On 10/10/2013 08:17 PM, Mnyb wrote:
If you run debian testing ? why not run the 7.8 beta version of the
server that have some fixes for the perl issues ( perl 5.18 ).
if your prepared to run a beta versions of an OS Why not of the server
I didn't even know there was a 7.8 beta version --
I've heavily used several Squeezeboxes and Boom Boxes for years, but I'm
ready to throw them all in the trash.
I just wasted several hours in an unsuccessful attempt to get
squeezeboxserver (or logitechmediaserver, or slimserver, or whatever
it's called this week) running again on a Debian Jesse
On 10/10/2013 06:12 PM, castalla wrote:
I have LMS running on Fedora, Ubuntu and Debian - none of which are the
latest and greatest - end result, rock solid systems and virtually no
maintenance.
That's your choice, but it's not mine. I strongly believe in updating
software on a regular
On 10/10/2013 06:50 PM, castalla wrote:
That's your choice! hardware is so cheap these days that you can easily
run a headless server for LMS at about 35 USD.
I think you are just giving yourself unnecessary grief.
Oh, I know hardware is cheap. I even bought a separate server recently
to
On 10/10/2013 06:16 PM, garym wrote:
You might be interested in the ickstream project.
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?98467-Pre-Announcement-ickStream-Music-Platformhighlight=Ickstream
Thanks for the pointer. There is very little in the way of specifics,
and a proprietary
On 10/10/2013 07:22 PM, paulster wrote:
Use Debian then. I've updated mine regularly over the last 5 years and
keep LMS up to date as well, and have never had a hiccup. There are more
bleeding-edge distros than Debian but their security patches are up to
date.
That's exactly what I run --
My Squeezebox servers have been down for a week because of this most
recent problem and I get the very definite impression that no one really
understands what's wrong (I certainly don't).
Perl is fine for its original purpose of running quickie, one-off
scripts on text and system log files.
I accepted the package update on both of my Linux servers, and
squeezeboxserver stopped working on both. The logs showed only that the
wrapper was continually restarting the daemon, so I invoked it manually
and got this very cryptic message. What should I make of it? I'm not a
perl hacker, I just
On 7/19/11 9:47 AM, aubuti wrote:
You would be much more likely to get a helpful response if you indicated
(a) which Linux distro and version you are using, (b) which version of
SBS you are using, (c) what version of SBS was previously working on
the server, (d) what method you used to
Are the .deb packages for Debian and Ubuntu Linux signed with GPG/PGP keys?
This is standard practice for the Debian repositories to prevent the
distribution of malware should a repository be compromised.
I don't see a key for the Squeezeboxserver packages distributed from
Every 5 minutes, like clockwork but sometimes even more often, the
squeezeboxserver running on my Linux box opens a HTTP connection to
www.myqueezebox.com and performs a GET.
I've turned off all sorts of network syncing options and other features
I've never used but the GETs continue. It appears
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Books
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody give me the low down - I am trying to play .m4a files (AAC and
stuff) through SqueezeCentre (latest version). I use SqueezeCentre and
then connect to the stream file with WMP at work. Is this possible,
what needs to be
I just got my Boom. Works great as a network player. I hooked my iPod up
to the aux input and found that the gain is VERY low. With the iPod and
Boom both cranked all the way up, I can just hear it across the room.
What is the rated sensitivity of the Boom aux input?
I just found the aux gain setting in the squeezecenter config page. It was
at 50%. Turning it to 100% helped, but it's still not as high as it should
be.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Goodsounds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what is your take on the CD quality issue? I personally prefer
vinyl to plastic based on my listening experiences, but do you think
that to be unfounded?
Wow. A vinyl fan who is actually open to the possibility that
Mnyb wrote:
I don't have any OGG files myself, so i can not experiment with this,
somebody else have to chime in here.
Do experiments with this, you wont damage anything, you can always
restore the settings to what it was before.
A guess would be that setting the OGG Vorbis box in OGG
I know this is a really minor nit, but I've noticed it for a long time.
Slimserver displays, on the Squeezebox and the web page, the bit rate for FLAC
and other lossless material as CBR (Constant Bit Rate). Lossless compression
algorithms like FLAC, ALAC, Monkey's Audio, Shorten, etc, are never
I already run avahi (a Bonjour daemon) on my Linux box and I'd rather have it
advertise my slimserver instead of having slimserver run its own copy of
mDNSResponder.
In the past I've done this by manually creating the appropriate avahi config
file and commenting out the mDNSResponder invocation
Lost Viking wrote:
It takes ~45secs from clicking to diplaying the result page. Is this
normal? Will it be as slow using the Transporter (once I have it in my
hands, it is still on its way..)?? *shudder*
No, that's definitely not normal. IMHO, the Slimserver web interface
could be a lot
I haven't seen any comments on my problems playing Ogg files with 6.5.1.
Can anybody confirm that they *can* play Ogg files on 6.5.1 and a
Squeezebox 2 or 3 with firmware version 71 without server decoding?
Phil
___
discuss mailing list
Eric Seaberg wrote:
I'd really rather NOT re-rip everything with FLAC. I have thought
about it just to get the extra quality bump, but iTunes won't read them
which, for me anyway, REALLY puts a crimp in my tag editing and
organization for SlimServer. As a Mac user, there just aren't as many
Eric Seaberg wrote:
I'd really rather NOT re-rip everything with FLAC. I have thought
about it just to get the extra quality bump, but iTunes won't read them
which, for me anyway, REALLY puts a crimp in my tag editing and
organization for SlimServer. As a Mac user, there just aren't as many
rgmiller1974 wrote:
Just tried that; no luck. Tried both compiling from source and a
pre-built 32-bit binary (I'm running an Athlon64 so the one I compiled
was 64-bit.) No matter what I use, I get the same errors from
slimserver.pl:
2006-12-19 22:11:59.1207 Error: Decoder does not support
Phil Karn wrote:
Today's build came with a player firmware update to version 71, and now
neither my Squeezebox 2 nor my Squeezebox 3 will play any of my Ogg
Vorbis files. WAV, FLAC and MP3 still play fine. Unfortunately, I
updated both players' firmware files so I can't test with a 2 or 3
Phil Karn wrote:
I figured out how to downgrade my Squeezebox 2 to the previous firmware
version, 64. That does *NOT* fix the problem; Ogg Vorbis files still
won't play on the 12/28/2006 version of 6.5.1. The log shows the
following backtrace:
I rolled everything back to 6.5.0 and my
Phil Karn wrote:
If the firmware is indeed broken, is there a simple workaround to force
transcoding of Ogg Vorbis to WAV for Squeezebox 2/3?
I found the workaround: simply uncheck the Ogg Vorbis/Ogg Vorbis line
in File Formats under Server Settings. Slimserver now transcodes to WAV
Peter wrote:
Or try this:
mms://radioio-dead-hi.wm.llnwd.net/radioio_dead_hi?MSWMExt=.asf
(note the underscores)
Works for me in 6.2.2. Thanks!
--Phil
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
0xdeadbeef wrote:
Unfortunately, in my case the DHCP server is running on my DSL
modem/router and there's nothing to configure there. Though it should
give the SQ the same IP every time due to MAC caching, I have the
feeling it doesn't. Indeed, I observed at least 3 different IP
addresses in the
0xdeadbeef wrote:
When the Squeezebox requests an IP adress from a DHCP server, it doesn't
seem to send its own host name.
E.g. in Linux (Debian/Ubuntu), you can send the hostname to the DHCP
server by adding the following lines to /etc/dhclient.conf:
send dhcp-client-identifier
mflint wrote:
Forgive me if this has been mentioned before:
http://www.silentpcreview.com/article287-page1.html
Overall it's a good review, and I'm glad he liked the Squeezebox 3, but
early on he makes a few erroneous statements that might reduce his
credibility with other readers. And it's
Marshall Clow wrote:
So I use a Mac, and most of my music is on a laptop. Last year I had a
laptop stolen, and had to rip everything again.
So what i sthe best way to back up music on a Mac? Is there an easy
way to get iTunes to access an external harddrive, or should I just
burn everything
JJZolx wrote:
I recently assigned my Windows XP computer a second IP address and
switched to HTTP port 80 so that I could more easily address the
SlimServer without a port, and so that I could run Apache on port 80 at
another IP address on the same machine. SlimServer had been at
Two related questions. I've been looking at the protocols between the
Squeezebox and the Slimserver with ethereal and I've noticed that the
protocol specifications bundled with the Slimserver appear to be
incomplete. I see commands and data structures that aren't documented.
Is a more recent
seanadams wrote:
Who cares about 20Kb/s on a LAN?
Nobody, at least not on a LAN. But it can be a problem if your
Squeezebox and its server are separated by a shared wide area network.
The Squeezeboxnetwork server appears designed to minimize network
overhead, e.g., by updating the clock
kdf wrote:
I have 192.168.1.34 as a static assignment for the mac address of the
player (listed on the bottom and in player settings). however, the
lease table shows an entry for 20:05:73:00:00:0C and has been given
192.168.1.100. i have 100-149 as a 7-day dynamic block of leases.
Whether
I just received a pair of Slimserver 3s and opened one of them up.
When I configured it for my wireless network, it quickly configured
itself with DHCP and downloaded new firmware, version 28. It then came
back up, auto-configured itself again and worked fine for a while.
Then I unplugged it
A followup: I forced a reset to factory defaults (by holding down the
ADD key and cycling power) and the problem I encountered with DHCP
disappeared. DHCP worked fine.
Then I turned on Ethernet/WiFi bridging, and the problem appeared again.
Neither the Squeezebox nor the Powerbook I have
kdf wrote:
This sounds a lot like this report:
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221
Thanks for the pointer. This is indeed exactly the problem I'm seeing.
That report specifies firmware version 22. I'm running 28, so apparently
the bug has been in several versions. Is version 28
max.spicer wrote:
I've got a list of tracks that I'd like to own, but don't necessarily
like the artists enough to go out and by the relevant albums (yet).
I can't help you if you've got a list of specific tracks by artists on
RIAA labels. But if you're looking for a good way to obtain MP3,
slimbls wrote:
Hi, slimserver newbie here...I have a suse 9.2 linux system that's my
firewall and media server (please, no bottle tossing this way).
After I installed slimserver (6.1.1) I asked it very nicely to only use
my internal ethernet, but I'm still seeing UDP packets from myself on
port
Where can I find the source for the various binaries included in the
Slimserver package?
I'm particularly interested in the source for the mDNSResponderPosix
program, as I'm trying to set up mDNS on all my Linux machines to make
them play better with our Macs. It appears that the Slimserver
icestorm wrote:
However...When I try to play AAC music from my FreeBSD server, (which
is most of my music collection), I can hear a sound like a constant
wind in the background, which becomes intolerable when I increase the
volume. Please note that I can hear the song fine! This problem does
not
warc1 wrote:
have experienced. The most annoying is a loud noise spike that occurs
during the start of some songs when playing a long playlist.
Is the spike really, really short and sharp, and right at the beginning
of the track?
If so, this could be the sound of the WAV header on the front of
Frank Xavier Ledo wrote:
First, It seems that all songs start out with a pop. I am guessing that
the command line options I set in convert.conf were incorrect and are
resulting in a linefeed or space at the start of the song.
What I used is:
mov wav squeezebox *
[alac] $FILE$
As a test
Sean Adams wrote:
When I started designing the Squeezebox1 hardware in 2002, I fully
realized that an enormous buffer would be desirable. However, the
architecture (which was chosen based on a long list of goals including
ethernet/wireless capability, ability to drive a graphic VFD, OS
Robin Bowes wrote:
Can you show me where this claim is made? I'd be very surprised if this
is true. For a start, the wired port on the SB1 is only 10MB/s (I can't
find a spec. sheet to confirm this, but the last point here [1] says:
- faster 100Mbps wired ethernet interface
I do believe you're
Additional comment: the crunching during startup does *not* occur with
the original SB running off the same v6.0.0 server. The problem happens
only with the SB2, and only when playing FLAC or OGG, not MP3. Haven't
tried other file types.
Phil
___
Phillip Kerman wrote:
First, mine goes blank for no apparent reason sometimes. Blank screen.
I see that too. I don't think the unit actually crashes, but it can be
disconcerting.
Also, I'm trying to compare the digital out into my DAC to the internal DAC
but the digital out can't stay locked (I
Jack Coates wrote:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=c2coff=1client=firefox-arls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficialq=linux+encrypted+swap+partitionbtnG=Search
I'm aware of the various ways to encrypt a swap partition. They are
obsolete in this age of cheap, large RAM modules.
Again, a fun
Jack Coates wrote:
You might want to do some research on modern virtual memory
management... swap is necessary no matter how much RAM you have.
I disagree. I see no reason for a swap partition when you already have
far more physical RAM than most swap partitions used to be, and tasks
never fail
Jason wrote:
The overwhelming majority of users do not seem to have the problems you have
with the server crashing or grinding to a halt.
It sounds like it might be worth your time to try Slimserver on another
machine.
Perhaps I did overstate the unreliability of the 5.4 code. What I said
Richard Elen wrote:
First, with the vast majority of users storing their music in
lossy-compressed formats with sample rates seldom exceeding 44.1 kHz and
often lower, this may be moot for a lot of people.
Agreed.
However with the
advent of lossless compression format availability in the
Robin Bowes wrote:
Advice: Make sure you safeguard your collection against HDD failure in
one or more ways. For example:
- buy an external 400GB HDD and copy your rips onto that
- buy another internal 400GB HDD and mirror your first disc.
- burn your rips to DVD
- stream your rips to
Pat Farrell wrote:
The problem with open source is that the contributors want to
do the cool stuff, especially when it is pretty easy.
Redesigning the basic engine is hard, slow, and has zero sizzle
Well, most people would say the same thing about an operating system
kernel. Yet Linux routinely
Todd Larason wrote:
Another option would be to run a server which speaks iTunes' sharing
protocol. I haven't paid much attention to this space since doing the initial
work figuring out the protocol, so I'm not sure if any of the pre-packaged
servers would do quite what you want. The perl module
Danny Rego wrote:
Ummm...as does Windows XP (although the more geek-sided may refuse to
believe that)what's your point?
Slimserver is open source, so Linux is the closer analogue. Windows XP
is 1) proprietary and 2) owned by Microsoft, so it has its excuses for
being so unreliable.
Making
Patrick Dixon wrote:
Phil, are you seriously saying that you can design a 'brick-wall'
reconstruction filter at the Nyquist rate (fs/2)?
With reasonably modern DSP techniques such as those employed in most
modern DACs, yes. It's not *totally* brick-wall because all such filters
are impossible,
Christian Pernegger wrote:
Sorry if I missed something in this thread, but what's the down side
of ogg-pcm on the server? Bandwidth to the SB?
Yes. Raw PCM is just below 1400kbit while the ogg stream itself would be
much larger.
Don't you mean that the ogg stream would be much *smaller* than
Patrick Dixon wrote:
IMHO, the two biggest threats to Slim Devices' competitive advantage are:
* Product design - most 'normal' people think the Roku styling is better.
Maybe. Personally, I think basic functionality and reliability are far
more important. Then again, my Squeezeboxes are all
Dan Sully wrote:
I agree completely Phil - we're focused right now on making 6.0 stable.
There
was a big jump in functionality, speed and stability in changing out the
entire backend between 5.4 and 6.0. However, as you well know, bugs are
introduced along the way.
I think this is exactly where
Todd Larason wrote:
Can you point me to documentation for the Vorbis metadata? I've scanned
vorbis.com and xiph.org, and I'm just not finding it.
Start here:
http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/v-comment.html
I decided on Vorbis for my meta data partly because I have a large
collection of
Todd Larason wrote:
The iTunes practice isn't that simple.
Speaking of the iTunes database structure, do you happen to know of any
utilities that can scan a music folder and build the iTunes XML
structure from the tags in the music files (other than iTunes itself,
that is)?
The reason I ask is
Michael Peters wrote:
There are issues in other areas - for example, some CD's will have
more than one artist - U2 for example, the album Rattle and Hum.
In that case I'd just use a different ARTIST tag for each track, just as
for a compilation album like Greatest Hits of the '70s. Unlike the
Patrick Dixon wrote:
it's worked very well for Linux.
Really? As someone struggling to get FC3 configured, googling for
information produces many more people with Linux problems than there are
solutions out there.
I was talking about Linux, which is just an OS kernel. There has
traditionally
kdf wrote:
to make things worse, systems like windows dont like /dev/null so the server
spits out a warning for every shorten file it finds and never adds them to the
db properly. I have only about 10 shorten files. Only 2 are playable with
slimserver. I have tried to find alternative ways of
momerath wrote:
having odd problems connecting after power off, and, of course, pcm
streaming skips sometimes, even in situations I would have thought
would certainly work.
I think the PCM skipping (buffer underflow) problem could be
substantially improved if a little attention were paid to
Chris Glushko wrote:
I would suggest staying away from Netgear. I just
replaced my WR614 today. Even with the latest
firmware, my netgear router was never very stable and
under intense use (i.e. a few hours of Bittorrent w/
Azureus) the netgear would essentially freeze, needed
to power cut off
Phillip Kerman wrote:
I have a proof of concept thing I built in Flash that parses iTunes's XML.
What do you need to extract exactly? I'm pretty sure it'd be easy to adapt
this thing I have to output a string (in any form you want) to your
clipboard so that you can paste it into another tool or
Michael Peters wrote:
Just for the record - I have the same issue with my Linksys wrt54g router.
I should point out that I use only the wireless base station and 4-port
Ethernet switch features on our WRT54Gs. I don't use the built-in DHCP
or NAT/routing functions at all; that's all handled by a
Has anyone tried to listen to Virgin Radio (London) on their Ogg Vorbis
streams?
The streams are:
http://ogg.smgradio.com/vr160.ogg
http://ogg.smgradio.com/vc160.ogg
http://ogg.smgradio.com/gr160.ogg
Their equivalent MP3 streams work fine, but their Ogg streams close at
the end of each song. At
I brought up 6.0b1 tonight, and while it was rebuilding the database it
abruptly exited with these messages:
Use of uninitialized value in multiplication (*) at
/usr/local/slimserver/Slim/Player/SqueezeboxG.pm line 65.
Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at
kdf wrote:
that's a font crash. are you trying to run slimserver 5.4 with a softsqueeze
session that is still running from 6.0?
SB2 (and softsqueeze 2.0a11) use different fonts, so they will cause earlier
servers to barf.
It may also be that you ran with 6.0 and it had the same MAC addy, so the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried the new version 60b1 yesterday, but immediately downgraded to 5.4.1
Where's 5.4.1? I don't see it in http://www.slimdevices.com/downloads. I
only see 5.4.0 and the v6 betas.
If there's a stable, no-frills version of the server software, I would
very much like to
Phillip Kerman wrote:
For my ears, my SB plays FLACs back to back perfectly. I've yet to find an
instance where it doesn't... and there are many cases where you'd definitely
hear a pause if one were inserted.
Right, thanks for confirming my observation.
As an aside, I have noticed that, unlike
Sean Adams wrote:
That was SLIMP3 firmware, which was all code I wrote myself, so we could
release it however we wanted. Squeezebox and Squeezebox2 include 3rd
party proprietary OS and wireless drivers and require a $30,000
development kit in order to write code for them. These are just a few
Patrick Dowling wrote:
On average what level of compression are you seeing? I know there are
many factors, but for space planning I'm looking for a general estimate.
A very rough rule-of-thumb is about 50% (2:1). You get better than that
on quiet classical music, and worse on loud,
Here's another data point for comparison. I recently bought the
Magnatune label album Nocturne by The West Exit and was given my
choice of file format to download. Here are the sizes:
# 44k/16bit WAV: 507meg zip of perfect quality WAVs.
# FLAC: 357meg zip file of perfect quality FLAC files.
#
Jack Coates wrote:
Either slimserver is already running, or something else is using its
network port. As root, ps aux | grep slimserver.
That won't show if another process is listening to that port.
If you have the lsof (list open files) command, that's a better way to
get the information you
Chris Glushko wrote:
If you are an iPod user and you like using iTunes to
manage your music, wouldn't Apple Lossless be the most
logical choice for your primary archive?
Well, it might be -- if you're willing to spend all that precious iPod
disk space on a lossless format. If you insist on
Joshua Uziel wrote:
Oh, I'm well-aware of SCO and a whole bunch of other open source related
cases over the years. :) Sure, this is a conceivable outcome. To be
honest, while I'd prefer to be able to play with the firmware for the
SB2 and add stuff like native ogg support, the fact that it
Can somebody give me some background on gapless playback? I don't
understand why it's a big problem.
With FLAC, at least, I don't seem to have any problem at all playing
tracks that flow together seamlessly. Occasionally I'll get a FLAC file
that was created with an erroneously embedded WAV
Steinar Bjaerum wrote:
I have started to rip my record collection to FLAC. I am using one FLAC file
per album, internal cuesheets with tag information included as numbered
Vorbis Comments.
This works great with SB1 and server-side decoding.
I'm curious as to why you did this. I've also ripped my
Jason wrote:
The obvious risk to slim devices if they do this is that some other company
can produce a super budget version of the SB, load the SB firmware onto it
and completely undercut Slim Devices potentially putting them out of
business.
Quite frankly, I just don't see all that much value in
Andrew Lucas wrote:
Hi,
Just curious, seeing you can get to the Squeeze 2's wireless interface via
the ethernet connector, would it be also possible to use this this a basic
wireless access point.
The SB2 as described is a wireless bridge, not an access point. A
wireless bridge is a *client* of
Christian Pernegger wrote:
Question: Are there any disadvantages in having the radio and one
antenna internal? I'm thinking interference, added noise in the analog
stages ...
Probably very little, if any. Spurious noise from computing equipment is
generally strongest at the lowest frequencies,
Ken Hokugo wrote:
Dean or anyone,
Would the firewall feature in these routers (wireless or wired) be good
enough so that I can get rid of Zonealarm Pro which contributes 10 to
15% more of CPU usage when playing Slimserver? If I could get rid of
the sw based firewall, that would be great.
A
Christian Pernegger wrote:
I'd been holding out for a public domain linux apple
lossless decompression solution that would run
compfortably on a squeezebox, but this might push me
to dual libraries (one flac, one aac for ipod)...
There is a preliminary FOSS decoder for ALE out:
Roy Owen wrote:
Don't be suprised if the problem re-occurs. It's been my experience
that problems that fix themselves will bite you in the backside at the
most inconvient time.
Yeah. That's why you should take the time to assign permanent addresses
to each one of your devices, and use dynamic
Maurice Poirier wrote:
Since I installed my Squeezebox, there is constant static interference
on AM radio reception. Is it the ethernet cable that is causing this --
or the Squeezebox itself??
The AM tuner is on same receiver that the Squeezebox is connected to,
and the Squeezebox is located
Others have already pointed out that MP3 files are like any other kind
of computer file; as long as no errors occur during copying, the copies
will be exactly identical to the original. Only if you decompress and
recompress will there be any further degradation.
Having said that, let me make a
http://craz.net/programs/itunes/alac.html
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
momerath wrote:
Phil is absolutely correct that the burden of proof is on the
audiophile, and that a double blind study is the only practical way to
prove the audibility of jitter. I intend to do this in the near
future with some skeptical friends.
By all means, if you can run a controlled test,
Robin Bowes wrote:
I'd like to propose that additional mailing lists are created to split
up the traffic more, particularly on the general list. I'd also like
to see the names of the lists change as indicated below.
In general, I think this is a bad idea. Topics have a way of crossing
Christopher Jacob wrote:
and a hard drive
and a keyboard
and a mouse
Then build yourself a mini-ATX PC, or buy a Mac mini and run Softsqueeze.
The whole point of a Squeezebox is to have a small, light, low-power,
and **fanless** box that just plays music and plays it well. I think the
current
Chip Hart wrote:
...after hearing a few references to Magnatunes here, I decided
to check it out. Cool idea, surprisingly good music. I was
about to work on parsing their WWW pages to extra playlists when
I realized _they'd already done the hard work_ and
Chip Hart wrote:
Oh, unless I am misunderstanding you, check this out:
http://magnatune.com/info/api
Look at the XML and csv files - tons of data. I've got it
parsed and all, what I really struggle with is a cool way to
I guess I wasn't aware of all that stuff.
Robin Bowes wrote:
What information on that image tells you that? It seems to me you're not
understanding what you're seeing.
The legend says the time trace is 5 ns/div. A pair of measuring lines
implies that the jitter on the uncorrected is somewhat less than that,
about 3 ns.
As I recall (I
Phil Karn wrote:
Even if that jitter were directly imposed on the local VCO, which it is
not because of loop filtering, it would still be reduced by a factor of
64 as the VCO clock is divided by 64 to produce the DAC sample clock.
I'm going to have to revise and correct this. (In my defense
Triode wrote:
For some science, try the following:
http://www.essex.ac.uk/ese/research/audio_lab/malcolmspubdocs/C41%20SPDIF%20interface%20flawed.pdf
Okay, I've read it. And I'm still not convinced.
Although his math looks fairly solid, he makes a lot of questionable
assumptions that lead to
Julian Alden-Salter wrote:
1) The fact that my dac locks on with different qualities of lock when mp3
and flacs are played back. Suggesting that there is indeed some difference
in the spdif data stream between the two formats.
What do you mean by different qualities of lock? I've had no trouble
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
