to 26-GHz; only display that
will cover that for me is my old surplus HP141T spectrum analyzer -
max scan spectrum is 200-MHz wide with the mw plug-in starting at fo =1500-MHz.
73, Ed - KL7UW
From: Doug Ellmore <d...@ellmore.net>
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] What c
I am one of those folks who has the INRAD 700Hz filter (special-ordered by
the guys at UNPCBs, http://www.unpcbs.com/). I use it exclusively for
scanning the bands on CW. When I want to get tighter, I have the 400Hz
filter below that. I've found that combination works wonderfully for me.
For SSB,
Bob,
Good comments. I think those of us who have been in ham radio for
many years still think of physical filters as doing the job of
specifying the radio bandwidth and forget that today's radio often is
digital or partially digital where DSP does the job and filters are
only used
Here 400 Hz on CW, 2800 Hz mostly on CW -- though
I have the 1000 Hz filter for tuning on CW and one
tighter one (2100 Hz) for more crowded SSB situations.
If budget had been a concern, I'd have gone with
400 Hz and the stock 2700 Hz pair.
73, Phil W7OX
On 9/28/15 12:35 PM, Dan Atchison
Being 95% CW and only sometimes on SSB
I use almost all the time 500Hz 5-pole filter.
I have 200Hz but use it very rarely.
This is just my experience since beginning of K3 history.
235 countries in QRP in 2 years, all States, all Oblasts.
BennyOH9NB
---
Avast Antivirus on tarkistanut tämän
Oops -- Here 400 Hz on CW, 2800 Hz mostly on SSB :-)
Phil W7OX
On 9/28/15 11:35 PM, Phil Wheeler wrote:
Here 400 Hz on CW, 2800 Hz mostly on CW --
though I have the 1000 Hz filter for tuning on
CW and one tighter one (2100 Hz) for more
crowded SSB situations.
If budget had been a concern,
The advice I received was to try the radio stock then select what I needed. I
didn't want to deal with offsets or aligning filters when I eventually get the
sub RX. Because of this I opted to upgrade to the 2.8KHz and purchased the
400Hz on this list. When I get the sub rx I'll buy 250Hz x2,
On my K3 I have an LP-Pan connected to my IF out on the main receiver and a
FunCube Pro on the subreceiver IF out. The LP-Pan is setup to a Steinberg
USB UR22 sound card. Therefore, I have two panadapters, one through Win4K3
for the main receiver, the second using NAP3 v5 to the funcube pro.
The lineup here is: 2.7 & 1.9 for ssb, 500/8pole and 200/5pole for cw.
I'm seldom on ssb, 95%+ on cw, so can't say anything useful for the
first two filters. I use both of the cw filters as conditions and
circumstances dictate. The 500cps filter is first choice and does most
of the work here.
I have 3 roofing filters, 400Hz for CW and digital, 2.8kHz for SSB and 13kHz
for listening to broadcast stations. But I should have selected 500Hz 5-pole
and 2.7kHz 5-pole instead of 400Hz and 2.8kHz. I have very strong local power
line noise, often S3 to S5 level. Steep filter like 8-pole
This is an interesting discussion.
Before I purchased my K3 in 2008, I had become addicted to narrow
selectivity with my previous rigs, and was routinely tuning the bands
with cascaded 250 Hz filters. Since I'm nearly 100 pct. CW, I purchased
a range of crystal roofing filters to try out in
I'm with W4TV on the 5-pole 200 Hz filter as my overall go to on close
in CW sigs. The 8-pole 250 Hz filter, which I also have, is actually
about 350 Hz in width and way too wide for me. That said, I use either
a 500 Hz or 400 Hz filter most of the time on CW/RTTY
It is unfortunate that
Again and again, we all encounter signal conditions where a very weak
wanted signal is close to a very loud unwanted signal. For this the
best filter setup is where BOTH the roofing and the DSP filters are at the
desired operating bandwidth.
That is why for CW contesting, in pure self-defense,
Hi Mike,
I understand it is a roofing filter... I have a number of hams, (5),
all within 1.5 miles of me, I need the roofing filter to remove them
during contests... :)
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
For MixW support see;
> What filter do you find you use the most and why?
The 400 Hz filter as it works well for both CW and RTTY.
If I were not so concerned about RTTY, I would consider the
*INRAD* 500 Hz (8 pole) filter for CW along with the 200 Hz
(5 pole) Elecraft filter for times when adjacent signals are
just
Ken makes a pertinent comment; "the DSP does all the rest". Suggested
filters are roofing filters and serve a function of signal path and how
signals outside of the DSP bandwidth can affect the receive
performance. Receiver selectivity is actually accomplished by the DSP
engine. Regarding
I would think it best to get the K3S and see how it performs before
throwing money at a problem that may not actually exist. Adding filters
if and as needed is rather simple.
73
Bob, K4TAX
K3S s/n 10,163
On 9/28/2015 1:15 PM, David Cole wrote:
Hi Mike,
I understand it is a roofing filter...
The filters you guys are discussing are roofing filters. The filtering you're
thinking about is done digitally, and is continuously variable. The K3s isn't
your Dad's analog rig.
Here's an Elecraft article explaining roofing filters.
http://www.elecraft.com/K3/Roofing_Filters.htm
73, Mike
Hey DW etal,
I noticed that you like to get on 40 and 30 at sunrise..I may try
that if I can get up early enough! Have you read the article in the last
QST about the 3 myths about propagation, notably on ionization at
sunrise? It may be of benefit.
73, Phil, W0XI, Lawrence, KS.
dw
Hello gang,
Just ordered my first K3.
I haven't ordered any filters or accessories yet.
Want to wait and see what I really will need.
I'd like to illicit your experience with the use of crystal filters for
CW.
What filter do you find you use the most and why?
I won't be using the K3 for
Hi to the gang
My vote would be for the 400 hz filter. I ordered one for my K3s and like it.
73
Ken W0CZ w0cz at i29 dot net
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:57 AM, dw wrote:
>
> Hello gang,
> Just ordered my first K3.
> I haven't ordered any filters or
Hi to the Gang
This is a subjective question but after using a 500 hz and 200 hz filter for 7
years I ordered a 400 filter for my K3s. The main reason is it works well for
both CW and RTTY and of course the DSP does all the rest. I also ordered a 2.1
khz filter so if I go past 400 hz I get
Hi,
I use the 400 Hz filter for CW, and would enjoy a 1 KHz filter I
believe... The 400 is just a touch to narrow for my tastes. It works
well in crowded conditions, and I would not want to get rid of it, but a
1 KHz might get more use...
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups
rson <aldenmcduf...@sunflower.com>
To: dw <bw...@fastmail.fm>
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] What crystal filter do you use the most?
Hey DW etal,
I noticed that you like to get on 40 and 30 at sunrise..I ma
24 matches
Mail list logo