Unfortunately, the XM Radio plugin is not currently supported.
It doesn't use the XMLBrowser plugin interface most other radio
plugins use but only provides a Web Interface.
For the same reason, the XM Radio plugin also doesn't work on the
Squeezebox Controller.
I do have an Idea how it could
I have a fairly converluted way of getting to the SC via DLNA hardware.
If you have a DLNA Denon Amp, (which can only play MP3 up to 320K) You
can use the remote streaming from the Amp to SC,
http://XXX.com:9000/stream.mp3. A not overly elegant solution, but it
works for me.
My setup
Denon
ThomP;381840 Wrote:
Then why do they call it a media center? My pc can control other devices
as well, but that doesn't make it a remote control.
Of course you can call it whatever you want, but it's nonsense to
compare it to a Harmony.
Besides, this is getting way OT!
Yeah, these
Howard Passman wrote:
peter;381812 Wrote:
Robin Bowes wrote:
Hi all,
Net::UDAP is a Perl module to configure the SqueezeBox Receiver (SBR)
from a PC, i.e. without requiring a SqueezeBox Controller (SBC).
The project homepage is here:
http://projects.robinbowes.com/Net-UDAP
Net::UDAP
Peter wrote:
I don't understand how they get away with selling the SBR
as a separate product without providing a simple setup tool with it.
Open Source does not mean you let your users do all the work.
The SBR is sold separately for users who require 1 receiver with just
one controller,
Skinny;382055 Wrote:
I'm with you on that. Bits will be bits.
With you on that as well.
I would have once said that bits are bits (and so they are) but without
an accurate clock bits can't be reproduced into the waveform they
represent.
Since the S/PDIF standard doesn't provide a clock
I know the Logitech guys use perlapp for packaging SqueezeCenter, so
they could have packed it for you too. Even better, they could also make
an OS-X executable.
We only use PerlApp on Windows (so far). Shouldn't the script run on OSX'
perl installation?
Michael
Quote: Een Logitech® Squeezebox™ Duet of Squeezebox™ is vereist voor de
netwerkset-up.
Thanks for the heads up! While Squeezebox doesn't mean Classic, this
clearly is misleading. It's a translation error. DE/EN both say
Squeezebox Controller. I'll let our marketing know about this.
Michael
I would also like to see the Year against an album on the controller
along with the ability to sort Albums by Year when selecting an Artist.
I know you can sort the Albums list by Artist, Year, Album but that's
not the same. It needs to be for an individual Artist - there is
nothing worse than
roboele;381924 Wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but does the 'I use them mostly ...' indicate you
have been involved in the development of Slim devices?
There is a very big clue to your question following Sean Adams' name in
his post.:)
--
toby10
I think I use SqueezeCenter version 7.0, but where do I see which one it
is I have active?
--
Anne
Squeezebox 3 Stereovox XV2 Bryston B100-DA SST Martin Logan Aeon I
Anne's Profile:
It's not just me.
http://forum.rpc1.org/viewtopic.php?t=25140
So does SATA and so too does every single piece of hardware in, and
plugged into, every computer on the planet.
But from what I understand USB is more of a software driven level I/O
protocol. For example I have NEVER
Robin Bowes;382121 Wrote:
Peter wrote:
I don't understand how they get away with selling the SBR
as a separate product without providing a simple setup tool with it.
Open Source does not mean you let your users do all the work.
The SBR is sold separately for users who require 1
Robin Bowes;382119 Wrote:
Howard Passman wrote:
peter;381812 Wrote:
Robin Bowes wrote:
Hi all,
Net::UDAP is a Perl module to configure the SqueezeBox Receiver
(SBR)
from a PC, i.e. without requiring a SqueezeBox Controller (SBC).
The project homepage is here:
Thank you for all the replies - you were right, the problem was
definitely in the socket connection. I dismantled it, applied the
age-old technique of blowing on it, re-wired it, and it works great!
Thanks again!
Chris
--
chriscc
I agree NET-UDAP is nedeed for the setup even if you have an SBC.
It is completely logical to have two independent setup procedures one
for SBC and one for SBR as they are two separate machines. To make one
depend on the other is a bizzare choice ?
The benchmarks is actually the SB2,3 classic
From the WebUI, »Settings« in lower right corner, then select the
Information tab on the new page.
--
Moonbase
Moonbase: 'The Problem Solver' (http://www.kaufen-ist-toll.de/moonbase)
Moonbase's Profile:
Hello,
I have a wireless connection to my Transporter. Squeezecenter is
running directly from my ReadyNas NV+ and everything is ok when I use
my control. The problem is: I can't see my player in WebGUI when I use
Standard mode, but if I change to Classic mode, my player and playlist
is
I have a Drobo in use with a Mac holding a very large library of music
for my squeezecenter - all in all I have to say I have been very
pleased with it. They are going for ease of use and to a very large
extent they have nailed it (not easy to explain RAID to everyone I
would think).
I've had no
Michael Herger wrote:
I know the Logitech guys use perlapp for packaging SqueezeCenter, so
they could have packed it for you too. Even better, they could also make
an OS-X executable.
We only use PerlApp on Windows (so far). Shouldn't the script run on OSX'
perl installation?
Mnyb wrote:
The benchmarks is actually the SB2,3 classic so they know how to do
it ;-)
They don't have a computer based setup either.
They have their own UI.
Not great, but workable.
But if I read my flood of bugmail corectly there is promising work
going on.
to their credit they are
Michael Herger wrote:
Quote: Een Logitech® Squeezebox™ Duet of Squeezebox™ is vereist voor de
netwerkset-up.
Thanks for the heads up! While Squeezebox doesn't mean Classic, this
clearly is misleading. It's a translation error. DE/EN both say
Squeezebox Controller. I'll let our
Seems to me that it's not the best value proposition. I see the Drobo
unit listed for around $425 and the NAS adapter for $185. That's $615
without drives.
I just paid $725 for the LaCie 5Big Network Disk, a 5 drive RAID NAS.
For that price it came with 2.5TB in the form of 5 x 500 GB Sata-2
Can you buy the Lacie with a red glass sphere? :-)
--
badbob
badbob's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7358
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57941
dsdreamer wrote:
Skinny;382055 Wrote:
I'm with you on that. Bits will be bits.
With you on that as well.
I would have once said that bits are bits (and so they are) but without
an accurate clock bits can't be reproduced into the waveform they
represent.
...cut...
OMG, it's digi...,
deserttaxguy;381957 Wrote:
Its very unresponsive and balks at just about every entry on the push
buttons. My first inclination was to replace the batteries, but thats
not helping. This thread about replacing the remote hasn't helped
suggest whether a new one is required or not. If you
toby10;382133 Wrote:
There is a very big clue to your question following Sean Adams' name in
his post.:)
ohoh ... blush
Sean: apologize for the inconsiderate question, and I really want to
congratulate you with a series of great devices!
--
roboele
There is no correct answer to this question
As pointed out above the bits are not the problem - The problem is with
the timing information provided by the data edge transitions.
Both connections methods have their drawbacks and all transceiver
implementations have their own foibles.
From
roboele;382252 Wrote:
ohoh ... blush
Sean: apologize for the inconsiderate question, and I really want to
congratulate you with a series of great devices!
I hardly think an apology is needed. He seems like a nice guy with a
good sense of humour.
I'm sure, worse case scenario, he would
That's what I thought until I saw it came with a bag! That must
explain the price.
-Chris
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Peter landen-sl...@frg.eur.nl wrote:
mvalera wrote:
Get them while they're hot!
https://secure.slimdevices.com/products.php?product=Transporter-Rack-Mount-Kit
50
badbob,
You don't mention the hardware brands involved, but the symptoms you
describe sound consistent with cheap/low quality parts. Maybe not the
case for you and you've just had bad luck. But I don't think so.
Do what works for you, but to call USB unreliable is pretty extreme. It
works for
One nice attribute of the Coax approach is that you can use your Coax in
the walls to connect systems remotely. In my case, I use the DAC in the
Transporter locally to my 2 channel system and also use the Coax digital
out to connect it into my home theater system on a different floor.
Although
Thanks Pippin
Unfortunatly i was mistaken, the XM plugin only worked the first time
after I installed it, then it stopped working. So i cannot use it at
all in SC either. I hope someone gets it working soon.
No if you could only get a way to play Wolfgang's Vault in SC or Ipeng,
I would be so
Any new delelopments in getting Wolfgang's Vault to play through
Squeezebox?
I would love for that functionality. Its a great site!!
--
jmanings
jmanings's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=19949
CantThinkOfOne;382128 Wrote:
I would also like to see the Year against an album on the controller
along with the ability to sort Albums by Year when selecting an Artist.
I know you can sort the Albums list by Artist, Year, Album but that's
not the same. It needs to be for an individual
jmanings;382290 Wrote:
Thanks Pippin
Unfortunatly i was mistaken, the XM plugin only worked the first time
after I installed it, then it stopped working. So i cannot use it at
all in SC either. I hope someone gets it working soon.
No if you could only get a way to play Wolfgang's Vault
flytox;374324 Wrote:
DLNA/upNp, compliance of Sc means the end of sb/transporter. Some
amp/receiver could display the tags and the integrated dac provide
conversions to the amp.
Isn't that threat real regardless? From my standpoint, SD needs to
figure out how to be the default server for
I should add that the IPOD app store now had a free app that allows you
to play the shows on your ipod touch/phone. So i would assume it is now
easier to make a SB plugin.
Another questionis there a way to wirelessly stream your IPOD touch
to the squeezebox?
--
jmanings
Yeah... I started to realize the futility of syncing them... ;) Thanks
--
davedash
davedash's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22862
View this thread:
jmanings;382292 Wrote:
Any new delelopments in getting Wolfgang's Vault to play through
Squeezebox?
I would love for that functionality. Its a great site!!
Add the WaveInput plugin, select that source in SC, start your favorite
concert in a browser window, sit back and enjoy.
You do need
thomsens;382299 Wrote:
My problem is that I've spent over $3K with them and I don't want bricks
on my hands.
There is zero risk of that. If Mountain View gets struck by a comet
and every trace of SlimDevices is burnt to a crisp, SqueezeCenter would
still be actively updated with new
Hi Thomsens...
thomsens wrote:
One nice attribute of the Coax approach is that you can use your Coax in
the walls to connect systems remotely. In my case, I use the DAC in the
Transporter locally to my 2 channel system and also use the Coax digital
out to connect it into my home theater
Thanks Goodsounds..
Do you see the possibilty of a pure plugin intgrated with ipeng in the
future?
Since I can already play Wolfgang's Vault directly on my ipod touch, I
assume that if the ipod can do it, Squeeze center could as well.
I also assume the sound should be better. correct?
I'll
I read through the provided links and from all the information I
understand that all three are good applications with their pro and
cons. Since iPeng in the oldest application I guess this is also the
most mature application. It has gone through the initial bug fixing
phase. This is one of the
Pascal Hibon;382331 Wrote:
1)Add the capability to shuffle songs. This is the mode I use mostly
with my SB in the living room.
I assume you are talking about Random Mix, not the actual shuffle
mode, right?
The shuffle mode is there today, you can select it from the
NowPlaying overlay
pippin;382340 Wrote:
I assume you are talking about Random Mix, not the actual shuffle
mode, right?
The shuffle mode is there today, you can select it from the
NowPlaying overlay that you get when you tap the Album Cover on
NowPlaying - just like in the iPod application.
Random Mix will be
Pascal Hibon;382349 Wrote:
Yes, Random Mix is what I meant.
Do you also have a timeframe on those releases?
There's a very, very rough roadmap here:
https://trac.penguinlovesmusic.de/trac/ipengnat
I don't yet know whether Alarms will be in 1.1 or 1.2 since I don't yet
know how much own
Did anybody see hard specs anyplace? Maximum number of zones? Maximum
number of controllers? Is there an option for using wired ethernet in
locations where it is available?
--
upstatemike
upstatemike's Profile:
How about this for a Logitech Music Server:
Instead of Logitech debuting a hard disk based server, how about a
Logitech Music Server that, instead of incorporating a hard disk,
instead just has an iPod dock?
Logitech already has several iPod dock speaker products:
upstatemike;382374 Wrote:
Did anybody see hard specs anyplace? Maximum number of zones? Maximum
number of controllers? Is there an option for using wired ethernet in
locations where it is available?
http://www.linksysbycisco.com/US/en/products/DMC250
Looks like there's an ethernet port. I
upstatemike;382374 Wrote:
Did anybody see hard specs anyplace? Maximum number of zones? Maximum
number of controllers? Is there an option for using wired ethernet in
locations where it is available?
You can pull the other ones down under each component. Clearly it has
Ethernet as well. I
jt25741;381856 Wrote:
No native FLAC in the player? Transcoding necesssary.802.11n will
be needed even more pushing around uncompressed filesgood for the
business of anyone who sells such devices :)
I just noticed in the specs that it states that the three streaming
formats are
JJZolx;382384 Wrote:
http://www.linksysbycisco.com/US/en/products/DMC250
Looks like there's an ethernet port. I imagine number of zones and
controllers may be limited primarily by your network and possibly the
processing power of your server, since none of the boxes run the server
itself
It looks like the newly announced Linksys/Cisco home audio system has an
iPod component intergrated into it.
http://www.shoplinksys.com/Docking-Station-for-iPod---Wired-Accessory--MCCI40-Home-Audio-Devices_stcVVproductId59095235VVcatId544640VVviewprod.htm
I am suggesting a more stand-alone iPod
First, believe it or not, many people don't own an ipod.
Second, the devices you mention also lacks both CPU processing power
and internet access for SC to run. NAS'es and computers have this.
Actually that device would have to have every thing a NAS or a computer
has apart from a harddrive,
mortslim wrote:
How about this for a Logitech Music Server:
Instead of Logitech debuting a hard disk based server, how about a
Logitech Music Server that, instead of incorporating a hard disk,
instead just has an iPod dock?
It would be a pretty cool product IMO. (and I don't even own an
Dogberry2 wrote:
It means somebody did a lazy job of coding that routine in
SqueezeCenter. Most likely nothing for you to worry about, however.
Just sloppy programming.
Yeah, they should've removed the 'use warnings' line ;)
Regards,
Peter
___
roboele;382252 Wrote:
ohoh ... blush
Sean: apologize for the inconsiderate question, and I really want to
congratulate you with a series of great devices!
I don't know off the top of my head where it might be.. the thing is,
reprogramming it is not a simple affair and it's very unlikely that
deserttaxguy;381957 Wrote:
Its very unresponsive and balks at just about every entry on the push
buttons. My first inclination was to replace the batteries, but thats
not helping. This thread about replacing the remote hasn't helped
suggest whether a new one is required or not. If you
Dunno.. that links work for me on my ISP.
--
vinnielo
RADIOFEEDS UK IRELAND..[/B] AN UP-TO-DATE RADIO DIRECTORY FOR YOUR
SQUEEZEBOX/TRANSPORTER
CLICK: [B]HTTP://WWW.RADIOFEEDS.CO.UK/SQUEEZE
With over 350 registered users, it's available for SqueezeNetwork,
SlimServer AND SqueezeCenter!
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 5:24 PM, vinnielo
vinnielo.3ltm3n1231629...@no-mx.forums.slimdevices.com wrote:
Dunno.. that links work for me on my ISP.
Woosh!
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
Letten;382398 Wrote:
First, believe it or not, many people don't own an ipod.
You're right, and I'm one of them. But tens and tens (hundreds?) of
millions of people do own ipods. Imagine if you sold one of these new
gizmos to one or two percent of them - that might make it one of
Logitech's
ftlight;381983 Wrote:
That's another one of those domain names that needs a hyphen, like
expertsexchange.com
Excellent. And, DUH! to the response.
--
Goodsounds
Goodsounds's Profile:
It's not clear yet whether or not the Linksys product lets you
distribute the audio from the iPod to other players on the network, or
if it's just a simple audio input port for the local system. I suppose
the latter would have some value, but the first would really be slick.
But neither is at
Here is a log file from when Squeezecenter starting playing up again
earlier.
It shows the start of the track right up to where the squeezebox
stopped before the end of the track.
The file format is Flac.
+---+
|Filename: log.txt
JJZolx;382392 Wrote:
I just noticed in the specs that it states that the three streaming
formats are PCM, MP3 and FLAC, so it must do native FLAC decoding in
the players.
http://www.linksysbycisco.com/US/en/products/DMC250
Page 36 clearly states what is supported on the player, and FLAC
Anne,
if ur comfortable doing it, DL a newer SC and install it, it has RG
fixes:
http://downloads.slimdevices.com/nightly/latest/7.3/
--
MrSinatra
www.LION-Radio.org
Using:
Squeezebox2 (my home) / SBR (parent's home) / SBC (my home) - w/SC
7.3.2b - Win XP Pro SP3 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram -
jt25741;382482 Wrote:
Page 36 clearly states what is supported on the player, and FLAC is not
there (mp3, AAC-LC, WMA9, and WAV).On another manual it states FLAC
is transcoded...just poke around. The system supports FLAC, but not
over the air -- two different topics.
May be Streamed
JJZolx;382473 Wrote:
It's not clear yet whether or not the Linksys product lets you
distribute the audio from the iPod to other players on the network
The Linksys webpage cited above seems to indicate the audio from the
iPod is distributed:
Share your favorite tunes and playlists, advance
A bit off topic, but since I noticed a lot of XBMC users in the thread
-
I've been an XBMC user for several years, first on a modded xbox and
then
on an Ubuntu HTPC. I've spent the last 48 hours playing with the boxee
alpha (http://boxee.tv) and I'm blown away by the interface and
integration
mortslim;382491 Wrote:
The Linksys webpage cited above seems to indicate the audio from the
iPod is distributed:
Share your favorite tunes and playlists, advance tracks, adjust volume
on each Wireless Home Audio device in your home.
However whether the Linksys system does or doesn't, I
The idea I propose is to make an iPod based server for access by any
Squeezebox
Seems to be unnecessarily limited solution. I have done plugins to
provides access to a PC CDplayer and Tuner cards.
If an Ipod is plugged into USB port - there is no reason why a plugin
cannot access the
Same topic, slightly different issue. I have a first gen SB without
wifi. So I plugged Ethernet cable into it, connected to an Airport
Express. During the SB setup, I get as far as the SB getting an IP but
then it cannot find the SC server. I then get that error that says the
SB cannot find the
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=56180
Question:
JJZolx;382392 Wrote:
I just noticed in the specs that it states that the three streaming
formats are PCM, MP3 and FLAC, so it must do native FLAC decoding in
the players.
http://www.linksysbycisco.com/US/en/products/DMC250
I wonder if it supports gapless playback. This is the sort of
bpa;382500 Wrote:
If an Ipod is plugged into USB port
I am envisioning a stand-alone product. There are many situations
where I don't want my computer on while listening to music (save energy
to save the planet). I assume that the proposed iPod server would
consume far less energy as a slim
maggior;382514 Wrote:
I wonder if it supports gapless playback. This is the sort of detail
that is easily missed by companies whose core competencies are not
audio related. That will irritate the hell out of audio enthusiasts
that spend tons of money on this system. And how quickly do you
Just got this thing hooked up. Had a lot of trouble with connection
until put hand held right next to wireless router. It is not for the
IT novice in my opinion and definitely would not call it plug and
play.
Now I find when I am in mix mode (albums) it stops some tracks before
the end and
For those having stuttering issues with 1080p (or even 720), it may come
down to how you are streaming your content. If you stream over http
rather than smb (using the free my ihome server), you get almost doule
the bandwidth of smb streaming. This makes 1080p no problem, 720 no
problem, and
All,
I noticed that this appeared recently
http://www.stereophile.com/features/1208jitter/ .
The right bits at the wrong time are equivalent to the wrong bits at
the right time. --John Atkinson
Nice one, John. :-)
--dsdreamer
--
dsdreamer
--
Dreamer, easy in the chair
mortslim wrote:
bpa;382500 Wrote:
If an Ipod is plugged into USB port
I am envisioning a stand-alone product. There are many situations
where I don't want my computer on while listening to music (save energy
to save the planet). I assume that the proposed iPod server would
Peter wrote:
I think the biggest problem with this is that the SC software is written
in Perl and requires a whole OS (and DBMS) underneath
it
That is not a problem its a feature. Something has to be the OS and
then you add the application on it. Perl is not the problem, but if you
want to
82 matches
Mail list logo
