Return Receipt
Your Re: [pfSense-discussion] HOW MUCH TRUST ON PFSENSE ?
document
Bill Marquette wrote:
or others that could make use of mechanisms like dynamic allocation of port.
That could cause you problems potentially. But would be no different
in any other firewall that didn't already understand your protocol. I
regularly force vendors to redesign their applications
On Dec 24, 2007 5:41 AM, Paul M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Marquette wrote:
or others that could make use of mechanisms like dynamic allocation of
port.
That could cause you problems potentially. But would be no different
in any other firewall that didn't already understand your
Hi,
Thanks a lot to everybody for coming in this discussion and for sharing
their experiences that convinced me
to traslate into a production environment with no problems!
Anyway i still have some little doubts on implementing a DMZ containing all
the servers, behind NAT.
This because i don't
On Dec 22, 2007 2:22 AM, Paolo Gentili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway i still have some little doubts on implementing a DMZ containing all
the servers, behind NAT.
This because i don't know how pfsense's NAT implementation can handle the
new internet applications/protocols
like AJAX or
I'm in full agreement with Chris. The CD burning issue is not unique to
pfSense. It will happen with any system if you have bad compatibility
between your CD/DVD burner, media, and your drive reading the result. I've
seen it with certain media with many other OSes given the wrong
I have follow the thread but i don´t understand it, not reallly., i
have many pfs 1.2rcx
firewalls up and running around the world, what is your mission critical
needed feature?
Sorry!
Greetings
Heiko
Ron Lockard schrieb:
I'm in full agreement with Chris. The CD burning issue is not
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:05:08 +0100
Paolo Gentili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your thoughts or experiences about how much trust can i have on pfsense
Since everyone is just singing praises, I'll add some things to look for ;)
Besides running it at home we run it on three production locations,
I have never had a problem with burning the PFSense ISO on CD. The CD-R
brand I use is Memorex.
The only stability problem I saw was caused by the network cards. To fix
this simply switch out the network cards for something else until you
get a good combination. For best stability it has been
Jure Pečar wrote:
Since everyone is just singing praises, I'll add some things to look for ;)
Besides running it at home we run it on three production locations, which
are two server rooms and one fast growing wireless lan.
First bad expirience: it is really touchy about the quality of your
Paolo Gentili wrote:
your thoughts or experiences about how much trust can i have on pfsense
we've got seven boxes doing pfsense - three pairs of 1U servers as
firewall clusters protecting public facing web services, and one acting
as a VPN concentrator for road warriors. we rely on carp and
Paolo
I have a customer running it with over 100 clients and 6 servers and it runs
flawless. I run it on our production hosting network as well with 20+ servers
and heavy VOIP usage. The only major issues I have run into are with FTP + SSL.
Thanks
Bryant
We were forced to jump from testing to production (our previous firewall
bit the dust) with pfSense v0.62.5 (alpha). Remarkably, it was the most
stable platform I had tested to date out of numerous open source and
commercial offerings. I had it in-place and operational within a couple
of hours
want to throw at it.
Zach.
Hotwire Networks
From: Ted Crow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 4:51 PM
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense-discussion] HOW MUCH TRUST ON PFSENSE ?
We were forced to jump from testing to production (our previous
We currently have 3 pfSense boxes running on our network. Two different
subnets, and one master to our Bonded T1. These are simple P4
(2.4ghz)workstations, with 1gb of ram. We have some 20 servers, 32 public IPs
(1 to 1 nat on a few servers), and about 70 clients. Performane, uptime, and
15 matches
Mail list logo
