On Thursday, 16 November 2017 at 23:03:41 UTC, solidstate1991
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 11:46:48 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
I'm thinking on picking up some Android tablet for development
purposes, would be good to port my game engine for mobile
devices, probably have to resort
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 11:46:48 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I just saw this post about the upcoming Lenovo/AT Moto Tab
and thought of you:
https://www.phonearena.com/news/Lenovo-Moto-Tab-ATT-features_id99782
For $300, you can buy a tablet that lets you do everything you
normally do on a
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 03:15:04 UTC, solidstate1991
wrote:
After all this flaming about Windows, mobile devices (I
personally prefer my desktop PC thanks to its "power", or at
least what it used to left, thanks to long unemployment time
and lack of income, have a Nokia Lumia which I
On 11/14/2017 7:15 PM, solidstate1991 wrote:
Walter Bright: What's the licensing state of DMC and OPTLINK?
Boost
Can it made open-source?
Yes.
If yes, we should patch in a COFF32/64 support, maybe even port it
to D for easier development. I can spend some of my time working on the DLL
On 15/11/2017 3:15 AM, solidstate1991 wrote:
After all this flaming about Windows, mobile devices (I personally
prefer my desktop PC thanks to its "power", or at least what it used to
left, thanks to long unemployment time and lack of income, have a Nokia
Lumia which I cannot upgrade to W10
After all this flaming about Windows, mobile devices (I
personally prefer my desktop PC thanks to its "power", or at
least what it used to left, thanks to long unemployment time and
lack of income, have a Nokia Lumia which I cannot upgrade to W10
due to BS reasons, and I think open-source
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 20:22:21 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Hmmm, i get home to find eight messages from codebaby, he sees
sockpuppets everywhere, snapping at every bit of bait I laid...
says he'll ignore my whole comment and then replys to it
another two times, LOL, a full on meltdown
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:55:59 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:39:07 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:34:00 UTC, realdonaldtrump
wrote:
Lol now I know ur full of it cause real football is only found
in America.
With their cute little helmets. I love it.
We don't need no helmets over here.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:34:00 UTC, realdonaldtrump
wrote:
Lol now I know ur full of it cause real football is only found
in America.
With their cute little helmets. I love it.
We don't need no helmets over here.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:34:00 UTC, realdonaldtrump
wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:50:20 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I wish I was young again. I used to love arguing about
pointless crap, i couldn't resit it, mac vs
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:50:20 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I wish I was young again. I used to love arguing about
pointless crap, i couldn't resit it, mac vs pc, risc vs cisc,
sony vs nintendo, utd vs liverpool
utd and
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
that just works for most everyone else. And yes you hate
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I wish I was young again. I used to love arguing about
pointless crap, i couldn't resit it, mac vs pc, risc vs cisc,
sony vs nintendo, utd vs liverpool
utd and liverpool? just bunch of little kiddies kicking around a
ball.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:46:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Considering you kept ignoring my evidence of Android and
jumping to Apple, I'd say that it was perfectly accurate.
Oh well, I'm focusing on what I am interested in… Anyway, it is
rather obvious that subjective ad-hominem statements in
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:33:08 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 10:26:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I accurately characterized the tenor of their problem
Uhm… «accurately» ?? LOL!! 8'D
Considering you kept ignoring my evidence of Android and jumping
to Apple,
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I'm old and don't give a shit .
Perhaps it's all that *snorting*...that stuff will do that to you.
Go see your local doctor, cause I believe there's something you
can take..to get it all flowing again...
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 10:26:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I accurately characterized the tenor of their problem
Uhm… «accurately» ?? LOL!! 8'D
generalize and point that out, ie he _was_ confused in the
points he was making.
I am never confused, but this is dlang.org, I've seen worse…
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 10:26:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I'm not sure why you're picking out my comments from arguments
I had with Ola and Tony days ago at the end of all this, but we
had OT conversations about OS market share where I felt they
were repeatedly making the same mistake.
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
that just works for most everyone else. And yes you hate
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
that just works for most everyone else. And yes you hate
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:56:05 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1185516
*snort* scientific yeah.. he called you names, so you called
him names, so he called you names.. every child in the
playground knows that game.
A bit less *snorting* and perhaps you'd
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:56:05 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1185516
*snort* scientific yeah.. he called you names, so you called
him names, so he called you names.. every child in the
playground knows that game.
a bit less *snorting* and maybe you'd
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:51:33 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
That's it little fella let it all out...
*passes codebaby a tissue*
really?
you think that was a useful contribution?
who are you anyway?
One of Jerry's 'other' accounts perhaps?
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 03:48:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/8/2017 1:36 PM, Joakim wrote:
You don't want to own up to the fact that
Please refrain from berating others here.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 03:54:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/10/2017 3:28 AM, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 01:14:32 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:47:46 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:41:32 UTC, Jerry wrote:
harassing people isn't defending your argument.
Yeah...it's not nice...being harassed..is it.
You have to
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:47:46 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:41:32 UTC, Jerry wrote:
harassing people isn't defending your argument.
Yeah...it's not nice...being harassed..is it.
You have to be harassed to know what if feels like.
That was my objective.
On 11/10/2017 3:28 AM, Joakim wrote:
Your logic is extremely confused.
[...]
You seem to be confused
Please stop berating others here.
On 11/8/2017 1:36 PM, Joakim wrote:
You don't want to own up to the fact that
Please refrain from berating others here.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:47:46 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:41:32 UTC, Jerry wrote:
harassing people isn't defending your argument.
Yeah...it's not nice...being harassed..is it.
You have to be harassed to know what if feels like.
That was my objective.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:41:32 UTC, Jerry wrote:
You weren't attacked and you aren't a victim ...
Another quote to add..thanks.
Keep em' coming... I could make money of this...
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:41:32 UTC, Jerry wrote:
harassing people isn't defending your argument.
Yeah...it's not nice...being harassed..is it.
You have to be harassed to know what if feels like.
That was my objective. Not to harass you, but to let you know how
I felt when you
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:22:46 UTC, codephantom wrote:
It's so like people these days, and even on these forums, to
attack the ones sticking up for themselves, rather than
stopping them from being attacked in the first place, just for
having a different opinion - or god
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:40:29 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:36:17 UTC, Jerry wrote:
It's easy to take a single sentence out of context maybe i
should just keep everything as one long protruding sentence so
that you are forced to quote everything so that
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:36:17 UTC, Jerry wrote:
It's easy to take a single sentence out of context maybe i
should just keep everything as one long protruding sentence so
that you are forced to quote everything so that you you won't
misinterpret what it means by what I don't know
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 00:24:31 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 20:35:40 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Taking away the start button wasn't that big of a deal.
Thanks...another qoute to add to:
'The famous quotes of Jerry the MSFT fanboy'.
It's easy to take a single
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:39:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/10/2017 2:54 PM, codephantom wrote:
MSFT fanboy...at it again...
Knock it off, everyone.
Oh gee..Sorry daddy.
...maybe you have jumped in a few 100 threads ago, and addressed
your response to the actual perpertrator
On 11/10/2017 2:54 PM, codephantom wrote:
MSFT fanboy...at it again...
Knock it off, everyone.
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 10:18:09 UTC, Tony wrote:
But those humans at the top, working for public companies, are
monitored by a board and stockholders who place "making money"
as the main, and normally only, measure of their job
performance.
Sure, when you get a leader that is weak on
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 02:07:03 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 20:35:40 UTC, Jerry wrote:
When I joined the forum a little while back, I dared to
suggest that D should be able to compile a 64bit binary on
Windows, without having to relying on gigabytes of
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 14:28:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 12:55:24 UTC, Tony wrote:
Very few companies are not "all about making money". That is
why Americans were laid off by the millions and replaced by
workers in countries with much cheaper labor
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 20:35:40 UTC, Jerry wrote:
..if people had their way we would still be in the stone age
cause they were more comfortable with using stones than having
to learn to use something new.
I'll add that one as well, to Jerry's famous quotes.
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 20:35:40 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Whether to use Visual Studio or not isn't a "design decision".
It's not relatable in the slightest bit.
It's a tool that generates a binary file.
... a multi-GB tool ...just to generate a binary...
Thank. Another qoute to add to:
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 20:35:40 UTC, Jerry wrote:
When I joined the forum a little while back, I dared to
suggest that D should be able to compile a 64bit binary on
Windows, without having to relying on gigabytes of
proprietaty, closed source, bloat from MSFT.
I stand by that
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 20:35:40 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Taking away the start button wasn't that big of a deal.
Thanks...another qoute to add to:
'The famous quotes of Jerry the MSFT fanboy'.
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 22:54:40 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 22:16:55 UTC, Jerry wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 01:19:06 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 01:15:26 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Not much of a technie nerd if it "just finished"
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 22:16:55 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Indeed, you could contact Microsoft for support and know you
are talking to professional and not some rabid fanatic that
will split hairs over the differences between linux and freebsd.
Well.. if MSFT stop making stupid design
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 22:16:55 UTC, Jerry wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 01:19:06 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 01:15:26 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Not much of a technie nerd if it "just finished" and you've
already exhausted your knowledge and have given up :).
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 01:19:06 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 01:15:26 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Not much of a technie nerd if it "just finished" and you've
already exhausted your knowledge and have given up :). Just
sayin'.
Well, everytime I wanted to find
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 12:55:24 UTC, Tony wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 11:28:41 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Your logic is extremely confused. Let me spell it out for
you: the Mac is all but dead, particularly when compared to
the mobile computing tidal wave, since they sell 10 iPhones
Oh wait, I forgot. The have a new 8-core model that is expected
to sell for $5000… Right… So that would bring the 18-core model
at… $15000?
At what pricing-point is it reasonable to call Apple customers
for suckers? :-)
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 12:55:24 UTC, Tony wrote:
Very few companies are not "all about making money". That is
why Americans were laid off by the millions and replaced by
workers in countries with much cheaper labor rates. Bad for the
workers, good for "making money". Apple isn't unique
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 11:28:41 UTC, Joakim wrote:
It would either be you and Jobs, or just you, letting them
rebel. I would keep the line.
That's funny, as I was responding to your statement above,
"So, let them rebel." :D
"Let them rebel" was with regard to your point of view. As
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 11:10:30 UTC, Tony wrote:
I don't see any relationship between that iOS picture in the
Wiki article and Metro. The idea is RESIZABLE, LIVE tiles. Not
effects to make them look 3D or not.
"live tile" meaning the underlying app can dynamically put
readable
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 10:42:37 UTC, Tony wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 09:34:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Why did they fund development of a new iMac Pro which is
coming this December as well as the new MacBook Pros that
came out this June? That's a contradiction of "milk it
like
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 09:34:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I see, so your claim is that MS, Nokia, HP, Sony, all much
larger companies than Apple or Google at the time, could not
have countered them even on a lucky day. I wonder why this is,
as they certainly had more money, you don't
On 10/11/2017 10:42 AM, Tony wrote:
If people ever get so cost-conscious that they decide to buy a $150
companion for their phone, instead of a $400 laptop, it's unlikely they
will be using iPhones. You can get a nice Android phone with plenty of
RAM/ROM for half the price of an iPhone.
You
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 09:34:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Why did they fund development of a new iMac Pro which is
coming this December as well as the new MacBook Pros that
came out this June? That's a contradiction of "milk it
like an iPod".
Because their userbase was rebelling? I take
Apple had a big benefit on mobile with their iTunes store that
had already been established on Desktop and the very popular
iPod. They also had rich USA buyers who bought more apps than
users of the other platforms which encouraged developers to
target iOS. And they had the Apple/Jobs
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 01:19:06 UTC, codephantom wrote:
Well, everytime I wanted to find something, I had to google
it...
Then I realised I had to pay for it as well...and, that's when
i gave up.
Bill Gates wasn't the richest man in the world for so long
without reason. ;)
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 14:42:41 UTC, Joakim wrote:
As I said earlier, the mobile OS story is not over yet, there
are more changes to come.
Yeah...like more factories making more dongles.
You want a dongle?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XSC_UG5_kU
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 01:15:26 UTC, Jerry wrote:
Not much of a technie nerd if it "just finished" and you've
already exhausted your knowledge and have given up :). Just
sayin'.
Well, everytime I wanted to find something, I had to google it...
Then I realised I had to pay for it as
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 01:04:05 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 00:23:03 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I don't disagree that there are differences between FreeBSD
and Linux, but my point is that for most folks, the
differences are small enough that it's not all
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 00:23:03 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I don't disagree that there are differences between FreeBSD and
Linux, but my point is that for most folks, the differences are
small enough that it's not all that different from trying to
convince someone to use one Linux
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 00:23:03 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Plenty of us do get picky about details, which would lead us to
one or the other, depending on our preferences, but there are
way more similarities than differences - to the point that to
many folks, the differences seem
On Thursday, November 09, 2017 23:42:37 codephantom via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 11:47:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Oh, I'm all for using FreeBSD, but most of the arguments for
> > using FreeBSD over Windows apply to Linux. And if you can't get
> > someone
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 11:47:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Oh, I'm all for using FreeBSD, but most of the arguments for
using FreeBSD over Windows apply to Linux. And if you can't get
someone to switch from Windows to Linux, you're not going to
get them to switch to FreeBSD.
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 14:42:41 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Do you blame them, given such anti-competitive measures long
undertaken by MS and Apple?
Big businesses do what they can get away with. Once upon a time
governments cared about anti-trust (E.g. AT and IBM), but
nowadays it seems
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 14:42:41 UTC, Joakim wrote:
There is some truth to this, but if you cannot compete with a
free product- cough, cough, Windows Mobile- I don't know what
to tell you. In other words, google cannot afford to spend a
fraction of the money on Android that Apple
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 14:22:22 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I also think we should add to this discussion that Google was
hellbent on going forward with Android even when it was clearly
inferior. Apple tried to squish out Google's services from
their iOS products for a while. And
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 14:15:47 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 00:09:32 UTC, Joakim wrote:
smaller search company, did with Android, leaving aside Apple
because of your silly claims that their existing software gave
them a headstart, which is why those
I also think we should add to this discussion that Google was
hellbent on going forward with Android even when it was clearly
inferior. Apple tried to squish out Google's services from their
iOS products for a while. And that is exactly what Google tries
to prevent by funding things like
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 00:09:32 UTC, Joakim wrote:
smaller search company, did with Android, leaving aside Apple
because of your silly claims that their existing software gave
them a headstart, which is why those former computing giants
are all either dead or fading fast.
It is
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 12:27:49 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 00:09:32 UTC, Joakim wrote:
...
I think you greatly overestimate what was needed to compete in
this mobile market at that time. I'm not saying it was easy,
but the PC and mobile giants before
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 00:09:32 UTC, Joakim wrote:
...
I think you greatly overestimate what was needed to compete in
this mobile market at that time. I'm not saying it was easy,
but the PC and mobile giants before iOS/Android clearly didn't
have the vision or ability to execute
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 02:34:35 UTC, codephantom wrote:
I'll try it out today too(I just have to wait till the
Windows 10 iso finishes downloading...so maybe I should say...
I'll try it out 'tomorrow'...
ohhh..wtf...it's still downloading??.gee...
I might go to sleep..and
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 02:23:33 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I just got DMD set up using those instructions (though not sure
all were needed, I followed them anyway). I am probably going
to make good use of this, so thanks for highlighting it.
Thanks for testing it and letting us know.
I'll
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 18:06:25 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Thanks. I'll make use of that. I'll be happy if I can get
blas/lapack working.
I just got DMD set up using those instructions (though not sure
all were needed, I followed them anyway). I am probably going to
make good use of
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 22:28:32 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 21:36:58 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't know why you go back to Apple, when you clearly cut
out the part of the above excuses quote where I pointed out
that _google had none of the
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 22:28:32 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
in anything less than a decade. Apple could focus on hardware
and drivers and a little bit of fickling with their existing
OS-X frameworks. That's a major difference.
I didn't mean «fickling», that was quasi-norwegian…
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 21:36:58 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't know why you go back to Apple, when you clearly cut out
the part of the above excuses quote where I pointed out that
_google had none of the advantages_ you think were necessary to
win mobile, yet created the OS that now
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 21:02:26 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 17:51:45 UTC, Joakim wrote:
way to axing that line altogether. The notion that their iOS
line, which now brings in the vast majority of their profits
and revenue, is riskier is a joke.
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 17:51:45 UTC, Joakim wrote:
way to axing that line altogether. The notion that their iOS
line, which now brings in the vast majority of their profits
and revenue, is riskier is a joke.
That really depends on what you mean by risk. There is no general
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 17:51:45 UTC, Joakim wrote:
The linux build of dmd has already been used on WSL to compile
ldc without a problem:
https://wiki.dlang.org/Build_LDC_for_Android#Notes_for_Bash_on_Ubuntu_on_Windows
Thanks. I'll make use of that. I'll be happy if I can get
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 14:36:11 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 12:35:19 UTC, codephantom
wrote:
btw. I wonder if anyone has got the linux version of DMD x64
to run on the Windows Subsystem for Linux (available in
Windows 10 I believe).
I'm not that familiar
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 09:34:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 00:09:51 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 19:46:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Not at all, it makes things easier certainly, but there's a
reason why mobile devs always test on
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 12:35:19 UTC, codephantom wrote:
btw. I wonder if anyone has got the linux version of DMD x64 to
run on the Windows Subsystem for Linux (available in Windows 10
I believe).
I'm not that familiar with the Windows Subsystem for Linux, but
it looks like it
On Wednesday, November 08, 2017 12:35:19 codephantom via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 11:47:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Personally, I think that the best course of action in general
> > as a developer is to try and make your software as
> > cross-platform as
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 11:47:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Personally, I think that the best course of action in general
as a developer is to try and make your software as
cross-platform as reasonably possible and let folks run
whatever they want to run. A lot of the OS-related
On Wednesday, November 08, 2017 10:35:17 codephantom via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 09:34:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
> > ...
>
> Companies (along with their technologies and profits) are like
> waves in the ocean..they come..and they go..
>
> But BSD Unix.. like the energy
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 09:34:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
...
Companies (along with their technologies and profits) are like
waves in the ocean..they come..and they go..
But BSD Unix.. like the energy which binds our molecules...will
always be with us... it seems..
So I re-iterate. If
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 00:09:51 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 19:46:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Not at all, it makes things easier certainly, but there's a
reason why mobile devs always test on the actual devices,
because there are real differences.
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 06:27:15 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 01:13:00 UTC, codephantom
wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 00:09:51 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
[...]
Redhat have demonstrated that it can be done. GPL is not the
obstacle. The
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 01:13:00 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 00:09:51 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
[...]
Redhat have demonstrated that it can be done. GPL is not the
obstacle. The obstacle is the desire to control/dominate a
market. There, GPL will
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 00:09:51 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
But frankly, I don't think many giants would start with a GPL
code base like Linux.
Redhat have demonstrated that it can be done. GPL is not the
obstacle. The obstacle is the desire to control/dominate a
market. There,
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 19:46:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Not at all, it makes things easier certainly, but there's a
reason why mobile devs always test on the actual devices,
because there are real differences.
Mostly with low level stuff in my experience.
Now, they're not going to dump
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 15:09:05 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 14:33:28 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Hopefully that means we'll see more competition in
mobile than just android/iOS in the future.
Watch out for the MINIX3/NetBSD combo...a microkernel coupled
with a
97 matches
Mail list logo
