Re: The XMLField ticket

I've attached a patch per the discussion here. It's ready for review and hopefully a speedy commit. http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3094#comment:19 -Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send

Re: Your thoughts on the Secure Web Application Framework Manifesto

Hi Jacob, just as an FYI I messaged you last week about this off list - my email was from my first name @securitycompass.com. Just wanted to make sure you got it Thanks, Rohit On Feb 24, 6:55 am, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > Hi Rohit -- > > I had a skim of the document, too,

Re: Trac components cleanup

I'm not endorsing any specific set of changes here, but I can address the feasibility of making the changes in Trac: >From empirical testing on my own Trac installation (running 0.11 currently, Django is on 0.12) updates to components, resolutions, etc. all propagate correctly when edited

Re: Trac components cleanup

On Feb 28, 10:58 am, Paul McMillan wrote: > I think the django-admin.py categories could be consolidated into a single > one. > > In the interest of readability, we might rename django.contrib.foo to > simply contrib.foo. > > As long as we're clarifying, "Django Web Site" might

Re: Trac components cleanup

>> * The "Contrib apps" component [1] should be made redundant and new >> components for each missing contrib app (e.g. contenttypes, sitemaps) >> should be added. I mean, even databrowse has its own component! :) The >> "Contrib app" mixes lots of unrelated things, making it a bit >> pointless.

Re: Customizable Serialization

Hi I just stumbled across this discussion ... even though I have always been very interested about contributing to Django, I never took the step yet ! But this is actually a topic that interests me very much (even though for the moment it is Vivek's). For several projects I am working on (a lot

Re: Suggestion: a new "nature" field in Trac

> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: > > Hello, > > > I was wondering if others would find it useful to introduce a new > > field in Trac to characterise the nature of a ticket, allowing to > > choose from at least: "bug report", "feature request", or > >

Re: Trac components cleanup

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: > Hi, > > Tweaking Trac seems to be in the air, so I had some more ideas to > suggest :) > > The "component" field in Trac is very useful when people look for > tickets in their areas of familiarity/expertise. I think there

Trac components cleanup

Hi, Tweaking Trac seems to be in the air, so I had some more ideas to suggest :) The "component" field in Trac is very useful when people look for tickets in their areas of familiarity/expertise. I think there are a few things that should be cleaned up to make the system a bit more useful and