Re: [slim] Blog.Logitech: An Open Letter to Squeezebox Fans

2012-11-17 Thread reinholdk
I also successfully updated the FW of my spare Touch and Radio *without* registering them to mysb.com. On the Touch the 'left swipe' didn't work to abort registration during the initial setup, but - as gharris999 mentioned - disconnecting the WAN line from the broadband modem finally let the

Re: [slim] Please tell me it ain't so.

2012-11-17 Thread Daryle Tilroe
I've been a Squeezebox user and advocate almost since the beginning. About the only product I didn't own was the original SLIMP3. I have a dozen devices and was just talking about streaming home solutions with an acquaintance the other day and showing off my SB solution where I could control my

Re: [slim] Squeezeplay on Windows 8

2012-11-17 Thread pizzaman
kidstypike wrote: To be able to use Squeezeplay as a controller to control Squeezeplayer, you need to choose Squeezeplayer as the player you are controlling. Settings Choose Player SqueezePlayer I see the choose player option. But i don't care about using it as a controller. Quite the

Re: [slim] Please tell me it ain't so.

2012-11-17 Thread toby10
Ikabob wrote: I guess time will tell. But, I sense that LOGITECH is assuring us that they will remain accountable to us. LOGITECH'S statements are on record.. This is Dudley from the Logitech UE product team.. Logitech will continue to support these products with troubleshooting

Re: [slim] Please tell me it ain't so.

2012-11-17 Thread Ikabob
toby10 wrote: The issue is the time frame and level of support, not their good intentions or whether they mean what they say. now. Time Frame: Technically they could shut down MySB.com tomorrow and Dudley's statement would still be accurate because they continued support for a

Re: [slim] Do any Squeezeplayers actually have the horsepower to play 192/24 remote streams?

2012-11-17 Thread AndrewFG
Triode wrote: Touch is the only player which can play 192k streams and needs 7.8 if its wav. If the requirement is to stream from another source on the local lan then I don't see why this will be any different from streaming from the LMS - the client code in squeezeplay is the same.

Re: [slim] Do any Squeezeplayers actually have the horsepower to play 192/24 remote streams?

2012-11-17 Thread Triode
AndrewFG wrote: I have been doing some testing: LOCAL 96K OR 192K FLAC FILES SERVED BY LMS - Radio, Squeezeplay: LMS down samples using flac.exe | sox.exe $resample; audio intelligible; no buffer stalls - I suppose ditto for Duet, Squeezebox - Transporter: LMS just sends the file;

Re: [slim] Please tell me it ain't so.

2012-11-17 Thread garym
Ikabob wrote: Excellent points and I totally agree. Because of the large numbers of consumers who have invested large amounts of money in these excellent LOGITECH products with expectations of longevity and functionality, I do not think LOGITECH would want the publicity from disgruntled

Re: [slim] Please tell me it ain't so.

2012-11-17 Thread Ikabob
garym wrote: The number of squeezebox customers of logitech is so very tiny compared to their total customer base that I doubt Logitech cares about them one way or another. And longevity in today's computer hardware market is 2 years max. After that the assumption is throw away and replace.

Re: [slim] Please tell me it ain't so.

2012-11-17 Thread Ikabob
garym wrote: The number of squeezebox customers of logitech is so very tiny compared to their total customer base that I doubt Logitech cares about them one way or another. And longevity in today's computer hardware market is 2 years max. After that the assumption is throw away and replace.

Re: [slim] Please tell me it ain't so.

2012-11-17 Thread garym
Ikabob wrote: You're probably right,Gary. I definitely respect your opinion. The 2 year and then throw it away part is hard for me to understand. It's true,IMO, that hardware becomes outdated in a short time (2 years), but the hardware is still functional for an indefinite period of time. I

Re: [slim] Do any Squeezeplayers actually have the horsepower to play 192/24 remote streams?

2012-11-17 Thread Mnyb
AndrewFG wrote: I have been doing some testing: LOCAL 96K OR 192K FLAC FILES SERVED BY LMS - Radio, Squeezeplay: LMS down samples using flac.exe | sox.exe $resample; audio intelligible; no buffer stalls - I suppose ditto for Duet, Squeezebox - Transporter: LMS just sends the file;

Re: [slim] Please tell me it ain't so.

2012-11-17 Thread Jack Gilvey
garym wrote: I agree that the hardware can last forever. I have perfectly working radios from the 1930s, 40s, and 50s (I collect old radios). I expect my Squeezebox hardware to last many years as should you. And with LMS and a computer or NAS that can run LMS, the core functions can

Re: [slim] Squeezeplay on Windows 8

2012-11-17 Thread w3wilkes
Since all you really need/want is a player on your Win8 box have you tried using SoftSqueeze rather than SqueezePlay? SoftSqueeze even has a headless mode so that you can run it with no UI at all. Yes, you can control it from the WebUI or your Android.

Re: [slim] Squeezeplay on Windows 8

2012-11-17 Thread Mnyb
Hmm , what firewall and intivirus you migth have to alter settings in both and sorry to say disabling firewalls does not *really* disable them in many cases ( unistall is what works ). Mnyb's Profile: