I have a 384K DSL connection, and I don't understand what I should be adding for traffic shapping... I put down 1kbit for the LAN (IN) side and 256Kbit for the WAN (Out)... Was that the correct entries for the shapper?
-- Kim C. Callis[EMAIL PROTECTED]__
03:28:28PM -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
>In this case check with you're isp and see if they have a speedtest
>site setup. That's what my ISP does atleast.
>
>On 2/21/06, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Scott,
>>
>> You were right on the money
38 ms
>> 162.029 ms
>> 17 anhmca1wcx4-pos6-0.wcg.net (64.200.141.94) 162.788 ms 162.340 ms
>> 163.445 ms
>> 18 telmex-anhmca1wcx4-pos-10-0-wcg.net (64.200.224.150) 166.515 ms
>> 175.247 ms 171.111 ms
>> 19 red-corp-200.76.250.45.telnor.net (200.76.250.45) 321.
2500] <=> [pfSense box] <=> [LAN]
>>
>>Is the cisco doing some kind of routing? What is the model of the
>>first box?
>>
>>
>>nb
>>
>>
>>On Feb 21, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Kim C. Callis wrote:
>>
>>>I have pfsense connecte
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 06:57:19PM -, Greg Hennessy wrote:
>
>> Of course, the ISP that I am consulting with is blaming
>> pfsense. What can I do to prove that pfSense it working
>> optimally and the problem is with the telco?
>>
>> Any pointer would be greatly appreciated!
>
>Take PFsense
understand
>correctly, you have:
>
>[some internet connecton] <=> [Cisco 2500] <=> [pfSense box] <=> [LAN]
>
>Is the cisco doing some kind of routing? What is the model of the
>first box?
>
>
>nb
>
>
>On Feb 21, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Kim C. Calli
I have pfsense connected to a Cisco 2500 for the WAN
connection. Attached to the Cisco via a high speed serial
cable to a box that say World DSL. I can't get any specifics
on the capabilities of the DSL box. When I did telnet the
box, I get connected to another Cisco router which I cannot
access.
I am not using the embedded version...
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 03:03:58AM -0600, Bill Marquette wrote:
>On 2/20/06, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And what differnces and benefits will one get from the
>> OpenBSD deployment?
>
>This is just a test image to
And what differnces and benefits will one get from the
OpenBSD deployment?
K.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:50:51AM -0600, Bill Marquette wrote:
>On 2/20/06, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I started the traffic shapping on
>> 1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-2-06.
, everything went
back to normal. Currently, I have the shaper of and am
monitoring service.
K.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:40:24PM -0600, Bill Marquette wrote:
>On 2/19/06, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am currently running 1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-2-06.
>>
:32:53PM -0600, Bill Marquette wrote:
>On 2/19/06, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nick,
>>
>> You are right... Before I started fooling around, I removed
>> traffic shaping and suddenly my download was good to go. I
>> think I still need to do so
;decent sized ISP for years and in my experience last mile problems
>>are almost always relate to the telco and not [dynamic] routing.
>>Why do you feel you need dynamic routing? Do you have more than 1
>>provider?
>>
>>nb
>>
>>
>>
>>On
ing the
>configuration !
>You will need console access to the router though I have used it from
>800 series till 1 series routers so I know it works :)
>
>I will post the link later on I have to grab my laptop for it ;)
>
>J.
>
>
>Kim C. Callis wrote:
>>Here i
Cisco 2500 with a single interface and 8 serial ports
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 03:59:21PM -0500, Nelson Papel wrote:
>What model Cisco router is it?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Kim C. Callis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: February 18, 2006 15:25
>To: PfSense Mai
aps needed to recover the password without deleting the
>configuration !
>You will need console access to the router though I have used it from
>800 series till 1 series routers so I know it works :)
>
>I will post the link later on I have to grab my laptop for it ;)
>
>J.
&
lved within the cisco as the
>Linux routing packages are notoriously instable and unreliable.
>
>I work allot with checkpoint firewalls at work and they have the zebra
>and gated solutions (depending on the version) and there are major
>issues with the dynamic routing on those.
>
I installed pfsense on a server for a WISP. The LAN
interface is connected to a switch which as 4 access points connected
which provides the LAN connectivity to the clients.
On the WAN side is a cross-over cable connected to a Cisco
2500 series router with does absolutely nothing except to
provide
still.
>
>On 2/18/06, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I believe that once upon a time, one of the packages that
>> was available was zebra/quagga. Has that package been
>> removed or was that a figment of my imagination?
>>
>> K.
>>
>>
I believe that once upon a time, one of the packages that
was available was zebra/quagga. Has that package been
removed or was that a figment of my imagination?
K.
ons have a static port option.
>Have you tried to setup a static port?
>
>On 2/8/06, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have installed siproxd on my pfsense. I have read all of
>> the documentation both at sourceforge as well at pfsense
>> forum. I
Ben,
Thanks for info on all of the above. The only thing that I
think I am having a problem it, is I cannot setup a static
route on D-Link device. There is not option on DI-624 that
allow for setup of static routes.
Understand that the WRT54gs router does go out on the
internet just fine. The on
I have installed siproxd on my pfsense. I have read all of
the documentation both at sourceforge as well at pfsense
forum. I am still lost on what I need to set up on pfsense
to allow my asterisk server to proxy the SIP connection
through siproxd. Has anyone played with that?
K.
I am connected to a wireless service at my house. In my
house I have a WRT54g with a LAN address of 192.168.10.1,
and a WAN address of 10.0.0.1.
On the WAN port, I am connected to a D-Link D-624 which has
a LAN address of 10.0.0.1 and WAN address of 192.168.0.200.
The router off the service is 19
and install as opposed to trying to load remotely at
128kb.
K.
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 01:54:21AM -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
>Use the web interface to manually upgrade the image with the full upgrade.
>
>On 2/3/06, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for the
lrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-2-06/
>
>On 2/3/06, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Every package that I attempt in install fails. I am running
>> 1.0 beta1. I also have tried to do the auto updater try and
>> get the beta firmware and that seems to fail a
Every package that I attempt in install fails. I am running
1.0 beta1. I also have tried to do the auto updater try and
get the beta firmware and that seems to fail as well. Is
there something that I am not enabling?
K.
With pfSense, is it possible to bond together several
incoming media (for instance several DSL circuits), to
provide create larger bandwidth to the LAN? And if so, could
one effectively creates create greater outgoing bandwidth?
K.
I have a client that want to be able to view graphs and
other general reports. Is there a way to make a strictly
report based web interface, which will allow some to see
things like state tables, dhcp leases, graphs, and other
reports, but no ability to make any changes to any features
or rules?
K
I just got on the console the following:
kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded; see turning(7)
And with that, I can not get dhcpd to allot client addresses to the AP.
Although I am able to get an address when I am plugged into the switch.
Does anyone know what might be the problem?-- Kim C. Callis[EMAIL
?
-- Kim C. Callis[EMAIL PROTECTED]_"A
human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance
accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders,
give orders, coop
I just installed squid... Do I need to open up port 3128 for the
tranparency to be available?
--
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, wr
On 8/18/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Its designed to do the same thing that m0n0walls feature does. It
> > distributes bandwidth evenly among LAN clients -> INTERNET.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > On 8/17/05, Kim C. Callis <[EM
t "libwrap.so.3" not found, required by
> "snmpd"
>
>
> -Kyle
>
>
>
>
> Chris Buechler wrote:
> On 8/18/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> How does one ascertain that OID for the interfaces on a pfsense box. I
&g
How does one ascertain that OID for the interfaces on a pfsense box. I
need to display some graphs to the powers that be, but the monitoring
packages wants the OID. I know what it is, but I have to make use of
that before..
Thanks
--
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED
When you first install pfSense the first time, you are given the
option of making a VLAN between the LAN and WAN interface. Is there
any benefit in doing that, and what exactly does it do to have a VLAN
in place?
--
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
butcher a h
Can I assign static IP address out of the pool of DHCP issues hosts?
--
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance
accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders,
give orders, coop
Need I add more?
--
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance
accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders,
give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new
pro
It there awy way to make use DNSMasq while I am replacing my DNS
server? For that matter, is there an easy way to install bind on
pfsense...
--
When It Absolutely, Positively has to be Destroyed Overnight!!!
1-(800) MARINES
___
Kim C. Callis
get the hand of bsd firewall
setup... This ain't my daddy's iptable, that's for sure... :)
--
When It Absolutely, Positively has to be Destroyed Overnight!!!
1-(800) MARINES
___________
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
night!!!
1-(800) MARINES
_______
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
royed Overnight!!!
1-(800) MARINES
_______
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ou use 1 to 1 nat you don't
> need all the VIP stuff. But anyway??
>
> Where are you at now trying to get port forwarding working?
> For example to a http service or something??
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim C. Callis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
ote:
> When you set up the virtual IP use the proxy arp setting it is easier
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim C. Callis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 July 2005 08:57
> To: analyzerx
> Cc: discussion@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Interface he
Also, wouldn't I be able to see the virtual interface when I do a ifconfig?
On 7/25/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is what I did.. I added the virtual interface... Then I went to
> go ping it and was unable to get any response...
>
> On 7/25/05, anal
nless I'm still dreaming! :P (just woke
> up) - hehe!
>
>
> On 7/25/05, Kim C. Callis < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To have a public IP address that is 200.xx.xx.xx/28 which provides me
> > with 14 public address. Prior to the switch I was using IPCop and
> >
pointers would be greatly appreciated!
--
When It Absolutely, Positively has to be Destroyed Overnight!!!
1-(800) MARINES
___
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
iated...
--
When It Absolutely, Positively has to be Destroyed Overnight!!!
1-(800) MARINES
_______
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opps, I was responding to another message...
Because I am currently downloading uploads, I can't see what the queue
usage is until I finish downloading...
On 7/23/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Sorry, I got a little sidetracked with something else..
.
On 7/23/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/23/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I noticed that when I was uploading the update to the router, that the
> > speed was dirt slow... What would be a good entry in to traffic
> > shapin
!!!
1-(800) MARINES
___
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do I need to load the updates in order or can I just download the
latest.tgz and call it a day?
--
When It Absolutely, Positively has to be Destroyed Overnight!!!
1-(800) MARINES
___
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Absolutely, Positively has to be Destroyed Overnight!!!
1-(800) MARINES
___
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/05, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should just go to the NAT section and add them there and pfSense
> will create the actual rule for you. I think there is a check box on
> the NAT setup screen to tell pfSense to create the rule.
>
> Kim C. Callis wrote:
> &g
Destroyed Overnight!!!
1-(800) MARINES
___
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rough QoS?
--
When It Absolutely, Positively has to be Destroyed Overnight!!!
1-(800) MARINES
_______
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firewall: NAT: Port Forward
>
> On 7/15/05, Kim C. Callis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am attempting to set up squid to do transparent proxying. Is there a
> > way via the web interface to forward port 80 to 3128 or is that
> > somet
___
Kim C. Callis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
58 matches
Mail list logo
