[digitalradio] ROS: Works well ! 1st QSO

RX: <13:49 UTC> <23.4 Hz.> CQ CQ CQ de KB5OZE KB5OZE KB5OZE pse k TX <13:50 UTC> KB5OZE KB5OZE de K3UK K3UK K3UK kn RX: <13:50 UTC> <23.4 Hz.> K3UK DE KB5OZE WORKS WITH vox btu TX <13:51 UTC> Great, strong here in NY. BTU de k3uk RX: <13:51 UTC> <23.4 Hz.> tHANKS CONSIDERING THAT i AM RUNNING

[digitalradio] ROS notification: KB5OZE has received your Radio Message

FYI, this is how the auto notification works. Andy K3UK -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:33 AM Subject: ROS notification: KB5OZE has received your Radio Message To: k3uka...@gmail.com ** Please don't reply to this email

[digitalradio] ROS band plan , and other modes

Avoid 14075-76 since this is where JT65A is on 20M. I like the idea of us all be around the same place with differing modes, that way, we can hear people calling and do not have to constantly twirl the dial. Since most people's waterfalls , including the one in ROS, are 3kHZ wide , and people's

[digitalradio] ROS width

I think it is 2200 Hz wide. Andy On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Glenn L. Roeser wrote: > > > Hello Toby, > Your suggestions sound fine with me. I'm sorry that I missed the second M > during our QSO. The band was just not there. > I'm wondering? How wide is this mode? I'm sure the RTTY stati

[digitalradio] Go here to download ROS

http://*rosmodem*.wordpress.com/ On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:32 AM, ivor peters wrote: > > > > m5...@blueyonder.co.uk > hello all. > can someone tell me where i go to > download this ros. > many thanks 73 ivor/m5ply > >

Re: [digitalradio] ROS, legal in USA?

Joe, N8FQ... http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/d-305.html Describes Spread Spectrum as n

Re: [digitalradio] ROS

Jose, a button that hands over to the other person in the call e.g. k3uk de p5dx kn K3UK would have "P5DX" " in the destination" box. I think it would be the same as the "call button" though. Andy K3UK On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:58 PM, jose alberto nieto ros < nietoro...@yahoo.es> wrote: > >

Re: [digitalradio] ROS, legal in USA?

Thanks Skip, I agree after doing some more reading and I will not use this mode on HF. Your UHF idea sounds good. Andy K3Uk On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:32 PM, KH6TY wrote: > > > Unfortunately, the ROS explanation of Spread Spectrum and Frequency Hopping > in the documentation too closely resemble

Re: [digitalradio] RTTY and mode selection on radios

FSK is RTTY but so is AFSK. Some rigs support the use of RTTY in FSK while others require a TNC or sound card to generate the tones. FSK on transceivers tends to invoke narrower filters and the frequency you are receiving is displayed differently. The serious RTTY guys tend to prefer FSK. This

[digitalradio] FCC Spread Spectrum

3. " Spread spectrum is a technique whereby the energy of the transmitted signal is distributed over a wide segment of spectrum. The signal power density can be very low and the duration of a transmission on any frequency in the segment of the spectrum can be but a fraction of a second. SS s

[digitalradio] ROS experiments

My "experiments" (many receptions and 2 transmissions) today with ROS 1 and ROS 16 shows that it is quite an effective mode. Congratulations Jose. Of particular interest to me were the several occasions where I decoded a signal that was not visible in the waterfall or audible to my ears. It w

Re: [digitalradio] ROS experiments

racter rate. As you know > ROS is two times faster than OLIVIA 32/1000. > > You should compare ROS 16 with OLIVIA 8/1000. Then the different is about > 5-6 dBs for the same character rate. > > ------ > *De:* Andy obrien > *Para:* digitalradio &

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS, legal in USA?

Andy, I think you are incorrect. 50% of the 89 messages , so far, are related to the legality in the USA issue. You are also preaching to the choir, here. Most of the member agree that the regulations in the USA should be as you suggest, and many representations have been made. OK, now back to

[digitalradio] QRV 14080 ROS 1 and 16

My station is listening for ROS signals on 14080 USB (dial). I am interested in how ROS does across the Atlantic around 10-1300 UTC when 20M is usually marginal. Hopefully I will receive some European or African signals. Andy K3UK Fredonia, NY FN02

Re: [digitalradio] QRV 14080 ROS 1 and 16

I missed their rumblings, but did not know anyone was using ROS near the JT65A campsite, I will be tuned to 14080 until Man U and Everton match starts. Andy K3UK On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Dave Ackrill wrote: > > > Andy obrien wrote: > > My station is listening for ROS s

Re: [digitalradio] QRV 18105 ROS 1 and 16

I will move to 17M and listen on 18105 Andy K3UK On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Dave Ackrill wrote: > > > Andy obrien wrote: > > I missed their rumblings, but did not know anyone was using ROS near the > > JT65A campsite, I will be tuned to 14080 until Man U and Eve

Re: [digitalradio] QRV 18105 ROS 1 and 16

I have "auto" chosen, so either 16 or 1 . Andy K3UK On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Dave Ackrill wrote: > > > Andy obrien wrote: > > My station is listening for ROS signals on 14080 USB (dial). > > Oh, and I meant to ask if you were using 16 or 1 baud Andy? > > Dave (G0DJA) > > >

[digitalradio] Digital modes band plans.

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:54 AM, bruce mallon wrote: > > > > SO what you are saying is lets ctush the other modes so we can play with our > new toy ? > We just went through this with wideband/spredsprectrum on 6 and 2 meters . > I dont care what mode anyone uses as long as it does not cause p

Re: [digitalradio] ROS FREQUENCY

Good point, I am so used to narrow modes that I forget such things. Andy K3UK On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:06 AM, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD < wd4...@suddenlink.net> wrote: > > > if you are gonna be trying new bands, at the minimum, > do use frequencies that are good for SSB or wideband digital

[digitalradio] Rethinking digital mode band plans-developing a solution

Just some thoughts, critique welcome. If we think about HF digital QSOs there are 5 general types. 1. Weak signal propagation "probes" that are frequent in nature and regularly used by hams around the world (JT65A, ROS, WSPR, SLOW CW), Usually the exchange is a signal report, callsign, and loca

Re: [digitalradio] Something to test

and vice-versa, can it withstand QRM? On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 2:54 PM, jhaynesatalumni wrote: > > > It would be interesting to try to find out how much ROS > interferes with other modes when it operates on top of them. > That is, if you had a RTTY or PSK or Olivia or some other kind > of QSO goi

[digitalradio] ROS "QRM" to 20M packet

Sholto, my tests suggest it is people on 14101 USB splashing in to you BBS frequency, rather than creeping up the band. Andy K3UK On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:01 PM, sholtofish wrote: > > > > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com , > "jhaynesatalumni" wrote: > > > > It would be interesting to tr

[digitalradio] ROS "bug"

It seems that an "invalid procedure" error occurs if the the two email addresses that appear in the @ macro for Baud 16 run together and the ending ">" of the first one, does not get printed. e.g. This is happened at the moment every time SV8CS sends his info with a weak signal. Perhaps it is tw

[digitalradio] Draft digital band plan (feedback solicited)

I took a look at the IARU Region 1 and Region 2 band plans, removed areas where there are clear differences (30, 40 and 160, I'll work on them later) , and produced a plan that is compatible with these two regions (I'll look at other regions). While doing this, and thinking how "easy" the task was

[digitalradio] Draft USA digital band plan (feedback solicited)

OK, while the USA drifts from the suggested IARU Region 2 band plan, here is an "almost" compatible digital band plan, "Compatible" with the Region 1 and Region 2 bandplan for digital modes with a couple of exceptions where "wide" and "narrow" digital modes are mixed . I mixed them because the US

[digitalradio] ROS, legal in USA? Letter to FCC

I have compiled a letter to Laura Smith Esq, at the FCC, with details of this mode. I will let you all know when I receive a reply. Andy K3UK

[digitalradio] USA digital bandplan chart

http://www.obriensweb.com/bandmap.html A quick and dirty chart. Comments welcome.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: USA digital bandplan chart

, and keep unattended modes at the upper end, where possible. On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:16 PM, wd4kpd wrote: > > > > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com , Andy > obrien wrote: > > > > http://www.obriensweb.com/bandmap.html > > > > A quick and dirty c

Re: [digitalradio] Why ROS?

Good question Alan. It does seem quite robust but does not seem to add anything that Olivia or some levels of Thor. Too early to say for sure. Andy K3UK On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Alan Beagley wrote: > > > Why this new mode? Advantages? > > 73 > > Alan NV8A > > >

[digitalradio] ROS ability to deal with ALE QRM?

Anyone been able to test ROS 16 with QRM present ? It would be interesting to use it on common ALE frequencies and see how it does when a brief ALE sounding occurs. The description suggests that is should be able to cope with the brief "QRM". Andy

Re: [digitalradio] ROS sked group

http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/ click on digital or... if you are greedy.. http://www.obriensweb.com/skedpskr4.html On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Toby Burnett wrote: > > > I think I have lost the message. There has been so many, did someone > come up with a ROS mode sked page yesterd

[digitalradio] Try some JT65A

Well, ROS 1 and 16 look like good new modes. I think I will give up on this mode until the FCC clarifies the legality for USA hams. For those having fun With ROS, don't forget much the same fun can be had with JT65A (ROS1) or Olivia (ROS 16). I am monitoring 3576 JT65A overnight Andy K3UK

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Try some JT65A

er > than JT65 too. > > 73 > > Sholto > > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com , Andy > obrien wrote: > > > > Well, ROS 1 and 16 look like good new modes. I think I will give up > > on this mode until the FCC clarifies the legality for USA hams. For >

Re: [digitalradio] Re: USA digital bandplan chart

Thanks for the feedback, some very good points. I think the higher end of CW portions, is an especially good point. Andy K3UK On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:50 PM, W8RIT wrote: > > > Hi Andy, > > First I'd like to say that I think I can argue both sides of the coin on > this matter. > I think it

Re: [digitalradio] FCC Technology Jail: ROS Dead on HF for USA Hams

Feel free to disagree, but please show respect for opinions that differ from yours. "BS" is not the most respectful term when disagreeing. Andy K3UK On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:36 PM, W2XJ wrote: > > > > Bonnie you have a Ham unfriendly addenda. Say what you like but at the end of > the day it

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Considerate Operation: CW and JT65A

I often "look" at the CW signal on the waterfall when I hear one close to me. My view is...if his signal is not exactly on the same part of the waterfall as mine, we are "OK". I can notch him out and he can do the same to me. A couple of hundred Hz separation should be all we need. On Mon, Feb

Re: [digitalradio] ROS Advantage- mode ranking

It seems unfair, especially because of all the hard work put in to developing it, but I do not see it as any better than many other modes... nothing that says "gee...this is way better ". It is GOOD, and a mode to add to our bag of tricks, but not a killer app. The software interface is very nice

[digitalradio] PSK SPOTS

That is a good point, Alan. Now that i think about it, you would think that after 10 years we would have come up with a point and click method. Andy K3UK On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Alan Barrow wrote: > > > jhaynesatalumni wrote: > > - > > > > My belief is that all the RTTY is largely fr

Re: [digitalradio] I'm curious about this Mix W oddity

I have seen something similar to this, I think, in DM780, when using Olivia mode. The previous QSO , or the tail end of it, is displayed back. Andy K3UK On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:56 AM, raf3151019 wrote: > > > Its happened so often that I'm now curious to know why a CQ response from a > user of

Re: [digitalradio] RTTY frequencies?

James, you will not have to LOOK. This contest will bring out thousabds of RTTY ops and 80-40-20-15-10 will be full if those bands are "open". The ARRL band plan will be where you find them, but some operators will go higher, Andy K3UK On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:49 AM, James French wrote: > >

[digitalradio] BREAKING NEWS. ARRL: ROS is SS and NOT legal on HF in USA

FYI From: Henderson, Dan N1ND Subject: RE: Spread Spectrum To: "Carol & Fred deleted for privacy. Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 7:13 AM Hi Fred: I ran this by our technical experts. They concur that ROS is a spread spectrum mode and as such is not allowed by the FCC on bands below 222 MHz.

[digitalradio] ROS . FCC request and response

-- Forwarded message -- From: Tim - N3TL Date: Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:58 PM Following is the complete text of the request I made to the FCC for a ruling on ROS use on HF by licensed U.S. amateurs, along with the response from the FCC I just received. As part of my request,

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Consensus? Is ROS Legal in US?`

The FCC has stated , today, that IF the author describes it as spread spectrum, the USA ham is responsible for determining the accuracy of this claim. They also affirmed that SS is not legal below 220 Mhz. The ARRL technical folks said today that , based on the description available, they believe

[digitalradio] ROS discussion: Ending 25/2/10 1200 UTC

Discussion of ROS' legality was allowed to continue because of the news from ARRL and FCC. The topic will be closed as of 25/2/10 at 1200 UTC. Get you final say in on the issue , if you wish. After that, leave the topic alone for a while. Andy K3UK Andy

Re: [digitalradio] ROS impressions so far

I have had a few more days to test it and watch how it does in QRM. Same impressions, a good mode but not offering substantially more than the other well known modes. In a couple of specific tests, Olivia 500-128 did better than ROS 1. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Stelios Bounanos wrote:

Re: [digitalradio] ROS impressions so far

ite and then sends Gmail ?[x]<http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/sked.php?page=digital&delete=852> 02/23 02:49 <*K3UK*> 10 watts[x]<http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/sked.php?page=digital&delete=851> 02/23 02:49 <*K3UK*> white line in FL-Dgi is on 1000hz sholto[x]<http://www.obri

Re: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.1.0 More Powerfull

Nice email feature. By the way, the version info says v2.1.1 but the exe file says 1.3.1 ? On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:50 PM, nietorosdj wrote: > > > Download here: http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/ > > And configure the Email menu > > >

Re: [digitalradio] LPDA calculation software?

Log Periodic Dipole Array On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Ian Wade G3NRW wrote: > > > From: obrienaj > > Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 Time: 06:12:07 > > > >Anyone have a link to the old LPDA DOS software? I found a couple of > >on-line calculators but they do not seem to allow for custom designs > >a

Re: [digitalradio] LPDA Software

Many thanks Myrton, the lpda software I have been looking for was at your link, 73 de Andy K3K On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:00 AM, n1gke wrote: > > > I hope you will find some useful software here -->>> > http://www.electromagnetics.biz/Tools.htm > > I will ask around of my local group and see wh

[digitalradio] BPSK125 this weekend

>From http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/weeklycont.php BPSK125 Bands: 80, 40, 20, 15, 10m Classes:Single Op All Band (High/Low)(24/12) Single Op Single Band (High/Low) Single Op Low Bands (High/Low) Single Op High Bands (High/Low Multi Op Single Transmitter (Old/Young)

[digitalradio] Screenshot: HRD-SDR-DM780 sync'd

http://www.obriensweb.com/hrdsdr.jpg FYI, SDR-IQ,, TS2000, SpectraVue, HRD, DM780 all fully sync'd and interfaced. Andy K3UK

[digitalradio] Calculating CPU use for multiple applications?

I like to multitask, and I am greedy... I like to keep an eye on several things at once. I am thinking about a better PC, one with enough CPU capability to run many tasks at the same time. Is there a way to calculate the total CPU demands of severall applications. Here is a list of what I often

[digitalradio] A new concept in digital mode band plans- reducing the number of tongues in the tower of Babylon

On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, g4ilo wrote: > To be honest I think the basic problem is just that there isn't enough space > on the busy bands for all the people who want to use a 2.2kHz wide digital > mode to use it. Because of all the QRM you just end up making the same > contacts you coul

Re: [digitalradio] ROS Path Simulations

Good tests, thanks Tony. On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Tony wrote: > > > All, > > I ran several path tests with ROS-16 and Olivia 2K this evening. The > simulator showed that Olivia is about as sensitive as ROS when configured to > run at the same baud rate, but it is not as sensitive when co

Re: [digitalradio] RS-ID & MSG-ID with SDR

Since the RS ID works well over this range with my SDR, I see no reason why the MSG ID would not work. Andy K3UK On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Dave Ackrill wrote: > > > sholtofish wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone has used the MSG ID function in MultiPSK with > an SDR radio? > > I have a P

Re: [digitalradio] Re: A new concept in digital mode band plans- reducing the number of tongues in the tower of Babylon

Just to make myself clear, I am not suggesting that we actually use the standard ALE digital mode for calling CQ. I'd be fine with it, but it is quite wide and would start a debate all over again. I'm also not suggesting we use ALE-style soundings that are unattended. What I like about the gene

[digitalradio] FCC comments further on ROS

>From Jose's web site http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/fcc-ros-legal-in-usa/ FCC: ROS LEGAL IN USA By José Alberto Nieto Ros It ended the controversy about whether ROS is legal in USA or not. For which they insisted on it was illegal: “A mamarla” The case you submitted via the FCC has been

[digitalradio] Statement on Withdrawal of Support for ROS (K3UK Sked Pages)

I was disturbed when the ROS author suggested that he was considering legal action against N3TL for merely raising the question of legality in the USA. I am even more disturbed that the author of the software has an apparent plan to include the callsign of certain hams in a "non-grata" list , sugg

[digitalradio] ROS rationing

Thanks to all those that expressed views, nice to see varying opinions. I will be rationing ROS related posts for the next few days. No email will be censored, I will simply send them through to the group in dribs and drabs, so that we can focus on a wider array of digital mode topics. Andy K3

Re: [digitalradio] TS-850S and ROS

The latest version has support for different comm ports. Andy K3UK On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Tom wrote: > > > I downloaded ROS the other day and just tried it for the first time today, > but it will not key my transmitter. I have my Kenwood on Com1 but I see > there are not other setting f

Re: [digitalradio] ROS UHF "net" February 6 1230 UTC

ooops, I meant MARCH 6th On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:16 PM, obrienaj wrote: > > > I will be on 432.090 mHz this Saturday Feb 6 at 1230 UTC . listening and > testing ROS 1 and 16. If interested, check in to the K3Uk Sked page > > http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/ > > >

[digitalradio] ROS Sked Page, someone else has one

http://ham2ham.com/room307_ros.php FYI, Andy K3UK

[digitalradio] Olivia web site

Members of this group that are new to digital mdoes may find this web site useful http://www.oliviamode.com/ What is Olivia? Where can I find a computer program for it? Olivia is a ham radio digital mode designed to work in difficult (low s/n ratios plus multipath propagation) conditio

[digitalradio] DARC 10-Meter Digital Contest: 1100Z-1700Z, Mar 7

Courtesy of http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/weeklycont.php DARC 10-Meter Digital Contest: 1100Z-1700Z, Mar 7 Mode: RTTY, Amtor, Clover, PSK31, Pactor Bands: 10m Only Classes:Single Op SWL Exchange: RST + Serial No. QSO Points: 1 poi

[digitalradio] NEW NARROWBAND DIGITAL MODE

-- Forwarded message -- From: ROS v2.5.0 Beta Date: Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:42 PM Subject: [New post] NEW NARROWBAND DIGITAL MODE To: k3uka...@gmail.com NEW NARROWBAND DIGITAL MODE

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia web site

I don't know of one. Pawel is a member of this group, so perhaps he can chime in on this. To have one avaiable much like the PSK Core that Moe gave the ham world, would be very nice. Andy K3UK On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, g4ilo wrote: > > > Andy. Do you or anyone know if there is an Olivia

[digitalradio] Dominoex revisited

It has been a few years since Dominoex was added to our tool box. I still see it on the air from time to time but not on a daily basis. I wonder why it is not used ? http://www.southgatearc.org/news/december2005/domino_ex.htm

[digitalradio] SDR-Radio Console updated pushed back to March 6-7

Simon Brown is finalising an important update to his SDR-Radio application . It was targeted for release March 5th but the date has been pushed back to March 6 or 7.. Check http://www.sdr-radio.com and click on "news" for info. \ Andy K3UK

[digitalradio] Ping Jockey Status (back-up info)

FYI. -- Forwarded message -- From: Bruce Brackin, N5SIX The PJ pages apparently went down last night. Use the nice backup page(s) that Lee, AA1YN has. http://www.aa1yn.com/vhf/vhfregister.html to register and set cookies (like PJ) and then on to the ping chat page. There is

[digitalradio] DX: ZK3OU ZK3YA 7-8 March

ZK3OU ZK3YA Nukunonu Island N7OU and W7YAQ will be active from Nukunonu Island, (IOTA OC-048),Tokelau Islands starting 7-8 March 2010 as ZK3OU and ZK3YA No word on what digital modes may be used. Andy K3UK

[digitalradio] ARRL views Chip to not be legal on HF in USA

>From the ROS web page (https://mail.google.com/mail/?hl=en&shva=1#inbox/1272ea080e273b49) , alleging that the ARRL views Chip64 not legal on HF. The language is rather odd though. "We read the information and reviewed the CHIP64 information yesterday and have come to the same place as with ROS -

[digitalradio] Fwd: [wpaNBEMS] Ragchew, 3/6/2010, 11:00 am

-- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:02 PM Subject: [wpaNBEMS] Ragchew, 3/6/2010, 11:00 am To: wpanb...@yahoogroups.com Reminder from: *wpaNBEMS Yahoo! Group * Title: Ragchew Date: Saturday March 6,

[digitalradio] The cost of digital mode interfaces

I was helping a ham get set-up for digital modes recently and turned to the issue of interfaces for digital modes. I researched the price for a Rigblaster Pro and was shocked that they sell for $299. My friend settled for another interface that cost $69, new. I was wondering about interfaces an

Re: [digitalradio] What is SS? Senor Ros is not an honest person !

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Arnaldo Coro wrote: > > > > So, amigos at "digital radio ",  my advise , and that's what I am going to > do, is to > alert ROS users of the possibility that the author of the software may even be > attempting to use it for other purposes that are not related to ama

Re: [digitalradio] JT65A harmonics

While harmonics from modes like PSK31 are common, I have never seen a JT65A signal generate what you describe. Interesting. Andy K3UK On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 11:28 AM, g4ilo wrote: > > > I was listening down around 14.077, just above some slow FSK mode which I > think is JT65A. The JT65A was tun

[digitalradio] Cooling off period

Please get you last comments in on this ROS issue by 0500 UTC Feb 7. This will give everyone a chance to cathart , get the issue fully vented. Then I am going to invoke a cooling off period when no posts will be allowed for 24 hours. Thanks. Andy K3UK Owner.

[digitalradio] ALE400 Experiment-Development of Standard Calling Mode: NAN NETWORK

Further to our earlier conversation about using many of the concepts in ALE networks for establishing digital mode QSOs, this weekend I will be using ALE technology to scan the following frequencies USB VFO frequencies plus standard ALE center frequency of 1625Hz. 3583 10143 14073 18103 24923 2812

[digitalradio] Silent scan with ALE and TS2000?

I can achieve a silent scan with PC-ALE and a TS-2000 but not with Multipsk. Has anyone figured out if it is possible with Multipsk? I know that with PC ALE you put the TS-2000 in split mode and it scans with VFO B, then switches to VFO A (in the same frequency) before transmitting a sounding .

[digitalradio] Re: Silent scan with ALE and TS2000?

I have it figured out now. The TS2000 is scanning silently with Multipsk in ALE400 mode. Andy K3UK On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Andy obrien wrote: > I can achieve a silent scan with PC-ALE and a TS-2000 but not with > Multipsk.  Has anyone figured out if it is possible with Multip

Re: [digitalradio] Cooling

Yep. Andy On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Tom Phelps wrote: > > > Hi Andy, > > Don't you mean March 7th, 2010? Just thought I would ask. > > Tom, Wd8MBE > > > >

[digitalradio] ROS with QRM

> > ROS still had problems in version 1.6.3 and it is easy to notice that it > > works in a free channel, but does not stand burst errors (in fact, > > errors long as a packet or pactor frame length) and its ability to copy > > crumbles. That does not happen, at least so noticeably, with JT65 or Ol

[digitalradio] 80M decodes tonight

04:48 ab9ft DOMINO 3584013 04:47 KA2TMU/2 DOMINO 3584008 04:37 AB9FT DOMINO 3583023 04:05 W3YJ OLIVIA 3583030 03:47 w3yj OLIVIA 3583498 03:45 W3YJ OLIVIA 3583498 03:03 nx8a OLIVIA 3584770 22:01 KB7RLY OLIVIA 18104067 21:16 N6CRR OLIVIA 14073571

Re: [digitalradio] Beta testing PSKmail 1.0

On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Rein Couperus wrote: > > > > java runs even on windoze > > the server needs a proper OS. :) > > Rein PA0R Nice way to put it :) Andy K3UK

Re: [digitalradio] 1976 FCC - Delete all Emission Types from Part 97

A "roger beep" that substitutes RSID instead , sends mode/callsign and a Q-sign ? In a PIC inside the rig. On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: > > > Unless you can convince the transceiver manufacturers to include the > capability in each unit, someone operating without a comp

[digitalradio] RS ID survey today on 20M

Here are the results of two hours of monitoring the entire digital band on 20M 14065-14110 37 BPSK31 25 BPSK250 04 RTTY45 02 MFSK16 01 CONTESTIA-8-250 Some of the above may be the same station (especially the PSK250) . In just over two hours only 5 modes heard. Seems we still have some ways to g

Re: [digitalradio] RS ID survey today on 20M

Exactly ! On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:10 PM, KH6TY wrote: > > > Andy, > > Isn't the current recommendation now not to use RSID for PSK31 or RTTY? > > Take those out, and not much RSID use at all! > > 73 - Skip KH6TY > > >

Re: [digitalradio] 1976 FCC - Delete all Emission Types from Part 97

Yep, same concept. On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Warren Moxley wrote: > > > > Ever heard of Mic-E protocol? > > --- On Mon, 3/8/10, Andy obrien wrote: > > From: Andy obrien > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 1976 FCC - Delete all Emission Types from Part 97 > To

[digitalradio] HB9DRV SDR-Radio updated 1e now available

HB9DRV SDR-Radio updated 1e now available http://www.sdr-radio.com/Downloads/March8th2010TechPreview1e.aspx cool Andy K3UK

[digitalradio] 80M RS ID Usage..survey

Another survey of RS ID usage, this time on 80M. This was unattended monitoring, I suspect the RS IDs were not from numerous stations. 14 MT63-500-LG 13 BPSK250 4OLIVIA-8-500 2OLIVIA-4-500 1BPSK31 Ideally, it would be useful to know how may transmissions were made that did not inv

Re: [digitalradio] RECOMPENSE DE LA FONDATION MELINDA

oops, sorry...I press "approve" rather than delete on this moderated spam. Andy K3Uk 2010/3/10 morgane d > > > Bonjour, > Nous avons le plaisir de vous annoncez que vous êtes l'un des heureux > gagnants de la Fondation Melinda. Les résultats ont été libérés et vous fait > bénéficier de 85.000,

[digitalradio] K3UK Sked page down...back-up in use

My Sked Page files has been hacked to send out spam emails from my web site. My ISP has disabled the folders as a security message and notified me. I will require a master reset of my web site , that may takes a few hours. You can use the back up site at http://www.electroblog.com/sked/ until

[digitalradio] Re: K3UK Sked page down...back-up in use

I am still waiting for my ISP to do a master re-set and then I will upload files . Hope to get it back later today, Andy K3UK On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Andy obrien wrote: > My Sked Page files has been hacked to send out spam emails from my web > site. My ISP has disabled the f

[digitalradio] EA PSK31 contest 16:00 UTC Saturday till 16:00 UTC Sunday (March 13-14, 2010).

This could be an interesting challenge, if not for the points...perhaps the chhalenge of trying to work all the Spanish provinces. Andy K3UK Sponsored by Unión de Radioaficionados Españoles (URE). The manager of the contest is EA4ZB. Participants: Any licensed amateur station. Date: 2nd full we

[digitalradio] Feld Hell Sprint: 1600Z-1800Z, Mar 13

Info courtesy of http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/weeklycont.php Feld Hell Sprint: 1600Z-1800Z, Mar 13 Mode: Feld Hell Bands: 160, 80, 40, 20, 15, 10m Classes:(none) Max power: 100 watts Exchange: (see rules) Work stations:

[digitalradio] Updated "sked page" news after site hack... a few changes

My K3UK Sked Pages are now restored after the site was hacked on Friday. For security purposes my ISP re-set my web site and deleted all files . The site has the same address but has been upgraded to a different server (supposedly better, faster). My apologies to the may users that were inconven

[digitalradio] How far did I get today ?

Who heard me today, so far. Not very active today but a few heard me. How about others ? Andy K3UK Recvr BandModeDistanceTime (UTC) F6DKQ 20m JT65A 3986 miles 21:38:51 GW3LEW 20m JT65A 3417 miles 21:39:15 MD0MAN 17m PSK31 3366 miles 19:48

[digitalradio] WARC band scan results...

I set Multipsk to report to PSKreporter and Commander to change bands every 2 minutes. Here is what I decoded from 123o to 2330 UTC. It reads in reverse order, reading it from bottom to top will give you a sense of the band openings. Andy K3UK 23:32 AD5DX PSK31 10142056 23:26 CO1RG PSK31 10141

[digitalradio] Re: WARC band scan results...

PSK31 18101943 11:49 F8DBF PSK31 18101511 11:46 I4GAD PSK31 18100502 On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Andy obrien wrote: > I set Multipsk to report to PSKreporter and Commander to change bands > every 2 minutes.  Here is what I decoded from 123o to 2330 UTC.  It > reads in reverse order, r

Re: [digitalradio] FCC - Spread Spectrum NPRM

I read the proposed rule making and did not find any reference to frequency/band. So, where is it saying SS is allow but only on 220Mhz and above ? On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:11 PM, KH6TY wrote: > > > Extensive tests on 70cm using ROS 16 baud spread spectrum have been > disappointing. ROS appear

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WARC band scan results...

; >14:51 PF7DKW PSK31 18101283 > >14:44 KC9O PSK31 18101285 > >14:42 DG9KON PSK31 18102007 > >14:36 M0SAS PSK31 18102014 > >14:27 PF7DKW PSK31 18101283 > >14:19 ES7FQ PSK31 18101057 > >14:11 PF7DKW PSK31 18101283 > >14:04 IK7JT PSK31 18100311 > >14:0

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >