> Daniel Pocock hat am 12. Oktober 2019 um 21:16
> geschrieben:
>
>
>
> The case for Matthias Kirschner's resignation as FSFE president is more
> serious than the case for RMS's resignation.
>
> Does anybody agree that at least one of the points on this list is more
> serious than all the
Because
Matthias Kirschner != RMS
;-)
Kind regards
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
I hate Mondays
Oct 12, 2019, 19:16 by dan...@pocock.pro:
>
> The case for Matthias Kirschner's resignation as FSFE president is more
> serious than the case for RMS's resignation.
>
> Does anybody agree that at least one of the points on this list is more
> serious than all the false
On 14/10/2019 11:25, lists...@netcologne.de wrote:
>> Daniel Pocock hat am 12. Oktober 2019 um 21:16
>> geschrieben:
>>
>>
>>
>> The case for Matthias Kirschner's resignation as FSFE president is more
>> serious than the case for RMS's resignation.
>>
>> Does anybody agree that at least one of
Oct 14, 2019, 08:21 by anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de:
> Matthias Kirschner != RMS
>
What do you mean? I don't understand the comment. I think you're hiding your
true opinion. Now I also know why you didn't answer my message about free
dance. You are obviously not a dancer. Dancers carry their
Oct 14, 2019, 11:59 by dan...@pocock.pro:
> Where there any other measurable consequences of the
> decision to close Düsseldorf?
>
I can't read the archive, but I find it outrageous that FSFE simply closes
Dusseldorf. This concerns a lot of people and what are they supposed to do now?
Do they
Oct 8, 2019, 16:41 by m...@arlsoft.com:
>
> Since I was the onewho first pointed out that the UID portion of the
> email addressseemed to refer to Adolf Hitler, I feel the need to
> mention thatI just noticed that it doesn't. Note that the "l" in the
> UIDcomes
Oct 14, 2019, 13:42 by stefan.fr...@gmx.de:
>
> Unsubscribe
>
What's that supposed to mean? Are you trying to get out of here? That would be
a pity! Daniel has done so much work and set up this list for us so that we can
protect free software from vermin and black movements. Stay with us and
Am 14.10.19 um 15:39 schrieb ahil...@keemail.me:
> Then FSFE did something right, if that was the result. I didn't think I'd be
> in favor of ending a city, but I guess Dusseldorf was just so overrun with
> censorship, corruption and unfree software that it couldn't be saved. Almost
> like
Am 14.10.19 um 15:21 schrieb ahil...@keemail.me:
I didn't notice that before, but I can see from your sender that you are
a doctor. If I had known that, I would have asked you something a week
ago, because I was really shitty last time. I don't know if it was just
physical or if it was the
Unsubscribe
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Oct 14, 2019, 13:14 by ahil...@keemail.me:
>
> We should organize a demo of ... uphold our principles.
>
Napping is one of my principles, a demo I do several times every day
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu
On 14/10/2019 14:49, ahil...@keemail.me wrote:
> Oct 14, 2019, 13:42 by stefan.fr...@gmx.de:
>
>>
> we are protected from censorship.
No, you're not. Do you really believe I wouldn't consider censoring
this list if somebody from Google arrived on my doorstep right now and
handed me
Oct 14, 2019, 14:05 by dan...@pocock.pro:
> No, you're not. Do you really believe I wouldn't consider censoring
> this list if somebody from Google arrived on my doorstep right now and
> handed me $300,000 to do so?
>
What's that supposed to mean? You also take money from Google? Why? I thought
Oct 14, 2019, 07:55 by garfi...@tutanota.de:
> I hate Mondays
>
What the fuck is this shit? You're not even real yet. You can't even hate
mondays. So what are you doing here? You only disturb us at work. Or do I
hallucinate? But cats don't even have the physical ability to use a keyboard.
Oct 8, 2019, 21:36 by dan...@pocock.pro:
> It wouldn't be hard to make a Thunderbird plugin or a script on the mail
> server to automatically add the necessary headers and operate parallel
> lists.
>
Can you do it automatically so we can bypass the censorship on this list? You
have announced the
On 14/10/2019 16:15, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Daniel Pocock [2019-10-14 19:36]:
>> On 14/10/2019 14:49, ahil...@keemail.me wrote:
>>> Oct 14, 2019, 13:42 by stefan.fr...@gmx.de:
>>>
>>> we are protected from censorship.
>>
>>
>>
>> No, you're not. Do you really believe I wouldn't consider
On 14/10/2019 16:24, ahil...@keemail.me wrote:
> Oct 8, 2019, 21:36 by dan...@pocock.pro:
>
>> It wouldn't be hard to make a Thunderbird plugin or a script on the mail
>> server to automatically add the necessary headers and operate parallel
>> lists.
>>
> Can you do it automatically so we can
Oct 8, 2019, 17:37 by rol...@mxchange.org:
> On 10/08/2019 06:41 PM, MBR wrote:
> Very easy to misunderstand it. He/she should consider changing the email
> address because it"feels" like Adolf Hitler. Maybe take a pseudonym
> instead?
>
Why would I need a pseudonym if other people are too
Oct 14, 2019, 15:28 by dan...@pocock.pro:
> Give me $300,000 and I will consider censoring the list, that is all I
> wrote.
>
That's an announcement!? You obviously have no principles. You've censored
mails here already. One of me too. Although I fight for you. If you give RMS
$300,000,
Is this list censored (what many call moderation) too? Please tell me the
truth: Yes or No.
On Mon, October 14, 2019 9:26 am, ahil...@keemail.me wrote:
>
> Date: Oct 14, 2019, 14:14
> From: discussion-ow...@lists.fsfellowship.eu
> To: ahil...@keemail.me
> Subject: Your message to Discussion
On 14/10/2019 16:48, quil...@riseup.net wrote:
> Is this list censored (what many call moderation) too? Please tell me the
> truth: Yes or No.
>
Sometimes people submit an email using an email address that isn't
subscribed and it goes in the moderation queue.
Then they send the same email
On 14/10/2019 16:50, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Daniel Pocock [2019-10-14 20:57]:
>> When I wrote re-think the whole platform, I meant either finding a
>> de-centralized way to distribute control of list membership or an
>> alternative technology. I wasn't just thinking about everybody
>>
* Daniel Pocock [2019-10-14 21:29]:
> I started thinking that maybe some of this could be done with a
> Thunderbird plugin, managing a BCC list in any block chain or
> distributed data structure.
Plugin would make it centralized and locked to Thunderbird.
Email system would make it
On Mon, October 14, 2019 11:15 am, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 14/10/2019 17:10, quil...@riseup.net wrote:
>> On Mon, October 14, 2019 10:53 am, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14/10/2019 16:48, quil...@riseup.net wrote:
Is this list censored (what many call moderation) too? Please tell
On 14/10/2019 17:10, quil...@riseup.net wrote:
> On Mon, October 14, 2019 10:53 am, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14/10/2019 16:48, quil...@riseup.net wrote:
>>> Is this list censored (what many call moderation) too? Please tell me
>>> the
>>> truth: Yes or No.
>>>
>>
>> Sometimes people
On Mon, October 14, 2019 10:53 am, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 14/10/2019 16:48, quil...@riseup.net wrote:
>> Is this list censored (what many call moderation) too? Please tell me
>> the
>> truth: Yes or No.
>>
>
> Sometimes people submit an email using an email address that isn't
> subscribed
27 matches
Mail list logo
