On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 13:53:29 -0500
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 10 March 2018 12:42:56 Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
>
> > I just discovered it take about 200µs to write six bytes of process
> > data in process RAM via SPI into the LAN9252 chip! It's horrible slow.
> > I can't figure out they thi
On Saturday 10 March 2018 12:42:56 Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
> I just discovered it take about 200µs to write six bytes of process
> data in process RAM via SPI into the LAN9252 chip! It's horrible slow.
> I can't figure out they think about then they make SPI protocol like
> this.
>
> Write adresse
I just discovered it take about 200µs to write six bytes of process data in
process RAM via SPI into the LAN9252 chip! It's horrible slow. I can't figure
out they think about then they make SPI protocol like this.
Write adresse(s) and read/write as many bytes as needed had been the most
obvious
> Change the species.
>
> etherCAT becomes etherDOG
Connect it in a ring, apply high enough voltage and it will come back bite your
ass like a dog.
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
enga
On 5 March 2018 at 12:06, Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
> Smart serial is UART?
It is serial. I don't know if it uses a UART.
It is not the same as the Mesa UART Hostmot2 module.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuse
Smart serial is UART?
2018-01-18 9:40 GMT+01:00 andy pugh :
> On 17 January 2018 at 23:41, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>
> > I think this might be right up PCW's alley. He is already selling some
> > cards that expand via an rj45 jack.
>
>
> There is already at least one non-Mesa servo-drive that is c
On 2 March 2018 at 13:07, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> Change the species.
>
> etherCAT becomes etherDOG
ÆtherCAT
(May need Unicode)
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch,
Change the species.
etherCAT becomes etherDOG
Ken
Kenneth Lerman
55 Main Street
Newtown, CT 06470
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <
nicklas.karlsso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 08:17:52 -0500
> Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 23 January 2018 08:01:01 andy
On 01/16/2018 07:51 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
Our policy is that any code added to LinuxCNC has to be compatible with
the license terms "GPL version 2 or any later version".
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
Anything that imposes a restriction on how the software
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 08:17:52 -0500
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 January 2018 08:01:01 andy pugh wrote:
>
> > On 23 January 2018 at 03:26, Rod Webster
> wrote:
> > > This link seems to confirm the Etherlab invocation is GPLv2 so you
> > > may be right!
> > > https://etherlab.org/en/ether
On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 08:29:53PM +0100, Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
> https://openethercatsociety.github.io/doc/soem/index.html
> ...
> Features as of 1.2.0 :
> Changed license to GPLv2 only. Adresses leagal concerns about master
> licensing.
> ...
>
> So I guess it is OK.
>
On this date, tha
https://openethercatsociety.github.io/doc/soem/index.html
...
Features as of 1.2.0 :
Changed license to GPLv2 only. Adresses leagal concerns about master
licensing.
...
So I guess it is OK.
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:27:25 -0500
Dave Cole wrote:
> The text below is at the end of the SOEM page
If all that Linuxcnc does is talk to the GPL'ed EtherLab library, how is it
then you need to worry about trademarks and the like? Isn't that an issue
for the EtherLab team?
The LinuxCNC team has nothing to do with licensed material. The onus is on
the integrator to comply with any requirements just
> On 13 January 2018 at 15:06, Nicklas Karlsson
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I checked out via git, how do I procede if I want to commit via git?
>
>
> You would push it to your own repository on github, then press the
I make my own repository, it's not enought with a personal fork?
> pull-request butt
> On Tuesday 23 January 2018 08:01:01 andy pugh wrote:
>
> > On 23 January 2018 at 03:26, Rod Webster
> wrote:
> > > This link seems to confirm the Etherlab invocation is GPLv2 so you
> > > may be right!
> > > https://etherlab.org/en/ethercat/index.php
> >
> > Etherlab and SOEM are both GPL (or
On 1/23/2018 8:01 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 23 January 2018 at 03:26, Rod Webster wrote:
This link seems to confirm the Etherlab invocation is GPLv2 so you may be
right!
https://etherlab.org/en/ethercat/index.php
Etherlab and SOEM are both GPL (or want to be)
The problem is with Beckhoff who
On Tuesday 23 January 2018 08:01:01 andy pugh wrote:
> On 23 January 2018 at 03:26, Rod Webster
wrote:
> > This link seems to confirm the Etherlab invocation is GPLv2 so you
> > may be right!
> > https://etherlab.org/en/ethercat/index.php
>
> Etherlab and SOEM are both GPL (or want to be)
>
> Th
On 23 January 2018 at 03:26, Rod Webster wrote:
> This link seems to confirm the Etherlab invocation is GPLv2 so you may be
> right!
> https://etherlab.org/en/ethercat/index.php
Etherlab and SOEM are both GPL (or want to be)
The problem is with Beckhoff who own the EtherCAT trademark and
techn
> This link seems to confirm the Etherlab invocation is GPLv2 so you may be
> right!
> https://etherlab.org/en/ethercat/index.php
>
> Rod Webster
> +61 435 765 611
> Vehicle Modifications Network
> www.vehiclemods.net.au
It already is publically available so if I make my contributions available I
This link seems to confirm the Etherlab invocation is GPLv2 so you may be
right!
https://etherlab.org/en/ethercat/index.php
Rod Webster
+61 435 765 611
Vehicle Modifications Network
www.vehiclemods.net.au
On 23 January 2018 at 11:06, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 22 January 2018 15:14:34 Rod
On Monday 22 January 2018 15:14:34 Rod Webster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Its been a long time but many years ago when working with Ghostscript
> and commercial interfaces to it. The solution was (under their
> license) to build an interface to the external library in such a way
> if the external library/DL
Hi,
Its been a long time but many years ago when working with Ghostscript and
commercial interfaces to it. The solution was (under their license) to
build an interface to the external library in such a way if the external
library/DLL wasn't there the software did not fail and if another library
wi
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 08:38:43 +1300
Darren Conway wrote:
> Hi
>
> Has anyone considered asking Bekhoff for their view on this issue?
As is now I use LAN9252, maybe that will not get them in the right mood.
Anybody with an Beckhoff device?
---
Hi
Has anyone considered asking Bekhoff for their view on this issue?
They might grant a GPL compatible license for LinuxCNC.
Regards
Darren Conway
On 23.01.18 8:27 AM, Andy Pugh wrote:
On 22 Jan 2018, at 21:08, Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
In source code I got from soem there is GNU license
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:27:50 +0200
Andy Pugh wrote:
>
>
> > On 22 Jan 2018, at 21:08, Nicklas Karlsson
> > wrote:
> >
> > In source code I got from soem there is GNU license but somewhere I also
> > found an exception, below so I am a little bit confused.
>
> I have always been confused by
> On 22 Jan 2018, at 21:08, Nicklas Karlsson
> wrote:
>
> In source code I got from soem there is GNU license but somewhere I also
> found an exception, below so I am a little bit confused.
I have always been confused by this too.
The worry is that if we distribute anything EtherCAT with L
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:32:58 +0200
andy pugh wrote:
> On 13 January 2018 at 15:06, Nicklas Karlsson
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I checked out via git, how do I procede if I want to commit via git?
>
>
> You would push it to your own repository on github, then press the
> pull-request button on the Lin
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 19:56:21 -0500
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 January 2018 17:20:47 Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:41:59 -0500
> >
> > Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 17 January 2018 11:10:53 Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:27:25 -0
On Thursday 18 January 2018 03:40:56 andy pugh wrote:
> On 17 January 2018 at 23:41, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I think this might be right up PCW's alley. He is already selling
> > some cards that expand via an rj45 jack.
>
> There is already at least one non-Mesa servo-drive that is
> controllable
On 17 January 2018 at 23:41, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I think this might be right up PCW's alley. He is already selling some
> cards that expand via an rj45 jack.
There is already at least one non-Mesa servo-drive that is controllable via
the Mesa "Smart Serial" interface.
Plug an STMBL drive int
On Wednesday 17 January 2018 17:20:47 Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:41:59 -0500
>
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 January 2018 11:10:53 Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:27:25 -0500
> > >
> > > Dave Cole wrote:
> > > > The text below is at the end
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:41:59 -0500
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 January 2018 11:10:53 Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:27:25 -0500
> >
> > Dave Cole wrote:
> > > The text below is at the end of the SOEM page from the link below.
> > > https://openethercatsociety.git
On Wednesday 17 January 2018 11:10:53 Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:27:25 -0500
>
> Dave Cole wrote:
> > The text below is at the end of the SOEM page from the link below.
> > https://openethercatsociety.github.io/doc/soem/index.html
> >
> > So how does this work?? The SOEM s
Why a license?
I have no idea. It sounds like they want you to ask permission.
However I am quite sure the software will work without permission being granted.
So what's the point?
And if you obtained a license, what exactly do you do with it?
Print it out and paste it on the wall? Put in in
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:27:25 -0500
Dave Cole wrote:
> The text below is at the end of the SOEM page from the link below.
> https://openethercatsociety.github.io/doc/soem/index.html
>
> So how does this work?? The SOEM software itself is GPL, but if you
> implement an Ethercat master, you need
On Wednesday 17 January 2018 09:27:25 Dave Cole wrote:
> The text below is at the end of the SOEM page from the link below.
> https://openethercatsociety.github.io/doc/soem/index.html
>
> So how does this work?? The SOEM software itself is GPL, but if you
> implement an Ethercat master, you need
The text below is at the end of the SOEM page from the link below.
https://openethercatsociety.github.io/doc/soem/index.html
So how does this work?? The SOEM software itself is GPL, but if you
implement an Ethercat master, you need to get a license ??
That's an interesting approach.
If the
I will look into this.
2018-01-17 2:51 GMT+01:00 Jeff Epler :
> Our policy is that any code added to LinuxCNC has to be compatible with
> the license terms "GPL version 2 or any later version".
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
>
> Anything that imposes a rest
Our policy is that any code added to LinuxCNC has to be compatible with
the license terms "GPL version 2 or any later version".
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
Anything that imposes a restriction on how the software can be used (for
example, if it is claimed th
On 16 January 2018 at 18:52, Nicklas Karlsson
wrote:ause of lack of official company home page.
>
>
> Software is basically "soem" https://openethercatsociety.
> github.io/doc/soem/index.html
>
I would very much like to see EtherCAT supported by LinuxCNC, but this part
of the SOEM license is (I t
> On 13 January 2018 at 15:06, Nicklas Karlsson
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I checked out via git, how do I procede if I want to commit via git?
>
>
> You would push it to your own repository on github, then press the
> pull-request button on the LinuxCNC github.
>
> Though there are other ways, I beli
On 13 January 2018 at 15:06, Nicklas Karlsson
wrote:
>
> I checked out via git, how do I procede if I want to commit via git?
You would push it to your own repository on github, then press the
pull-request button on the LinuxCNC github.
Though there are other ways, I believe.
Are you sure tha
Sascha Ittner hat am 18. August 2013 um 22:20
geschrieben:
> Hi John,
>
> thank you for your hints. Here the current status:
>
> > - The configure.in check might be better done using AC_CHECK_HEADER
> > (look for other examples in the file)
>
> This is right. But I need the path of the ecrt.h fil
Hi John,
thank you for your hints. Here the current status:
> - The configure.in check might be better done using AC_CHECK_HEADER
> (look for other examples in the file)
This is right. But I need the path of the ecrt.h file, because I have to symlink
it to the ethercat hal driver source director
Hi Sascha,
I managed to delete your reply to this email. I'm copying the text from
the sf archive, but replying to myself, so your client's threading may
get messed up. ;(
>> Since EtherCAT libs will be missing on most systems, library detection
>> would need to be added configure.in, and drive
> Since EtherCAT libs will be missing on most systems, library detection
> would need to be added configure.in, and driver build made conditional
> in the Makefiles.
I've just added a config check for this. It works with the deb install and with
the manual install of the master. The later however
On 08/10/2013 09:55 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 20:18, Sascha Ittner wrote:
>
>> The project home of the used EtherCAT master:
>> http://www.etherlab.org/de/ethercat/index.php
>
> There is an english version at: http://www.etherlab.org/en/ethercat/index.php
>
> I am not sure how we
On 7 August 2013 20:18, Sascha Ittner wrote:
> The project home of the used EtherCAT master:
> http://www.etherlab.org/de/ethercat/index.php
There is an english version at: http://www.etherlab.org/en/ethercat/index.php
I am not sure how we support things which require additional packages
like t
48 matches
Mail list logo
