On 01/04/17 23:15, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
> Actually I have some patches somewhere for a few tweaks I made as well.
> Let me see if I can find them, and I'll trade you my patches.
Ken,
Sorry, I got buried with work and this slipped through the cracks.
I am unable to find my patches to the web
On 01/04/17 17:29, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 05:18:39PM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 01/04/17 14:01, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>>> Hi DSPAM users,
>>>
>>> We have finished our DSPAM upgrade to 3.10.2. I noticed that the DSPAM
>>> UI for the Quarantine has a 'Select 200'
Actually I have some patches somewhere for a few tweaks I made as well.
Let me see if I can find them, and I'll trade you my patches.
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerllewys.net
p...@co.ordinate.org
Landline: 603.293.8485
---
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 05:18:39PM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 01/04/17 14:01, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> > Hi DSPAM users,
> >
> > We have finished our DSPAM upgrade to 3.10.2. I noticed that the DSPAM
> > UI for the Quarantine has a 'Select 200' button but it is not very
> > useful because
On 01/04/17 14:01, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> Hi DSPAM users,
>
> We have finished our DSPAM upgrade to 3.10.2. I noticed that the DSPAM
> UI for the Quarantine has a 'Select 200' button but it is not very
> useful because the available sort orders for the quarantine a by
> rating - leastlike to mo
Hi DSPAM users,
We have finished our DSPAM upgrade to 3.10.2. I noticed that the DSPAM
UI for the Quarantine has a 'Select 200' button but it is not very
useful because the available sort orders for the quarantine a by
rating - leastlike to mostlike SPAM, date - newest to to oldest, and
then from
Yes, off course ☺
It was a permission problem.
When you explained that you moved from user root to a non-privileged user and
showed the dspam behaviour it was easy for me to correlate.
Try this;
ls -lad /tmp
ls -la /tmp/dspam.sock
You see those special permissions? I leave the exercise to l
It worked! Thank you sir! I also remembered to update the line in
postfix/master.cf :)
Any idea what the problem with the default socket path might have been?
Just curious.
C.
On 2016-11-07 07:19, L. Jankok [via dspam users] wrote:
> You may try this;
>
> ServerDomainSocketPath "/tmp/dspam.
You may try this;
ServerDomainSocketPath "/tmp/dspam.sock"
On 06/11/2016, 22:07, "Colin Brace" wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
I detected one problem: I had changed the ownership of /var/db/dspam/ to
dspam, I neglected to change the ownership of the directory itself
added to the
>> discussion below:
>> http://dspam-users.2290790.n4.nabble.com/dspam-daemon-mode-destination-user-error-tp4642071p4642073.html
>> To unsubscribe from dspam daemon mode "destination user" error, click
>> here.
>> NAML
>
>
>
>
>
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
I detected one problem: I had changed the ownership of /var/db/dspam/ to
dspam, I neglected to change the ownership of the directory itself:
/var/db/dspam
That was still root, so I fixed that.
Now v3.10.2_3 starts without the destination user error, but it still
fai
Oh btw. in theory it could be a packaging issue ;)
I am using the following port
dspam-3.10.2_3
On 06/11/2016, 11:01, "L. Jankok" wrote:
It is not a packaging issue because otherwise I should have it too.
I am also on FreeBSD and I am also using the port.
After installing the
It is not a packaging issue because otherwise I should have it too.
I am also on FreeBSD and I am also using the port.
After installing the port I used the startup script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ to
start dspam.
Dspam is started like this: /usr/local/bin/dspam –daemon
Who is the owner of
/var/r
Hi all,
I am encountering what appears to be a packaging issue specific to the
FreeBSD port, but I'm not entirely sure.
Previously, dspam on FreeBSD ran as root. This changed with release
v3.10.2_2 dspam which was released in May. From files/UPDATING:
# dspam-3.10.2_2
#
Port Changes:
- Runs as
Hi,
I have dspam 3.10 compiled up - this was done with '--enable-debug' and
'--enable-verbose-debug'.
It's run in Daemon mode with just '--daemon' - i.e. no '--debug'
I get a lot of:
"query error: VERBOSE DEBUG (INFO ONLY - NOT AN ERROR): see sql.errors for
more details"
syslog'd - and the
On 2016-09-20 09:19, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> It's available at https://github.com/whyscream/dspam-milter.
i will create a gentoo ebuild for this to test it
will be in fidonet gentoo overlay if any is intrested to help me
On 20-09-16 03:45, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> i like to try it :=)
>
Hi,
It's available at https://github.com/whyscream/dspam-milter.
Regards,
Tom
--
___
Dspam-user mai
I used it for ages with great results.
Now I like j-chkmail :) DSPAM is still in the loop, but it doesn't have a lot
to do...
Regards,
D.
>i like to try it :=)
>
--
___
Dsp
i like to try it :=)
--
___
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
Ken,
I erased the DSPAM database, reconfigured it to toe/osb, and retrained. Now
it's working much better. Spam hit rate is >90%.
Thanks!
>
--
___
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspa
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:40:15AM -0700, Jerry Gardner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, just delete them. You can look at /etc/dspam.conf to see where they
> > are stored.
> >
>
> Okay, thanks. I've saved all spam and non-spam I've received since
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>
> Yes, just delete them. You can look at /etc/dspam.conf to see where they
> are stored.
>
Okay, thanks. I've saved all spam and non-spam I've received since I set
this server up. Should I use it to train DSPAM before I change teft to to
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:06:11AM -0700, Jerry Gardner wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>
> > Hi Jerry,
> >
> > First, I see that you have teft set as the training mode. Change that
> > to toe, instead. Otherwise your accuracy can degrade over time. Second,
> > yo
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> First, I see that you have teft set as the training mode. Change that
> to toe, instead. Otherwise your accuracy can degrade over time. Second,
> you are using the hash driver and the chain tokenizer, even though the
> commen
Did you feed it the initial corpus to train it with both ham and spam?
>
>
> --
> ___
> Dspam-user mailing list
> Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https:/
in client/server mode, uncomment and
> # set these variables. A ClientHost beginning with a / will be treated as
> # a domain socket.
> #
> #ClientHost /var/run/dspam/dspam.sock
> #ClientIdent"secret@Relay1"
> #
> #ClientHost 127.0.0.1
>
On 9/2/16 3:44 PM, Jerry Gardner wrote:
> What can I do to help DSPAM learn faster so I can cut down all of the
> spam I have to manually deal with each day?
Did you feed it the initial corpus to train it with both ham and spam?
I set up a new mail server about four months ago with DSPAM as the spam
filter. While it is filtering out some spam, it completely misses most of
it. I trained it for the first 2500 emails, but it doesn't seem to be
getting any better at filtering after that. I regularly retrain any false
negatives
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:19:37AM +0100, RW wrote:
>
> I've noticed that DSPAM can slightly modify the mime layout when mail
> is piped through it with --stdout. It's a problem if the output is
> piped through another filter, such as SpamAssassin, because it
> changes the DKIM body hash.
>
> In
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 01:19:37 +0100
RW wrote:
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary=001a113eb6969361b20530203ac7
That should, of course, have been one line.
--
Find and fix application performance issues fa
I've noticed that DSPAM can slightly modify the mime layout when mail
is piped through it with --stdout. It's a problem if the output is
piped through another filter, such as SpamAssassin, because it
changes the DKIM body hash.
In the example below two extra blank lines are inserted, one after e
I was having this same problem. I've verified that my configuration has
Preference "spamAction=tag"
Preference "spamSubject=***SPAM***"
I've verified that the user (me!) does not have any personal dspam
preference file, so nothing to override these Preferences.
Innocent messages are
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:34:25AM -0500, Al Zick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone help me please?
>
> Dspam will run for a long time now. However, it fills the /var
> directory and I end up do a new corpus training. Also, I can not
> retrain dspam. When I run dspamc to retrain it gives me an e
Hi,
Could someone help me please?
Dspam will run for a long time now. However, it fills the /var
directory and I end up do a new corpus training. Also, I can not
retrain dspam. When I run dspamc to retrain it gives me an error
'misconfigured'.
Kind Regards,
Al
--
On Oct 28, 2015, at 10:24 AM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 07:30:48AM -0400, Al Zick wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't know if anyone can help. It seems spam is unstoppable and
>> keeps getting worst.
>>
>> At this point, I would just like to remove dspam from my config, but
>> there
Hi,
I don't know if anyone can help. It seems spam is unstoppable and
keeps getting worst.
At this point, I would just like to remove dspam from my config, but
there is a large number of emails in my postfix cache that are
waiting to be sent to dspam. Some of which I need. The issue is that
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 07:30:48AM -0400, Al Zick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if anyone can help. It seems spam is unstoppable and
> keeps getting worst.
>
> At this point, I would just like to remove dspam from my config, but
> there is a large number of emails in my postfix cache that are
Hello,
I would like to ask a little help about storage profiles.
I would like to use Dspam Storage Profiles, but I can't understand how
to pass the profile from Postfix to Dspam.
I have the following setup. A Postfix MX server receive mails for many
domains. Because I have thousands of acco
I forgot to mention that I'm using 3.10.1:
# dspam --version
DSPAM Anti-Spam Suite 3.10.1 (agent/library)
Copyright (C) 2002-2011 DSPAM Project
http://dspam.sourceforge.net.
DSPAM may be copied only under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public
License, a copy of which can be found with the
Hi all,
I'm getting a strange situation regarding to DSPAM + Dovecot antispam
plugin.
I've check everywhere to see a similar situation but I didn't find it. I
found other related issue to the same error.
My DPSAM setup:
#Home /var/spool/dspam
StorageDriver /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dspam/li
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:36:49PM -0400, Al Zick wrote:
>
> >Hi Al,
> >
> >It does not look like your training is working. If you retrained 100's
> >of messages, you should have appropriate counts in the FP/FN fields.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Ken
> >
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> What do I need to do to fix this?
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:17:18AM -0700, waterdog wrote:
> Okay, I apologize for all the following questions but, the more I
> troubleshoot dspam without progress, the more questions I have.
>
> Are there recommendations/documentation on how to properly train? It seems
> that some users do corpu
On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:53 AM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:17:14AM -0400, Al Zick wrote:
Hi,
Here are my stats after retraining 100's of messages. Both spam
and ham:
{227} dspam_stats -H
antispam:
TP True Positives: 4818
;
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://dspam-users.2290790.n4.nabble.com/dspam-not-training-tp4641961p4641980.html
> Sent from the dspam users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ------
> ___
> Dspam-user mailing list
> Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.ne
Okay, I apologize for all the following questions but, the more I
troubleshoot dspam without progress, the more questions I have.
Are there recommendations/documentation on how to properly train? It seems
that some users do corpus training and other users just train based on
actual messages.
Wha
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:17:14AM -0400, Al Zick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are my stats after retraining 100's of messages. Both spam and ham:
>
> {227} dspam_stats -H
> antispam:
> TP True Positives: 4818
> TN True Negatives: 22115
list back in the day explaining that they
> were
> better defaults.
>
>
>
> ------
>
> ___
> Dspam-user mailing list
> Dspam-user@lists.sourcefo
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 17:48 -0700, waterdog wrote:
> The dspam_stats for this user don't look too good even after multiple
> training attempts:
>
> TP True Positives: 0
> TN True Negatives:4
> FP False Positiv
ers.2290790.n4.nabble.com/dspam-not-training-tp4641961p4641971.html
> Sent from the dspam users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> _______
> Dspam-user maili
BTW, even though I think I have dspam configured to log debug messages, I
haven't seen any new dspam log entries to /var/log/dspam/dspam.debug in
several days.
/etc/default/dspam options:
START=yes
USER=dspam
OPTIONS="--debug"
MAINTENANCE_OPTIONS="--with-sql-autoupdate --with-sql-optimization"
RU
Okay, I've transitioned to mysql and made several other changes to my
postfix/dspam/dovecot configs but dspam is still not filtering SPAM. At
least now, postfix is calling dspam to filter incoming email but SPAM
continues to get delivered even after multiple training attempts using my
Junk folder.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:53:02AM +, John Kenyon wrote:
> Hi Dspam Admins,
>
> Has anyone experienced issues with the DSPAM signature
> (signatureLocation=message) breaking attachments?
>
> On occasion we receive messages that contain attachments only, the headers
> will specify "Content-
: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Dspam-user] dspam signature in message messing up attachments
>
> Hi Dspam Admins,
>
> Has anyone experienced issues with the DSPAM signature
> (signatureLocation=message) breaking attachments?
>
> On occasion we receive message
Hi Dspam Admins,
Has anyone experienced issues with the DSPAM signature
(signatureLocation=message) breaking attachments?
On occasion we receive messages that contain attachments only, the headers will
specify "Content-Type: application/pdf" and will not be multipart... when
DSPAM adds the si
Sorry, not Postfix, but PostgreSQL.
On 7/15/2015 1:42 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
> First, I would move to a MySQL (or Postfix) backend. I use MySQL because
> I'm familiar with it. This would resolve any need to clean your hash
> database.
> I think misclassification of email is (at least in my case) a
First, I would move to a MySQL (or Postfix) backend. I use MySQL because
I'm familiar with it. This would resolve any need to clean your hash
database.
I think misclassification of email is (at least in my case) a
problematic database and reason to clear it. I had a similar issue in
the past on whi
Eric,
This doesn't seem to be working right. Here is an example of running dspam
on a known clean email in my inbox:
1) Initially, dspam incorrectly classifies the message as Spam even though
it delivered the email properly.
dspam --user --classify <
1436977475.M667188P27913.www,S=22671,W=2309
I train only spam, never corpus. I only train when spam email was
classified as innocent by DSPAM and ends up in the inbox.
Using IMAP I have users move spam (marked as innocent by DSPAM) from
their inbox to their spam folder and loop through every email (server
side) and learn with the following c
I'm running postfix, dspam version 3.10.2, and dovecot with the dspam plugin
but it doesn't seem to be classifying email or training properly. I've
configured everything according to the documentation and have been pulling
my hair out for the past two days trying to figure out why it's not working
Maybe,
IN the meantime I have found where the problem is.
The server parameters tell which mails should be delivered and which
should not, so in my case I had to alter that line to look like this:
ServerParameters"--deliver=innocent -d %u"
Cheers,
P.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, at 04:46 PM,
On 06/18/2015 09:30 PM, Peter wrote:
Just got the DSPAM 3.9.1 RC1 installed and forwarded a couple of spam
messages through it. Then, in the web GUI I marked them as SPAM and sent
them through again to see whether or not they really are recognised as
spam. All is good, however, despite of the fa
Hi there,
Just got the DSPAM 3.9.1 RC1 installed and forwarded a couple of spam
messages through it. Then, in the web GUI I marked them as SPAM and sent
them through again to see whether or not they really are recognised as
spam. All is good, however, despite of the fact I have got:
Filter sensi
Hi,
I hope that someone can help me.
It really doesn't look like my retraining is working. My guess is
that I have something wrong in a config somewhere. However, I have
been working on this for months and still have not been able to solve
the problem.
agnus: {420} grep -v ^# /usr/local/et
In fact, I used your advice: instead of using perdition or something
else as an IMAP proxy for DSPAM, I used Postfix as an IMAP proxy for
DSPAM. Now the scheme is like this:
letter ==> Postfix VM1 or Postfix VM2 ==> (DSPAM VM with Local Postfix)
==> IMAP VM1 or IMAP VM2 ==> directory.
And it w
On 3/30/2015 11:39 PM, Орхан Касумов wrote:
> what's the point of reinjecting back to an SMTP server? Even though
> configuration files of Postfix allow to specify further recipient as
> an FQDN record
Because it's normal. That's what SMTP servers are made for.
The ultimate goal is to achieve full redundancy and avoid a single point of
failure. For that purpose I use 2 separate VMs for 2 MX servers,
2 separate VMs for 2 IMAP servers, and currently 1 VM for 1 DSPAM server (but 2
planned). In addition, DNS servers has a record that resolves to
IPs of bot
Why can't you reinject into an smtp server?
On 3/30/2015 12:08 PM, Orkhan Gasimov wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick answer! I've never used such a setup, but if it's
> the only way, then I'll surely try. Do you know a verified link
> describing something like that?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Отправл
Am 2015-03-30 15:18, schrieb k...@rice.edu:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:08:56PM +0300, Орхан Касумов wrote:
>
> In my setup, DSPAM server receives mails from several MX servers and
> relays them to a single IMAP server.
> The IMAP server's:
> - IP address is the "DeliveryHost"
> - and its DNS na
Thanks for the quick answer! I've never used such a setup, but if it's the only
way, then I'll surely try. Do you know a verified link describing something
like that?
Thanks in advance!
Отправлено от Type Mail
На 18:22, 30.03.2015, в 18:22, "k...@rice.edu" написал:п>On
Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:08:56PM +0300, Орхан Касумов wrote:
>
> In my setup, DSPAM server receives mails from several MX servers and relays
> them to a single IMAP server.
> The IMAP server's:
> - IP address is the "DeliveryHost"
> - and its DNS name is the "DeliveryIdent"
> in DSPAM's configu
In my setup, DSPAM server receives mails from several MX servers and relays
them to a single IMAP server.
The IMAP server's:
- IP address is the "DeliveryHost"
- and its DNS name is the "DeliveryIdent"
in DSPAM's configuration file.
The question is: is it possible to use several IMAP servers in t
On 03/25/2015 08:04 AM, dspam-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using DSPAM in a 100.000 users e-email structure. I run 6 mail
> server with dspam with the hash driver. The database is kept in a NFS
> share and it seems to work fine.
>
> I'm using TOE training mode, since
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership
> blogs to
> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join
> the
> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> __
On 03/11/15 04:10, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> If you were using TEFT, that is almost certainly the cause of your reduced
>> accuracy.
>
> It is working again! Thanks for your advice. Some emails have been
> mis-identified as spam since yesterday, but I guess that these errors will
> be
Hello,
> If you were using TEFT, that is almost certainly the cause of your reduced
> accuracy.
It is working again! Thanks for your advice. Some emails have been
mis-identified as spam since yesterday, but I guess that these errors will
become fewer after some time of training.
Regards
Christ
On 03/10/15 17:47, Remo Mattei wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Not sure if anyone has any suggestions on how to have postfix dspam
> integration and also if anyone has implemented this on centos 7. I
> was looking at postfix admin as well any other suggestions will be
> great. I am running some older vers
Hello all
Not sure if anyone has any suggestions on how to have postfix dspam integration
and also if anyone has implemented this on centos 7. I was looking at postfix
admin as well any other suggestions will be great. I am running some older
version of Linux with qmail.
Thanks.
Remo
-
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:11:43PM -0600, Eric Broch wrote:
> On 3/10/2015 10:25 AM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:17:36PM +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>> Do DSPAM headers get added to your messages?
> >> Yes, they are.
> >>
> >>> We see poor tagging most
On 3/10/2015 10:25 AM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:17:36PM +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>> Do DSPAM headers get added to your messages?
>> Yes, they are.
>>
>>> We see poor tagging most often as a result of
>>> using
>>> the TEFT (train on everything) setting.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:17:36PM +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Do DSPAM headers get added to your messages?
>
> Yes, they are.
>
> > We see poor tagging most often as a result of
> > using
> > the TEFT (train on everything) setting. That is good for initial learning
> > but
> >
Hello,
> Do DSPAM headers get added to your messages?
Yes, they are.
> We see poor tagging most often as a result of
> using
> the TEFT (train on everything) setting. That is good for initial learning
> but
> over time the sensitivity continues to decrease based on your ratio of
> good to
> bad
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:02:50PM +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems that my dspam does not work like expected any more. It did once, but
>
> now, for a long time nothing has been automatically marked as spam, even if
> the spam emails are very similar to what I have defined
Hello,
it seems that my dspam does not work like expected any more. It did once, but
now, for a long time nothing has been automatically marked as spam, even if
the spam emails are very similar to what I have defined as spam by moving
emails to my Spam folder.
About my configuration: I use do
Hi Tom,
We use Dovecot, but its not Dovecot changing the message header its MS
Outlook 2013. It's not just a local copy (pst file) that's being
changed; the server copy is being changed by Outlook as well. We ran
into this when trying to train DSPAM on messages moved from the inbox to
a spam folde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Eric,
Does the change also happen on the IMAP server, or only in the
client's local cache? Which IMAP server is that?
I'm no expert, but AFAIK the client tells the server to move the
message around. There is no way for the client to tell the ser
Hi Tom,
I have a client who uses MS Outlook 2013. It strips some of the header
when moving email between IMAP folders. Have you heard of this? Leave it
to Microsoft to break RFC protocol.
Eric Broch
On 2/26/2015 3:06 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 26-02-15 22:23, David Mehler wrote:
> > Hello,
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26-02-15 22:23, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having an issue where spam messages are delivered to a Spam
> mailbox via sieve, but to retrain I have to move them to the inbox
> or another folder. Well, the subject ***spam*** header is st
ase studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join
> the
> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> ___
> Dspam-user mailing list
> Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
>
> !DSPAM:41,5
Hello,
I'm having an issue where spam messages are delivered to a Spam
mailbox via sieve, but to retrain I have to move them to the inbox or
another folder. Well, the subject ***spam*** header is still there and
the message headers are still showing a status of spam and in the
message the text id
Hello List
We had a stable postfix+dspam+virtual mailbox setup running since over a year
and one day it decided to start dropping all the incoming emails with:
ii dspam 3.10.2+dfsg-8 amd64
Scalable, fast and statistical anti-spam filter
ii p
Hello all,
I've been wrestling with postfix/dspam/clamav and I have postfix running
inbound email through dspam and dspam seems to be doing it's magic and
marking up the headers, but when I sent the EICAR test virus to myself, it
doesn't seem to be running the emails though ClamAV.
I would also l
We don't use email addresses like j...@domain.com to log into the DPAM WebUI.
We use something like "username.domain".
Example: jim.company
Adding a "*" wildcard to the subadmins file to cover all users under one domain
name doesn't work:
Example: jim.company: *.company
Only add
ktm rice.edu wrote:
> We currently use a SQL purge that is adjusted to only process a subset of the
> users per query. We use the first letter of the user name, but anything that
> partitions the query into smaller pieces will work. The actual DB
> partitioning
> allows maintenance to work on sm
On 07/03/2014 08:22 PM, Marco wrote:
> I'm also wondering if it could be a good choice to switch to TOE mode.
I am using TOE for about a year now. It is great.
P.V.Anthony
--
Open source business process management sui
On 07/03/2014 09:01 PM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> First, you really, really, REALLY need to only use TOE. The biggest cause
> of poor performance for our users is the result of using any other training
> method. You need to disallow changing it from TOE and default to it.
+1
P.V.Anthony
--
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 02:22:36PM +0200, Marco wrote:
>
> > Your best bet is to increase the granularity of the SQL statements that
> > you are running to make the time taken per piece short enough to prevent
> > scanning problems. We currently process by first letter of the account
> > to break
> Your best bet is to increase the granularity of the SQL statements that
> you are running to make the time taken per piece short enough to prevent
> scanning problems. We currently process by first letter of the account
> to break it into 26 smaller pieces. This is with DSPAM 3.6.8 w/ MySQL and
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:00:52AM +0200, Marco wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a slow performance on my dspam-mysql conf. The purge nightly
> script take 7-12 hours to complete. During this time I see a lot of
> locks
>
> [07/02/2014 09:28:35] 32082: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try
> restarting
> First and most obvious question: Are your tables InnoDB or MyISAM?
> MyISAM should not be used in any production DB unless you absolutely
> require MyISAM features not supported by InnoDB.
Ops, yes: all tables are InnoDB.
Thanks
Marco
---
On 07/02/14 04:00, Marco wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a slow performance on my dspam-mysql conf. The purge nightly
> script take 7-12 hours to complete. During this time I see a lot of
> locks
First and most obvious question: Are your tables InnoDB or MyISAM?
MyISAM should not be used in any pr
1 - 100 of 1065 matches
Mail list logo
