Re: DigitalMars' GSoC application has been rejected

2014-03-13 Thread Joakim
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 13:40:30 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote: On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 11:13:32 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote: I am quite sure I will have time for this, next year. We'll keep in touch. I had also expressed and interest in helping out with this, as had at least one other

Re: D/Objective-C 64bit

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Murphy
Michel Fortin wrote in message news:lfqcs6$2su5$1...@digitalmars.com... If the compiler is going to be converted to the D language (how is that progressing?), it'd probably be better to merge before that, otherwise it'll be a lot of work to port all those changes. The converter can convert

Re: D/Objective-C 64bit

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Murphy
Jacob Carlborg wrote in message news:lfqf4t$2v1o$1...@digitalmars.com... I think Daniel has said he as a working Linux compiler. He just need to create pull requests (and get them merged) for all changes his tool requires. The changes to dmd's source are all done(!), it's now time to start

Re: D/Objective-C 64bit

2014-03-13 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 13 March 2014 at 12:02:24 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote: The changes to dmd's source are all done(!), it's now time to start putting the manually ported stuff into the main repo. That's great :). -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: D/Objective-C 64bit

2014-03-13 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 12 March 2014 at 17:53:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I'll defer to domain experts on this one. Please advise. Yeah, we need some comments from Walter, Daniel, Kenji and others of the core DMD developers. Probably good to have comments from David and Iain as well, to get

Re: D/Objective-C 64bit

2014-03-13 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:20:54 + schrieb Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com: On Wednesday, 12 March 2014 at 17:53:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I'll defer to domain experts on this one. Please advise. Yeah, we need some comments from Walter, Daniel, Kenji and others of the core DMD

Re: D/Objective-C 64bit

2014-03-13 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2014-03-13 17:16, Johannes Pfau wrote: Is it possible to split objc.c into two files, one for backend interfacing functions (ObjcSymbols) and one for the generic frontend stuff? I would guess so. I would need to take a look to see how coupled the code in objc.c is. Although, most code is

Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325905-shared-phobos-library-doesn-t-work-on-all-linux-distributions Over $2000 in open bounties left: https://www.bountysource.com/trackers/383571-d-programming-language https://www.bountysource.com/trackers/455080-gdc

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Adam D. Ruppe
Nick recently did a patch for this one: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1327154-dmd-never-inlines-functions-that-could-throw+ we've had a lot of movement on this one https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1326911-dtoh-utility-convert-d-files-to-c-header-files and it pretty well works now

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Vladimir Panteleev
On Thursday, 13 March 2014 at 18:20:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325905-shared-phobos-library-doesn-t-work-on-all-linux-distributions Over $2000 in open bounties left: https://www.bountysource.com/trackers/383571-d-programming-language Looks like

GladeD - Gtk Glade Files to GtkD classes

2014-03-13 Thread Robert Schadek
Writing gui's by hand is not that much fun. Using glade files is also not so entertaining. GladeD creates class, out of glade files, you can inherited and implement. Glade is just a very small tool, I thought other people might find hand. Check: https://github.com/burner/gladeD

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Brad Anderson
On Thursday, 13 March 2014 at 18:38:45 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Nick recently did a patch for this one: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1327154-dmd-never-inlines-functions-that-could-throw+ we've had a lot of movement on this one

Re: D/Objective-C 64bit

2014-03-13 Thread Michel Fortin
On 2014-03-13 18:13:44 +, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said: On 2014-03-13 17:16, Johannes Pfau wrote: Is it possible to split objc.c into two files, one for backend interfacing functions (ObjcSymbols) and one for the generic frontend stuff? I would guess so. I would need to take a look

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Andrej Mitrovic
On 3/13/14, Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote: However, the biggest problem is the open pull request count. What good is authoring a patch if no one wants to take time to review it? IMHO, we don't need more bug bounties - we need REVIEWER bounties. Some way to convince

Re: Mono-D v1.5.2 - Completion improvements, dub support fixes

2014-03-13 Thread Rene Zwanenburg
On Sunday, 16 February 2014 at 12:59:31 UTC, Alexander Bothe wrote: On Sunday, 16 February 2014 at 11:49:08 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote: 5) Could you pastebin me your last log file(s) please? (You can open the folder via 'Help' menu - Open Log directory) Parts of the log file is Dutch (OS

Re: DigitalMars' GSoC application has been rejected

2014-03-13 Thread Craig Dillabaugh
On Thursday, 13 March 2014 at 10:23:09 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 13:40:30 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote: On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 11:13:32 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote: I am quite sure I will have time for this, next year. We'll keep in touch. I had also expressed and

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Joakim
On Thursday, 13 March 2014 at 18:38:45 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Generally though, I don't think the bounties are going to change much behavior; the only issues that will be addressed are the ones that we were going to do anyway, since the dollar amount is just too small to change a business

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Adam D. Ruppe, el 13 de March a las 18:38 me escribiste: Nick recently did a patch for this one: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1327154-dmd-never-inlines-functions-that-could-throw+ we've had a lot of movement on this one

Re: GladeD - Gtk Glade Files to GtkD classes

2014-03-13 Thread captaindet
On 2014-03-13 11:03, Robert Schadek wrote: Writing gui's by hand is not that much fun. Using glade files is also not so entertaining. GladeD creates class, out of glade files, you can inherited and implement. Glade is just a very small tool, I thought other people might find hand. Check:

Re: GladeD - Gtk Glade Files to GtkD classes

2014-03-13 Thread Robert Schadek
On 03/13/2014 11:26 PM, captaindet wrote: very neat! the test worked under windows as well. just a few tweaks were necessary cause i did not want to move yr logger into std, ... yet. well, a boy must have dreams ;-) I didn't expect it to run under win, but hey, nice to hear i have been

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Nick Sabalausky
On 3/13/2014 2:38 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: financially, I'd be better off flipping burgers. No real change to the incentive. I flipped burgers for a month when I was 16. Money being the same, I'd rather patch a compiler ;) But yea, if you do the math it does tend to work out less than

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 3/13/14, 11:38 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Nick recently did a patch for this one: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1327154-dmd-never-inlines-functions-that-could-throw+ we've had a lot of movement on this one

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Nick Sabalausky
On 3/13/2014 9:05 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: What would make the amounts interesting? Just taking a stab in the dark here but...greater numbers are probably more interesting numbers? :) (Sorry I can't be more helpful/specific than that.)

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Nick Sabalausky
On 3/13/2014 4:48 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: So these complicated DMD changesets can only really be reviewed by people with intricate knowledge of the compiler. I don't think there's that many people around with that kind of knowledge. I think that's a good, and important, point. And I think

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 3/13/14, 6:14 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: On 3/13/2014 9:05 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: What would make the amounts interesting? Just taking a stab in the dark here but...greater numbers are probably more interesting numbers? :) (Sorry I can't be more helpful/specific than that.)

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 3/13/14, 2:45 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote: Is still better than nothing, and at least a nice gesture to the community, but definitely not bounty-driven development :D Probably we don't want that anyway. Where I'd hope to get is a point where bounties increase participation and dynamism,

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Adam D. Ruppe
On Friday, 14 March 2014 at 01:05:08 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Still, that's more than the $0/hr for most of the D contributions we're happy to do, so I'm not complaining. Aye, but it doesn't push you over the line from I'd like to do this but am too busy with other work or meh i don't care

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Adam D. Ruppe
On Friday, 14 March 2014 at 01:19:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Yah, I meant HOW MUCH would make the amounts interesting? That's hard to say, but something around 5x larger would be enough for me at least to start doing D bugs instead of taking more PHP contracts - that'd put the bounty

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Nick Sabalausky
On 3/13/2014 9:23 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Friday, 14 March 2014 at 01:05:08 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Still, that's more than the $0/hr for most of the D contributions we're happy to do, so I'm not complaining. Aye, but it doesn't push you over the line from I'd like to do this but am

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Nick Sabalausky
On 3/13/2014 9:19 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 3/13/14, 6:14 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: On 3/13/2014 9:05 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: What would make the amounts interesting? Just taking a stab in the dark here but...greater numbers are probably more interesting numbers? :) (Sorry

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Nick Sabalausky
On 3/13/2014 2:40 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: The only Phobos one is the std.getopt one, however its situation is two abandoned patches and no clear goal as to what constitutes a change worthy of marking the issue as fixed and paying out the bounty. Yea, this is actually a general issue I

Re: Bountysource activity

2014-03-13 Thread Mathias LANG
On Friday, 14 March 2014 at 01:16:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Probably we don't want that anyway. Where I'd hope to get is a point where bounties increase participation and dynamism, and steer work toward certain issues. Andrei From my point of view, bounties won't be super efficient