Re: [jQuery] isNot
On 06/11/06, Aaron Heimlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just do
if(!jQuery(div).is(:foo)) {
// do stuff...
}
I thought of that just after hitting send... however, when providing a
function I think it is good to provided a counterpart as well.
While it is documented, 'not' may be misinterpreted as returning a
boolean (in reality it is the opposite of filter).
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
Hi jQueryians! I actually managed to release my first official and documented jQuery plugin, a Tooltip implementation. It doesn't use AJAX, nor extra markup, only title and href attributes and some styles. You can customize the delay after which it should be displayed, default is instant display when hovering something. More details and examples can be found here: http://bassistance.de/index.php/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-tooltip/ Comments are welcome! I'll commit the source to the jQuery SVN as soon as it is available again. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb: Hi jQueryians! I actually managed to release my first official and documented jQuery plugin, a Tooltip implementation. It doesn't use AJAX, nor extra markup, only title and href attributes and some styles. You can customize the delay after which it should be displayed, default is instant display when hovering something. More details and examples can be found here: http://bassistance.de/index.php/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-tooltip/ Comments are welcome! I'll commit the source to the jQuery SVN as soon as it is available again. Hi Jörn, I like it! Using the title attribute instead of XHR degrades much better (uh, it degrades at all). I have done something similiar for Plazes, not very mature, quick and easy. Maybe I'm going to switch, but I'd need a clickable tooltip (appears on click only). Maybe you will add that some time? Is tabs a widget? I'd have to rename it to Tabs() ;-) But I don't like that not-yet convention. Having a little Java background uppercased class names represent a constructor to me... It is also harder to type in. Thank you for sharing! -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
On 06/11/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi jQueryians! I actually managed to release my first official and documented jQuery plugin, a Tooltip implementation. It doesn't use AJAX, nor extra markup, only title and href attributes and some styles. You can customize the delay after which it should be displayed, default is instant display when hovering something. More details and examples can be found here: http://bassistance.de/index.php/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-tooltip/ Comments are welcome! I'll commit the source to the jQuery SVN as soon as it is available again. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de A suggestion - perhaps you should use 'jQuery' instead of '$' as isn't that the convention for plugin authoring? ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
Sam Collett schrieb:
On 06/11/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi jQueryians!
I actually managed to release my first official and documented jQuery
plugin, a Tooltip implementation. It doesn't use AJAX, nor extra markup,
only title and href attributes and some styles. You can customize the delay
after which it should be displayed, default is instant display when hovering
something.
More details and examples can be found here:
http://bassistance.de/index.php/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-tooltip/
Comments are welcome!
I'll commit the source to the jQuery SVN as soon as it is available again.
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
A suggestion - perhaps you should use 'jQuery' instead of '$' as isn't
that the convention for plugin authoring?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Jörn took care of that and simulated block scope:
(function($) {
...
})(jQuery);
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
From: Jörn Zaefferer
I actually managed to release my first official and
documented jQuery plugin, a Tooltip implementation. It
doesn't use AJAX, nor extra markup, only title and href
attributes and some styles. You can customize the delay after
which it should be displayed, default is instant display when
hovering something.
More details and examples can be found here:
http://bassistance.de/index.php/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-tooltip/
Comments are welcome!
Very nice!
It doesn't behave the same as a standard tooltip, though. Tooltips don't
usually track the mouse - once a tooltip is displayed it doesn't move. It
would be nice to have that option. In fact, instead of the defaults being no
delay and mouse tracking, I'd suggest making the defaults follow the most
common tooltip behavior - a short delay and no mouse tracking.
Whatever you make the defaults, it would be more flexible to change the
delay argument to an args object with properties like delay and track and
whatever else comes up later. Then you could code like this:
$(foo).Tooltip({ delay:250, track:true });
-Mike
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
http://bassistance.de/index.php/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-tooltip/
A suggestion - perhaps you should use 'jQuery' instead of '$'
as isn't that the convention for plugin authoring?
The code does use jQuery instead of $. Jörn used the trick I suggested a
while back to get the best of both worlds - convenient coding with $ but not
using the global $. Note the function wrapper:
(function($) {
// plugin code here
})(jQuery);
-Mike
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
A suggestion - perhaps you should use 'jQuery' instead of '$' as isn't
that the convention for plugin authoring?
Jörn took care of that and simulated block scope:
(function($) {
...
})(jQuery);
Aye, another lesson I learned from the great Michael Geary :-)
It allows me to use $ and forces a perfect private scope, with making only the
jQuery method public.
By the way, as nearly no one uses the convention for filenaming
(jquery.xxx.js): I think it's time to simply remove it, any objections?
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
--
GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist!
NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
A suggestion - perhaps you should use 'jQuery' instead of '$' as isn't
that the convention for plugin authoring?
Jörn took care of that and simulated block scope:
(function($) {
...
})(jQuery);
Aye, another lesson I learned from the great Michael Geary :-)
It allows me to use $ and forces a perfect private scope, with making only
the jQuery method public.
By the way, as nearly no one uses the convention for filenaming
(jquery.xxx.js): I think it's time to simply remove it, any objections?
I use it for the plugins I offer at stilbuero.de, but in SVN I didn't
adopt that, because all the other plugins didn't either. I'm still for it!
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] SVN?
Is anyone having problems accessing source via SVN svn://jquery.com/trunk or svn://jquery.com/plugins Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask - I tried googling first - but I keep getting Can't connect to jquery.com... Is an account required? Tried with svn+ssh too - no dice. andre ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
On 06/11/06, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bassistance.de/index.php/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-tooltip/
A suggestion - perhaps you should use 'jQuery' instead of '$'
as isn't that the convention for plugin authoring?
The code does use jQuery instead of $. Jörn used the trick I suggested a
while back to get the best of both worlds - convenient coding with $ but not
using the global $. Note the function wrapper:
(function($) {
// plugin code here
})(jQuery);
-Mike
I've seen that used before, but can it have memory leak or other
issues? Does it work on all modern browsers (and not so modern - IE
5), included those on PDA's etc (not that jQuery supports portable
devices). What happens if 'jQuery' is undefined?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
On 06/11/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By the way, as nearly no one uses the convention for filenaming (jquery.xxx.js): I think it's time to simply remove it, any objections? -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- I do find it helpful as it shows that jQuery is required to use it. Although, the other way is to but it in a jquery\plugins subfolder. I use that convention (but '-' instead of '.'). Saving 7 bytes by removing it won't really make much difference, unless a page has lots of plugins (in that circumstance the page would probably be sluggish on slow computers anyway). ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Styling a file input control
Thanks for the info, I was aware of this link. I just wondered if there was a jquery version available. regards, George. -- http://gmosx.com/blog http://nitroproject.org ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] set focus?
I see focus() will run the events tied to an elements onfocus, but how can I set the focus. (e.g. click button to un-disable a textinput, then set the focus on said input.) Regards, Jez ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Also new bug in cookie plugin
Microtoby schrieb: Thanks Klaus, I'm using http/1.1, It's my desktop computer, XP system with IIS 5.1, I modify the host file, add a test domain name, for example: 127.0.0.1 demo.com, It seems default cookie plug in execute not correctly. Stupid me, I have taken the max-age part from my JavaScript - The Definitive Guide book, assuming that it will be ok in IE. But as a matter of fact IE doesn't support the max-age attribute. So currently in IE you can only set session cookies. I'll check that fix in as soon as SVN is available again, I only need to have a look into an earlier version to rollback. Oh and by the way, if you start a new thread, please do not reply to another thread. I'm having a hard time to find these mails again in my client. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] set focus?
On 06/11/06, Jez McKean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see focus() will run the events tied to an elements onfocus, but how can I set the focus. (e.g. click button to un-disable a text input, then set the focus on said input.) Regards, Jez $(#myinput)[0].focus() Perhaps calling focus ($(#myinput).focus()) should actually set the focus on the element as well as fire the onfocus event - rather than just fire the event. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Unsure about the usage of .parent()
Why does .parent() modify the original object? This isn't right according to me. Let's say i have this code: testDOM = SOMEOBJECT.parent().parent()[0]; And i want to do some more work on the original object; SOMEOBJECT.hide(); I get this error: .. IS NOT A FUNCTION I am unsure on how to correctly get the parent's parent without changing the original object. -- Gilles ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Unsure about the usage of .parent()
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Why does .parent() modify the original object? This isn't right according to me. Let's say i have this code: testDOM = SOMEOBJECT.parent().parent()[0]; And i want to do some more work on the original object; SOMEOBJECT.hide(); I get this error: .. IS NOT A FUNCTION I am unsure on how to correctly get the parent's parent without changing the original object. -- Gilles Use a cloned object or end(): var testDOM = $( SOMEOBJECT ).parent().parent()[0]; SOMEOBJECT.hide(); or: testDOM = SOMEOBJECT.parent().parent()[0]; SOMEOBJECT.end().end().hide(); -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New Plugin: Resizeable
Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
Hi Stefan,
I have been trying your resize plugin, it is really slick and works great!
I have a request, does it already have or can you add the ability to
added a call back at the end of the resize, so other code can be
notified of the change in size? Like notify below:
$(document).ready(function(){
$('#resize_map').Resizeable(
{
minHeight: 100,
maxHeight: 700,
minWidth: 100,
maxWidth: 800,
handlers: {
se: '#resize'
},
notify: function(){
alert(I have been resized);
$('#map_tag').Resized(this.sizes);
}
}
);
});
Maybe there is another way to do this?
Would this not be better suited to an event?
$('#resize_map').bind('resize', function() {
alert(I have been resized);
});
I've not had chance to test it, but I'm sure all elements
have a resize event. If not then the resizeable plugin can
trigger() it itself.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] set focus?
Perhaps calling focus ($(#myinput).focus()) should actually set the
focus on the element as well as fire the onfocus event - rather than
just fire the event.
It would help if the event shortcuts were less ambigous, eg. onfocus() instead
of focus(). If so, it would be easy to add focus to actually call focus on the
first element, eg.
jQuery.fn.focus = function() {
if(this.length 0)
this[0].focus();
return this;
};
I wonder if that would trigger the focus events for that element...
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
--
GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist!
NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
I like it! Using the title attribute instead of XHR degrades much better
(uh, it degrades at all). I have done something similiar for Plazes, not
very mature, quick and easy. Maybe I'm going to switch, but I'd need a
clickable tooltip (appears on click only).
Maybe you will add that some time?
Something like this?
$(#container a).addClass(clickable).Tooltip({show: onclick});
Is tabs a widget? I'd have to rename it to Tabs() ;-) But I don't like
that not-yet convention. Having a little Java background uppercased
class names represent a constructor to me... It is also harder to type in.
Stefan uses that in all his Interface stuff. After thinking about it again and
again (with lots of Java-Background), I thought it would be a nice way to show
the difference between simple methods and complex widget methods. Tabs
would be a widget, just like a Thickbox, a sortable table, accordion etc.
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
--
GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist!
NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] SVN?
I have the same error, Can't connect to host 'jquery.com':no connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. Toby 2006-11-6 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Molnar Sent: 2006年11月6日 18:14 To: discuss@jquery.com Subject: [jQuery] SVN? Is anyone having problems accessing source via SVN svn://jquery.com/trunk or svn://jquery.com/plugins Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask - I tried googling first - but I keep getting Can't connect to jquery.com... Is an account required? Tried with svn+ssh too - no dice. andre ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
It doesn't behave the same as a standard tooltip, though. Tooltips don't
usually track the mouse - once a tooltip is displayed it doesn't move. It
would be nice to have that option. In fact, instead of the defaults being
no
delay and mouse tracking, I'd suggest making the defaults follow the most
common tooltip behavior - a short delay and no mouse tracking.
Good suggestion! I'll add that.
Whatever you make the defaults, it would be more flexible to change the
delay argument to an args object with properties like delay and track and
whatever else comes up later. Then you could code like this:
$(foo).Tooltip({ delay:250, track:true });
How about:
$(a).Tooltip({show: 250, track: true});
So show would have either a Number value (delay) or a String like onclick or
click. click would be intersting, then I could implement that like this:
[...]
if(typeof settings.show == String)
this[settings.show](show);
[...]
According to Klaus' request to show the tooltip when the element is clicked.
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Scroll document if draggable leaves viewport
Hm. and what about the OP? once again: Hi jQueries, i've posted this mail 2 times ago, but it didn't appear in the mailing list. Only the web frontend did get it, nothing in my inbox. Did you get it? I'll try it once again: - Is it possible to get a scrolling feature for any drag/droppable? For Example: If you leave the viewport with an object and the document body is longer or wider than the viewport, the document scrolls connected to the mouse position. This YUI demo is a good example: http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/examples/dragdrop/ontop.html?mode=dist Is somebody working on it or did I miss it in the documentation? Or is there a simple way to implement this feature? regards ecki ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jQuery 1.0.3 .click() not firing in IE
On Nov 6, 2006, at 12:25 AM, Marshall Salinger wrote: I am not set-up to connect to SVN. I tried calling the method with a blank object and it broke both FF and IE. You can get to SVN on the web, too, if you want. Start at http://jquery.com/dev/svn/trunk/jquery/ and poke around until you find what you're looking for. When you get to a page of code that you want to grab, just add the following to the URI: ?format=txt Cheers, Karl ___ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com www.learningjquery.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] set focus?
Great, thanks. :) BTW: I have found that this is also true of .select() Perhaps calling focus ($(#myinput).focus()) should actually set the focus on the element... I guess actually it might cause difficulty if another selector type was used since there may be more than on match. Jez -Original Message- From: Sam Collett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 November 2006 12:07 To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] set focus? On 06/11/06, Jez McKean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see focus() will run the events tied to an elements onfocus, but how can I set the focus. (e.g. click button to un-disable a text input, then set the focus on said input.) Regards, Jez $(#myinput)[0].focus() Perhaps calling focus ($(#myinput).focus()) should actually set the focus on the element as well as fire the onfocus event - rather than just fire the event. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] jQuery Forums soon?
If not I would happily host something small and temporary... Jez ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jQuery Forums soon?
This is working pretty good right now: http://www.nabble.com/JQuery-f15494.html Rey... Jez McKean wrote: If not I would happily host something small and temporary... Jez ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] jQuery Button - Time to Vote - Get Involved!
From John: The next round of the jQuery Button Contest is upon us! After some careful deliberation, the judges have narrowed the playing field of 123 jQuery button submissions down to just 30. We were completely overwhelmed with both the quality and quantity of submission and would like to personally thank everyone who participated. There were a ton of excellent entries but ultimately the following 30 buttons were chosen due to their clarity, composition, and originality. Now it’s your turn to help! In order to narrow the results down to the final three, winning, buttons we need you to vote for which buttons that you like. You’re allowed to vote for as many buttons as you’d like, but only once. You can vote here: http://jquery.com/blog/2006/11/06/vote-for-the-jquery-button/ The polls will be closed Monday 11:59pm (EST, GMT -0500). So get your voting in now - and make your decision count! ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] $(form.elements) fails (in IE this time)
Do you know what the nodeType test is for on that line? That nodeType test is trying to tell the difference between a NodeList and a DOMElement. If it's a DOMElement it will have a non-zero nodeType. What would break if we took it out? If you took it out, any DOMElement with a .length property would be treated like a list and not an element. For example, the form element has a length. If you passed in $(document.myform) and myform had 3 elements, jQuery.length would be 3 instead of 1. The intent was to allow collections like form.elements to pass in lists of nodes but still let you pass in the form element if you wanted to refer to just the form element. IE is spoiling that. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] IE and the escape key triggering a hide action
I just came across something in IE, that I hadn't noticed so far: It seems that the escape key triggers some action by default: Say you have a link which on click opens a form via slide down. If you then press the escape key, the form slides up again... Is it just me or did someone else notice that as well? Just wondering if it's Plazes specific due to my style of coding. For example have a look at the http://plazes.com homepage (sorry, this is no advertise): There's a login link in the upper right corner, that triggers a login form to be revealed. If the form is visible in IE press escape and you will see, that it gets hidden again... I really don't know what's happening? -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
I get an error in IE6/PC on your demo page. !//-- andy matthews web developer certified advanced coldfusion programmer ICGLink, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 615.370.1530 x737 --//- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jörn Zaefferer Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:20 AM To: discuss@jquery.com Subject: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip Hi jQueryians! I actually managed to release my first official and documented jQuery plugin, a Tooltip implementation. It doesn't use AJAX, nor extra markup, only title and href attributes and some styles. You can customize the delay after which it should be displayed, default is instant display when hovering something. More details and examples can be found here: http://bassistance.de/index.php/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-tooltip/ Comments are welcome! I'll commit the source to the jQuery SVN as soon as it is available again. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Star Rating Plugin?
Yehuda...
But
what if for some reason the user didn't submit the form? Then they'd think that
they rated/voted, when in reality they didn't.
!//--andy matthewsweb
developercertified advanced coldfusion programmerICGLink,
Inc.[EMAIL PROTECTED]615.370.1530
x737--//-
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Yehuda
KatzSent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 6:05 PMTo: jQuery
Discussion.Subject: Re: [jQuery] Star Rating
Plugin?The only difficult thing about a star plugin is
reporting fractional star-counts. Otherwise, it's *really* trivial. I would
use a hidden text-field or somesuch, and bind clicking the stars to updating
the field.As to reporting the existing star counts, you could use a
blank star template stick it in front of a full star image, which increases or
decreases in size based upon the value of the hidden field. --
Yehuda
On 11/4/06, Rey
Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How
about recreating it from scratch?Rey...Dragan Krstic
wrote: I did similar thing, fully unobtrusive, as part o some cms.
It is very similar, but I'm not allowed to post it, shmr, shmrc...
- Original Message - From: "Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
"jQuery Discussion."
discuss@jquery.com Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 6:37
AM Subject: Re: [jQuery] Star Rating
Plugin?something
like:$("a.starRating
").each(function(){var $this = $(this);var href =
"">var stars =
$this.text();$this.empty();for (var i = 0; i
stars.length; i++){$this.append("span class = '" + (i+1) +
"'" + stars.substr(i,1) +
"/span");}$this.children('span').click(function(){$.get(href,{rating:this.className});$this.children('span').removeClass("selected");
$(this).addClass("selected");return
false;})});rate mea
class="starRating" href=""✰/a!
dom tested , but I didn't write the cgi or the
styles.PSthose are utf-8 stars in the
aOn 11/3/06, Sean O [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Looking for something to rate the JQuery
Button submissions,
Rey?;)___SEAN
O Rey
Bango-2 wrote:Has a
star rating plugin like this:
http://www.masugadesign.com/the-lab/scripts/unobtrusive-ajax-star-rating-bar/been
developed?Rey...___
jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/
--View
this message in context:http://www.nabble.com/Star-Rating-Plugin--tf2572187.html#a7171176
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___jQuery
mailing list discuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/--Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ
- יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
___jQuery
mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/
___ jQuery mailing
list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/___jQuery
mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/
-- Yehuda KatzWeb
Developer | Wycats Designs(ph)718.877.1325
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] IE and the escape key triggering a hide action
Klaus Hartl schrieb: I just came across something in IE, that I hadn't noticed so far: It seems that the escape key triggers some action by default: Say you have a link which on click opens a form via slide down. If you then press the escape key, the form slides up again... Is it just me or did someone else notice that as well? Just wondering if it's Plazes specific due to my style of coding. For example have a look at the http://plazes.com homepage (sorry, this is no advertise): There's a login link in the upper right corner, that triggers a login form to be revealed. If the form is visible in IE press escape and you will see, that it gets hidden again... I really don't know what's happening? -- Klaus Ah, I got it. If you have an input/button of type reset, the escape key triggers that action in IE... Ugh! -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] IE and the escape key triggering a hide action
I just came across something in IE, that I hadn't noticed so far: It seems that the escape key triggers some action by default: Say you have a link which on click opens a form via slide down. If you then press the escape key, the form slides up again... Is it just me or did someone else notice that as well? Just wondering if it's Plazes specific due to my style of coding. For example have a look at the http://plazes.com homepage (sorry, this is no advertise): There's a login link in the upper right corner, that triggers a login form to be revealed. If the form is visible in IE press escape and you will see, that it gets hidden again... I really don't know what's happening? Do you use Thickbox for that form? If so, take a look at it's document.onkeyup binding. If not: Ugh, no idea. I took a look, but couldn't find it for myself... -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
Excellent work Jörn (yet again), The only suggestion I have deals with displaying the tips close to the right side of the screen. You do an excellent job of handling the width of the tip when it is close to the right edge of the window, but if a word is too long inside of the tip it will push outside of the viewable area and cause the horizontal scroll bar to appear. I would suggest that you attempt to detect that situation and flip the tip so that it shows to the left of the pointer when it is too wide to be completely within the window. @Mike Thanks for bringing up that tip about the function wrapper to localize $ scope. I hadn't seen that before. Very useful. Paul ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] IE and the escape key triggering a hide action
Ah, I got it. If you have an input/button of type reset, the escape key triggers that action in IE... Jep, funny huh? ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
I get an error in IE6/PC on your demo page. I just tested it again but couldn't see any issues. Could give me a hint what exactly is failing? By the way, it's interesting that IE reports src attributes as href attributes... -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
The only suggestion I have deals with displaying the tips close to the right side of the screen. You do an excellent job of handling the width of the tip when it is close to the right edge of the window, but if a word is too long inside of the tip it will push outside of the viewable area and cause the horizontal scroll bar to appear. I would suggest that you attempt to detect that situation and flip the tip so that it shows to the left of the pointer when it is too wide to be completely within the window. That problem occurs most frequently when trying to display long URLs within the tooltip. Your suggestion of flipping the tooltip would be the best solution, but not easy to implement. I should ask Karl Swedberg for his experience on that topic, I think he and Rey already (tried to) solve that for their jTip adoption. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassitance.de -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
I get the error too. Here's a screen shot: Hope this helps. Chris Jrn Zaefferer wrote: I get an error in IE6/PC on your demo page. I just tested it again but couldn't see any issues. Could give me a hint what exactly is failing? By the way, it's interesting that IE reports src attributes as href attributes... -- Jrn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
In IE6/PC I get the following error on load. Line 18 Char 1 Error: Object doesn't support this property or method Code: 0 Just to point out though that the Tooltip works on the previous page for the demo link. !//-- andy matthews web developer certified advanced coldfusion programmer ICGLink, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 615.370.1530 x737 --//- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jörn Zaefferer Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 8:36 AM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip I get an error in IE6/PC on your demo page. I just tested it again but couldn't see any issues. Could give me a hint what exactly is failing? By the way, it's interesting that IE reports src attributes as href attributes... -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Parsing XML
Hi Blair
Thanks for your suggestion. Seems to work
perfectly in Firefox but not in IE6.
I think it takes objection to this line:
var $this=$(this);
and says error: object required
Any ideas on how to fix it?
Thanks
Richard
From: Blair McKenzie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 November 2006 22:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Parsing XML
I would suggest this:
var reminders = [];
$('reminder',xml).each(function(i) { // apply this function to each reminder
(index as parameter)
var $this=$(this); // each applies the function so that 'this' is the
relevant element
reminders[i] = {
id:$this.find(id).text(),
date:$this.end().find(date).text(), // end() because the previous
find(id) is persistent
event:$this.end().find(event).text(),
start:$this.end().find(start).text(),
end:$this.end().find(end).text(),
};
});
Blair
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.28/518 - Release Date: 04/11/2006
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
I'm getting... $(a, label, input).not(#yahoo).Tooltip is not a function In FF 1.5.0.7/Win, and FF 2.0 Linux. And I get the Object doesn't support this property or method worthless error in IE7. Oh bugger. I just forgot to update the html file, sorry for the confusion. All reported errors should be history now :-) FF, IE and Opera seem to work fine now. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist! NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
jQuery can do everything that it can, natively (except color animation). Just as an aside, if anyone needs colour animation then http://jquery.offput.ca/highlightFade/ works well for animating color, backgroundcolor or bordercolor. (Though you might not immediately guess from its name) George -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/New-way-of-animating-tf2568944.html#a7200316 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
I just tested the demo page with FF 1.5.0.7 and it works great, but there's an oddity that I wanted to tell you about. Loading the page from scratch and all of the tooltips work as advertised, but when I mouseover the 3rd yahoo link (link to Yahoo2), then click the Tonus image, the tooltip is now empty. I can recreate it every time with those steps. Furthermore, it appears that you can also get the same results with other steps, but the ones I listed will work for you. !//-- andy matthews web developer certified advanced coldfusion programmer ICGLink, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 615.370.1530 x737 --//- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Matthews Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 8:59 AM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip In IE6/PC I get the following error on load. Line 18 Char 1 Error: Object doesn't support this property or method Code: 0 Just to point out though that the Tooltip works on the previous page for the demo link. !//-- andy matthews web developer certified advanced coldfusion programmer ICGLink, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 615.370.1530 x737 --//- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jörn Zaefferer Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 8:36 AM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip I get an error in IE6/PC on your demo page. I just tested it again but couldn't see any issues. Could give me a hint what exactly is failing? By the way, it's interesting that IE reports src attributes as href attributes... -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:12:06 -0600 Von: Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: jQuery Discussion. discuss@jquery.com Betreff: Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip I just tested the demo page with FF 1.5.0.7 and it works great, but there's an oddity that I wanted to tell you about. Loading the page from scratch and all of the tooltips work as advertised, but when I mouseover the 3rd yahoo link (link to Yahoo2), then click the Tonus image, the tooltip is now empty. I can recreate it every time with those steps. Furthermore, it appears that you can also get the same results with other steps, but the ones I listed will work for you. Thanks. That is the problem I mentioned, but unfortuanetely, I can't recreate steadily. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist! NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
I'm sorry, I'm not convinced.
Pretty much everything in there is in jQuery standalone. I'm not sure about
the 'killer feature' either.
An expanding div is not a killer feature. That is effectively just like
$.show('slow'). The same killer feature code could be written in about an
eighth of this in jQuery.
Don't get me wrong though. I'm glad people are doing this for the
scriptaculous and moo folks. Christ knows they need some form of morale
boost.
Cheers for the link anyhoo.
Paul Bakaus wrote:
Hey guys,
has someone seen this at ajaxian? Check it out:
http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.html
This is probably the most sexiest animate lib I've ever seen in my life.
Porting this to jQuery would be the PERFECT addition to jQuery's css
parsing
possiblities.
What do you think?
--
Paul Bakaus
Web Developer
Hildastr. 35
79102 Freiburg
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/New-way-of-animating-tf2568944.html#a7200630
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
If all the animation features are in jQuery standalone, then I'm onboard with Dan. What would be good, though, is if a page showing this being done in jQuery was created. Paul, are you up for that challenge? :o) Rey... Paul Bakaus wrote: Hey guys, has someone seen this at ajaxian? Check it out: http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.html This is probably the most sexiest animate lib I've ever seen in my life. Porting this to jQuery would be the PERFECT addition to jQuery's css parsing possiblities. What do you think? -- Paul Bakaus Web Developer Hildastr. 35 79102 Freiburg ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Sure Rey ;-)Maybe my email was a bit too enthusiastic. Don't get me wrong, I'm not talking about the script itself, of course it has some problems and drawbacks and whatelse. And I really like the way of jQuery animating styles. It's all about the method.Having a div-element with a certain style, then the jQuery way could be like this:1.) $(#mydiv).animateStyle(background-color: #eee; border: 1px solid black; opacity: 0.5;);-If only one param given, this function animates from the current style of the element, to the one given into the function.2) $(#mydiv).animateStyle(old, new);-animate from one style to the second but now my own killer feature :D3.) $(#mydiv).animateClass(oldClass, newClass); -or- $(#mydiv).animateClass(newClass);-So you change the class of the object, but you animate the change. Waiting for comments!2006/11/6, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If all the animation features are in jQuery standalone, then I'm onboardwith Dan.What would be good, though, is if a page showing this being done injQuery was created. Paul, are you up for that challenge? :o) Rey... Paul Bakaus wrote:Hey guys,has someone seen this at ajaxian? Check it out:http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.html This is probably the most sexiest animate lib I've ever seen in my life.Porting this to jQuery would be the PERFECT addition to jQuery's cssparsingpossiblities. What do you think?--Paul BakausWeb DeveloperHildastr. 3579102 Freiburg___ jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/ ___jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Paul BakausWeb DeveloperHildastr. 3579102 Freiburg ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] IE and the escape key triggering a hide action
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
I just came across something in IE, that I hadn't noticed so far: It
seems that the escape key triggers some action by default:
Say you have a link which on click opens a form via slide down. If you
then press the escape key, the form slides up again... Is it just me or
did someone else notice that as well? Just wondering if it's Plazes
specific due to my style of coding.
For example have a look at the http://plazes.com homepage (sorry, this
is no advertise): There's a login link in the upper right corner, that
triggers a login form to be revealed. If the form is visible in IE press
escape and you will see, that it gets hidden again...
I really don't know what's happening?
Do you use Thickbox for that form? If so, take a look at it's
document.onkeyup binding. If not: Ugh, no idea.
I took a look, but couldn't find it for myself...
If you want to disable that behavior (I had to because pressing escape
in a thickbox screen triggered the hide on reset...):
if ($.browser.msie) {
$(document).keydown(function() {
window.stopEsc = true;
}).keyup(function() {
window.stopEsc = false;
});
}
and then:
$('form').reset(function() {
if (window.stopEsc) return false; // in IE the escape key triggers
the reset action of a form, don't wan't that here
}
Fortunately the reset event is fired between keydown and keyup, tested
in IE 6/7...
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Well, I guess we disagree again. In my opinion, if someone has created something very cool, then I don't see why people shouldn't try to replicate it using their favorite library. In this case, if Paul created a page showing how this could be done in jQuery, it could be put into the demo page and leveraged as a way to show new users how to add those cool types of animations. Rey... Dan Atkinson wrote: There's a whole page of various plugins that can be attached to jQuery. http://jquery.com/plugins/ In my opinion, going after individuals who show their work would not only be a childish 'me too'-ism, but it would be damaging to the reputation of jQuery, as it would just make people think that we don't have our own ideas, so we have to copy those of others. Rey Bango-2 wrote: If all the animation features are in jQuery standalone, then I'm onboard with Dan. What would be good, though, is if a page showing this being done in jQuery was created. Paul, are you up for that challenge? :o) Rey... Paul Bakaus wrote: Hey guys, has someone seen this at ajaxian? Check it out: http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.html This is probably the most sexiest animate lib I've ever seen in my life. Porting this to jQuery would be the PERFECT addition to jQuery's css parsing possiblities. What do you think? -- Paul Bakaus Web Developer Hildastr. 35 79102 Freiburg ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Dan,Adapting good ideas from other sources is not something evil, but often a important step to a good solution.There is a active _javascript_ community around us, and many influences went into the creation of our all beloved jQuery. For example, Dean Edwards had the same approach of a cs selector.While I think you are a creative person yourself, I'm absolutely sure you are being influenced by many different sources, too.No offense, but I'm convinced you know that I know about our plugins (since I'm contributing from time to time), and calling people childish because of them adapting ideas from various sources is something I for myself cannot understand. 2006/11/6, Dan Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There's a whole page of various plugins that can be attached to jQuery.http://jquery.com/plugins/In my opinion, going after individuals who show their work would not only be a childish 'me too'-ism, but it would be damaging to the reputation ofjQuery, as it would just make people think that we don't have our own ideas,so we have to copy those of others.Rey Bango-2 wrote: If all the animation features are in jQuery standalone, then I'm onboard with Dan. What would be good, though, is if a page showing this being done in jQuery was created. Paul, are you up for that challenge? :o) Rey... Paul Bakaus wrote:Hey guys,has someone seen this at ajaxian? Check it out: http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.htmlThis is probably the most sexiest animate lib I've ever seen in my life.Porting this to jQuery would be the PERFECT addition to jQuery's css parsingpossiblities.What do you think?--Paul BakausWeb Developer Hildastr. 3579102 Freiburg___jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/--View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/New-way-of-animating-tf2568944.html#a7201229Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Paul BakausWeb DeveloperHildastr. 3579102 Freiburg ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] stripping out tags...
Hi there...
I was about to ask how to strip a tag from the DOM.
For example we have this:
div id=someId
label for=someForsome spantext/span here/label
/div
I want to remove the label tag and preserve what it contains.
But while I was writing my question, I came up with this:
jQuery.fn.stripOut = function (el) {
$(this).each( function(){
$(this).find(el).parent().html(($(this).find(el).html()));
})
}
so we can do:
$(#someID).stripOut(label);
This will produce:
div id=someId
some spantext/span here
/div
But I see a tiny problem here...
If we have for example:
div id=someId
some div text
label for=someForsome spantext/span here/label
some div text
/div
with my stripOut() the text some div text together with all the eventual
siblings of the label tag will go pooof.
I'm not good at the coding, so can somebody help me with a better solution?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] $(form.elements) fails (in IE this time)
Okay ... looking through all the properties of the form.elements nodelist in IE reveals that it is exactly the form element as you said. That also means it has a reference to the elements property. So to fix this 'special case' I added this: this.get( a.constructor == Array || a.length != undefined ( !a.nodeType || (jQuery.browser.msie a.elements) ) a[0] != undefined a[0].nodeType ? This appears to work fine but I don't know if it will affect anything else. http://brandon.jquery.com/testing/node_lists/ If it doesn't break anything else, then we should probably get this and the fix for #164 in SVN and get another point release out the door. -- Brandon Aaron On 11/6/06, Dave Methvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you know what the nodeType test is for on that line? That nodeType test is trying to tell the difference between a NodeList and a DOMElement. If it's a DOMElement it will have a non-zero nodeType. What would break if we took it out? If you took it out, any DOMElement with a .length property would be treated like a list and not an element. For example, the form element has a length. If you passed in $(document.myform) and myform had 3 elements, jQuery.length would be 3 instead of 1. The intent was to allow collections like form.elements to pass in lists of nodes but still let you pass in the form element if you wanted to refer to just the form element. IE is spoiling that. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Hi Paul, This is the type of stuff that I think would be OOO helpful in a tutorial or demo page. Like a best practices type of thing. I recently spent a lot of time talking to John about how to get the project more exposure and one of the things we threw out was getting more examples of coding practices on the site. Would you mind terribly jotting down some of these examples? I think they'd really help new users transition to jQuery. Let me know. Rey... Paul Bakaus wrote: Sure Rey ;-) Maybe my email was a bit too enthusiastic. Don't get me wrong, I'm not talking about the script itself, of course it has some problems and drawbacks and whatelse. And I really like the way of jQuery animating styles. It's all about the method. Having a div-element with a certain style, then the jQuery way could be like this: 1.) $(#mydiv).animateStyle(background-color: #eee; border: 1px solid black; opacity: 0.5;); -If only one param given, this function animates from the current style of the element, to the one given into the function. 2) $(#mydiv).animateStyle(old, new); -animate from one style to the second but now my own killer feature :D 3.) $(#mydiv).animateClass(oldClass, newClass); -or- $(#mydiv).animateClass(newClass); -So you change the class of the object, but you animate the change. Waiting for comments! 2006/11/6, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: If all the animation features are in jQuery standalone, then I'm onboard with Dan. What would be good, though, is if a page showing this being done in jQuery was created. Paul, are you up for that challenge? :o) Rey... Paul Bakaus wrote: Hey guys, has someone seen this at ajaxian? Check it out: http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.html http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.html This is probably the most sexiest animate lib I've ever seen in my life. Porting this to jQuery would be the PERFECT addition to jQuery's css parsing possiblities. What do you think? -- Paul Bakaus Web Developer Hildastr. 35 79102 Freiburg ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com mailto:discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com mailto:discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Paul Bakaus Web Developer Hildastr. 35 79102 Freiburg ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] $(form.elements) fails (in IE this time)
If it doesn't break anything else, then we should probably get this and the fix for #164 in SVN and get another point release out the door. I'm curious if this stuff fixes the weird errors that occured in the test suite somewhere since 1.0.2. Would be great if that is solved, too. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist! NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Hi,
but now my own killer feature :D
3.) $(#mydiv).animateClass(oldClass, newClass); -or-
$(#mydiv).animateClass(newClass);
That would be nice, but what about this:
.myFirstClass {
display:inline;
background-color:#00;
}
.mySecondClass {
display:block;
background-color:#ff;
}
$(#mydiv).animateClass('myFirstClass', 'mySecondClass');
What will hapen?
Another thing: after the animation has finished, will the element only have
the style of the new class or will it be of the new class. Will it still be
of the old class? When does that change if it does?
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
So show would have either a Number value (delay) or a String like onclick
or click. click would be intersting, then I could implement that like
this:
[...]
if(typeof settings.show == String)
this[settings.show](show);
[...]
Interesting how ideas evolve at the same time... I recently had to do this:
var handler = $.browser.msie ? 'keydown' : 'focus';
$(document)[handler](function(e) {
// handle event
});
That was much shorter than duplicating the code and having a branch like
that:
if () {
$(document).keydown( ... );
} else {
$(document).focus( ... )
}
Yeah, JavaScript rocks! Still learning...
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Rey Bango schrieb: Hi Paul, This is the type of stuff that I think would be OOO helpful in a tutorial or demo page. Like a best practices type of thing. I recently spent a lot of time talking to John about how to get the project more exposure and one of the things we threw out was getting more examples of coding practices on the site. Would you mind terribly jotting down some of these examples? I think they'd really help new users transition to jQuery. Let me know. Rey... Hey, not they I do not appreciate your marketing efforts, but jQuery is so good, it will make its way anyway. There's not a single person I know, that is not enthusiastic about it after having used it for the first time... -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Hi Klaus, Man, I totally agree with you. I was hooked the first time I used it as well and my friends have gone through the same thing. What I'm trying to do is get people to use it for the first time and when they do, ease their transition as much as possible. Rey... Hey, not they I do not appreciate your marketing efforts, but jQuery is so good, it will make its way anyway. There's not a single person I know, that is not enthusiastic about it after having used it for the first time... -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Writing documentation, jQuery style?
Is there some documentation describing the metatags within the jQuery documentation? I want to write some documentation for a project at work but in the jQuery style. Also, are there any handy tools out there to turn this jQuery documentation into something more readable? It'd be nice to have some basic HTML pages or something that is the JavaDoc-style. Thanks,Derrek ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
Yeah, JavaScript rocks! Still learning...
Yep. Just after writing the answer to your proposal, I modified it to this:
options = $.extend({
[...]
event: mouseover,
[...]
}, options || {});
[...]
.bind(options.event, bind); // bind is the callback to handle the mouseover
or click or whatever event
Now you could basically bind the tooltip showing to whatever event you can
think of. Dunno what else then mouseover and click make any sense...
The focus event! Finally a tooltip solution that would be device
independent! Yeah!
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
That's what I'm getting at though... The stuff on that site... It's been done in jQuery already. Still, I suppose if you make enough examples of everythin everyone else has done, and then throw jQuery's own killer features, then we might get more converts! :D There's plenty of cool stuff out there that we should push more and more. Like this, that I've been trying to do some work on for a few days (p.s. it's knackered right now): http://www.nabble.com/file/3990/test.zip test.zip Rey Bango-2 wrote: Well, I guess we disagree again. In my opinion, if someone has created something very cool, then I don't see why people shouldn't try to replicate it using their favorite library. In this case, if Paul created a page showing how this could be done in jQuery, it could be put into the demo page and leveraged as a way to show new users how to add those cool types of animations. Rey... Dan Atkinson wrote: There's a whole page of various plugins that can be attached to jQuery. http://jquery.com/plugins/ In my opinion, going after individuals who show their work would not only be a childish 'me too'-ism, but it would be damaging to the reputation of jQuery, as it would just make people think that we don't have our own ideas, so we have to copy those of others. Rey Bango-2 wrote: If all the animation features are in jQuery standalone, then I'm onboard with Dan. What would be good, though, is if a page showing this being done in jQuery was created. Paul, are you up for that challenge? :o) Rey... Paul Bakaus wrote: Hey guys, has someone seen this at ajaxian? Check it out: http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.html This is probably the most sexiest animate lib I've ever seen in my life. Porting this to jQuery would be the PERFECT addition to jQuery's css parsing possiblities. What do you think? -- Paul Bakaus Web Developer Hildastr. 35 79102 Freiburg ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/New-way-of-animating-tf2568944.html#a7202332 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
This is the type of stuff that I think would be OOO helpful in a tutorial or demo page. Like a best practices type of thing. I recently spent a lot of time talking to John about how to get the project more exposure and one of the things we threw out was getting more examples of coding practices on the site. Would you mind terribly jotting down some of these examples? I think they'd really help new users transition to jQuery. I think a good approach to this would be better examples in the jQuery API. And for that to work, a better presentation of the API. This (http://www.mondotondo.com/aercolino/jquery/docs/API/jquery-api2.xml) is an interesting starting point. I think a tree naviagtion, with either alphabetical or categorized hierachy (selectable via tabs) would be a great start. It's great that every method of jQuery is documented, but there is still lots of room for improvement. Adding examples with more realistic context and on that way advertising best-practices could help jQuery users a lot. -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de -- GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist! NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
Klaus Hartl schrieb: The focus event! Finally a tooltip solution that would be device independent! Yeah! You should make focus the default! -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
From: Paul McLanahan
The only suggestion I have deals with displaying the tips
close to the right side of the screen. You do an excellent
job of handling the width of the tip when it is close to the
right edge of the window, but if a word is too long inside of
the tip it will push outside of the viewable area and cause
the horizontal scroll bar to appear. I would suggest that
you attempt to detect that situation and flip the tip so that
it shows to the left of the pointer when it is too wide to be
completely within the window.
Great idea, and it's not too hard to do, like on this page for example:
http://denverpost.zvents.com/venues/show/13197
When you hover over any of the map pins, a tooltip-like window appears. If
there isn't room on the right, it goes on the left instead. Similarly, if
there isn't enough room below the pin, the tip moves up. (But I just noticed
a bug - I meant to move the tip so that its bottom lines up with the bottom
of the little box around the pin, like the way the top of the tip lines up
with the top of the box normally - but it's badly misaligned. It works OK in
the horizontal direction.)
All I had to do to make this work was first generate the tip in its normal
bottom-right position and then see if it overflows the visible area of the
window. If it does, then I move it to the left or up. The tip window's
offsetHeight and offsetWidth are available at this point, and the browser
won't actually render the tip window until the JavaScript code stops
executing - so it does no harm to first generate it in one position and then
move it to another.
I use this code to get the viewport (visible rectangle of the window). I
think I saw similar code in one of the jQuery plugins:
viewport: function() {
var e = document.documentElement || {},
b = document.body || {},
w = window;
return {
x: w.pageXOffset || e.scrollLeft || b.scrollLeft || 0,
y: w.pageYOffset || e.scrollTop || b.scrollTop || 0,
cx: min( e.clientWidth, b.clientWidth, w.innerWidth ),
cy: min( e.clientHeight, b.clientHeight, w.innerHeight )
};
function min() {
var v = Infinity;
for( var i = 0; i arguments.length; i++ ) {
var n = arguments[i];
if( n n v ) v = n;
}
return v;
}
}
In the returned viewport, cx and cy are the width and height (old habit of
using Windows naming conventions here!), and x and y are of course the left
and top. Then, after generating the popup window, I compare its offsetLeft,
offsetTop, offsetWidth, and offsetHeight against the viewport and move it as
needed.
-Mike
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Hi Dan, Still, I suppose if you make enough examples of everythin everyone else has done, and then throw jQuery's own killer features, then we might get more converts! :D There's plenty of cool stuff out there that we should push more and more. Yep! See, part of my concern is that it seems that the other libraries get a ton more exposure than jQuery does so when someone creates a new whiz-bang page using moo or Prototype, it gives a ton of press to those libraries even though in many cases, jQuery has had those features for some time. So I think its important to empathize, in some tangible fashion, these capabilities especially to new visitors. I think the folks at Scriptaculous have done a really good job of this with their new site. Going along your comments, I think you're right that we need to clearly delineate whats already built-in to jQuery, what can be enhanced via a plugin, and what should be added to some best practices/demo page so that we're not constantly reinventing the wheel. I would just hate for someone to come by and say, Well, jQuery doesn't seem to have this animation capability that I saw on Ajaxian simply because its not obvious to them from what they see on the site. Rey... ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] append quicktime plugin
hi,i'm trying to append a quicktime movie using jquery.$(#qtmoviediv).append('embed src="" qtsrc=rtsp://some.streaming.content/movie.mov pluginspage=
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/ autoplay=true type=video/quicktime width=320 height=240 loop=false controller=false name=qtmovie enablejavascript=true /embed').fadeIn(slow, function () {startCounter();});
this is fine for firefox, but .append with an object-tag (for ie) doesn't work.$(#qtmoviediv).append('object id=qtmovie width=320 height=240 classid="" codebase=""
http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cabparam name=src value=picture.jpgparam name=qtsrc value=rtsp://some.streaming.content/movie.movparam name=autoplay value=trueparam name=controller value=falseparam name=name value=qtmovieparam name=enablejavascript value=true/object').fadeIn(slow, function () {startCounter();});
so does anybody knows how to create an object element ?thanks,bacca
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] append quicktime plugin
i'm trying to append a quicktime movie using jquery. Use $().html(). I have a plugin for this if you're interested. Mike ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Plugin Release: Tooltip
On Nov 6, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Michael Geary wrote:
Great idea, and it's not too hard to do... [see full email below]
Well done, Michael! Wow, I have so much to learn.
On Nov 6, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Your suggestion of flipping the tooltip would be the best solution,
but not easy to implement. I should ask Karl Swedberg for his
experience on that topic, I think he and Rey already (tried to)
solve that for their jTip adoption.
Actually, Cody's jTip had the flipping part in it before I got my
hands on it, so credit go to him. :)
I just added a couple adjustments:
1 If the JTip flips to the left of the element hovered over, and if
the JTip is too wide to fit entirely between the linked item and the
left side of the viewportt, its width decreases to the widest
possible without having any of it cut off.
2. The JTip position moves up if it's initially cut off at the bottom
of the viewable area, and moves down to the top of viewable area if
its height is greater than that of the viewport.
The source file is here:
http://test.learningjquery.com/scripts/jtip.js
My part of the code is a little messy (I'm still learning), but it
might still help you get something done a bit quicker if you decide
to pursue this.
Karl
___
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Nov 6, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Michael Geary wrote:
Great idea, and it's not too hard to do, like on this page for
example:
http://denverpost.zvents.com/venues/show/13197
When you hover over any of the map pins, a tooltip-like window
appears. If
there isn't room on the right, it goes on the left instead.
Similarly, if
there isn't enough room below the pin, the tip moves up. (But I
just noticed
a bug - I meant to move the tip so that its bottom lines up with
the bottom
of the little box around the pin, like the way the top of the tip
lines up
with the top of the box normally - but it's badly misaligned. It
works OK in
the horizontal direction.)
All I had to do to make this work was first generate the tip in its
normal
bottom-right position and then see if it overflows the visible area
of the
window. If it does, then I move it to the left or up. The tip window's
offsetHeight and offsetWidth are available at this point, and the
browser
won't actually render the tip window until the JavaScript code stops
executing - so it does no harm to first generate it in one position
and then
move it to another.
I use this code to get the viewport (visible rectangle of the
window). I
think I saw similar code in one of the jQuery plugins:
viewport: function() {
var e = document.documentElement || {},
b = document.body || {},
w = window;
return {
x: w.pageXOffset || e.scrollLeft || b.scrollLeft || 0,
y: w.pageYOffset || e.scrollTop || b.scrollTop || 0,
cx: min( e.clientWidth, b.clientWidth, w.innerWidth ),
cy: min( e.clientHeight, b.clientHeight, w.innerHeight )
};
function min() {
var v = Infinity;
for( var i = 0; i arguments.length; i++ ) {
var n = arguments[i];
if( n n v ) v = n;
}
return v;
}
}
In the returned viewport, cx and cy are the width and height (old
habit of
using Windows naming conventions here!), and x and y are of course
the left
and top. Then, after generating the popup window, I compare its
offsetLeft,
offsetTop, offsetWidth, and offsetHeight against the viewport and
move it as
needed.
-Mike
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] stripping out tags...
div id=someId
label for=someForsome spantext/span here/label /div
I want to remove the label tag and preserve what it contains.
But while I was writing my question, I came up with this:
jQuery.fn.stripOut = function (el) {
$(this).each( function(){
$(this).find(el).parent().html(($(this).find(el).html()));
})
}
How about an .unwrap method to do the opposite of .wrap?
jQuery.fn.unwrap = function (el) {
return this.each( function(){
$(this.childNodes).appendTo(this.parentNode);
});
};
$('label').unwrap().remove();
I guess it's really more like .dumpChildrenOnGrandparent, but .unwrap is
shorter. :)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
On Nov 6, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Rey Bango wrote: Hi Paul, This is the type of stuff that I think would be OOO helpful in a tutorial or demo page. Like a best practices type of thing. I recently spent a lot of time talking to John about how to get the project more exposure and one of the things we threw out was getting more examples of coding practices on the site. Would you mind terribly jotting down some of these examples? I think they'd really help new users transition to jQuery. Please forgive the self-promotion, but these are the kinds of thing I'm also trying to do on learningjquery.com, and I (again) warmly welcome anyone who would like to author one or more tutorials for it or offer suggestions. Of course, adding more of this to the official jquery.com site would be great, too. Still, IMO the more jQuery love out there, the better. Third-party sites such as Cody Lindley's jQuery examples page and 15 Days of jQuery did as much as anything to get me hooked on jQuery. I'm currently working on these topics (in roughly this order): - How to Get Anything You Want (DOM Traversing) - Multi-Level Drop-Down Menus - jQuery Chaining - Basic Ajax Form Submission - Create a Basic Plugin - Collapsible Details Using Definition Lists and Brandon Aaron has been working on Populating a Select Menu with JSON and AJAX. Cheers, Karl ___ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com www.learningjquery.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Unicode (I love Unicode)
Andy, it's just unicode... your e-mail and your web browser don't do unicode right what kind of programs and system are you using? I thought XP did UNICODE EVERYWHERE... are there fonts missing on your system? Is it an add-in? On my macs it all just works. I've noticed that some PCs show my e-mail name as (J)(a)(k)(e) instead of Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ (pretty circled letters from the netherworld of utf), but I think that is just a bad font choice, my signature is a combo of my name in hebrew, english, and some Asian utf chars that look like Jake. Is there a route to help PC people make the full transition from ascii-7 to unicode? -- Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ On 11/6/06, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep... Your name, and the stars, come across as a series of boxes. !//-- andy matthews web developer certified advanced coldfusion programmer ICGLink, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 615.370.1530 x737 --//- ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Hey Karl! Yep, your site is invaluable. You really do have some great tutorials on there and I think expanding it out via your submissions and those from anyone else is an awesome idea. Rey... Karl Swedberg wrote: On Nov 6, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Rey Bango wrote: Hi Paul, This is the type of stuff that I think would be OOO helpful in a tutorial or demo page. Like a best practices type of thing. I recently spent a lot of time talking to John about how to get the project more exposure and one of the things we threw out was getting more examples of coding practices on the site. Would you mind terribly jotting down some of these examples? I think they'd really help new users transition to jQuery. Please forgive the self-promotion, but these are the kinds of thing I'm also trying to do on learningjquery.com, and I (again) warmly welcome anyone who would like to author one or more tutorials for it or offer suggestions. Of course, adding more of this to the official jquery.com site would be great, too. Still, IMO the more jQuery love out there, the better. Third-party sites such as Cody Lindley's jQuery examples page and 15 Days of jQuery did as much as anything to get me hooked on jQuery. I'm currently working on these topics (in roughly this order): - How to Get Anything You Want (DOM Traversing) - Multi-Level Drop-Down Menus - jQuery Chaining - Basic Ajax Form Submission - Create a Basic Plugin - Collapsible Details Using Definition Lists and Brandon Aaron has been working on Populating a Select Menu with JSON and AJAX. Cheers, Karl ___ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com www.learningjquery.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] append quicktime plugin
i'm trying to append a quicktime movie using jquery. Use $().html(). I have a plugin for this if you're interested. Mike ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ So since he wants to do append, it'd be $(#qtDiv).html($(#qtDiv).html() . $newHTML) right? --Jacob ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Unicode (I love Unicode)
Andy, it's just unicode... your e-mail and your web browser don't do unicode right Neither does Nabble, then. This is what I see in my mail client as well. Maybe the mailing list software is doing it before it arrives at Nabble. http://www.nabble.com/JQuery-f15494.html Is there a route to help PC people make the full transition from ascii-7 to unicode? Absolutely, it's the same route that gets people to make the transition from IE5.5 to IE7 or FF2. Wait five or six years and the problem is mostly solved. :( ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] append quicktime plugin
$(#qtDiv).html($(#qtDiv).html() . $newHTML)
Yes, except with Javascript syntax instead of php. :-)
var qtHtml = object.;
var $qtDiv = $('#qtDiv');
$qtDiv.html($qtDiv.html() + qtHtml);
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Unicode (I love Unicode)
Nabble doesn't nibble at my nybbles. (IE they don't mess with the unicode and it works!) FF 2.0 Mac shows just fine. On 11/6/06, Dave Methvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andy, it's just unicode... your e-mail and your web browser don't do unicode right Neither does Nabble, then. This is what I see in my mail client as well. Maybe the mailing list software is doing it before it arrives at Nabble. http://www.nabble.com/JQuery-f15494.html Is there a route to help PC people make the full transition from ascii-7 to unicode? Absolutely, it's the same route that gets people to make the transition from IE5.5 to IE7 or FF2. Wait five or six years and the problem is mostly solved. :( ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Unicode (I love Unicode)
Nabble doesn't nibble at my nybbles. (IE they don't mess with the unicode and it works!) FF 2.0 Mac shows just fine. You're right, I think it's your earlier guess that we don't have all the world's fonts installed. I think it is best to assume that users have only a basic set of fonts, and not the entire set of Unicode glyphs. Windows has a font download option but I have turned it off. I don't see any point in installing Thai or Chinese since I can't read it anyway; the little rectangular boxes make just as much sense and take up less memory. There was a security vulnerability in Windows last year having to do with automatic font download (MS06-002) so you can bet that many companies have turned it off as well. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Scrolling to the bottom of a page
Okay... That's a beginning... But I want to make a chat. So if you scroll up and already down, it should fix the bottom, when the scroll bar is bottom-most. Any idea? Am 6.11.2006 schrieb Sean O [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Interface's ScrollTo should work nicely (and aesthetically) for that: http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos/ifxscrollto.html http://interface.eyecon.ro/ SEAN O sd-11 wrote: Hi, how to scroll always to the bottom of a page with jquery? Thank you. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Scrolling-to-the-bottom- of-a-page-tf2578618.html#a7192370 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Scrolling to the bottom of a page
Sounds like you need CSS help, not jQuery help. Try googling css position fixed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay... That's a beginning... But I want to make a chat. So if you scroll up and already down, it should fix the bottom, when the scroll bar is bottom-most. Any idea? Am 6.11.2006 schrieb Sean O [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Interface's ScrollTo should work nicely (and aesthetically) for that: http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos/ifxscrollto.html http://interface.eyecon.ro/ SEAN O sd-11 wrote: Hi, how to scroll always to the bottom of a page with jquery? Thank you. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Scrolling-to-the-bottom- of-a-page-tf2578618.html#a7192370 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] jquery incompatible with adsense?
Hi all,When I finished my little project with jquery I decided to add my adsense code. After this I saw there is something that makes jquery incompatible with the adsense script. I don't know what it is so I created a little test page so you all can check it: http://www.markdbd.com/proyectos/jquery_test/Just click on the image to get the error, I think it only happens on firefox. I am using the thinkbox plugin but If I am right the bug is in jquery.js.Regards,-- --Mark D.B.Dhttp://www.markdbd.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]-- ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Scrolling to the bottom of a page
I think this has nothing to do with CSS... Look, if you have content on a page, which will grow in the direction of the bottom, than you get a large range to scroll. JQuery should scroll automaticly at the lowest point of the page ( to the bottom ). If the user wants to read something again, let me say in the middle of the page, then he should be able to scroll to the position. Am 6.11.2006 schrieb Bryan Buchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sounds like you need CSS help, not jQuery help. Try googling css position fixed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay... That's a beginning... But I want to make a chat. So if you scroll up and already down, it should fix the bottom, when the scroll bar is bottom-most. Any idea? Am 6.11.2006 schrieb Sean O [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Interface's ScrollTo should work nicely (and aesthetically) for that: http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos/ifxscrollto.html http://interface.eyecon.ro/ SEAN O sd-11 wrote: Hi, how to scroll always to the bottom of a page with jquery? Thank you. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Scrolling-to-the-bott om- of-a-page-tf2578618.html#a7192370 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jquery incompatible with adsense?
I had a similar problem, Mark. Upgrading to the latest revision of jQuery (522 at the time) solved the problem :-) Luke Mark D.B.D wrote: Hi all, When I finished my little project with jquery I decided to add my adsense code. After this I saw there is something that makes jquery incompatible with the adsense script. I don't know what it is so I created a little test page so you all can check it: http://www.markdbd.com/proyectos/jquery_test/ Just click on the image to get the error, I think it only happens on firefox. I am using the thinkbox plugin but If I am right the bug is in jquery.js. Regards, -- -- Mark D.B.D http://www.markdbd.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Can we make biz-wang-ultra-boom-bang-crash site, for jQuery, with tones of cool features, animations, etc... - Original Message - From: Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: jQuery Discussion. discuss@jquery.com Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 7:07 PM Subject: Re: [jQuery] New way of animating Hey Karl! Yep, your site is invaluable. You really do have some great tutorials on there and I think expanding it out via your submissions and those from anyone else is an awesome idea. Rey... Karl Swedberg wrote: On Nov 6, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Rey Bango wrote: Hi Paul, This is the type of stuff that I think would be OOO helpful in a tutorial or demo page. Like a best practices type of thing. I recently spent a lot of time talking to John about how to get the project more exposure and one of the things we threw out was getting more examples of coding practices on the site. Would you mind terribly jotting down some of these examples? I think they'd really help new users transition to jQuery. Please forgive the self-promotion, but these are the kinds of thing I'm also trying to do on learningjquery.com, and I (again) warmly welcome anyone who would like to author one or more tutorials for it or offer suggestions. Of course, adding more of this to the official jquery.com site would be great, too. Still, IMO the more jQuery love out there, the better. Third-party sites such as Cody Lindley's jQuery examples page and 15 Days of jQuery did as much as anything to get me hooked on jQuery. I'm currently working on these topics (in roughly this order): - How to Get Anything You Want (DOM Traversing) - Multi-Level Drop-Down Menus - jQuery Chaining - Basic Ajax Form Submission - Create a Basic Plugin - Collapsible Details Using Definition Lists and Brandon Aaron has been working on Populating a Select Menu with JSON and AJAX. Cheers, Karl ___ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com www.learningjquery.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
I can't speak to most of these issues, but I would like to point that for myself, learning works best by taking something that exists and rewriting it into jQuery. This allows me to not have to think about the existing application, but rather focus on get it working or getting it right in jQuery. Getting a thoughtful (not judgmental) critic and suggestions from more knowledge users is also very useful. I often get so focused on what I am trying to get working, I totally miss that there was a different simpler way to solve the problem. jQuery is relatively new, and many of the things that some of the more mature packages have are not use available in jQuery, (for the good or bad), so I applaud anyone that has time and effort and a willingness to create and offer new tools. The free market place of plugins will determine which are more useful. -Steve Dan Atkinson wrote: There's a whole page of various plugins that can be attached to jQuery. http://jquery.com/plugins/ In my opinion, going after individuals who show their work would not only be a childish 'me too'-ism, but it would be damaging to the reputation of jQuery, as it would just make people think that we don't have our own ideas, so we have to copy those of others. Rey Bango-2 wrote: If all the animation features are in jQuery standalone, then I'm onboard with Dan. What would be good, though, is if a page showing this being done in jQuery was created. Paul, are you up for that challenge? :o) Rey... Paul Bakaus wrote: Hey guys, has someone seen this at ajaxian? Check it out: http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.html This is probably the most sexiest animate lib I've ever seen in my life. Porting this to jQuery would be the PERFECT addition to jQuery's css parsing possiblities. What do you think? -- Paul Bakaus Web Developer Hildastr. 35 79102 Freiburg ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] return this.each
From: Simon Corless
Thanks for the help Mike, it's starting to come together.
I've been testing it just now.
If I do use return this.each() then how do I reference the
jQuery methods? without this.hover() etc? Obviously as this
is no longer what I am expecting this.hover (as you say)
fails. So do I use my 'self' variable or another way?
If you are calling each(), that means your plugin may operate on more than
one element, right? If you do var self = this; outside the each() call,
that is a reference to the entire jQuery object - an array of all the DOM
elements. The reason you would call each() is to operate on those elements
one by one. So in most cases that 'self' isn't what you want inside the
each() inner function.
In that inner function 'this' is the individual DOM element, so if you want
a jQuery object for that element, use $(this).
Let's try some more descriptive names instead of self and this:
(function( $ ) {
$.fn.twiddle = function() {
var $all = this;
$all.each( function() {
var element = this, $element = $(element);
// Now we have:
// $all - jQuery obect for all matching elements
// $element - jQuery obect for a single element
// element - a single element itself
});
};
})( jQuery );
Now you can write the entire plugin using meaningful names. In practice, I
tend to use shorter names like e and $e instead of element and $element, but
I used the longer ones here to make it more descriptive.
Remember that if the plugin doesn't need to work on the individual DOM
elements but only uses jQuery methods on the whole collection, then you
don't need an each() loop at all.
Contrast a plugin that sets all matching elements to the same random color:
(function( $ ) {
$.fn.twiddle = function() {
var $all = this;
$all.background( randomColor() );
};
})( jQuery );
vs. a plugin that sets each matching element to a different random color:
(function( $ ) {
$.fn.twiddle = function() {
$all.each( function() {
var element = this, $element = $(element);
$element.background( randomColor() );
});
};
})( jQuery );
Note the use of the $ prefix to indicate that a variable is a jQuery object,
and the use of matching names with and without the $ when you have both a
DOM element and a matching jQuery object for that element only. A similar
use of this pattern is:
var $foo = $('.foo'), foo = $foo[0];
This is for typical non-plugin code where you're starting with a query.
Instead of writing code like this:
$('.foo').zip();
// more code
$('.foo').zoom();
// more code
$('.foo').fly();
You'd write:
var $foo = $('.foo');
$foo.zip();
// more code
$foo.zoom();
// more code
$foo.fly();
In this case we're not using any DOM methods, so we only use $foo and not
foo.
I thought I saw someone just using
.hover() (without any prefix) but this just fails.
You probably saw code like:
$('.foo')
.zip()
.zoom()
.fly();
That's a single line of code split into multiple lines. It's the same as:
$('.foo').zip().zoom().fly();
I don't fully understand the difference, currently I don't
use any dom methods I just use jQuery (I partly thought
that was the point of it? - Although I realise sometimes
you need to go deeper).
jQuery doesn't try to provide its own equivalent of every possible DOM
property and method, so it's pretty handy to be able to mix and match when
you need to.
Basically I have 3 internal functions defined in two ways as:
nextItem = function ()
or
function pause()
Am I right in thinking that nextItem() could be called
through a jQuery chain and that pause() can only be called
internally from my plugin? Or are they both the same just
written differently?
Those are just different ways of writing functions - they have little or
nothing to do with how a function can be used.
For example, these are essentially identical, creating functions in the
current scope:
var foo = function(){};
function foo(){}
If I left off the var, the first one would create a global function:
foo = function(){};
That is usually a mistake, as it is in your code - your nextItem should be
either:
var nextItem = function()...
or:
function nextItem()...
The latter would be more consistent with the rest of your code, so that's
what I'd use.
Another coding tip or two...
You have several places with code like this:
settings['blank']
That's OK, but you can substitute the simpler:
settings.blank
I would change this code:
if (items[i]['link']) {
self.html(a href=\\ + items[i]['item'] + /a);
} else {
self.html(items[i]['item']);
}
to:
var item = items[i];
if (item.link) {
[jQuery] (no subject)
why doesn't this work:
$('#text-field').val(this.name);
when this does:
$('#text-field).click( function() { alert(this.name); } );
? did i find a bug?also: what does 'this' refer to? the jquery object, right?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] this.name
why doesn't this work:
$('#text-field').val(this.name);
when this does:
$('#text-field).click( function() { alert(this.name); } );
? did i find a bug?
also: what does 'this' refer to? the jquery object, right?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Hey again,Rey: I'm absolutely with you with the idea of pushing jQuery with tutorials and examples. I myself love jQuery and I am starting to use in in commercial projects, too, but many of my co-workers are very interested in examples.
Of course, checking out demos of plugins is always a great idea. But I would also welcome more migration sheets of different frameworks like the one that was posted in jQuery's blog recently.By the way, I perfectly know well that jQuery's build-in animation method should not be replaced, this is were some people may get a wrong idea in my first email in this thread.
I just wanted to have this extended functionality for myself, so as you said Rey, I will go ahead and create a demo / tutorial like plugin and post it again. This plugin will feature the method like described my Christof, because it's very interesting:
When doing $(#mydiv).animateClass('myFirstClass', 'mySecondClass'), the object is transparently cloned at opacity 0.0001 or visibility hidden with the given new class, then the style of this clone is computed, then a diff is made between the old computed style properties and the new ones, and finally our beloved animate() function takes care of the animation, then sets the class with className and removes the animated styles again (because we don't need them anymore if the class is set on the original). harhar :)
2006/11/6, Christof Donat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, but now my own killer feature :D 3.) $(#mydiv).animateClass(oldClass, newClass); -or- $(#mydiv).animateClass(newClass);That would be nice, but what about this:
.myFirstClass {display:inline;background-color:#00;}.mySecondClass {display:block;background-color:#ff;}$(#mydiv).animateClass('myFirstClass', 'mySecondClass');
What will hapen?Another thing: after the animation has finished, will the element only havethe style of the new class or will it be of the new class. Will it still beof the old class? When does that change if it does?
Christof___jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/
-- Paul BakausWeb DeveloperHildastr. 3579102 Freiburg
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] this.name
why doesn't this work:
$('#text-field').val(this.name);
What is this? You haven't given it a value. So it depends on the context
of this code. If the code is not in an object method, then this is the
window object.
when this does:
$('#text-field).click( function() { alert(this.name); } );
? did i find a bug?
also: what does 'this' refer to? the jquery object, right?
Now your reference to this is inside a function, specifically an event
handler. jQuery follows the same practice as the native DOM: inside an event
handler, this is the DOM element associated with the event. That's why you
can do this.name.
-Mike
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Feel free to offer something up Dragan. John's a fairly receptive to anything that will benefit the project. Rey... Dragan Krstic wrote: Can we make biz-wang-ultra-boom-bang-crash site, for jQuery, with tones of cool features, animations, etc... - Original Message - From: Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: jQuery Discussion. discuss@jquery.com Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 7:07 PM Subject: Re: [jQuery] New way of animating Hey Karl! Yep, your site is invaluable. You really do have some great tutorials on there and I think expanding it out via your submissions and those from anyone else is an awesome idea. Rey... Karl Swedberg wrote: On Nov 6, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Rey Bango wrote: Hi Paul, This is the type of stuff that I think would be OOO helpful in a tutorial or demo page. Like a best practices type of thing. I recently spent a lot of time talking to John about how to get the project more exposure and one of the things we threw out was getting more examples of coding practices on the site. Would you mind terribly jotting down some of these examples? I think they'd really help new users transition to jQuery. Please forgive the self-promotion, but these are the kinds of thing I'm also trying to do on learningjquery.com, and I (again) warmly welcome anyone who would like to author one or more tutorials for it or offer suggestions. Of course, adding more of this to the official jquery.com site would be great, too. Still, IMO the more jQuery love out there, the better. Third-party sites such as Cody Lindley's jQuery examples page and 15 Days of jQuery did as much as anything to get me hooked on jQuery. I'm currently working on these topics (in roughly this order): - How to Get Anything You Want (DOM Traversing) - Multi-Level Drop-Down Menus - jQuery Chaining - Basic Ajax Form Submission - Create a Basic Plugin - Collapsible Details Using Definition Lists and Brandon Aaron has been working on Populating a Select Menu with JSON and AJAX. Cheers, Karl ___ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com www.learningjquery.com ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Great Paul! Look forward to seeing bud.
Rey...
Paul Bakaus wrote:
Hey again,
Rey: I'm absolutely with you with the idea of pushing jQuery with
tutorials and examples. I myself love jQuery and I am starting to use in
in commercial projects, too, but many of my co-workers are very
interested in examples.
Of course, checking out demos of plugins is always a great idea. But I
would also welcome more migration sheets of different frameworks like
the one that was posted in jQuery's blog recently.
By the way, I perfectly know well that jQuery's build-in animation
method should not be replaced, this is were some people may get a wrong
idea in my first email in this thread.
I just wanted to have this extended functionality for myself, so as you
said Rey, I will go ahead and create a demo / tutorial like plugin and
post it again. This plugin will feature the method like described my
Christof, because it's very interesting:
When doing $(#mydiv).animateClass(
'myFirstClass', 'mySecondClass'), the object is transparently cloned at
opacity 0.0001 or visibility hidden with the given new class, then the
style of this clone is computed, then a diff is made between the old
computed style properties and the new ones, and finally our beloved
animate() function takes care of the animation, then sets the class with
className and removes the animated styles again (because we don't need
them anymore if the class is set on the original). harhar :)
2006/11/6, Christof Donat [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
but now my own killer feature :D
3.) $(#mydiv).animateClass(oldClass, newClass); -or-
$(#mydiv).animateClass(newClass);
That would be nice, but what about this:
.myFirstClass {
display:inline;
background-color:#00;
}
.mySecondClass {
display:block;
background-color:#ff;
}
$(#mydiv).animateClass('myFirstClass', 'mySecondClass');
What will hapen?
Another thing: after the animation has finished, will the element
only have
the style of the new class or will it be of the new class. Will it
still be
of the old class? When does that change if it does?
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com mailto:discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/ http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Paul Bakaus
Web Developer
Hildastr. 35
79102 Freiburg
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
Well said, Steve. Rey Stephen Woodbridge wrote: I can't speak to most of these issues, but I would like to point that for myself, learning works best by taking something that exists and rewriting it into jQuery. This allows me to not have to think about the existing application, but rather focus on get it working or getting it right in jQuery. Getting a thoughtful (not judgmental) critic and suggestions from more knowledge users is also very useful. I often get so focused on what I am trying to get working, I totally miss that there was a different simpler way to solve the problem. jQuery is relatively new, and many of the things that some of the more mature packages have are not use available in jQuery, (for the good or bad), so I applaud anyone that has time and effort and a willingness to create and offer new tools. The free market place of plugins will determine which are more useful. -Steve Dan Atkinson wrote: There's a whole page of various plugins that can be attached to jQuery. http://jquery.com/plugins/ In my opinion, going after individuals who show their work would not only be a childish 'me too'-ism, but it would be damaging to the reputation of jQuery, as it would just make people think that we don't have our own ideas, so we have to copy those of others. Rey Bango-2 wrote: If all the animation features are in jQuery standalone, then I'm onboard with Dan. What would be good, though, is if a page showing this being done in jQuery was created. Paul, are you up for that challenge? :o) Rey... Paul Bakaus wrote: Hey guys, has someone seen this at ajaxian? Check it out: http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.html This is probably the most sexiest animate lib I've ever seen in my life. Porting this to jQuery would be the PERFECT addition to jQuery's css parsing possiblities. What do you think? -- Paul Bakaus Web Developer Hildastr. 35 79102 Freiburg ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Unicode (I love Unicode)
if you don't want to play the whole game, MS makes a font that contains just about all the chars.. ms arial unicode, you get it with office or some other ms apps, and can be installed anywhere ttf fonts are supported. I don't speak many of the languages that unicode supports, but GOOGLE(and others) have helped me translate many times! On 11/6/06, Dave Methvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nabble doesn't nibble at my nybbles. (IE they don't mess with the unicode and it works!) FF 2.0 Mac shows just fine. You're right, I think it's your earlier guess that we don't have all the world's fonts installed. I think it is best to assume that users have only a basic set of fonts, and not the entire set of Unicode glyphs. Windows has a font download option but I have turned it off. I don't see any point in installing Thai or Chinese since I can't read it anyway; the little rectangular boxes make just as much sense and take up less memory. There was a security vulnerability in Windows last year having to do with automatic font download (MS06-002) so you can bet that many companies have turned it off as well. ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Tabs plugin 2.0
Will Arp schrieb: Hi Klaus, when clicking the Activate third tab in your example, the url doesn't change. Thank you for the great update! will Hi Will, I have now fixed that as well. -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] New jQuery plug - selectBox
Hi, The other day i started working with a new client, our designer wanted to use sucker fish type of menus. In the design select boxes are a common element due to the fact that this is a e-commerce website. Only one thought came to mind, Iframes So i started thinking, there must be a better way. And from those thought comes my latest jquery plugin - selectbox. This is what it does: It hooks right on your existing select element. Hides it and appends some div elements and a list, allowing you to style it to your taste. If you select something in the 'fake' selectbox the exact value is selected in the hidden selectbox, so your forms will not no what happend. Any way here is a small demo: http://cbach.jquery.com/demos/selectbox/ There are still a few bugs to sort out... Enjoy /Christian ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
I have to
agree that more examples of coding practices would be extremely
helpful. I've got some jQuery stuff workin' on my app., but I'm almost
positive, that I'm missing out on some of the real power that the
library offers. It's probably because I come from a procedural
programing background, and objects still (sometimes) get the better of
me.
I'd offer to help, but I think I'd just be in the way. :o) I'm rather
hoping that something like this comes together, and I can benefit from
it -- okay so I'm selfish... :op
Chris
Rey Bango wrote:
Hi Paul,
This is the type of stuff that I think would be OOO helpful in a
tutorial or demo page. Like a best practices type of thing. I recently
spent a lot of time talking to John about how to get the project more
exposure and one of the things we threw out was getting more examples of
coding practices on the site.
Would you mind terribly jotting down some of these examples? I think
they'd really help new users transition to jQuery.
Let me know.
Rey...
Paul Bakaus wrote:
Sure Rey ;-)
Maybe my email was a bit too enthusiastic. Don't get me wrong, I'm not
talking about the script itself, of course it has some problems and
drawbacks and whatelse. And I really like the way of jQuery animating
styles.
It's all about the method.
Having a div-element with a certain style, then the jQuery way could be
like this:
1.) $("#mydiv").animateStyle("background-color: #eee; border: 1px solid
black; opacity: 0.5;");
-If only one param given, this function animates from the current style
of the element, to the one given into the function.
2) $("#mydiv").animateStyle(old, new);
-animate from one style to the second
but now my own killer feature :D
3.) $("#mydiv").animateClass(oldClass, newClass); -or-
$("#mydiv").animateClass(newClass);
-So you change the class of the object, but you animate the change.
Waiting for comments!
2006/11/6, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If all the animation features are in jQuery standalone, then I'm onboard
with Dan.
What would be good, though, is if a page showing this being done in
jQuery was created. Paul, are you up for that challenge? :o)
Rey...
Paul Bakaus wrote:
Hey guys,
has someone seen this at ajaxian? Check it out:
http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.html
http://berniecode.com/writing/animator.html
This is probably the most sexiest animate lib I've ever seen in
my life.
Porting this to jQuery would be the PERFECT addition to jQuery's css
parsing
possiblities.
What do you think?
--
Paul Bakaus
Web Developer
Hildastr. 35
79102 Freiburg
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com mailto:discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com mailto:discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Paul Bakaus
Web Developer
Hildastr. 35
79102 Freiburg
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New way of animating
I was thinking about YUI guy, the official bloger. He show something very similar to resize plug-in. It is very effective. Then, we have solar system, Visual jQuery... I think that jQuery.com must be more visual appealing (yeah, I know, John don't have time). More informative, like www.pmachine.com. Then, we'll put some effects, animations... not extravaganza, just to jiggle it up. The dipper people goes in the site, more effects will be added, and so on... - Original Message - From: Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: jQuery Discussion. discuss@jquery.com Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 10:21 PM Subject: Re: [jQuery] New way of animating Feel free to offer something up Dragan. John's a fairly receptive to anything that will benefit the project. Rey... ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] [Fwd: jquery bug 164] (fix?)
Weird ... I wrote this email but never sent it :/
I've run it through the test suite and it doesn't affect anything else
but I think Jorn had some tests specific to this bug that need to be
added back in ... so it is probably best to wait for him to commit
this fix to SVN.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 11/4/06, Dave Methvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, this version doesn't error out at least:
http://methvin.com/junk/jquery-xml-bug.html?patched
The fix is to change this line of attr() :
Old:
} else if ( elem.getAttribute != undefined elem.tagName ) { // IE
elem.getAttribute passes even for style
New:
} else if ( typeof(elem.getAttribute) != undefined elem.tagName ) {
\
I think IE is trying to _call_ elem.getAttribute for some reason, must be a
bug in the COM typelib for the XML control.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brandon Aaron
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 1:01 PM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] [Fwd: jquery bug 164]
On 11/4/06, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is interesting. These both fail for me ...
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322;
.NET CLR 2.0.50727)
I should also mention it fails with the line #722 'Wrong number of arguments
or invalid property assignment' in both IE6 and IE7.
--
Brandon Aaron
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
