Re: [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

2016-10-18 Thread Jim Reid
> On 18 Oct 2016, at 10:09, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > > in the light of transparency, will resp. can the contract be disclosed? > > If not, is it a contract (draft) that has been put on the table by the > NCC? Or, vice versa, VeriSign's standard contract for such

Re: [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

2016-10-18 Thread Carsten Schiefner
Hi Elvis, On 18.10.2016 12:11, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote: > On 10/18/16 1:04 PM, Carsten Schiefner wrote: >> what other forum you would see fit then for such kind of Q? > ncc services ? or the GM? "NCC Services" I don't know... Wouldn't this WG be rather for services being rendered *BY* the NCC

[dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

2016-10-18 Thread Romeo Zwart
Dear colleagues, In July we published a Request for Proposals (RfP) for a trusted third party to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC's zones: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/2016-July/003303.html Following our announcement, we received three final proposals by the

Re: [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

2016-10-18 Thread Elvis Daniel Velea
Hi Carsten, On 10/18/16 1:04 PM, Carsten Schiefner wrote: what other forum you would see fit then for such kind of Q? ncc services ? or the GM? cheers, elvis

Re: [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

2016-10-18 Thread Jim Reid
> On 18 Oct 2016, at 10:53, Antonio Prado wrote: > > besides, I cannot fully understand how this WG could ask the NCC board > to investigate "if we have reason to believe the rfp was unfair or > defective in some way" when, actually, you just said "the contractual > terms

Re: [dns-wg] reminder about the co-chair appointment

2016-10-18 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:27:51PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: > At present, only two names have emerged: Ralf Weber and Shane > Kerr. More choices would be welcomed. So far, there have only been a > few statements of support on the list for both Ralf and Shane. More > voices of support would

Re: [dns-wg] co-chair appointment: yet another reminder

2016-10-18 Thread Randy Bush
>> I’d appreciate it if more members of the WG spoke up. > > I am very pleased with both candidates nominated so far. I would be > happy to see either Ralf or Shane serve as chair. i want pigasus!

Re: [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

2016-10-18 Thread Carsten Schiefner
Hi Romeo & NCC DNS team - first of all, congrats to the addition of resilience to the NCC's DNS services! Good to have this aboard these days, I (unfortunately have to) think... On 18.10.2016 10:54, Romeo Zwart wrote: > [...] > > The proposal submitted by VeriSign Sàrl (“Verisign”) was the best

Re: [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

2016-10-18 Thread Jim Reid
On 18 Oct 2016, at 11:04, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > On 18.10.2016 11:36, Jim Reid wrote: >> The contractual terms are implementation detail and therefore out of >> scope for the WG. This also applies to the RFP and NCC’s selection >> procedure. > > what

Re: [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

2016-10-18 Thread Antonio Prado
On 10/18/16 11:36 AM, Jim Reid wrote: > The contractual terms are implementation detail and therefore out of scope > for the WG > if we have reason to believe the RFP and/or contract was unfair or defective > in some way. > The WG must not and can’t (try to) micromanage the NCC’s DNS team.

Re: [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

2016-10-18 Thread Carsten Schiefner
On 18.10.2016 12:27, Jim Reid wrote: > On 18 Oct 2016, at 11:04, Carsten Schiefner wrote: >>> [WG micromanaging the NCC’s DNS team] >> >> Not that I have attempted this by any means, I think. > > I’m glad to hear that Carsten. But I must say you gave me that >

Re: [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

2016-10-18 Thread Jim Reid
> On 18 Oct 2016, at 09:54, Romeo Zwart wrote: > > The proposal submitted by VeriSign Sàrl (“Verisign”) was the best fit. > We subsequently signed a contract with Verisign, which comes into effect > before the end of this year. The contract is for the period of one year, >

[dns-wg] draft agenda DNS-WG

2016-10-18 Thread Jaap Akkerhuis
All, Find below the current draft agenda. Apologies for being late. jaap DNS WG, Thursday, October 27th 15-16:30, Afternoon Session I A. Administrative matters o Welcome o Scribe selection/introduction o Jabber selection/introduction o