On Thursday, 13 March 2014 at 10:23:09 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 13:40:30 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 11:13:32 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
I am quite sure I will have time for this, next year. We'll
keep in touch.
I had also expressed and intere
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 13:40:30 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 11:13:32 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
I am quite sure I will have time for this, next year. We'll
keep in touch.
I had also expressed and interest in helping out with this, as
had at least one other pos
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 02:34:53 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Unfortunately we won't participate in GSoC this year. The
decision was not surprising - our application has been rejected.
Sadly there are lots of things we could have done better. Our
application has been a low-priority
On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 at 11:13:32 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
I am quite sure I will have time for this, next year. We'll
keep in touch.
I had also expressed and interest in helping out with this, as
had at least one other poster (Mike I think). While 2015 is
still a good way off perhaps we
I am quite sure I will have time for this, next year. We'll keep
in touch.
On 27/02/2014 22:25, Brad Roberts wrote:
Also, keep in mind that GSoC is pretty much two things:
1) a nice little pay check for students
2) a bit of structure around getting work done
I would say it's one more thing too: Being able to say you participated
in GSoC (for your resume/credentials,
On 2/27/14, 3:21 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 22:25:27 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 2/27/14, 2:03 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 21:59:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/27/14, 1:42 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
In that case,
On 2/27/14, 3:22 PM, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 22:25:27 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
We can still do #2 without #1. And we don't need google to make it
happen. How about trying a practice run despite not having google
tossing in the funding?
If someone would want to co
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 01:02:11 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 18:47:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
For better or worse Walter and I are the bottlenecks on a lot
of D-related stuff.
I would really like to help with this, and (I think) others
would too.
The ide
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 23:21:29 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
https://community.kde.org/Getinvolved/development
(at the bottom)
Experienced D developers, who feel they could use
on a specific project, or who would be otherwise interested in
taking on an 'apprentice' could list projects
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 18:47:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
For better or worse Walter and I are the bottlenecks on a lot
of D-related stuff.
I would really like to help with this, and (I think) others would
too.
The ideas for GSoC 2015 could start now. I took the liberty of
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 22:25:27 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
We can still do #2 without #1. And we don't need google to
make it happen. How about trying a practice run despite not
having google tossing in the funding?
If someone would want to contribute, what would be the right
person
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 22:25:27 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 2/27/14, 2:03 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 21:59:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/27/14, 1:42 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
In that case, as Yoda would say:
Volunteer to prepare GSoC 20
On 2/27/14, 2:03 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 21:59:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/27/14, 1:42 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
In that case, as Yoda would say:
Volunteer to prepare GSoC 2015 proposal I shall.
Do you have copies of past submissions as a gu
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 21:59:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/27/14, 1:42 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 21:37:03 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/27/14, 11:11 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
One more question. Do you feel this is a job that someon
On 2/27/14, 1:42 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 21:37:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/27/14, 11:11 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
One more question. Do you feel this is a job that someone who isn't
necessarily well versed in the various technologies could take
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 21:37:03 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/27/14, 11:11 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
One more question. Do you feel this is a job that someone who
isn't
necessarily well versed in the various technologies could take
on (in a
sort of manager role), or would you
On 2/27/14, 11:11 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
One more question. Do you feel this is a job that someone who isn't
necessarily well versed in the various technologies could take on (in a
sort of manager role), or would you need someone who has the expertise
to evaluate various proposals.
Any mot
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 18:47:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/27/14, 10:10 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 02:34:53 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Unfortunately we won't participate in GSoC this year. The
decision was
not surprising - our applicat
On 2/27/14, 10:10 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 02:34:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Unfortunately we won't participate in GSoC this year. The decision was
not surprising - our application has been rejected.
Sadly there are lots of things we could have done be
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 02:34:53 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Unfortunately we won't participate in GSoC this year. The
decision was not surprising - our application has been rejected.
Sadly there are lots of things we could have done better. Our
application has been a low-priority
On 27 February 2014 02:34, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> Unfortunately we won't participate in GSoC this year. The decision was not
> surprising - our application has been rejected.
>
> Sadly there are lots of things we could have done better. Our application
> has been a low-priority side job for
22 matches
Mail list logo
