We started the net this week on 14.303 MHz, fitting in between nets at .300
and .306. Propagation was mixed with a lot of QSB. We had 27 participants
over the 21 minute net. The discussions were on cabling options for the
KPA500. See you next week.
Here is the list of participants.
Station Name
The new frequency (14.3035) was taken by an NEQP station in running mode. I
elected to start at 14.307 as the Ohana net finished about 1800Z. The
frequency was announced on the reflector and on 14.3035. Hopefully,
everybody found us. Conditions were so-so, but we had 25 participants over
a 20
We switched to a new frequency this week - 14.3035 MHz. It seemed to work
out, so we'll try it again next week at the same spot. The turn-out was
modest this week, 23 participants. The only discussions were audio checks
and a request for feedback on the KPA500 (nobody on frequency had one yet).
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Lyle Johnson k...@wavecable.com wrote:
...The frequency (14.316 MHz)
was plagued by some type of pulsed QRM - short pulses at about a 2 second
interval, about S6 here in Oregon with my antenna pointed east. I was able
to copy through it without too much
I had intentions of checking it Sunday and monitored the preceding
net, but was called to breakfast about 30-min before net time (10am
local). I got reading the newspaper and missed the net.
I had an interesting contact earlier on 20m with W6SMJ/mobile south
of Visalia, CA coming from the DX
Propagation was OK. Nothing too long however. The frequency (14.316 MHz)
was plagued by some type of pulsed QRM - short pulses at about a 2 second
interval, about S6 here in Oregon with my antenna pointed east. I was able
to copy through it without too much trouble. We had 25 participants over
...The frequency (14.316 MHz)
was plagued by some type of pulsed QRM - short pulses at about a 2 second
interval, about S6 here in Oregon with my antenna pointed east. I was able
to copy through it without too much trouble.
I noticed it too, and found that using AutoNotch reduced it enough
It was good to be back with the net this week. Thanks again to Ken, KO5Y,
for taking over the net in my absence. Propagation was OK to some areas,
but not as good to others. The new frequency (14.316) seems to be working
out. We had 32 participants over a 25 minute period. There is lots of
Phil came back to my K3/10 right away on 14.317. I did have a
persistent carrier on frequency which made copy a little difficult.
I run 16w to a TH3mk4 at 50-feet.
73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com
EME: 144-1.4kw,
I didn't see the email until after 1900. .314 was impossible between the
frequency
control lids and an EXTREMELY loud HA calling CQ DX just a tad below.
Oh well, maybe when the SteppIR is fixed
73, Mike NF4L
On 3/21/2011 7:57 AM, Edward R. Cole wrote:
Phil came back to my K3/10
Well, we started the net on 14.314 (our usual frequency). We quickly drew
heavy QRM, with harangues to get off of their frequency. I got about 8 of
our stronger stations checked in, but the situation was deteriorating
quickly. I looked up band, found quiet at 14.317 and took the net there.
Conditions weren't great, but they could have been worse. Many stations
were experiencing QRM from the contest. We had 19 participants over a 17
minute net, with no discussions. Thank you to all who hung in there. Here
is the list of participants.
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
*Nothing* heard in FL.
73, Mike NF4L
On 3/6/2011 3:50 PM, Phillip Shepard wrote:
Conditions weren't great, but they could have been worse. Many stations
were experiencing QRM from the contest. We had 19 participants over a 17
minute net, with no discussions. Thank you to all who hung in
He is licensed but obviously has been banished from QRZ.COM. Google his call
and you'll see why.
AB2TC - Knut
Phillip Shepard wrote:
Propagation was mixed - some stations were strong but many were weaker
than
they usually are. We did have two DX check-ins (EI6 and ZL1). We had 35
Propagation was mixed - some stations were strong but many were weaker than
they usually are. We did have two DX check-ins (EI6 and ZL1). We had 35
participants over a 37 minute period. The discussions were on the hardware
requirements for diversity receive in the shortwave broadcast bands.
The net got off to a slow start due to the terrible QRM from 14.313 and the
refuse taking over that frequency today. Rather than fight it, we moved to
14.316 MHz and were much better off. We'll see how the situation is next
week and see if we need to move again. Propagation was OK, and we had
We had a good net this morning with 36 participants over a 33 minute period.
QRM was not a problem, and most stations were strong in Oregon. We again
had five K2s this week, two of them QRP! We had a father and son, as well
as an OM and XYL checkin. Discussions were on filter selection for new
2/6/2001 I was on 14.314 but did not hear anyone on the freq. I
guess band conditions were not favoring the far north.
73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com
EME: 144-1.4kw*, 432-100w*, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter?
DUBUS
We had a good net this morning with 31 participants over a 24 minute period.
There was some splatter from 316 for the first half of the net, but we
managed OK. We had five K2s this week, two of them QRP! Here is the list
of participants.
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
WB6CLZ Mike
Propagation seemed poor in AZ. Usually Phil is 59 and I couldn't hear him
hardly at all. Relay stations and most others were not too strong either so
I didn't check in.
John N1JM K3 #2555
--
View this message in context:
We had a small net today, with only 19 of us over a 21 minute net.
Discussion was on the ALC function and an Icom solid state amp, and a query
for more news about the KPA-500. Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is
a list of the participants:
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
Hi,
Isn't it time to try to find a new frequency? I always have QRM from *both*
14313 and 14316. There are always politicos on 14313. In one of the earliest
nets, it was moved to 14310 which was very good here.
AB2TC - Knut
Phillip Shepard wrote:
We had a difficult net today. Propagation
We had a difficult net today. Propagation didn't seem that great, and we
were bothered quite a bit by QRM from 14.313 MHz. After a few minutes, we
QSYed to 14.315 MHz to get away from the QRM, but it was still a problem.
As it was, we had 15 participants over a 20 minute period. Thanks to
We had a nice net this morning with 24 participants over a 25 minute period.
Weather was again a primary discussion point. Gerry, K4GCJ, reported 7
inches of snow in Raleigh, NC! Thanks to everyone who checked in. It has
been a fun year getting to know all of the great Elecrafters who have
We had a good net this morning with 33 participants over a 30 minute period.
There were several new folks who are awaiting their K3s. Weather was the
primary discussion point. Thanks to everyone who checked in. I hope that
everyone has a great holiday filled with love, good cheer and new toys.
The Elecraft SSB net was held yesterday as scheduled. Ken, KO5Y, (with help
from Paul, AD5SX) was the net control. Others helped with relays, and a
good size group (32) of particpants joined in. Good job guys. The list
of participants will go out in a separate email.
73,
Phil, NS7P
Station NameQTH RIG Ser #
K6EQRoger CA K3 4629
WB6CLZ MikeCA K3 4522
AC7SB Peter WA K2 3016
K7PEH PhilWA K3 3799
K6CRC Randy CA K3
Propagation was fairly good this week. Most stations were S-9 or better here
in Oregon. We had 28 participants over a 25 minute net. The only discussions
were on the latest P3 firmware. Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is
the list of participants.
Station NameQTH Rig
Conditions seemed good again this week. We had 25 participants over a 25
minute net. Discussions were on what the blank spots on the back of the
P3 are for (upgrades/updates?). One station asked about moving the net to
1900Z during standard time. If you have an opinion about the net time,
email
Conditions seemed good this week. I could hear most everyone from here in
Oregon, including KL7UW and ZL1PWD, both well off of my quad's front lobe.
We had 34 participants over a 29 minute net. Discussions involved K8DD (SK),
TX equalization for a Heil mic and what the blank spots on the back of
Propagation seemed generally good this week. We had 20 participants over a
20 minute net. The discussions were on noise that one user is seeing with
his P3, as well as beta firmware versions. Thanks to everyone who checked
in. Here is the list of participants.
Station NameQTH Rig
Propagation seemed OK this week, but QRM from 14.316 was a problem. Marty
and the Icom group usually are respectful of our net start time; but they
went on long today, with S9+ QRM to me at times. We had 30 participants
over a 24 minute net, with no discussion following check-ins. Thanks to
Propagation seemed good this week, but QRM from 14.315 was a problem for
some. We had 27 participants over a 25 minute net, with no discussion
following check-ins. Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the list of
participants.
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
WB6CLZ Mike
Propagation within the US was spotty this week, though both EI6IZ and ZL1PWD
checked in off axis to my quad. Jim, W4RKS had a strong signal here in OR;
and he called for those I couldn't get, turning up another six stations.
Thanks, Jim. There were 20 of us over a 20 minute, with no discussions
Propagation seemed OK this week, though the number of stations checking in
was down due to QRM (CA QSO Party). There were 18 of us over a 20 minute
period. Both EI6IZ and ZL1PWD checked in with good signals off axis to my
quad. In fact, KG7UY in OR (the only other OR/WA station that was on the
Propagation seemed good this week, though the number of stations checking in
was down a bit. The discussions were on the availability of the KPA500
(thanks to Lyle for being a good sport about it) and the need for the K3
buffer mod if using the P3. Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the
Once again, I'm afraid I heard nothing. I started listening to 14.314
from 1745 and continued until 1815 and I heard nothing but atmospherics.
During that time I qsy'd up and down to be sure I wasn't missing
anything. My antenna is a vertical and there is a rise in the land to
the west of
Propagation seemed good this week. We did have to move down 2 kc to get
away from a special event station that moved up to 14.315 for us. Hope
everybody found us ok. To me, most siganls were good, but there was
splatter at times running on top of the weaker signals. We still have
trouble at
Propagation was uneven this week. The great plains and west were good here
in Oregon, but signals from the eastern third of the country were not very
strong. California was good at my QTH, but I needed relays for the
Washington stations. There was a quick discussion about the availability
date
Yeah, but you SOUNDED like you were in CA, Brendan!
Terry, W0FM
-Original Message-
From: Brendan Minish [mailto:ei6iz.bren...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 6:13 PM
To: Phil and Christina
Cc: Elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net results (8-22-10)
On Sun, 2010-08
I was too late for the net but found Roger, K7SJ on 14.314 Sunday
morning and had a nice chat. After that John, N6JW/6 and I had an
even longer QSO. I am running my K3/10 with 14w to a triband yagi at
50-feet. Near QRP did quite nicely. Eventually, we will have
250-300w using a CCI kit
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 16:19 -0700, Phil and Christina wrote:
EI6IZ Brenden CA K3 39
West coast of Ireland actually!
--
73
Brendan EI6IZ
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net]on Behalf Of Brendan Minish
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 4:13 PM
To: Phil and Christina
Cc: Elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net results (8-22-10)
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 16:19 -0700, Phil and Christina wrote:
EI6IZ
Propagation seemed good this week. The number of check-ins was the largest
in quite some time - there were 42 of us over 34 minutes! Early in the net,
the check-in requests sounded like a DX pileup. The main discussion this
week was about the DSP board upgrade and its advantages. Thanks to
Thanks to all who checked in today, quite a bit of QRN, QSB today, a special
thanks to the relays, much appreciated.
Still 88 degrees here at 7 pm in the evening, a warm one for western WA!!
Station,Name,QTH,Rig,S/N
VE3QF,Tony,ON,K3,137
W8FU,Bruce,OH,Other rig today!
WO1I,Dick,MA,K3,911
East coast stations were not very strong today, and we had no California
check-ins. Lyle using his prototype KPA500 was S9+10 into the side of my
quad - not bad for less than 300 miles! The net only ran 20 minutes with 26
participants. No discussion. Here is the list of the participants.
Station
Couldn't hear anything but S7 noise in eastern Mass.
Phil and Christina wrote:
East coast stations were not very strong today, and we had no California
check-ins. Lyle using his prototype KPA500 was S9+10 into the side of my
quad - not bad for less than 300 miles! The net only ran 20 minutes
Propagation seemed a little better this week. The only discussion this week
was about the shipment dates of P3s. There were 29 of us
over 30 minutes. Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the list of
participants.
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
N6JWJohn
Propagation was spotty this week, but the whole continent was present.
There were no discussions today beyond the check-ins. There were 27 of us
over 26 minutes. Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the list of
participants.
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
VE3QF Tony
I checked in late. Almost forgot about it. First time for me. I usually have
a church conflict. NCS was 5X9 here in Phoenix AZ.
73,
John N1JM
K3 #2555
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/SSB-Net-results-1-18-09-tp2178850p5283020.html
Sent from the Elecraft
Snip:
Ah, the vagaries of propagation! I tuned in to check into the net but I
could barely hear net control deep in the noise, and few of the responding
stations. I live 80 miles west of one of the California stations that
checked in and 80 miles north of he other, but I might as well have been
Propagation was much better this week. Signals were generally good in Oregon
from across the country. Paul, AD5SX, checked in on solar power. There were
no discussions today beyond the check-ins. There were 24 of us over 18
minutes. Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the list of
Ah, the vagaries of propagation! I tuned in to check into the net but I could
barely hear net control deep in the noise, and few of the responding stations.
I live 80 miles west of one of the California stations that checked in and 80
miles north of he other, but I might as well have been on
Propagation to the east from Oregon was nearly absent. Only four of the 21
participants were from east of the Rockie Mountains. West coast signals
were generally OK however. Lyle checked in using a prototype KPA500 that
sounded good. Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the list of
I had S3 noise with barely SSB signals underneath, and those that I
could barely make out were at 14.313. Even with NR, I couldn't resolve
any signals to the point of understanding.
Hope to try again next week.
Phil and Christina wrote:
Propagation to the east from Oregon was nearly
We had a good net yesterday, with much better propagation conditions than in
the last few weeks. We had 25 participants over the 21 minute net. A
question that came up without an answer was the ship date for the P3.
Another was looking for information on the WAS K3 award. No one had an
answer
Conditions on 20 meters at net time were terrible again this week. I could
only copy two stations east of the Mississippi River. No discussions took
place during the 18 minute net, but AE6IC said that he was running NR at
F8-1 and wondered if anyone else was similarly configured. No one answered
Conditions on 20 meters at net time were so bad that only ten stations
succeeded in checking in. Only a few stations at about 1000 miles from me
were strong. Most were a struggle to copy. No discussions took place
during the 12 minute net.
Here is the list of the group:
Station Name
The net was a bit challenging again today. Signals were just not very
strong, and QSB was deep at times. We had 29 participants over the 32 minute
net, however. We had both AK and HI, and I was able to hear two WA stations
as well. Notably, we had four K2s in the mix today. Conditions were bad
The net was a bit challenging today due to deep QSB and heavy QRM at times
from a net/QSO on 14.316 MHz. Nevertheless, We had 27 participants over the
21 minute net. The long DX was from M0CHK, Andy, and KL7QOW, Mike. N1LQ
gave a good report of Elecraft at Dayton.
Here is the list of the
We had another good net today, even though most signals were not that
strong. We had 27 participants over the 34 minute net. We had two from over
the pond (A65BI and DK1IP).
Here is the list of the group:
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
VE3QF TonyON K3
Hi Phil,
Things are coming better even with a low SFI.
I was listening a bit your voice when calling me but still no strong enough to
get up to my ground noise.
W7WLL was also heard for few seconds with clear audio !
Thanks again to tony VE3QF for the qsp and happy to contact Wolf DK1IP with
We had another good net today. Signals were generally good, and we had 28
participants over the 27 minute net. W4RKS and others helped pull in two NW
stations that I couldn't hear. Philippe, A65BI, from the UAE finally made
it through with help from VE3 stations. The short discussions centered
We had a good net today. Signals were generally good, and we had 27
participants over the 25 minute net. I swung my quad north and south to
listen for WA/OR and northern California stations. Relays pulled in Roger,
W7SJ, in WA and Brian, K0DTJ, in CA. We did have KL7QOW from AK check in.
The
We had a short and small net today. We had only ten participants, including
me. Easter probably had a lot of regulars tied up. It may not have been
helped by my quad being cranked down to about 40 feet due to high wind.
Brendan, EI6IZ, was the significant DX again. Anyway, the only discussions
Thanks to all who participated in today's post EQP SSB net. We had a
total of 26 check-ins with reasonably good conditions (A=5, K=0, and
SF=89). As is often the case, EI6IZ held the honors for the lowest S/N
and the greatest distance from the NCS. And NU4C had the highest S/N
during the net
We had a very good net today. Signals were generally good, and we had 37
participants over the 40 minute net. We had check-ins that spanned from
Ireland (EI6IZ, Brendan who peaked at S9 in Oregon off the side of my quad)
through New Zealand (ZL1PWD, Peter). The discussions centered on
Hi Phil,
Hope to put my name on the list soon as cycle 24 seems to start...finally like
an albatross who need some distance to take off.
Bst 73's
Philippe A65BI
Phillip Shepard ph...@rio.com 22-02-2010 8:50
We had a very good net today. Signals were generally good, and we had 37
participants
We had a good Valentine's Day net today. Signals were generally OK, and we
had 30 participants over the 28 minute net. The discussions centered on
information about the P3 (or lack thereof). One station reported trouble
getting registered for the reflector. Many in the east and southeast
Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net results (1-31-10)
We had a very good net today. Signals were generally strong, and we had 38
participants over the 35 minute net. The discussions centered on shipment
status/dates for the upgraded DSP PCB and the P3. Here is the list of the
group:
Station
We had a very good net today. Signals were generally strong, and we had 38
participants over the 35 minute net. The discussions centered on shipment
status/dates for the upgraded DSP PCB and the P3. Here is the list of the
group:
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
W4RKS Jim
Miserable. I too was blanked in my attempts to check in from Missouri
yesterday. Could not hear net control at all or most other stations on
frequency either. Two stations I heard booming in I asked for help with a
relay and received no response. I figured the net wrapped up quickly and
was
Elecrafters,
Phil, NS7P, our regular NCS was away this week.
My thanks to Bill, NZ0T for calling back east to assist me, as well as other
relays. Signal strengths were varied, with moderately deep QSB.
W4GRJ had the highest SN (3746) on the net today. VE3QF had the lowest SN
(147), I
Mark C. Killmon wrote:
Elecrafters,
Phil, NS7P, our regular NCS was away this week.
My thanks to Bill, NZ0T for calling back east to assist me, as well as other
relays. Signal strengths were varied, with moderately deep QSB.
W4GRJ had the highest SN (3746) on the net today. VE3QF
We had a good net today with a total of 33 participants again. Signals were
generally good. We ran for about 30 minutes. The only discussions were on
audio quality checks. Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the list
of participants.
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
W2RWA
Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Phil and Christina
Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 11:51 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net results (1-3-10)
We had a good net today with a total of 33
Elecrafters,
Phil, NS7P, our regular NCS was away this week.
My thanks to Steve, W0SZ, and Dave, W8OV for calling back east to assist me,
as well as other relays. Signals were not especially strong, and I have a
new, very slow, pulse noise source nearby. The K3's receiver was a real
help.
Phil, the Reflector is getting out of control. While waiting for the
SSB net to begin I began reading mail on the Reflector. When I next
looked at the time, and listened, the net was over. I need a Q-signal
for Reflector interference, say QRI, perhaps.
Sorry I didn't make it,
Dave, W8OV
The net today had 19 participants again. Signals were generally good. We
ran for 20 minutes, and the discussions were on the new DSP board and audio
reports. Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the list of
participants.
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
W5ETJ Gary
The net today had 19 participants. Signals were generally good. We only ran
for 14 minutes, and the only discussions were on the lack of signals in the
10 meter contest. Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the list of
participants.
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
K0JWC
The net today had 17 participants, but many signals were not that strong.
We only ran for 13 minutes, and there were no discussions.
Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the list of participants.
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
W3HVG Pat PA K1
The net today had 23 participants but was troubled by QRM from 14.313MHz.
The QSO on that adjacent frequency had said that is was wrapping up before
1800Z, but evidently stayed on that frequency after our net started. We
shifted up to 14.315 MHz part way through the net, but still were troubled
-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net]on Behalf Of Philippe Trottet
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:32 PM
To: Kevin Rock; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net results (11-15-09)
Hi Kevin,
Yesterday W2 on 20m was 59+ on my
We had a good net today with 32 participants. Propagation seemed better
than in some recent weeks. The discussions were on the W2 and P3.
Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the list of participants.
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
W4LTLou FL K3
Dears,
I would like to participate but considering the propagation between USA
and UAE the schedule is not adapted.
Any possibilty for an Elecrafter net by IARU zones ? i.e. the
International Emergency Network directed and monitored on 20m once a
month by the National French Amateur Federation
and Christina ph...@rio.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net results (11-15-09)
Dears,
I would like to participate but considering the propagation between USA
and UAE the schedule is not adapted.
Any possibilty for an Elecrafter net by IARU zones ? i.e. the
International Emergency Network directed
that or simply start your own.
73,
Kevin. KD5ONS
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Trottet trot...@unhcr.org
Sent: Nov 15, 2009 10:48 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net, Phil and Christina ph...@rio.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net results (11-15-09)
Dears,
I would like
more easily.
GL and 73,
Kevin. KD5ONS
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Trottet trot...@unhcr.org
Sent: Nov 16, 2009 12:02 AM
To: Kevin Rock kevinr...@earthlink.net, elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net results (11-15-09)
Hi Kevin,
I'm a brand new
SSB Net results (11-15-09)
Hi Kevin,
I'm a brand new one Elecrafter and received my K3 last Tuesday.
Only Elecraft company knows where K rigs have been solded to world
wide
Hams.
Am I the only Elecrafter in UAE ? I hope not Hi !
I will check tomorrow at the Emirates Amateur Radio Society (A62ER
The net was challenging today with spotty propagation and a fair amount of
QRM. There were 13 of us, and we ran for 11 minutes. The only discussion
was a question to ask if anyone had a W2 up and running yet. No one did.
We did have Peter, ZL1PWD, check in from New Zealand (off the back of my
Guys - We originally updated the elecraft main web page Net Times with a
change in time to PST, leaving the Zulu times the same. Please email me
with what reality is now. we're confused/ :-)
73, Eric WA6HHQ
Mark C. Killmon wrote:
Phil, NS7P, was away this week.
We began the net at
: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net results (11/1/2009)
Guys - We originally updated the elecraft main web page Net Times with a
change in time to PST, leaving the Zulu times the same. Please email me
with what reality is now. we're confused/ :-)
73, Eric WA6HHQ
Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
Guys - We originally updated the elecraft main web page Net Times with a
change in time to PST, leaving the Zulu times the same. Please email me
with what reality is now. we're confused/ :-)
Following the pattern use by the Icom net, which has for many
Phil, NS7P, was away this week.
We began the net at 18:00Z, which was an hour earlier today after the time
change, on 14.314.
We closed the net at 18:40 with the following 16 check-ins + NCS. I
apologize if we missed east coast stations as I did not ask for a direct
call to the east from
Mark C. Killmon wrote:
Phil, NS7P, was away this week.
We began the net at 18:00Z, which was an hour earlier today after the time
change, on 14.314.
We closed the net at 18:40 with the following 16 check-ins + NCS. I
apologize if we missed east coast stations as I did not ask for a
@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net results (11/1/2009)
Mark C. Killmon wrote:
Phil, NS7P, was away this week.
We began the net at 18:00Z, which was an hour earlier today after the time
change, on 14.314.
We closed the net at 18:40 with the following 16 check-ins + NCS. I
Another good net inspite of some QRM. There were 22 of us, and we ran for 23
minutes. The signals were generally OK, although a few required relays to
get
through. The discussions were on audio quality checks for several stations.
Thanks to everyone who checked in. Here is the list of
Wow, it was the best net we have had in awhile. There were 28 of us, and we
ran for 33 minutes. In addition to all of the stateside stations, we had
Andy, M0CHK, from the UK and Peter, ZL1PWD, from New Zealand! That spread
us across a lot of time zones! The most unusual weather was 6 inches of
The California QSO Party was providing lots of QRM around our regular
frequency today. I opened on 14.314 MHz, but quickly announced a QSY to
14.317, which was quieter but still noisy. Anyway, there were 10 of us on
14.317. We ran for 8 minutes there. Afetr we concluded, I went down to
14.314
: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net results (9-27-09)
I didn't hear any noise on 316 today with my beam pointed NW from here in
AZ. Just a group of guys who were operating there and they even mentioned
that the Elecraft net would be starting shortly and that they wanted to be
off the frequency by net start
201 - 300 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
