[easybuild] Fwd: [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v2.0.2 released

HI Kenneth et al. Can’t make if for todays telcon, but got the below this morning. You might want to considerer for foss/2017a, which is on the agenda. We’ll live with foss/2017a until August or so. Joachim Begin forwarded message: From: "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)"

Re: [easybuild] [ANN] EasyBuild v3.1.0

Hi Kenneth, Cool, congratulations on getting this out. From the discussions on this list (and the meeting minutes) I figured that the Intel 16 RHEL 7.3 issues is (about to be) resolved. I was expecting a mention here in the “EB 3.1 release email”. Can you elaborate? Do I just rebuild my

Re: [easybuild] foss + CUDA toolchain

On 25 Jan 2017, at 07:41, Kenneth Hoste > wrote: On 24/01/2017 16:56, Benjamin Evans wrote: ​Davide, Seems like a good idea to me. Would it make sense to build it on top of the gcccuda​ toolchain? Maybe call it fosscuda to fit with

[easybuild] Is discussing build issues on this mailing list ok?

Hi, I am new here and facing build issues of the basic easybuild on our soon to be in production cluster. The basic install of easybuild 2.4.0 fails :( Is it ok to discuss those here or should I move that elsewhere? If it is ok, here it goes: The cluster uses centos 7, the kernel is

Re: [easybuild] Is discussing build issues on this mailing list ok?

trap script in? It shouldn't matter anyway, since the bootstrap script redefines $PYTHONPATH to '' (empty string), I'm not sure what's going on... regards, Kenneth On 16/11/15 16:46, Kenneth Hoste wrote: Hi Joachim, On 16/11/15 16:15, Joachim Hein wrote: Hi, I am new here and facing build issues

[easybuild] Upgrading easybuild from 2.3 to 2.4

Hi, After all the recent discussions on building EasyBuild sandboxes on a machine with an EasyBuild installation (e.g. conflicts due to config files) I am now wondering what is the recommended procedure to upgrade an EasyBuild installation from 2.3 to 2.4. I assumed I would just build that

[easybuild] foss module not cleaning up

Hi, I am having a play with the module foss/2015b. When I load this it pulls in a lot of stuff (compilers, libraries). When I unload foss it doesn’t clean up. I unloaded that foss module but all the compilers and libraries are still loaded. Not the way I was matters expecting to behave. I

Re: [easybuild] [ANN] EasyBuild v2.5.0

Hi, I am seeing the same, see https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-framework/issues/1524 for a full report. Best wishes Joachim On 18 Dec 2015, at 15:43, Pieter Neerincx > wrote: Hi Kenneth, Thanks for the greatest! I'm running

[easybuild] pmi support in openmpi

Hi, To build openmpi for a slurm cluster, it seems that building pmi support into OpenMPI is “preferred”. See http://slurm.schedmd.com/mpi_guide.html#open_mpi. When building openmpi 1.8.8 with easybuild, that seems not specified on the configure. Looking into the output from the build, it

Re: [easybuild] pmi support in openmpi

.ho...@ugent.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Hi Joachim, On 14/01/16 18:44, Joachim Hein wrote: Hi, To build openmpi for a slurm cluster, it seems that building pmi support into OpenMPI is “preferred”. See <http://slurm.schedmd.com/mpi_guide.html#open_mpi> http:/

Re: [easybuild] Hierarchical modules

Lmod<http://hpcugent.github.io/easybuild/files/hust14_paper.pdf> hpcugent.github.io<http://hpcugent.github.io/> Modern Scientific Software Management Using EasyBuild and Lmod Markus Geimer Julich Supercomputing Centre (JSC)¨ Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH¨ 52425 J¨ulich, Germany On

[easybuild] PGI compiler: PGI-15.10-GCC-4.9.3-2.25.eb

Hi, We just build a PGI compiler using PGI-15.10-GCC-4.9.3-2.25.eb and had some fun with the license handling. We use flexlm and set an env-variable (LM_LICENSE_FILE). The icc easyconfigs can handle this, the PGI config does not. In the end we created a dummy licences file (EasyBuild seems

[easybuild] How to promote a package to a toolchain?

Hi, I have build a PGI compiler (PGI/15.10-GCC-4.9.3-2.25) using EasyBuild and need to build more packages against it. I tried with toolchain = {'name': 'PGI', 'version': '15.10-GCC-4.9.3-2.25'} inside my easyconfig, but am getting Toolchain PGI not found, available toolchains: ... There

Re: [easybuild] How to promote a package to a toolchain?

hat? Damian From: easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be<mailto:easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be> [mailto:easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be] On Behalf Of Joachim Hein Sent: Thursday, 11. February 2016 15:51 To: easybuild@lists.ugent.be<mailto:easybuild@lists.ugent.be> Subject: [easybuild]

[easybuild] Intel fortran runtime and Python modules

Hi, We use easybuild with an hierarchical naming scheme. I have build scipy-0.16.1-intel-2015b-Python-2.7.10.eb (EB 2.6) and when doing a module spider I get -bash-4.2$ module spider scipy/0.16.1-Python-2.7.10

Re: [easybuild] Intel fortran runtime and Python modules

when building software. This will hide icc/ifort by default and they won't show up in your spider output...but doing this means you need to rebuild your module tree (you only need new modules, --module-only, the software installations themselves are fine) Alan On 18 February 2016 at 16:05, Jo

Re: [easybuild] Molden-5.0 error

I build this earlier this week with --try-toolchain=intel,2015b also adding --try-software-version=5.4 worked. So if you have intel/2015b I would not recommend building that old toolchain. Another version of the intel toolchain might also work. Best wishes Joachim Sent from my nanoPad

Re: [easybuild] next EasyBuild conf call: Wed March 2nd, 5pm CET

I'd like to add vtune. The version currently in is quite old - though I need to check whether one can use this eb-file to build a newer version. Joachim Sent from my nanoPad > On 01 Mar 2016, at 20:20, Fotis Georgatos wrote: > > > Hi Kenneth, > > OK, I was

[easybuild] Double precision gromacs

Hi everyone, I have a user request for Gromacs in double precision. The “vanilla” gromacs configs do not build this, so I have to do some massaging and would need help with the easy block. Based on the Gromacs documentation:

Re: [easybuild] Double precision gromacs

However, you should be able to do this straight from the easyconfig, without any required modifications to the easyblock for GROMACS: configopts = "-DGMX_DOUBLE=ON" Be careful you don't hard overwrite possible other 'configopts' specifications that may be already there… Hi Feedback on

Re: [easybuild] Double precision gromacs

n, and specifying actual paths that should be there after the installation may save you quite a bit of time in the end... regards, Kenneth Kind regards, Pieter de Rijk, HPCS R Engineer From: easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be<mailto:easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be> [mailto:easybuild-req

[easybuild] vtune

Hi, I am trying to build vtune 2016 update 3 using the easyconfig 2013 update 10. There is this complication that there is now an additional intermediate layer in the installation. For example using a simple tweak of the 2013_update_10 config, binaries are expected in (full path of our

Re: [easybuild] vtune

On 08 Jun 2016, at 10:57, Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.ho...@ugent.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Hi Joachim, On 08/06/16 10:44, Joachim Hein wrote: Hi Kenneth, A bit more feedback - I am not sure action is actually needed. After upgrading to easybuild 2.8.1 I needed to r

Re: [easybuild] vtune

caching effect... Are you installing things to an NFS mount? regards, Kenneth On 08/06/16 11:12, Joachim Hein wrote: On 08 Jun 2016, at 10:57, Kenneth Hoste <<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>kenneth.ho...@ugent.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Hi Joachim, On 08/

Re: [easybuild] vtune

f you prefer)? regards, Kenneth On 08/06/16 11:47, Joachim Hein wrote: Hi Kenneth, Didn’t expect much out of this. So below is a cutting from the log: == 2016-06-08 11:40:31,546 templates.py:173 DEBUG version found in easyconfig is 2016_update3 == 2016-06-08 11:40:31,546 templates.py:173 DEBUG v

[easybuild] NAMD support?

HI, I have user requests for NAMD. The config for NAMD stop at beta 1 for 2.10 (2.11 is the current) and using an, what I understand outdated ictce-5.5.0 toolchain. I tried build 2.11 using intel/2016a but that fails: Failed to find easyconfig file 'zlib-1.2.7-intel-2016a.eb’ Could I get an

Re: [easybuild] NAMD support?

eth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Hi Joachim, On 09/06/16 13:11, Joachim Hein wrote: HI, I have user requests for NAMD. The config for NAMD stop at beta 1 for 2.10 (2.11 is the current) and using an, what I understand outdated ictce-5.5.0 toolchain. I tried build 2.11 using intel/2016a bu

[easybuild] Fwd: [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v2.0.0 released

Hi Got this yesterday. We should consider giving it some exposure in the EB community. Joachim Sent from my nanoPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" > List-Post: easybuild@lists.ugent.be Date: 13 July 2016 at 00:19:12

[easybuild] MKLMPI_Get_wrappers not found - VASP, intel toolchain

Hi, For a user I am trying to build VASP using a modified (version number of vasp, toolchain version) VASP-5.4.1-intel-2016.02-GCC-4.9.eb easy block. I am using the intel 2016b toolchain. The executable crashes with the error: Intel MKL FATAL ERROR: Cannot load symbol MKLMPI_Get_wrappers.

[easybuild] EB configuration file location on multimode cluster

Hi, The EasyBuild configuration file lives on a local disc of our frontend /etc/easybuild.d/config.cfg hence EB is broken on any other part of the cluster (e.g. building on a compute node). I am aware of http://easybuild.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Configuration.html#configuration-file-s and

Discontinuation of packages (Re: [easybuild] next EasyBuild conf call: *Thu* Sept 29th 2016, 5pm CET)

Hi Kenneth, I had a look into the notes and think some extra discussion is required on the “discontinuation business”. Not sure where to start this, so I am replying here. I occasionally get requests for “historic” and “fossile” versions of packages - not all of them totally unreasonable,

Re: Discontinuation of packages (Re: [easybuild] next EasyBuild conf call: *Thu* Sept 29th 2016, 5pm CET)

hat it's there. Many times even if the legacy easyconfig doesn't work it can be useful as a start point to write a new one so it's useful to find them easily. I know many of us are sysadmins and we like to reply RTFM but easybuild has many many different config flags and it's easy to skip this one

Re: Discontinuation of packages (Re: [easybuild] next EasyBuild conf call: *Thu* Sept 29th 2016, 5pm CET)

On 30 Sep 2016, at 13:23, Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.ho...@ugent.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Hi Joachim, On 30/09/16 11:41, Joachim Hein wrote: Hi Kenneth, I had a look into the notes and think some extra discussion is required on the “discontinuation business”. No

Re: [easybuild] FFTW modules: avx2 vs sse2

/hprc.tamu.edu/> HPRC Helpdesk: h...@hprc.tamu.edu<mailto:h...@hprc.tamu.edu> On 10/04/2016 07:13 AM, Kenneth Hoste wrote: Hi Joachim, On 03/10/16 12:01, Joachim Hein wrote: Hi, I am trying to a version push on a package that needs FFTW. I noticed that FFTW 3.3.5 is out now and there are F

Re: [easybuild] FFTW modules: avx2 vs sse2

? Any one with an SSE2 system likes to try? Best wishes Joachim On 06 Oct 2016, at 15:56, Joachim Hein <joachim.h...@math.lu.se<mailto:joachim.h...@math.lu.se>> wrote: On 04 Oct 2016, at 16:11, Jack Perdue <j-per...@tamu.edu<mailto:j-per...@tamu.edu>> wrote:

Re: [easybuild] EB 2.9.0 can't download GCC 6.2.0

Hi Ole, The issue is fixed inside the git repository and will be rolled out with the next EB release https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-easyconfigs/issues/3605#issuecomment-249352334 I think the easiest is to manually download the source and place in the directory you EB installation

[easybuild] FFTW modules: avx2 vs sse2

Hi, I am trying to a version push on a package that needs FFTW. I noticed that FFTW 3.3.5 is out now and there are FFTW 3.3.5 packages in EB 2.9.0 (for e.g foss/2016.09). Looking into the release node for FFTW 3.3.5, avx2 seems a big addition. Looking into the EB 2.9.0 configurations, it

[easybuild] Separate config releases from developments in the EasyBuild frame work - volunteers needed

Hi everyone, Easybuild releases typically contain new software support (newer versions of previously supported software, newly supported software) and improvements to the frame work. I think separating those and having more frequent releases for supported software could be of large benefit to

Re: [easybuild] next EasyBuild conf call: Wed Nov 23rd 2016, 5pm CET

Is 3.0.1 the last scheduled for 2016? Sent from my nanoPad > On 23 Nov 2016, at 18:35, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > > Notes for today's conf call are available at > https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild/wiki/Conference-call-notes-20161123 > > Next conf call is planned for

[easybuild] no module for CUDA-7.5.18

Hi, We are still struggling to build a CUDA 7.5.18 with EB 2.9.0. It seems to be failing in the “sanity check”, though the actual nvidia installer doesn’t give an error and the bin directory looks reasonable to us. We get a “KeyError: ‘GCC’ Anyone could comment with regards to what went

[easybuild] BOOST_ROOT

Hi, I had a user complaining that the easybuild generated Boost modules do not set a BOOST_ROOT env variable. Having done a bit of research, it seems that this is quite common (standard?) thing to have and many set-ups expect this. They figured themselves by export BOOST_ROOT=$EBROOTBOOST

[easybuild] Tcl/Tk modules when building tkrplot in R 3.3.1

Hi We have issues with R builds failing. It fails in the tkrplot extension. This concerns multiple easyconfigs e.g.: * R-3.2.3-foss-2016a.eb * R-3.3.1-foss-2016b.eb * R-3.3.1-intel-2016b.eb Older configs not asking for tkrplot seem fine. Error message suggest an issue with tcl

Re: [easybuild] COMSOL, Feko, ..

Hi, EB 2.8.2 has Amber 14 support. Though I haven’t tried this, so far we build Amber outside EB. Best wishes Joachim > On 17 Aug 2016, at 16:47, nan...@luis.uni-hannover.de wrote: > > > Hi, > > I can not find easyconfig of the following packages: COMSOL, > Feko, Gaussian,

Re: [easybuild] numpy, scipy, mpi4py

On 22 Aug 2016, at 15:58, Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.ho...@ugent.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: On 22/08/16 15:53, Joachim Hein wrote: Hi Ward, Thanks for the swift reaction. So a scipy-0.17.1-intel-2016b-Python-2.7.12.eb should not be needed, since the Python module P

Re: [easybuild] Cmake

You got a PR for CMake 3.6.2 and 3.7.1 J. > On 7 Dec 2016, at 16:12, Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.ho...@ugent.be> wrote: > > Hi Joachim, > > On 07/12/16 16:09, Joachim Hein wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a user request for a newer cmake. I am wondering what the

Re: [easybuild] Scalasca update?

User Meeting. Attached is a set of easyconfigs that can be untarred and used as follows (with EB 3.x): eb --include-easyblocks=Scalasca/jhbuild.py --robot=./Scalasca -D Scalasca/Scalasca-2.3.1-* Kind regards, Alan On 19 December 2016 at 12:42, Joachim Hein <joachim.h...@math.lu.se<mailto:joach

Re: [easybuild] gimkl naming conventions?

which contains > GCC 6.2.0, ipmi and imkl 2017.1.132 > > So a gimkl based on foss/2017a + intel/2017a should probably be 2017a, > just as the iomkl-2017a, based on foss/2017a + intel/2017a > > On 03/20/2017 11:30 AM, Joachim Hein wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The current

[easybuild] EasyBuild in user mode

Hi, Sorry, if that is a silly question, but I couldn’t see this documented. I have a user who likes to use the system EasyBuild to build packages in their private space using the modules we provided. If in user mode, I load the EB module and initiate an install using the system eb config and

Re: [easybuild] [ANN] EasyBuild v3.1.1

, Joachim Hein <joachim.h...@math.lu.se<mailto:joachim.h...@math.lu.se>> wrote: On 8 Mar 2017, at 15:12, Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.ho...@ugent.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Hi Joachim, On 08/03/2017 14:24, Joachim Hein wrote: On 7 Mar 2017, at 17:41, Kenneth Hoste

Re: [easybuild] [ANN] EasyBuild v3.1.1

> On 7 Mar 2017, at 17:41, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > > Dear EasyBuilders, > > I'm happy to announce the release of EasyBuild version 3.1.1 [1]. > This is, you've guessed it, the best EasyBuild release so far... > > This is a minor bugfix/update release. Highlights

Re: [easybuild] [ANN] EasyBuild v3.1.1

On 8 Mar 2017, at 15:12, Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.ho...@ugent.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Hi Joachim, On 08/03/2017 14:24, Joachim Hein wrote: On 7 Mar 2017, at 17:41, Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.ho...@ugent.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Dear

[easybuild] IOMKL based on Intel 17.4 and OpenMPI 2.1.1.

Hi, I have a user request for an IOMKL toolchains based on the Intel compiler 17.4 and OpenMPI 2.1.1. I understand that Intel 17.4 is a strong candidate for intel/2017b. I an IOMKL for that also in the making? Can one get configs and stuff for that? If no IOMKL for that is in the works, I

Re: [easybuild] IOMKL based on Intel 17.4 and OpenMPI 2.1.1.

2017, at 11:46, Alan O'Cais <a.oc...@fz-juelich.de<mailto:a.oc...@fz-juelich.de>> wrote: These should contain what you are looking for: https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Apr%20is%3Aopen%202017b On 18 August 2017 at 11:29, Joachim Hein

[easybuild] Boost-1.64.0-intel-2017a.eb fails in eb 3.2.1

Hi, I have an issue in EB 3.2.1 when tyring to build Boost-1.64.0-intel-2017a.eb. The critical section of the log seems: In file included from ./boost/mpi/detail/mpi_datatype_oarchive.hpp(18), from ./boost/mpi/detail/mpi_datatype_cache.hpp(13), from

Re: [easybuild] Boost-1.64.0-intel-2017a.eb fails in eb 3.2.1

ost/ticket/12723 We installed Boost 1.60 as the default module to avoid any issue with this. On 18 May 2017 at 12:12, Joachim Hein <joachim.h...@math.lu.se<mailto:joachim.h...@math.lu.se>> wrote: Hi, I have an issue in EB 3.2.1 when tyring to build Boost-1.64.0-intel-2017a.eb.

[easybuild] R and Java - general Java handling in EB

Hi, I am wondering how EasyBuild handling of Java is intended to be used. I am trying to built R 3.3.3 and 3.4.0 in intel/2017a using the descriptions in EB 3.2.1. The build fails on Java 1.8.0_121. The tarball for this is not automatically downloaded and it seems not easily available any

[easybuild] Building Python 2.7.13 in foss 2017a breaks on one cluster

Hi, I am having a strange issue when trying to build Python 2.7.13 for foss 2017a (using the Python-2.7.13-foss-2017a.eb in EB 3.2.1). It works on one of our clusters but breaks on the other one. The clusters should be identically (apart from individual packages (e.g. prerequisite) that

[easybuild] EB 3.2, issues with bzip2 for GCCcore 6.3 - fine in EB 3.1.2

Hi, First a big thanks to everyone who contributed to EB 3.2. I have just upgraded and am trying to install some of the new packages. On our installation a simple build of bzip2 for GCCcore 6.3 fails quite late. I get -bash-4.2$ eb bzip2-1.0.6-GCCcore-6.3.0.eb == temporary log file in case

Re: [easybuild] Perl in GCCcore?

chim, >> >> On 08/09/2017 19:12, Joachim Hein wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> For building git, it seems I require Perl. I think git would sit nicely in >>> GCCcore (instead of foss/intel). Is there a reason why the new Perl 5.26.0 >>> sits in in

Re: [easybuild] Perl in GCCcore?

> On 19 Sep 2017, at 16:10, Joachim Hein <joachim.h...@math.lu.se> wrote: > > Dear Jack and Kenneth > > Just a quick thanks for your input on the issue, highly appreciated. This is > to say I noticed your input and I intend to get back to it soon, but I lost a >

[easybuild] Boost 1.64.0 and DBD-mysql

HI I am trying to build DBD-mysql-4.042-intel-2017a-Perl-5.24.1.eb which depends on Boost 1.64.0, which suffers from (part of) the get_data.hpp issue, which we discussed in May. Then we expected 1.64.0 to resolve the issue, but it isn’t. I checked that I can build

Re: [easybuild] MariaDB-10.1.13-intel-2016a.eb

On 20 Sep 2017, at 17:57, Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.ho...@ugent.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Hi Joachim, On 20/09/2017 17:52, Joachim Hein wrote: On 20 Sep 2017, at 17:45, Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.ho...@ugent.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Hi Joa

Re: [easybuild] Perl in GCCcore?

> On 19 Sep 2017, at 16:21, Jack Perdue <j-per...@tamu.edu> wrote: > > On 09/19/2017 09:15 AM, Joachim Hein wrote: >>> On 19 Sep 2017, at 16:10, Joachim Hein <joachim.h...@math.lu.se> wrote: >>> >>> Dear Jack and Kenneth >>> &g

Re: [easybuild] MariaDB-10.1.13-intel-2016a.eb

6 or more recent should suffice. regards, Kenneth On 20/09/2017 17:28, Joachim Hein wrote: Attached as requested. Thanks for looking into this. Best wishes Joachim On 20 Sep 2017, at 14:49, Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.ho...@ugent.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Dear

[easybuild] Perl in GCCcore?

Hi For building git, it seems I require Perl. I think git would sit nicely in GCCcore (instead of foss/intel). Is there a reason why the new Perl 5.26.0 sits in intel/2017b or foss/2017b instead of GCCcore 6.4.0? I assume if I build a Perl in GCCcore for git I get nice conflicts with

[easybuild] x11 xbd and qt5

Hi, We are trying to deploy qt5 in various foss toolchains and are experiencing issues with the xkb library. The users report errors like (X11 20160819 in foss 2016b): xkbcommon: ERROR: failed to add default include path

[easybuild] PyQt, PyQt5, Qt and Qt5

Hi, I have requests for qt, qt5 incl python wrappers. Looking into the current development branch, there are no recent configs (e.g. foss/2017…). Am I missing something and I should not pick these ones up in EasyBuild, do we have known issues why they won’t build or is that something I

Should we skip foss/2018a (Re: [easybuild] 2018a toolchains)

Hi, Reading through Kenneth’ reply, I am honestly wondering whether we should skip a foss/2018a. The below does not suggest any big upgrade. Considering the human cost of moving all "helper” packages (such as HDF5, netcdf, Python and Pythonwrapers, Boost) that our users require, I am close

Re: [easybuild] 2018a toolchains

> On 6 Dec 2017, at 15:16, Jure Pečar wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:27:53 +0100 > Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> I'm happy to hear some feedback on this, > > On topic of toolchains (just building 2017b stuff) ... > > Numactl must now be fetched

Re: [easybuild] Python on GCCcore

Hi Markus, First of all, a big thanks for looking into this. I have been banging at FZJs doors multiple times for you to support it in EB. I am not sure I fully get the issues. If I see it correctly, set-up-tools doesn’t require MPI4PY or a BLAS lib. So it could in principle be in a Python

[easybuild] easybuild @ SC17

Hi, Is there an overview on Easybuild related activities at SC17 in Denver? Thanks Joachim

Re: [easybuild] Installation issue with "Intel Parallel Studio 2018 Update 1 Cluster Edition"

Same here. Our old license server worked for 2017 update 4, but wouldn’t allow anything like 2017 update 5 or newer. For 2017 update 5 we got an error message that pointed to an outdated license server. 2018 update 1 , which we tried first, gave the same message as you got and didn’t give

[easybuild] Standard gcc-cuda-mpi toolchains?

Hi, I am trying to catch up with a couple of EasyBuild developments. Regarding a recommended toolchain for gcc, cuda and MPI use, do we now have a standard? We currently have fosscuda and goolfc both of which seem (at least superficially) to do the same (GCC, Cuda, Cuda-aware OpenMPI,

Re: [easybuild] Python 3 in 2018b toolchains

> On 15 Aug 2018, at 12:18, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > > Dear Joachim, > > On 15/08/2018 11:29, Joachim Hein wrote: >> Hi, >> I noticed https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/issues/6682 >> and https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyco

[easybuild] Python 3 in 2018b toolchains

Hi, I noticed https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/issues/6682 and https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/6703 I am presently working on moving python packages to foss and intel 2018b (h5py was merged, so did boost with python). Could there please be a

Re: [easybuild] Python 3 in 2018b toolchains

> On 16 Aug 2018, at 09:16, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > > Dear Joachim, > > On 15/08/2018 12:34, Joachim Hein wrote: >>> On 15 Aug 2018, at 12:18, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >>> >>> Dear Joachim, >>> >>> On 15/08/2018 11:29, Joachim

[easybuild] Name change of cuDNN tgz files

Hi, I am trying TensorFlow-1.5.0-goolfc-2017b-Python-3.6.3.eb . It is looking for a file cudnn-9.0-linux-x64-v7.0.5.15.tgz , however I am currently getting cudnn-9.0-linux-x64-v7.tgz from the Nvidea download site. The sha256 sum of the file I just downloaded agrees with the one in the

[easybuild] sourceforge URL for boost source changed

I am having grief building boost for intel 2018a (Boost-1.66.0-intel-2018a-Python-3.6.4.eb) it looks for the source at http://download.sourceforge.net/boost/boost_1_66_0.tar.gz, which doesn’t work any longer. A working URL is e.g.

Re: [easybuild] sourceforge URL for boost source changed

.be<mailto:kenneth.ho...@ugent.be>> wrote: Hi Joachim, On 06/03/2018 14:58, Joachim Hein wrote: I am having grief building boost for intel 2018a (Boost-1.66.0-intel-2018a-Python-3.6.4.eb) it looks for the source at http://download.sourceforge.net/boost/boost_1_66_0.tar.gz, which doesn’t work

[easybuild] Packages lacking intel fortran runtime

Hi, There is a longstanding issue on our site regarding the intel fortran runtime for some packages. I assume other sites have the same, but am not sure it was ever discussed here. We are using hierarchical modules in production. If a package is build with an intel toolchain, you can load

[easybuild] no checksums in the plumed 2.4.0 easyconfigs

Hi, I am having a play with Plumed and noticed there are no checksums in the plumed 2.4.0 easy configs. I thought the testing blocks such pull requests. Is there a reason for this? If not I can do the “upgrade” to Plumed 2.4.0 in the current develop and master branch (3 configs). I intend

[easybuild] Cuda supporting toolchains

Hi, I am currently installing tensorflow via easybuild (I assume many of us do these days) and am trying to understand EasyBuild’s ideas on toolchains supporting cuda. I looked at TensorFlow-1.5.0-goolfc-2017b-Python-3.6.3.eb, which builds ontop of a toolchain containing GCC, Cuda (installed

[easybuild] Paramiko extension in Python 2.7.14 of intel 2017b fails sanity checking

Hi, I am having issues build Python 2.7.14 for intel 2017b on two installations. It fails the sanity check of the paramiko extension.I have no issues building Python-2.7.14-intel-2018.01.eb, Python-2.7.13-intel-2017a.eb and Python-3.6.3-intel-2017b.eb Below is, what I believe is the

[easybuild] Java module - how to use?

Hi, I tried to search for documentation regarding the new Java handling. All I found is https://easybuild.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Wrapping_dependencies.html?highlight=java, which doesn’t quite tell me how I should do this. This is the first time I want to install software using the new Java

Re: [easybuild] OpenFOAM and SCOTCH in foss/2018b

I put an issue ticket: https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/issues/7093 as well. J. On 31 Oct 2018, at 11:17, Joachim Hein mailto:joachim.h...@math.lu.se>> wrote: Hi I installed OpenFOAM-v1806-foss-2018b.eb using SCOTCH-6.0.5-foss-2018b.eb. A user reported: I was t

[easybuild] OpenFOAM and SCOTCH in foss/2018b

Hi I installed OpenFOAM-v1806-foss-2018b.eb using SCOTCH-6.0.5-foss-2018b.eb. A user reported: I was testing the new OF1806 installation by running one of the tutorials. I found the following error message in the snappyHexMesh logfile: ERROR: SCOTCH_dgraphInit: Scotch compiled with

Re: [easybuild] Lmod clean up

io/en/latest/190_Integration_of_EasyBuild_and_Lmod.html?highlight=mode#example-use-own-eb-append On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 11:17, Åke Sandgren mailto:ake.sandg...@hpc2n.umu.se>> wrote: use if (mode() == "unload") ? On 2/27/19 11:09 AM, Joachim Hein wrote: > Hi, > > This is more an Lmod than an Easybuild questi

[easybuild] Lmod clean up

Hi, This is more an Lmod than an Easybuild question, I hope it still ok to ask here. We have a package that needs an executable to be run when the module is loaded, which we succeeded in. However when there is a clean-up executable that needs running when the module is unloaded or purged.

[easybuild] EasyBuild at ISC in Frankfurt?

Hi, Are there any EasyBuild related activities planed for ISC in Frankfurt? I searched this email list and the BoF program, but couldn’t get anything obvious. Best wishes Joachim

[easybuild] libsoup and libresolv

Hi, i got a libsoup easyconfig from a member of this group and when trying to build it, I hit: In file included from /sw/easybuild/software/Compiler/GCCcore/7.3.0/GLib/2.54.3/include/glib-2.0/gio/gnetworking.h:44:0, from ../libsoup-2.65.2/libsoup/soup-address.c:14:

Re: [easybuild] libsoup and libresolv

chainopts = {'cstd': 'gnu89'} > > which fixed this exact problem for me, see the discussion in > https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/8116#issuecomment-487868612 > > > regards, > > Kenneth > > On 04/06/2019 12:18, Joachim Hein wrote: >>