Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-03-29 Thread Julien Phalip
On Mar 29, 4:47 pm, Gabriel Hurley wrote: > The component re-organization is done now, as per Julien's (and Jannis') > suggestions above. I even re-categorized the 84 tickets that were in > "Contrib apps" into their new separate contrib.foo components (thank god for > Trac bulk

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-03-28 Thread Gabriel Hurley
The component re-organization is done now, as per Julien's (and Jannis') suggestions above. I even re-categorized the 84 tickets that were in "Contrib apps" into their new separate contrib.foo components (thank god for Trac bulk modify privileges!). The organization definitely makes more sense

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-03-28 Thread Julien Phalip
On Mar 29, 8:58 am, Gabriel Hurley wrote: > I can work on it late tonight (about 6-8 hours from now) if no one else gets > to it. > > All the best, > >     - Gabriel Excellent, thank you Gabriel! There's no rush -- whenever it suits you. Let me know if I can help in any way.

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-03-28 Thread Gabriel Hurley
I can work on it late tonight (about 6-8 hours from now) if no one else gets to it. All the best, - Gabriel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-03-28 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: > I wouldn't mind trying but I don't have much experience administering > Trac and I wouldn't want to make a mess. Earlier in this thread > Gabriel has offered to help as he's got the Trac skillz. > > Gabriel, are you

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-03-28 Thread Julien Phalip
On Mar 29, 2:01 am, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Julien Phalip wrote: > > Now that 1.3 has been released (yay!), I'm reviving this thread to see > > if we can make Trac a little more efficient on our way to 1.4. I'll > > try

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-03-28 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Julien Phalip wrote: > Now that 1.3 has been released (yay!), I'm reviving this thread to see > if we can make Trac a little more efficient on our way to 1.4. I'll > try to summarise what's been suggested so far in regard to improving > and

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-03-28 Thread Jannis Leidel
On 28.03.2011, at 07:56, Julien Phalip wrote: > Now that 1.3 has been released (yay!), I'm reviving this thread to see > if we can make Trac a little more efficient on our way to 1.4. I'll > try to summarise what's been suggested so far in regard to improving > and clarifying the "Component"

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-03-28 Thread Carl Meyer
On 03/28/2011 02:33 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > As with the other thread on Trac changes -- I agree this is worth > doing, but would like to hear some other core dev voices before making > any changes. These changes look to me like a gain in sanity on every front. +1 Carl -- You

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-03-28 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that 1.3 has been released (yay!), I'm reviving this thread to see > if we can make Trac a little more efficient on our way to 1.4. I'll > try to summarise what's been suggested so far in regard to

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-03-27 Thread Julien Phalip
Hi all, Now that 1.3 has been released (yay!), I'm reviving this thread to see if we can make Trac a little more efficient on our way to 1.4. I'll try to summarise what's been suggested so far in regard to improving and clarifying the "Component" field: * The "Contrib apps" component would be

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-02-28 Thread Gabriel Hurley
I'm not endorsing any specific set of changes here, but I can address the feasibility of making the changes in Trac: >From empirical testing on my own Trac installation (running 0.11 currently, Django is on 0.12) updates to components, resolutions, etc. all propagate correctly when edited

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-02-28 Thread Julien Phalip
On Feb 28, 10:58 am, Paul McMillan wrote: > I think the django-admin.py categories could be consolidated into a single > one. > > In the interest of readability, we might rename django.contrib.foo to > simply contrib.foo. > > As long as we're clarifying, "Django Web Site" might

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-02-28 Thread Paul McMillan
>> * The "Contrib apps" component [1] should be made redundant and new >> components for each missing contrib app (e.g. contenttypes, sitemaps) >> should be added. I mean, even databrowse has its own component! :) The >> "Contrib app" mixes lots of unrelated things, making it a bit >> pointless.

Re: Trac components cleanup

2011-02-28 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Julien Phalip wrote: > Hi, > > Tweaking Trac seems to be in the air, so I had some more ideas to > suggest :) > > The "component" field in Trac is very useful when people look for > tickets in their areas of familiarity/expertise. I think there

Trac components cleanup

2011-02-28 Thread Julien Phalip
Hi, Tweaking Trac seems to be in the air, so I had some more ideas to suggest :) The "component" field in Trac is very useful when people look for tickets in their areas of familiarity/expertise. I think there are a few things that should be cleaned up to make the system a bit more useful and