Bastien writes:
>> 1. For org-insert-heading, we have multiple variants that allow
>>inserting heading at point, after current subtree, and the same
>>variants for TODO heading. We don't have enough key combinations left
>>to allow all the equivalents for subheadings.
>>
>> 2. With
Hi Adam,
Adam Porter writes:
> The "C-M-RET" binding doesn't feel quite right to me. Using "shift"
> feels like a mnemonic for "sub", whereas "C-M" seems like it should do
> something much less frequently used, since it requires two
> modifiers.
I agree that S- suggests "sub".
I've been
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> S-RET already "copy down" a table cells, so I'm really suggesting a
>> generalization of the current keybinding.
>
> This makes sense.
>
>> - S-RET on a list item calls `org-insert-subitem`, a new command.
>
> Did you mean `org-clone-item'?
Yes, sorry (`org-clone-item'
Hi Bastien, Ihor,
On 12/9/23 11:53, Bastien Guerry wrote:
Hi Adam,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
Adam Porter writes:
Well, it's been a few years since I forgot to bump this thread. [0] :)
I just rediscovered it after wondering why the command
org-insert-subheading still doesn't have a default
Bastien Guerry writes:
>>> Of course I could bind it myself, and in one of my configs I have, but I
>>> still think it deserves a default binding, even if it were to be a
>>> "smart" command that worked like org-table-copy-down when in a table and
>>> does org-insert-subheading otherwise
Hi Adam,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Adam Porter writes:
>
>> Well, it's been a few years since I forgot to bump this thread. [0] :)
>> I just rediscovered it after wondering why the command
>> org-insert-subheading still doesn't have a default binding. May we
>> revisit this? I find myself
Adam Porter writes:
> Well, it's been a few years since I forgot to bump this thread. [0] :)
> I just rediscovered it after wondering why the command
> org-insert-subheading still doesn't have a default binding. May we
> revisit this? I find myself wanting to insert a subheading almost
Hi Bastien,
I think that's a good idea to promote org-insert-subheading either by
binding it to a key or another way.
I already have some drafty code that might touch things in this (very
sensible) area, so if you don't mind, I'll come back to the details of
your suggestions when I can
Hi Adam,
Adam Porter writes:
> What do you think?
I think that's a good idea to promote org-insert-subheading either by
binding it to a key or another way.
I already have some drafty code that might touch things in this (very
sensible) area, so if you don't mind, I'll come back to the details
Bastien writes:
> First of all, don't be afraid, I don't have a grand plan for "cleaning
> up" things.
Don't worry, I trust you. :) Org wouldn't be what it is today without
your work, and I'm grateful for how much time you've been putting into
improving Org lately.
>> I'm not sure what you
Hi Adam,
First of all, don't be afraid, I don't have a grand plan for "cleaning
up" things.
> I'm not sure what you mean about functions mentioned as usable by the
> user. org-insert-subheading is an interactive command, so it's
> explicitly usable by the user.
Yes, org-insert-subheading is
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020, 15:28 Adam Porter wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> Bastien writes:
>
> > I still find it strange to keep functions that are used nowhere in the
> > Org's core--except of course for functions that explicitely mention as
> > usable by the user (e.g.
Hi Bastien,
Bastien writes:
> I still find it strange to keep functions that are used nowhere in the
> Org's core--except of course for functions that explicitely mention as
> usable by the user (e.g. `org-clock-persistence-insinuate'.)
>
> I'd rather have these functions stored in a
Adam Porter writes:
> Please do not delete org-insert-subheading!
Done :)
I still find it strange to keep functions that are used nowhere in the
Org's core--except of course for functions that explicitely mention as
usable by the user (e.g. `org-clock-persistence-insinuate'.)
I'd rather have
Bastien writes:
> `org-insert-subheading' and `org-insert-todo-subheading' are not used
> anywhere in Org's code. Do you them? How?
>
> I'm more inclined to delete these commands since they have no binding
> than to add an `org-insert-subitem'.
>
> Hitting then seems swift and handy enough.
en :
>
> Hi Dmitrii,
>
> Dmitrii Korobeinikov writes:
>
> > In short:
> > org-insert-heading -> org-insert-subheading
> > org-insert-todo-heading -> org-insert-todo-subheading
> > org-insert-item -> ?
> >
> > Maybe should provide org
Hi Dmitrii,
Dmitrii Korobeinikov writes:
> In short:
> org-insert-heading -> org-insert-subheading
> org-insert-todo-heading -> org-insert-todo-subheading
> org-insert-item -> ?
>
> Maybe should provide org-insert-subitem for consistency?
`org-insert-subheading' and
In short:
org-insert-heading -> org-insert-subheading
org-insert-todo-heading -> org-insert-todo-subheading
org-insert-item -> ?
Maybe should provide org-insert-subitem for consistency?
Regards,
Dmitrii
18 matches
Mail list logo
