On 11/20/05, Chad Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, but I did notice this is the 100th post on the thread
maybe time to kill it. It started on Oct 26
No - it's still relevant and the issue is not in the past yet.
RM
On 11/20/05, John Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To Discuss and Daniel Carrera: Your suggestions are being followed by me
as fast as I can. I need one KVM switch so I can use my monitor for both
Win and Linux, until I get my Linux under control, I mean knowledge
control. I bought a 64 bit
Roger Markus wrote:
but don't attempt a Bang! one day swtich-over, it's not realistic.
I did it :-)
I had only used Windows for years (at home). When I got my first
computer (486) I put Slackware on it, no Windows. Never looked back.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://oooauthors.org
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:36, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Terri Sprague wrote:
Quite a few of us, even though we have internet satellite
connections, do not stay connected all the time. In my
opinion, that is a disaster waiting to happen because of
hackers, viruses, etc.
Why not switch to Linux
Hi,
I think this is a great idea!
I would like to contribute my time by product testing. Please tell me what I
have to do.
Thanks
Alex Massey
On Sat November 19 2005 22:48, John Boyle wrote:
To Discuss and Daniel Carrera: Your suggestions are being followed by me
as fast as I can. I need one KVM switch so I can use my monitor for both
Win and Linux, until I get my Linux under control, I mean knowledge
control. I bought a 64 bit AMD
On Sat November 19 2005 03:17, mark wrote:
Unless you *really* want 1,753 return receipts clogging your inbox. It's
rude and inconsiderate - and downright dumb - to have your email
requesting a return receipt for every email you send out, and doubly so
for a mailing list.
I think that it is
On Fri November 18 2005 02:56, + arobinson18 wrote:
[ MODERATED ]
[snip]
This is a slightly modified copy of a subset of a spreadsheet I created to
calculate the min/max phase angle spread of a polyphase network. I want to
display the results graphically as well so I
On Tue November 15 2005 19:23, + DMA wrote:
[ MODERATED ] ***
Hello!
I've made a lot of works in OOo Writer using OOo Math objects. The
version I use is 1.1.3. One day I gave my friend some works. He has OOo
2.0. When he opened it he saw some incorrect equations.
Now
Roger Markus wrote:
On 11/20/05, John Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To Discuss and Daniel Carrera: Your suggestions are being followed by me
as fast as I can. I need one KVM switch so I can use my monitor for both
Win and Linux, until I get my Linux under control, I mean knowledge
snip
the
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:30:00 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I think this is a great idea!
I would like to contribute my time by product testing. Please tell me
what I
have to do.
Thanks
Alex Massey
You might want to sign up for the qa.openoffice.org mailing list, and some
documents
CPHennessy wrote:
On Sat November 19 2005 03:17, mark wrote:
Unless you *really* want 1,753 return receipts clogging your inbox. It's
rude and inconsiderate - and downright dumb - to have your email
requesting a return receipt for every email you send out, and doubly so
for a mailing list.
I
on 11/20/05 12:56 'mark' wrote:
Heh. Try the redhat list, where folks invoke an out-of-office
message, which responds to *every* *single* *post*.
But no, there's only two or three folks whose email wants the
receipts, and I'm assuming that thay just don't understand what's
happening, and I
Steve Kopischke wrote:
on 11/20/05 12:56 'mark' wrote:
snip
But no, there's only two or three folks whose email wants the
receipts, and I'm assuming that thay just don't understand what's
happening, and I was just trying to make them aware of it.
snip
As for the return receipts, I believe
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
If you call carpet-bombing effective, it is. Retail paper flyers are the
true spam ancestors.
It's cost effective is what I mean. But, you don't have to believe me.
From the April 2005 issue of Scientific American --
How about the anti spam Haiku?
http://www.oblomovka.com/writing/habeas:_the_antispam_haiku.php3
/$
2005/11/20, Randomthots [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
If you call carpet-bombing effective, it is. Retail paper flyers are the
true spam ancestors.
It's cost effective is
On 11/20/05, Randomthots [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charging a postage fee of some sort, whether my fee-bate system or
something else, has the side effect of mandating exactly the
authentication mechanisms you desire while simultaneously making spam
much less profitable.
Rod,
I agree with
Le lundi 21 novembre 2005 à 00:04 +0100, Henrik Sundberg a écrit :
How about the anti spam Haiku?
http://www.oblomovka.com/writing/habeas:_the_antispam_haiku.php3
Like SPF it is very popular with spammers.
Micropayements rely on spammers accepting to pay and not subverting
someone else's
Chad Smith wrote:
On 11/20/05, Randomthots [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charging a postage fee of some sort, whether my fee-bate system or
something else, has the side effect of mandating exactly the
authentication mechanisms you desire while simultaneously making spam
much less profitable.
snip
Chad Smith wrote:
Rod,
I agree with you more often than I do with most people on this list, but I'd
have to say I don't on this one.
I don't like this idea, if for no other reason, I don't want to pay for
email. I'm already paying $50 a month for high-speed Internet, there's no
way I'm
Randomthots wrote:
Would you be willing to spend
$0.01 per email? My idea behind the fee-bate was two-fold: make spam a
lot more expensive to send out and reimburse recipients and ISPs for the
A simpler way to achieve the same result without actually spending money
(in any way you'd
The only problem I see that makes this a bad move are the Thousands of
legitimate clubs and e-mail groups. This would hurt tham as much or more
than the spammaers. With little or no real gain. We would lose a wondeful
aspect of the Net by the thousands ( like this present list ), to get rid of
Mel Haun Sr wrote:
The only problem I see that makes this a bad move are the Thousands of
legitimate clubs and e-mail groups. This would hurt tham as much or more
than the spammaers. With little or no real gain. We would lose a
wondeful aspect of the Net by the thousands ( like this present
HUGE SNIP
This discussion thread has digressed to the point where it no longer has
anything to do with the original subject! Let's either end it or rename it.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 11/21/05, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger Markus wrote:
Do give yourself an overlap period to get used to Linux. Once you're up
to
speed with it, you'll never want to touch a Lose-W machine again, but
there
snip
use the Lose-W box less and less, but don't attempt a Bang! one day
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Randomthots wrote:
Would you be willing to spend $0.01 per email? My idea behind the
fee-bate was two-fold: make spam a lot more expensive to send out and
reimburse recipients and ISPs for the
A simpler way to achieve the same result without actually spending money
Wow.
I had no idea that my little email would generate all
this response. Wow.
I do use OpenOffice 2.0, Mozilla Thunderbird, Opera
and my Palm Desktop
for my calendar and notes. The only thing that I have
not changed is
that I still use MS XP for my operating system. Some
of the software
that
27 matches
Mail list logo
