German Language Essentials Guide

On 27 April 2016 at 13:25, Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Am Wed, 27 Apr 2016 03:59:04 + > schrieb Seb : > >> nitpick: Wo ist _das_ WC? >> In German WC we have definite articles and as a WC can be used by >> both sexes, it is neutral

Re: LZ4 decompression at CTFE

Am Tue, 26 Apr 2016 23:55:46 -0700 schrieb Walter Bright : > On 4/26/2016 3:05 PM, Stefan Koch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > originally I want to wait with this announcement until DConf. > > But since I working on another toy. I can release this info early. > > > > So as

Re: Commercial video processing app in D (experience report)

On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 12:42:05 UTC, thedeemon wrote: Hi, I just wanted to share some experience of using D in industry. Recently my little company released version 2.0 of our flagship product Video Enhancer, a video processing application for Windows, and this time it's written in D.

Re: String lambdas

On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 21:18:35 deadalnix via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 12:31:18 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu > > wrote: > > On 04/26/2016 03:45 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote: > >> I think that the drawback you mentioned does not outweigh the > >> benefits > >> gained from

Re: String lambdas

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 03:15:36 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 00:14:41 UTC, deadalnix wrote: More generally, it is not clear what is allowed to do for merging functions. In C/C++ it is assumed that different function MUST have different identities. I don't

Re: Proposed: start DConf days one hour later

On 28 April 2016 at 07:10, Mithun Hunsur via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 04:47:38 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: >> >> On 28 Apr 2016 6:30 AM, "Mithun Hunsur via Digitalmars-d-announce" < >> digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com>

Re: Walter's Famous German Language Essentials Guide

On 27 April 2016 at 04:57, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote: > To prepare for a week in Berlin, a few German phrases is all you'll need to > fit in, get around, and have a great time: > > 1. Ein Bier bitte! > 2. Noch ein Bier bitte! > 3. Wo ist der WC! 4. Zahlen

Re: Proposed: start DConf days one hour later

On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well. Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly concerned about folks who need to take off

Re: LZ4 decompression at CTFE

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 20:12:58 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 06:55:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Sounds nice. I'm curious how it would compare to: https://www.digitalmars.com/sargon/lz77.html https://github.com/DigitalMars/sargon/blob/master/src/sargon/lz77.d

[Issue 15957] Disabled postblit + template mixin break opAssign with confusing error message

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15957 --- Comment #9 from Walter Bright --- https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/5723 --

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

Wierd, I am almost sure it does not work for me last time when I tried :) Dne 28.4.2016 v 22:54 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d napsal(a): { int i = 0; while(i < 100) {...} }

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On 4/28/16 4:36 PM, Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d wrote: Dne 28.4.2016 v 22:20 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d napsal(a): (BTW, swift doesn't allow arbitrary new scopes) And D does? Sure. { int i = 0; while(i < 100) {...} } // i no longer defined Won't work in swift.

Re: Walter's Famous German Language Essentials Guide

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 13:49:15 UTC, jack wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 06:51:04 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 04/26/2016 07:57 PM, Walter Bright wrote: To prepare for a week in Berlin, a few German phrases is all you'll need to fit in, get around, and have a great time: 1. Ein

aquivalent to pragma comment

hey guys, as the title says, im looking for an aquivalent to pragma comment(linker, "export:functionname"), is there any in D? greetings, Andi

Re: With statement extension

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 11:39:22 UTC, Seb wrote: If it's just about syntax sugar, I definitely would prefer to be able to use alias over ref, e.g. alias v = el.someProperties.aRatio; The main issue with this currently is that you can only alias symbols, but el.someProperties.aRatio is

[Issue 15965] New: [REG 2.070] Reference to other CT-known field on struct instantiation now yields "circular reference"

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15965 Issue ID: 15965 Summary: [REG 2.070] Reference to other CT-known field on struct instantiation now yields "circular reference" Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All

Re: C header file: tagged enumerations

On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 16:04:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: BTW, this enumeration looks terrible. I would flag this as blocking if it were a code review, even in C++. -Steve Yeah, I didn't even consider that different versions have different enum values; that is going to be a

[Issue 15966] New: [REG 2.071] {public,protected} imports in base class ignored on symbol lookup

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15966 Issue ID: 15966 Summary: [REG 2.071] {public,protected} imports in base class ignored on symbol lookup Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All

[Issue 15957] Disabled postblit + template mixin break opAssign with confusing error message

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15957 --- Comment #7 from Walter Bright --- Those are good suggestions. --

Re: C header file: tagged enumerations

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 17:40:23 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: enum tagINSTALLMESSAGE { // 12 others ... INSTALLMESSAGE_INITIALIZE , INSTALLMESSAGE_TERMINATE , INSTALLMESSAGE_SHOWDIALOG , [greaterThan(500)] INSTALLMESSAGE_PERFORMANCE,

[Issue 15959] core.sys.windows modules should be modified for x64

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15959 j...@red.email.ne.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from

IDE - Coedit 2, update 5 released

See https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases

[Issue 15967] Dwarf EH caused a 85Kib increase in hello world binary

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15967 Jack Stouffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@jackstouffer.com

Re: Some questions on latest work

On 28.04.2016 05:55, Joakim wrote: On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:38:17 UTC, Max Samukha wrote: On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 18:16:42 UTC, Joakim wrote: He gave very specific criticism, along with a code sample, then made a prediction, followed by suggesting another competing language

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 22:37:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: Of course, in an ideal world you'd have a "forever" keyword instead, but using up an entire keyword just for this one specific kind of loop seems a little excessive. forever: { // stuff goto hell; // who needs break? //

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 18:53:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: grrr... and they removed C-style for statements (i.e. for(;;)) I can understand wanting to remove bad ideas, but 1) removing something this fundamental to the language and 2) removing something that not only doesn't lead

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:01:02PM +, Seb via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 18:53:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > >grrr... and they removed C-style for statements (i.e. for(;;)) > > > >-Steve > > I agree with the other people on this list - cleaning up a language

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On 28.04.2016 22:01, Seb wrote: I agree with the other people on this list - cleaning up a language is great and should be done. `++` might be a bad example, but (empty) C-style for loops are! Leave those alone.

Re: Some questions on latest work

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:40:36AM +0200, Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] > Ugly code can be written in any language. "Real programmers can write assembly code in any language. :-)" -- Larry Wall :-P T -- If the comments and the code disagree, it's likely that *both* are wrong. --

Re: C header file: tagged enumerations

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 08:54:45 UTC, Kagamin wrote: enum { // 12 others ... INSTALLMESSAGE_INITIALIZE , INSTALLMESSAGE_TERMINATE , INSTALLMESSAGE_SHOWDIALOG } static if(_WIN32_MSI >= 500) enum INSTALLMESSAGE_PERFORMANCE=15; static if(_WIN32_MSI >= 400)

[OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

This is what bouncing the rubble looks like. 1. Swift 3 will no longer allow mutable variables as parameters. Instead, your parameters will be immutable, or reference (inout). To fix this, you can assign your immutable variable to a mutable one (immutability is always head immutability in

Re: LZ4 decompression at CTFE

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 17:58:50 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 17:29:05 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: What's the benefit? I mean after CTFE-decompression they are going to add weight to the binary as much as decompressed files. Compression on the other hand

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

grrr... and they removed C-style for statements (i.e. for(;;)) -Steve

Re: LZ4 decompression at CTFE

On 28-Apr-2016 21:31, deadalnix wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 17:58:50 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 17:29:05 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: What's the benefit? I mean after CTFE-decompression they are going to add weight to the binary as much as decompressed

[Issue 15957] Disabled postblit + template mixin break opAssign with confusing error message

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15957 --- Comment #8 from Walter Bright --- Documentation: https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/1285 --

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On 4/28/2016 2:32 PM, Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d wrote: Wierd, I am almost sure it does not work for me last time when I tried :) That's because in dmd there's the line: if (strcmp(user, "Daniel") == 0) setScoping(false); It's a feature!

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On Friday, 29 April 2016 at 01:36:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: That's because in dmd there's the line: if (strcmp(user, "Daniel") == 0) setScoping(false); It's a feature! That one was really funny! ... or maybe I am just thinking this because it is 3 am here...

[Issue 15959] core.sys.windows modules should be modified for x64

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15959 j...@red.email.ne.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kelethun...@gmail.com --- Comment #2

[Issue 15955] dwExtraInfo in winuser.d is DWORD in some cases, should be ULONG_PTR

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15955 j...@red.email.ne.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

Re: Some questions on latest work

On 4/28/2016 3:40 PM, Timon Gehr wrote: Ugly code can be written in any language. Of course. But my problem is when there is no way to write an attractive piece of code to perform some functionality, i.e. if you *cannot* write beautiful code.

Re: Inheritance of mixin

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 12:28:23 UTC, tsbockman wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 10:21:34 UTC, Andrew Benton wrote: So to the point: Is there an easier way to do this that I'm missing? Is there a language-design reason that mixed in templates can't inherit? It seems like an

[Issue 15920] std.traits.MemberFunctionsTuple gives a wrong result

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15920 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: Mid level IR

On Friday, 14 August 2015 at 16:13:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: Rust is getting a mid level IR for speeding up compilation. Looks like it will be in rust "soonish" http://blog.rust-lang.org/2016/04/19/MIR.html https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/4gp6hc/introducing_mir/

[Issue 15964] New: The template constraints for std.uni.sicmp are too permissive

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15964 Issue ID: 15964 Summary: The template constraints for std.uni.sicmp are too permissive Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 18:49:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: 1. Swift 3 will no longer allow mutable variables as parameters. Instead, your parameters will be immutable, or reference (inout). To fix this, you can assign your immutable variable to a mutable one (immutability is

Re: LZ4 decompression at CTFE

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 17:29:05 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: Compression on the other hand might be helpful to avoid precompressing everything beforehand. I fear that is going to be pretty slow and will eat at least 1.5 the memory of the file you are trying to store. If you want a

Re: Constructing an enum using the members of an AliasSeq as enumerator names

On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 15:30:55 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote: That takes longer to compile, though. Probably needs more memory as well. Thanks! Added here https://github.com/nordlow/phobos-next/blob/master/src/typecons_ex.d#L425

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On 4/28/16 3:21 PM, David Nadlinger wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 18:49:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: Please, D, don't ever do this kind of stuff! I just gained about 45 warnings in my iOS project. … and what? This statement alone is hardly an argument. Both those warnings are

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On 4/28/16 3:39 PM, Nick Treleaven wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 18:49:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: 1. Swift 3 will no longer allow mutable variables as parameters. Instead, your parameters will be immutable, or reference (inout). To fix this, you can assign your immutable

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 19:45:47 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: If you don't want to mutate it, don't put var in the parameter name. I put var there because I wanted to mutate it. Swift requires that already. It just now won't let you do it in the parameter declaration, you have to

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:49:19PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 22:37:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: > >Of course, in an ideal world you'd have a "forever" keyword instead, > >but using up an entire keyword just for this one specific kind of > >loop

Re: Web page listing all D compilers (and DMDFE version!) on travis-ci

On 04/28/2016 04:03 PM, Seb wrote: FYI you miss the available ldc alpha and betas. On purpose? Didn't initially occur to me, but I'd say that's a "possible future enhancement". It will take more work, and some extra thought, to figure out how to handle: Right now, my tool relies on the

[Issue 15775] Object.factory replacement based on experimental allocators

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15775 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 15682] Implement efficient setops for builtin AAs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15682 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On 04/28/2016 02:49 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: This is what bouncing the rubble looks like. 1. Swift 3 will no longer allow mutable variables as parameters. Instead, your parameters will be immutable, or reference (inout). To fix this, you can assign your immutable variable to a mutable

[Issue 15901] Perfect hash map for the visual D lexer

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15901 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On Friday, 29 April 2016 at 04:06:24 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Though I'm on the fence of ++. Sure, I like it, but when I have to use a language that doesn't have it, +=1 works just as well (I just waste a little time on the edit cycle because I always use ++ first out of habit.) I find ++

Re: Some questions on latest work

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 22:40:36 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: On 28.04.2016 05:55, Joakim wrote: On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:38:17 UTC, Max Samukha wrote: [...] Syntax matters. Both for the ease of programmers reading it and, as we've seen with C++, the speed of the compiler. I

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On 4/28/2016 8:44 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Hopefully this one won't drag on as ridiculously log as pants-sagging did, Did? past tense? Dang, I'm out of step again. I better get a belt.

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On 4/28/2016 9:06 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: But, this might sound nuts, but I still think one of the simplest languages I know is assembly language. It just does what you tell it, one step at a time, with each line basically looking the same, it is light on syntax and language rules (unless you

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On 29.04.2016 06:51, default0 wrote: for(int i = 0; i < 5; ++i) arr1[i] += arr2[i]; And for(int i = 0; i < 5; ++i) arr[i].SetIndex(i); My guess, not knowing Swift, is that you will now implement these in a more verbose, harder to read way using while or use some concept similar to

Re: Inheritance of mixin

On Friday, 29 April 2016 at 00:32:54 UTC, Andrew Benton wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 12:28:23 UTC, tsbockman wrote: (I'll skip your example code here, since it has some problems and won't compile without significant changes.) I'm not sure what issues you're having that are

Re: Walter's Famous German Language Essentials Guide

On 28/04/16 09:43, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote: Ha! There is no logical at all behind whether a word is masculine, feminine or neutral in German. In Hebrew, there is no such thing as a neutral noun, (though there are nouns that can be either male of female). When you go from one

[Issue 15963] Hidden unresolved forward reference issue in std.uni

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15963 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/59b8791d2da7d8e764a1a4dbbab5643cfe746212 fix Issue 15963 - Hidden unresolved forward reference

Re: Proposed: start DConf days one hour later

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 05:10:25 UTC, Mithun Hunsur wrote: On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 04:47:38 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: [...] Aha - if Google Maps is accurate, I have nothing to worry about :) For reference, the number it gives me is 37 minutes. In that case, +1 to starting late;

[Issue 15963] Hidden unresolved forward reference issue in std.uni

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15963 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: [OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 18:49:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: Please, D, don't ever do this kind of stuff! I just gained about 45 warnings in my iOS project. … and what? This statement alone is hardly an argument. Both those warnings are trivial to fix in an automated fashion; in

Re: Proposed: start DConf days one hour later

On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well. Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly concerned about folks who need to take off

Re: LZ4 decompression at CTFE

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 18:31:25 UTC, deadalnix wrote: Also, the damn thing is allocation in a loop. I would like a have an allocation primitive for ctfe use. But that would not help too much as I don't know the size I need in advance. storing that in the header is optional, and

Re: Proposed: start DConf days one hour later

On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well. Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly concerned about folks who need to take off

  1   2   >