In Mac Firefox, when an element is anything other than opacity:1, the
text is rendered 'thinner' or lighter in weight. This means that, for
example, when you fadeUp, text is 'light' in weight until opacity:1
is reached. The transition from opacity:.999 to opacity:1 is very
noticeable as
Hi folks!
I am a graphic designer who has taught myself web development over
the last few years. I have been using jQuery for the behaviour layer
of a site since maybe March this year and absolutely love it. From a
Mac-oriented, drag and drop,user-friendly perspective, jQuery makes
Thanks Jörn, Sam, Michael and Jake,
I will look into Eclipse - hopefully I can work that out on my own -
I don't want to create unnecessary work for you Jörn. Thanks for your
generous offer.
Sam was correct that I wanted the latest SVN version. I also wanted
to see if I was missing out on
Thanks a lot Jörn!
Joel.
On 01/10/2006, at 11:10 PM, Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Joel Birch schrieb:
Thanks Jörn, Sam, Michael and Jake,
I will look into Eclipse - hopefully I can work that out on my own -
I don't want to create unnecessary work for you Jörn. Thanks for your
generous offer
On 02/10/2006, at 7:25 AM, Michael Geary wrote:
Joel, even if you want to use the svn version, you don't need to do
any of
this ant build stuff at all. All it does is strip comments and
concatenate
files.
The .js files straight out of svn are perfectly usable just as they
are. For
Yes... VERY interested!
Cheers
Joel.
On 02/11/2006, at 6:40 AM, Wil Stuckey wrote:
On 10/31/06, Sam Sherlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UFO Version 3.30 is coming soon sneek peak at http://www.refunk.com/
ufo/ufo.js
I'm actually working on a jQuery port of UFO 3.x
I've got a working port
Hi Jörn,
This plugin looks great. Very flexible. I love the example showing
that it can be used for a navigation list too.
I noticed that when text is scaled up in the browser, the containing
boxes do not expand to accommodate the larger content. Would this be
troublesome to fix? My lame
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
I noticed that when text is scaled up in the browser, the containing
boxes do not expand to accommodate the larger content. Would this be
troublesome to fix? My lame guess is that the height needs to be set
to auto at some stage of the animation, or will this cause a
On 11/9/06, Joel Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To this:
var finished = function() { --running; this.style.height=auto; };
Perhaps it would be best to just allow the style sheet to define
whether or not it is auto by setting the style to a blank string.
var finished = function
at the very least my jQuery code may give the experts a
few good belly laughs. :)
http://www.incomesolutions.com.au/
Cheers
Joel Birch.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
http://www.incomesolutions.com.au/
Hi Joel,
beautiful! I was wondering about this one:
$.browser.msie ?
$('#caseStudyTabs').addClass('tabs').tabs() : /*IE too buggy to
handle
animation*/
$('#caseStudyTabs').addClass('tabs').tabs({fxSlide: true,
fxFade:
On 12/11/2006, at 5:44 AM, Karl Swedberg wrote:
On Nov 11, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Joel Birch wrote:
but the worst is that
any use of the opacity filter in IE7 makes the type aliased which I
hate. How dodgy is that!
Forgive me if I'm
just repeating something you already know, but a common
On 12/11/2006, at 12:22 PM, Brandon Aaron wrote:
This is actually done on purpose to avoid the ugly text that
happens in IE 6.
I'm not sure what you mean. Just to verify - when I say IE7 makes
the type aliased I mean that it removes the smooth anti-aliasing,
and ends up looking jaggy. If
On 12/11/2006, at 1:34 PM, Brandon Aaron wrote:
On 11/11/06, Joel Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/11/2006, at 12:22 PM, Brandon Aaron wrote:
This is actually done on purpose to avoid the ugly text that
happens in IE 6.
I'm not sure what you mean. Just to verify - when I say IE7 makes
On 13/11/2006, at 9:08 PM, Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
I just fixed some more bugs occuring in IE on the Accordion plugin.
And created a page with some examples and documentation:
http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-accordion/
Hi Jörn,
The animation of accordion sections on your
Does it work if you change that line to:
$(#ajax_episodebox).load(url, {}, function() { // This line
So change the second argument from 'false' to an empty object. I may
be way off but I'm not sure 'false' is a valid argument for $.load.
Maybe 'null' would be valid too, but an empty hash
interested, and maybe add my email to your address book so I
get through to you.
Sorry for this email everyone else, please forgive me.
Joel Birch.
On 08/12/2006, at 12:45 AM, Rey Bango wrote:
Guys, some of you may know of my efforts to get jQuery more exposure
Hi all,
Just want to point out that there is a post from Mike Davies at
http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/12/reducing-the-pain-of-adopting-
a-javascript-library/ which refers to Chris Heilmann's post here
http://www.wait-till-i.com/index.php?p=366 and discusses the
difficulty in adopting
In the process of animating, I think jQuery adds display:block to
the inline style property. It probably doesn't do this with the
instant show. My guess is this is what is happening.
Joel.
On 13/12/2006, at 9:24 PM, jazzle wrote:
I'm sure I must be missing something basic, but I cannot
Assuming the class is set on the 'a' element:
$(a.newWindow).click( ...
On 16/12/2006, at 4:40 AM, Christopher Jordan wrote:
This should be a quick one.
I know there's a way to do this, but it escapes me at this time.
I've got a few a href... tags on my screen, and I want some of
them
On 05/01/2007, at 7:12 PM, Paul Bakaus wrote:
Until then, you can
just use vJustify!
-Paul
I just used vjustify and found that (for my purposes at least) the
plugin works better if it sets the min-height instead of the height.
This way the elements can still expand if the text is sized
As I have posted before - here it is again for completion's sake:
http://www.incomesolutions.com.au
Uses jQuery for:
- hiding and revealing blocks of content
- Ajax submission of sign-up forms
- Tabs plugin to compress content into a small space
- Corners plugin for rounded corners for IE6
- fix
On 17/01/2007, at 4:21 PM, Karl Swedberg wrote:
It's working for me now. Looks great. Not sure how I'd get to it if
you hadn't provided the link, though.
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Jan 17, 2007, at 12:03 AM, Gerry Danen
You simply need to attach the click behaviour to the .test element
after it is created. At the moment you are trying to attach it upon $
(document).ready which only happens once, just before the page is
first loaded.
Joel.
On 23/01/2007, at 9:24 PM, Laurent Goussard wrote:
Can someone
On 23/01/2007, at 9:56 PM, Roberto Ortelli wrote:
script type=text/javascript
$(document).ready(function(){
$(#trigger).click(function(){
$(#content).append('a href=
class=testclick does not work/a');
What I said about the handler being attached more than once really
only applied to the example we were working with. Considering you are
emptying the content now the previous .test will not exist by the
time you load the new one. Also, Jörn's advise about using find() is
good practice and
On 24/01/2007, at 11:13 PM, Klaus Hartl wrote:
Mike Alsup wrote:
I'd love to do that!
Excellent. Glad to hear it. Thanks, Klaus!
Excellent, I was really hoping Klaus would be the man to take over.
Hey, wait a moment, I think Cody has to have the latest word
here... (?)
Of course -
I checked in Safari and the problem does not occur. It's bad in FF2
Mac though. I've seen problems like this plenty and it seemed to
always be to do with not having a height or width set on the sliding
element. I remember that solutions involved resetting the inline
style property in the
On 29/01/2007, at 9:22 AM, Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Seems like the flash does not quite achieve the effect that it should.
I'll try to improve that.
Maybe animate a scroll to the requested item instead? That would make
it pretty obvious that you have moved to another item. On the other
hand,
On 29/01/2007, at 5:29 PM, Brice Burgess wrote:
it remains untested/unreported
under Safari.
Hi Brice,
It's all looking extremely tasty. Thought I'd check it out on Safari
2.0.4 for you. Good news. It works exactly like it does in Mac FF2.
The only strange thing I noticed in both browsers
On 29/01/2007, at 6:09 PM, Stéphane Nahmani wrote:
It works under the Tiger Safari, but only the last 2 are actually
modal; clicking on the bg for the first 3 closes the dialog.
I can confirm this actually. This differs from Mac FF2.
Joel.
___
On 29/01/2007, at 9:10 PM, Franck Marcia wrote:
Any idea how that could be designed?
Why not just links, like gmail for selection (all,none...), as they
don't alter data in the tree?
Should they be button elements? I think they are more semantically
correct for triggering behaviour like
On 29/01/2007, at 10:48 PM, Andreas Wahlin wrote:
It appears to not work at all in safari, all corners are black.
I sometimes get the black corners bug in Safari too. It's strange.
Sometimes they are there and sometimes not. I am trying my best to
pretend its not happening for now.
Joel.
On 29/01/2007, at 11:16 PM, Andreas Wahlin wrote:
And if you want to fire two animations at the same time, how do you
do that?
andreas
I think the answer to that one is to use the animate() function and
roll both animations into one custom animation.
Joel.
On 31/01/2007, at 8:49 PM, Andreas Wahlin wrote:
Like Dave said, you need to assign background colors in Safari. What
demo page has this problem? This Safari screenshot was taken this
morning:
well the official demo page to name one
http://methvin.com/jquery/jq-corner-demo.html
Yep I
that something is changing.
I have plenty more jQuery-powered sites in the works and will send
them in when they are ready if you are still looking for more. Thanks
Rey. Keep up the great work!
Joel Birch.
On 11/01/2007, at 7:56 AM, Rey Bango wrote:
Please keep sending links as we want to have
to using it when using jQuery
because the ease and speed benefits you mentioned are just too darn
seductive. The code is also much more readable so less-techy people
can possibly change the output easier.
I'll be interested to hear what other people think about this.
Joel Birch
On 01/02/2007, at 1:07 PM, Brandon Aaron wrote:
Let's not forget that xmlHttpRequest is also not standard.
I thought this was recently made standard.
Joel.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 01/02/2007, at 1:48 PM, John Resig wrote:
innerHTML works just fine on XHTML pages - jQuery.com is XHTML.
Ah yes, I meant XHTML served as XML not text/html. Are you saying
that innerHTML works even when served as an application of XML? If
so, I stand gratefully corrected.
Joel.
On 01/02/2007, at 1:58 PM, Chris Domigan wrote:
Ah yes, I meant XHTML served as XML not text/html. Are you saying
that innerHTML works even when served as an application of XML? If
so, I stand gratefully corrected.
Joel.
I use .html() fine and I'm serving proper xml :)
Chris
I was
On 01/02/2007, at 6:56 PM, Klaus Hartl wrote:
Joel, I couldn't have said it better. You read my mind.
-- Klaus
That might be because I most likely learnt all of that from you at
some stage.
Thanks Klaus.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
regarding the Mac FF text rendering issue.
Thanks in advance.
Joel Birch.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 03/02/2007, at 10:21 PM, Stéphane Nahmani wrote:
The only actual flicker i see is when the page
loads: the image at its smallest size turns off, back on, and then
starts scaling.
This describes the flicker I am referring to perfectly so thanks for
that. It only ever occurs after page
On 03/02/2007, at 10:48 PM, Stéphane Nahmani wrote:
My bad!
I missed the first time mention in your summary, so i was looking
for flickering with every image. You are right, the page with version
1.0.4 doesn't show that first time flicker.
Stéphane, I have adjusted the test pages to
the flicker. I assume you were
responsible for the fix so thank you greatly.
Here is a link to a test page that uses the SVN jQuery for those
following the thread:
http://users.tpg.com.au/j_birch/macFFflicker/usesJQrev1261.html
Joel Birch
___
jQuery
On 04/02/2007, at 1:00 PM, Brandon Aaron wrote:
On 2/3/07, Joel Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brandon. After a long and gruelling battle with my old nemesis,
the SVN repository, I seem to have managed to get the latest SVN
and it does indeed seem to fix the flicker. I assume you were
On 04/02/2007, at 10:18 PM, Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Joel Birch schrieb:
I am on a Mac and currently use Eclipse as recommended to me last
year by Jörn. I will have a look at svnX but I think the main
problem is that I do not understand the SVN in general and all the
options (at least
this?
jQuery(function($)
{
$(dt).click( function() {
$(this).next(dd).slideToggle();
});
});
Untested.
Joel Birch.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
generic) then I would use prototype style object-oriented code
instead.
I could be wrong though - I'm no guru - but it's something to consider.
Joel Birch.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hi Chris,
I'm not sure but I think this would have more chance of working:
$([EMAIL PROTECTED]:hidden);
The @ symbol is xPath apparently, which is what is used within the
square brackets. Also, I usually see things like :hidden at the end
of the string.
Joel.
On 06/02/2007, at 10:01 AM,
On 11/01/2007, at 7:56 AM, Rey Bango wrote:
Please keep sending links as we want to have a nice list of
jQuery-powered sites for the jQuery web site.
Thanks,
Rey...
Hey Rey,
I have just finished a web site for Preshil School here in Australia:
http://www.preshil.vic.edu.au/
Using jQuery
On 17/02/2007, at 6:53 PM, Aaron Heimlich wrote:
It should be noted that I have *never* experienced this double
script eval in any other Windows browser (I don't own a Mac, so I
can't test there).
I ran your test pages with Mac FF2 and four alerts are generated by
the unpatched test
On 18/02/2007, at 12:36 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
Very nice site, Joel... that's the first time I've seen the smooth
scroll
effect
and it's impressive. Nice design.
Rick
Thanks Rick, all credit for the smooth scroll goes to Stefan Petre,
of course. I like using it over a regular
On 18/02/2007, at 2:05 AM, Rey Bango wrote:
I've added the site Joel. Very nice work.
Thank you for submitting it and for using jQuery.
Rey
jQuery Project Team
Oh that's rich - *you* are thanking *me*? ;)
On the contrary jQuery Team, thank YOU - I love you guys!
On 18/02/2007, at 1:55 AM,
On 18/02/2007, at 2:41 AM, Karl Swedberg wrote:
On Feb 17, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Joel Birch wrote:
My thoughts exactly Karl.
On another note, I just created a simple plugin (my first ever!) that
I have applied to the Preshil site and may ask for feedback tomorrow
if it still seems like a good
On 18/02/2007, at 6:13 AM, Karl Swedberg wrote:
ok, now that the smooth scrolling has Klaus's blessing :) ... I
thought I'd share some code I wrote to make it happen for all same-
page links. It takes into account the difference in the way the
various browsers treat href.
Thanks for
On 18/02/2007, at 10:21 AM, Karl Swedberg wrote:
By using this.hash and limiting it to links with the scrolls class,
you seem to have things covered.
A phew, that's a relief. Thanks for clearing that up for me Karl.
Joel.
___
jQuery mailing list
Yes I've run into this and it had me stumped. I found out that it is
(drum roll) once again due to Mac FF ongoing issues with opacity. I
had opacity:.99; set on the body element because it triggers smoother
rendering of fonts (sometimes good, sometimes bad, but that's another
story). I had
On 22/02/2007, at 8:54 AM, Rey Bango wrote:
Thats what I think Brandon was mentioning.
Rey
Klaus Hartl wrote:
Rey Bango schrieb:
Hey all,
Have a buddy of mine thats having an issue and he asked if I can
help.
Here's what he said:
Only problem I have had with jQuery is regarding
On 22/02/2007, at 9:26 AM, Mike Alsup wrote:
This bug used to be fixable by applying a background color but not
anymore (that I know of anyways).
Not that I know of either (but I want to know!) I had this problem
with the tabs plugin in ie7 and had to chop some stuff out to get
around it.
.
Sorry I can't show you a test page - I just quickly tested it on a
client's site so it looked hideous for a second or two.
Joel Birch.
On 23/02/2007, at 1:09 PM, Brandon Aaron wrote:
I haven't had the chance to test this yet. Can anyone else confirm
that setting a background image, even just
Thanks for the test page Benjamin. I'm not convinced that what you
have there recreates the same issue though. I tried setting
background-color to fix the problem but it made not difference in my
case. Unfortunately I don't seem to be able to recall what conditions
are necessary to
I just tried that CSS on the live site and no luck. The type is still
not anti-aliased in IE7 after animations. Please note, the problem is
not so much the ugly bold and jagged effect that occurred in IE6,
but merely that the type loses its anti-aliasing/smoothing in IE7
with ClearType on.
that the element is still flexible if the contents is
reflowed. If the height is set in the actual CSS then this is not
altered or removed when the inline style attribute is altered.
Hope this is a viable change for what you want to do.
Joel Birch.
On 23/02/2007, at 4:24 PM, Yansky wrote:
Hi
Also, if you put a reference to the div the navigation links are
targeting, like this:
a href=#test1 id=test-click1Previous Articles/a
not only would you increase accessibility, but you could then
optimise your entire code down to just this:
$(function() {
$('#demo-show
On 23/02/2007, at 6:52 PM, Joel Birch wrote:
What's the best way to get around this? Should I try re-applying
the height
value after the animation has finished?
No, please first try my suggestion - if that doesn't work, we can
revisit the problem.
Sorry - I realised I'm wrong - other
You are right there. I'll put my thinking cap on - but I have to go
out now so I'm afraid I won't be able to reply soon. Maybe Klaus can
think of a workaround off the top of his head. Obviously the min-
height is not allowing the smaller heights needed during the animation.
Will check in
Thickbox so useful and it looks like Thickbox 3 takes
it a huge step forward with unobtrusiveness, quality code, and best
of all - all the best enhancements put together in one almighty 'box.
It's truly One Box to Rule Them All again! I'll be tinkering with this!
Joel Birch
many people could create something like this easily and quickly
enough, should there be plugins that cover such light tasks anyway?
Thanks and sorry for the long post.
Joel Birch.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 27/02/2007, at 9:10 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
So the basic idea is that you can create a table of contents based
on a series of links selected by a jQuery selector?
Could be useful...
-- Yehuda
You can create a table of contents based on the elements you collect
in a jQuery object. For
On 28/02/2007, at 12:29 AM, Klaus Hartl wrote:
Joel Birch schrieb:
Hi jQuerivites,
I'd like to offer up my humble plugin (humble is the key word here)
to get a sense of if something this basic is of any worth to the
community. I discussed an earlier version of the plugin briefly
On 28/02/2007, at 8:17 AM, Joel Birch wrote:
On 28/02/2007, at 12:29 AM, Klaus Hartl wrote:
Joel Birch schrieb:
Hi jQuerivites,
I'd like to offer up my humble plugin (humble is the key word here)
to get a sense of if something this basic is of any worth to the
community.
I think its
On 06/03/2007, at 10:02 PM, Klaus Hartl wrote:
with the if else
statements, a test must be made for each if statement, whereas
switch
blocks generate vector jump tables at compile time so NO test is
actually required in the underlying code!
vector jump tables… nice. Thanks for the extra
suggestions or
questions. Oh, and if you actually did mean 'context menu', just
ignore all of this ;)
Joel Birch.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 07/03/2007, at 8:02 AM, Joel Birch wrote:
On 07/03/2007, at 1:52 AM, Denis wrote:
Can you please share working context menu example?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hi Denis,
I am thinking you may
(){ $(this).parents(li[ul]).each(out);
});
return this;
};
})(jQuery);
Tested on:
Mac FF2, IE6, IE7, Safari2.
Opera9 has flicker and seems to not support keyboard access (?)
Not tested with three levels of menu but may work.
All feedback is greatly appreciated.
Joel Birch
not appear but the
default menu was suppressed. I think maybe it's possible that one of
my extensions interferes with it. I have NoScript (but allowed your
domain), adblock, Firebug, WebDeveloper, and All-in-one Gestures.
I then tried it in Safari and it works great. Well done!
Joel Birch
On 09/03/2007, at 7:22 PM, Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote:
Nice menues and a nice looking site!
What especially caught my eye though was the
rolling fact box. Very nice!
Cheers, Tobbe
Thanks for the compliments Tobbe! Whilst the intended purpose of this
thread is not so much to show off that
On 09/03/2007, at 8:32 PM, Abel Tamayo wrote:
Nah, that's easy.
The problem is I can't make the lists of lists look like an array
of buttons, and some of them place themselves in places I don't
want them to. It´s a matter pf position and display, I know that
for sure, but still I can't
On 09/03/2007, at 8:50 PM, Brice Burgess wrote:
Perhaps I'm way off in protecting the expando ... and I too would like
to hear some feedback ;)
~ Brice
I've got to admit that I'm not overly familiar with the techniques
you are discussing. From what I can tell you are creating an array to
On 09/03/2007, at 8:45 PM, Torbjorn Tornkvist wrote:
Thanks for the compliments Tobbe! Whilst the intended purpose of this
thread is not so much to show off that site (I only included the link
because I have not had chance to do a real demo page yet), I'm always
happy to hear that someone
On 09/03/2007, at 8:50 PM, Brice Burgess wrote:
Perhaps I'm way off in protecting the expando ... and I too would like
to hear some feedback ;)
~ Brice
I have studied your code closely now and I think I understand it
better. You are saying that it's important that the property I'm
be a few hours
getting back as its a crazy hour here and I need to hit the hay.
Joel Birch.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 10/03/2007, at 4:12 AM, Jonathan Sharp wrote:
Hi Joel,
This may sound crazy but try applying a width property to the
menus. I ran into a similar problem in developing my plugin and IE
was a goof unless a width was applied and once I did that the
animations went smoothly.
Cheers,
On 10/03/2007, at 5:56 AM, Brice Burgess wrote:
Joel,
I wrote those reviews/changes @ 4am, and after more thought realize
most of them were unnecessary. The original code would work @ multiple
menus at once without the return this.each(...); The reasons I began
with that is I wanted to do
On 10/03/2007, at 5:35 AM, Cees (**snow**) wrote:
Especially the .each- there is only 1 match but can the .addClass and
.removeClass be chained after the .prev() ?!?!?
Yep, you should be able to chain them instead of using the .each()
Joel.
___
);
});
});
});
},rpt*1000);
return this;
};
/ then I call that plugin like this:*/
$(function(){
$(#dynaFact p:first).hide().slideDown(700).switchContent(700,40,'/
phpIncludes/facts.php');
}
Joel Birch
of things, feel free to not add it to the list - I won't mind at all.
http://www.antaeusflowers.com.au/
Tell me when to stop ;)
Joel Birch.
P.S. There is the Blush site I'd like you to add too - I think maybe
you missed my post on that one.
___
jQuery
On 10/03/2007, at 10:23 PM, Joel Birch wrote:
On 10/03/2007, at 9:23 PM, Karl Rudd wrote:
Cool. There's an error though, Firebug reports:
$.bH has no properties
http://www.antaeusflowers.com.au/scripts/antaeus.js
Line 7
Karl Rudd
Hey thanks heaps for catching that. I didn't get the error
On 10/03/2007, at 9:23 PM, Karl Rudd wrote:
Cool. There's an error though, Firebug reports:
$.bH has no properties
http://www.antaeusflowers.com.au/scripts/antaeus.js
Line 7
Karl Rudd
Hey thanks heaps for catching that. I didn't get the error you said
but I got others. Hopefully its all
need to
add each subsequent one as a callback argument of the one that
occurs before it. This way, each subsequent effect only begins once
the previous is fully finished.
Hope I haven't misunderstood your problem.
Joel Birch.
___
jQuery mailing list
Sounds great. I'll be there in spirit - have a beer for me :)
Joel Birch.
On 11/03/2007, at 5:30 PM, John Resig wrote:
Absolutely. Let's try for Monday, I'll make a post to the jQuery blog
and see if we can drum up some more people. I already talked with a
bunch today, so I know
children('ul'). If you
have a li with no ul, your version will open the ul of the first li
with ul.
Here is the improved code:
// enhanced suckerfish-style menu plugin by Joel Birch, edited by
Mathias Bank
(function($){
$.fn.superfish = function(o){
var defaults
On 13/03/2007, at 4:43 PM, John W wrote:
This is a very nice implementation of the suckerfish menu with
jquery. One
thing, however, is there any way to add the z-index checking using
something
like bgiframe for the IE6 issue of menu elements not hovering over
select
menus in IE6? I
On 13/03/2007, at 4:43 PM, John W wrote:
This is a very nice implementation of the suckerfish menu with
jquery. One
thing, however, is there any way to add the z-index checking using
something
like bgiframe for the IE6 issue of menu elements not hovering over
select
menus in IE6? I
On 13/03/2007, at 6:00 PM, John W wrote:
Thanks for the reply Joel. The jdmenu (current beta version) is
employing the
bgiframe to compensate for this same issue. Basically you bind the
bgiclass
to an element like a div or in the case of an ordered list to the
the UL
tag. It then
On 13/03/2007, at 6:15 PM, Joel Birch wrote:
I implemented the bgiframe plugin and experimented a bit.
Forgot to mention, I also commented out the two expressions relating
to borders in the bgiframe plugin - I think that helped the
performance a little too.
Joel
On 13/03/2007, at 6:15 PM, Joel Birch wrote:
On 13/03/2007, at 6:00 PM, John W wrote:
Thanks for the reply Joel. The jdmenu (current beta version) is
employing the
bgiframe to compensate for this same issue. Basically you bind the
bgiclass
to an element like a div or in the case
Sounds great Brandon. My only thought is that currently your plugin
is nice and light which is great for such a useful utility plugin.
Wouldn't adding all these features bump up the size to almost 200%?
On the other hand I'm sure you have weighed the pros and cons of this
so... awesome!
Just a quick note to say that I finished a passable demo page for the
Superfish plugin and I have now added the plugin to the main plugin
page at jquery.com.
Thanks to everyone who provided feedback - it was indispensable.
Please post to this list if you have anymore suggestions etc.
Joel
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
