Quoting Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There are two parts to this. There is the assembly coded parts of Mesa
> (for 3Dnow & SSE) and there are compile switches for GCC. For example, we may
> wish to see if there are any benefits to building a version with
> '-mcpu=i686' or '-mcpu=k6' or
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:47:07AM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.02.25 10:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > anyone is interested in athlon-compiled binary drivers, I can help (but
> > not
> > before march 4th).
>
> I think that there is no reason for not enabling every optimization in
> Mes
On 2002.02.25 10:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
>
> Some good news, just when I'm away from school! (and its great connection
> :) ).
> But just a thought: it looks like you use the "standard" host.def for the
>
> mach64 build. And the last time I checked out the branch, the #define
> MesaUse
Quoting Jose Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
>
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
>
> Unfortunately, as you can notice the packages are huge. Attached is a
> f
Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:59:01PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > But can't we assume that the user is upgrading from a stable XFree 4.2.0
> > > > installation?
> > > >
> > > No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will
> > > be
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:54:22PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> But on a daily basis!? At least this was the initial plan..
>
> I was thinking in using a script that made some kind of rotation
> eliminating old releases, only adding a snapshot when there were
> differences, etc... This can be d
Is the idea here to have daily/weekly (or whatever) CVS snapshots or to
start an incremental release process seperate from XFree86 releases (i.e.,
with release tags)?
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:24:49PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > I have a web stati
On 2002.02.22 22:49 Daryll Strauss wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:24:49PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > I have a web statistics package on my webserver
> > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/cgi-bin/awstats.pl were one could get that
> > information.
> >
> > This doesn't mean that I won't put my stu
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:24:49PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> I have a web statistics package on my webserver
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/cgi-bin/awstats.pl were one could get that
> information.
>
> This doesn't mean that I won't put my stuff on DRI website: I've sent an
> email to Frank a
On 2002.02.22 22:27 Brian Paul wrote:
> Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
> >
> > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
> >
> > Unfortunately, as you can notice the packa
On 2002.02.22 22:00 Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> >
> > hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing
> > Sergey complaining about the size of the download! ;-) is to make two
> sets
> > of drivers:
> > - one with everything included, including debugging info
> > - another
On 2002.02.22 22:12 Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
> > hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing
> > Sergey complaining about the size of the download! ;-) is to make two
> sets
> :)) I do not like to complain as much as you can think:). But GATOS
> binary snapshots drivers
Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
> Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
>
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
>
> Unfortunately, as you can notice the packages are huge. Attached is a
> file list of the i810
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:59:01PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> > >
> > > But can't we assume that the user is upgrading from a stable XFree 4.2.0
> > > installation?
> > >
> > No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will
> > be Mesa 4.0.x based. A MAJOR update!
>
>
> hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing
> Sergey complaining about the size of the download! ;-) is to make two sets
:)) I do not like to complain as much as you can think:). But GATOS
binary snapshots drivers are only 190K! Even if dri will be 5 times
larger - it
On 2002.02.22 22:02 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:38:28PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > >>
> > >No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will
> > >be Mesa 4.0.x based. A MAJOR update!
> > >
> > >Alan.
> > >
> >
> > hmmm.. the only way I see to make ev
>
> hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing
> Sergey complaining about the size of the download! ;-) is to make two sets
> of drivers:
> - one with everything included, including debugging info
> - another with stripped binaries and without the libraries that do
> >
> > But can't we assume that the user is upgrading from a stable XFree 4.2.0
> > installation?
> >
> No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will
> be Mesa 4.0.x based. A MAJOR update!
I think we have to look at the scope of what we're trying to do: provide an
updat
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:53:50PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > Jos Fonseca wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > > > Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:38:28PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> >>
> >No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will
> >be Mesa 4.0.x based. A MAJOR update!
> >
> >Alan.
> >
>
> hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing
> Sergey complaining abou
Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Jos Fonseca wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > > Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > > > > sucessful
On 2002.02.22 21:35 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:17:28PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > On 2002.02.22 21:13 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >...
> > >What I meant is from a bug standpoint. If there's a bug in Mesa which
> > >is fixed, then libGLcore.a needs to be replaced. This is
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:17:28PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.02.22 21:13 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:59:01PM +, Jos Fonseca wrote:
> >> On 2002.02.22 20:57 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >> >...
> >> >libGLcore.a is the internal Mesa code that drives indirect GLX.
>
On 2002.02.22 21:13 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:59:01PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > On 2002.02.22 20:57 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >...
> > >libGLcore.a is the internal Mesa code that drives indirect GLX.
> > >
> > >If anything changes in Mesa, libGLcore.a changes too.
> >
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:59:01PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.02.22 20:57 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >> Jos Fonseca wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >> > > ...
> >> > > What is libGLcore.a? I
On 2002.02.22 20:57 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Jos Fonseca wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > What is libGLcore.a? Is that actually used?
> > > >
> > > > Keith
> > > >
> > >
> > > Is res
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Jos Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > > > sucessfully. The generated packages are available
José Fonseca wrote:
>
> On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > >
> > > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > > sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
> > >
> > > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
> > >
> >
On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
> >
> > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
> >
> > Unfortunately, as you can notice the p
Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
> Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
>
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
>
> Unfortunately, as you can notice the packages are huge. Attached is a
> file list of the i810
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:15:00PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 17:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:56:48PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > > sucessfully. The generated packages are av
I've also put the my (incredible simple and featureless) script for
doing this at the scripts/ subdirectory.
Jose Fonseca
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 16:56, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
>
>
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 17:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:56:48PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> > sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
> >
> > http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:56:48PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
> sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
>
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
>
Just a comment. Why don't you put these up on the DRI pa
Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
Unfortunately, as you can notice the packages are huge. Attached is a
file list of the i810 driver. libGLcore, e.g., is 18 MB..!
35 matches
Mail list logo
