[Emc-developers] Buildot Is Down

I think the Buildbot is having a nap. Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Intel graphics and RTAI

Could this be an issue? # CONFIG_FB_INTEL is not set > On 21 Dec 2019, at 12:06 pm, bari wrote: > > Here is his paste: > > https://pastebin.com/ZC2LhMe5 > > > > On 12/20/19 7:00 PM, Alec Ari via Emc-developers wrote: >> Phill I'm not seeing your files.. Post to dpaste or something? And

Re: [Emc-developers] Intel graphics and RTAI

No it doesn't. >From memory that also showed up as an error in the X11 log file when I had >FBDEV as a device in the X11 conf file. > On 21 Dec 2019, at 12:10 pm, Alec Ari via Emc-developers > wrote: > > My mistake, > So the config option for FBCON is CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE which is

Re: [Emc-developers] Intel graphics and RTAI

Alec, Thanks for persevering with this. The result is: phill@stretch:~$ grep "FBCON" /boot/config-*rtai* phill@stretch:~$ grep "fbcon" /boot/config-*rtai* phill@stretch:~$ I then did: phill@stretch:~$ grep "" /boot/config-*rtai* > grep.txt and the result is too large to attach so I will split

Re: [Emc-developers] Intel graphics and RTAI

Part 2: > On 20 Dec 2019, at 3:49 pm, Phillip Carter wrote: > > Alec, > > Thanks for persevering with this. > > The result is: > phill@stretch:~$ grep "FBCON" /boot/config-*rtai* > phill@stretch:~$ grep "fbcon" /boot/config-*rtai* > phill@s

Re: [Emc-developers] Intel graphics and RTAI

I think I would be happy to use FBDEV, but I haven't been able to get it to work. I tried several times with differnet Xorg configs to no avail, it would consistently revert to the VESA driver and limit the resolution to 1024 x 768. I cannot recall the different things I tried as it was quite a

[Emc-developers] Buildbot

It looks like the Buildbot is down, I cannot access the waterfall. Cheers, Phill ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Archived emails

https://sourceforge.net/p/emc/mailman/emc-developers/Cheers, Phill Original message From: Marius Date: 17/11/19 7:53 pm (GMT+10:00) To: Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Emc-developers] Archived emails Is there a place where I can see the archived emails for

[Emc-developers] Buildbot Asleep

The buildbot appears to be asleep. Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

[Emc-developers] Buildbot Stalled

It seems the Buildbot has stalled. Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] stretch boot problem.

> On 10 Oct 2019, at 3:02 am, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 October 2019 06:31:09 Nicklas Karlsson wrote: > >> Have sometimes also experienced boot problems and today reinstalled a >> computer with Ubunte with boot problem stuck half way thru with >> Debian. Software in both

[Emc-developers] Gmoccapy

I noticed on the Buildbot there were compile errors caused by a link in gmoccapy-hu.txt to a missing image. I took the liberty of removing the link so the compiles would complete. https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/commit/a4828e46a23425c22043595b4df09d782bf92c6a

[Emc-developers] Buildbot Asleep

The Buildbot seems to have been asleep for a few days. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Travis CI Errors

I restarted the build and it was successful so I guess it was a Travis CI thing... > On 23 Jul 2019, at 5:44 pm, Phillip Carter wrote: > > In the meantime I signed up to Travis CI and it did a build on my repository > <https://github.com/phillc54/linuxcnc/commits/master>

Re: [Emc-developers] Travis CI Errors

In the meantime I signed up to Travis CI and it did a build on my repository <https://github.com/phillc54/linuxcnc/commits/master> and it succeeded. Buildbot seemed to be successful as well. Cheers, Phill > On 23 Jul 2019, at 3:56 pm, Phillip Carter wrote: > > I have j

[Emc-developers] Travis CI Errors

I have just pushed some commits and I noticed an error on the commits page of GitHub. The error is: The command "./scripts/travis-install-build-deps.sh" failed and exited with 100 during . Your build has been stopped. Which I don’t

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

Yes, that was it, thanks. > On 20 Jul 2019, at 10:23 am, Chris Morley wrote: > > If it's just Roberts's stuff in 2.8 you are worried about - it seems to merge > cleanly to master - go for it. > > Chris > > ________ > From: Phillip Carter

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

icate merges later.. > > Now you can see why it's nice when a committer merges things right away so > they can deal with their own code. > > Chris > > ________ > From: Phillip Carter > Sent: July 20, 2019 12:02 AM > To: linuxcnc-developers > S

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

en-merging > > Chris > > ________ > From: Phillip Carter > Sent: July 19, 2019 11:33 PM > To: linuxcnc-developers > Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost > > > >> On 20 Jul 2019, at 12:13 am, andy pugh wrote: >> >> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

> On 20 Jul 2019, at 12:13 am, andy pugh wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 10:54, Phillip Carter > wrote: > >> Oops, yes, after Tested should be Switched to master > > > OK, so you are about to merge some changes that are in 2.8, not in master, > and were

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

Oops, yes, after Tested should be Switched to master.Cheers, Phill Original message From: andy pugh Date: 19/7/19 7:27 pm (GMT+10:00) To: EMC developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 08:01, Phillip Carter wrote:> I am working on 2.8 loca

[Emc-developers] Git lost

I am working on 2.8 locally, I have: Pulled from origin Modified some files Committed Tested Switched to 2.8 Pulled from origin Merged 2.8 Now there are commits that I am not sure belong in master I am not sure where to go from here. ___

[Emc-developers] GladeVCP panel names

I submitted a PR to master branch which allows GladeVCP panels to be named and it was committed three weeks ago. https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/commit/9da1f618679b2f3c31054bb116ff5d48adaf676f Would it

[Emc-developers] Did I break buildbot

I have done some updates to docs and when I look at the waterfall the last few builds in the update section say:HEAD is now at dcfbbb6 plasmac: rebrandingWhich I did on June 8Cheers, Phill ___ Emc-developers mailing list

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 plasmac

it's not possible because of someone else's complicated conflicts > that is in code you don't understand. > > if you have changes that belong just in master you commit them just to master > - keeping in mind that that can still > create merge conflicts when 2.8 is merged in next

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 plasmac

> if you have changes that belong just in master you commit them just to master > - keeping in mind that that can still > create merge conflicts when 2.8 is merged in next time. > > Hope that helps > > Chris M > > From: Phillip Carter

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.8 plasmac

>> (And since 2.8 isn't released yet we actually could back out code ) >> Chris M >> >> From: Phillip Carter >> Sent: July 5, 2019 4:25 AM >> To: linuxcnc-developers >> Subject: [Emc-developers] 2.8 plasmac &

[Emc-developers] 2.8 plasmac

I have tested the plasmac configurations on 2.8 and they appear to work ok with the only proviso that the reverse run feature is not supported. I have modified the GUIs so that none of the reverse run widgets show if the LinuxCNC version is less than 2.9. Is it feasible to put plasmac in 2.8?

Re: [Emc-developers] Plasma User Information

ng in Master? > > JT > > On 7/2/2019 6:16 PM, Phillip Carter wrote: >> I had originally thought of creating a separate plasma document like the >> integrators as well and putting both this document and the plasmac >> documentation in it but as there is no specific

Re: [Emc-developers] Plasma User Information

I had originally thought of creating a separate plasma document like the integrators as well and putting both this document and the plasmac documentation in it but as there is no specific lathe or mill document (or any others) then it would seem a bit odd. I think Chris’s suggestion is the way

[Emc-developers] Plasma User Information

Rod Webster (forum member rodw) has put together a document that provides general information about CNC plasma cutting. I feel that it would be worthwhile putting it into the documentation in the General User Information section. I have posted a PDF copy online.

Re: [Emc-developers] Workflow

Thanks guys, I think I have it sorted now. > On 1 Jul 2019, at 6:19 am, andy pugh wrote: > > If my new stuff is a single commit I take a short-cut. > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 20:52, Chris Morley wrote: > >> If I am working on a private branch based on master and want to push my work >> : >>

[Emc-developers] Workflow

I noticed today when I pushed a commit that it also pushed a message about a merge between my branches which doesn't seem correct.Currently I do all my work on my plasmac branch. I checkout master, fetch from upstream then rebase upstream/master. I then checkout plasmac and merge master.Then I

Re: [Emc-developers] Updates

ildbot/waterfall > > JT > > On 6/29/2019 5:42 AM, Phillip Carter wrote: >> Is there a specific time from when a commit is pushed until it appears in >> the online docs and the buildbot?Cheers, Phill >> ___ >>

Re: [Emc-developers] Updates

can force it to build the docs with the following in the #linuxcnc-devel IRC channel.linuxcnc-build: force build --branch-2.8 2000.docsYou can go to the buildbot waterfall page and see the status of any queued buildshttp://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/waterfallJTOn 6/29/2019 5:42 AM, Phillip

[Emc-developers] Updates

Is there a specific time from when a commit is pushed until it appears in the online docs and the buildbot?Cheers, Phill ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Re: [Emc-developers] plasmac

nless I thought it was > really important, before I initially added it to master. > > So I would suggest be ruthless with squashing before putting it in master. > > Oh welcome to linuxcnc developers ..club :) > > Chris M > ________ > From: Phi

[Emc-developers] plasmac

I am ready to push plasmac but before I do should I try to squash it to one commit. There are 440+ local commits and sometime I was a bit lazy with commit comments. Cheers, Phill. ___ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Emc-developers] Gmoccapy Documentation Links

Thanks Andy, it seemed to have worked… Cheers, Phill. > On 28 Jun 2019, at 9:28 am, andy pugh wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 23:40, Phillip Carter wrote: > >> The linuxcnc repo is my upstream repo, so do I just do git push this_branch >> upstream:master >

Re: [Emc-developers] Gmoccapy Documentation Links

idoc-markup.txt > > https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master/docs/src/gui/gmoccapy-hu.txt > > https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master/docs/src/gui/gmoccapy.txt > > You can't work around it, the document anchor must be fixed to be unique. > > JT > > On 6/2

[Emc-developers] Gmoccapy Documentation Links

I am trying to link to the Gmoccapy document by adding <> in my document. After I run make the link points to gmoccapy-hu.txt rather than gmoccapy.txt I see the same problem in the LinuxCNC html documentation, the link to Gmoccapy on http://linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/config/lathe-config.html

Re: [Emc-developers] plasmac

. There is another user currently compiling a generic plasma document that could be incorporated as well. > On 26 Jun 2019, at 11:42 am, Phillip Carter wrote: > > Chris, > > Thanks for that and yes, I would be interested. > > Cheers, Phill. > >> On 26 Jun 2

Re: [Emc-developers] plasmac

should give you push access - are you interested? > > Chris M > > ________ > From: Phillip Carter <mailto:phillcarte...@gmail.com>> > Sent: June 26, 2019 1:18 AM > To: emc-developers > Subject: [Emc-developers] plasmac > > I have been

[Emc-developers] plasmac

I have been working on a plasma config which is a complete configuration for a plasma cutter consisting of a component named plasmac.comp and configuration files for both Axis and Gmoccapy. It has been tested by several users and is at the stage where I think it could be incorporated into 2.9.

Re: [Emc-developers] Viewing documentation changes

update the browser page .when all is good save the file back to the original location .commit and make PR Cheers, Phill. > On 8 Jun 2019, at 10:34 pm, andy pugh wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 at 08:10, Phillip Carter wrote: > > How do I now view the documentation to ensure that it

Re: [Emc-developers] Viewing documentation changes

Thank you, that will give me something to play around with tomorrow.Cheers, Phill Original message From: andy pugh Date: 8/6/19 10:34 pm (GMT+10:00) To: EMC developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Viewing documentation changes On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 at 08:10, Phillip Carter

Re: [Emc-developers] Viewing documentation changes

Thank you, that will give me something to play around with tomorrow.Cheers, Phill Original message From: andy pugh Date: 8/6/19 10:34 pm (GMT+10:00) To: EMC developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Viewing documentation changes On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 at 08:10, Phillip Carter

Re: [Emc-developers] Viewing documentation changes

] Viewing documentation changes PhillYou would need to configure with --enable-build-documentaion=html (for html only docs) and then compile linuxcnc.Developers can push a scratch branch to git and the buildbot will do the same.Chris MFrom: Phillip Carter Sent

Re: [Emc-developers] Viewing documentation changes

only docs) and then compile linuxcnc.Developers can push a scratch branch to git and the buildbot will do the same.Chris MFrom: Phillip Carter Sent: June 8, 2019 7:08 AMTo: emc-developersSubject: [Emc-developers] Viewing documentation changesI have made a small

[Emc-developers] Viewing documentation changes

I have made a small change to Axis regarding integrating a GladeVCP panel and I intend to submit a PR when complete. I have edited the documentation which I found at /docs/src/gui/gladevcp.txt. How do I now view the documentation to ensure that it looks like it should. Cheers, Phill.

Re: [Emc-developers] Introduction and a couple of questions

Rob, The branch I have working is here https://github.com/phillc54/linuxcnc/tree/reverse-run it was up to date with master yesterday. Basically what I did was add your original reverse run commits to an up to date master (12 Dec 2018)

Re: [Emc-developers] Introduction and a couple of questions

I do have a separate reverse-run branch if that is up to date with Master (well it was of a couple of hours ago) https://github.com/phillc54/linuxcnc/tree/reverse-run Most probably if there are other TP updates then this will be broken…

Re: [Emc-developers] future of rpi?

This DIY tutorial may be of interest. > Cheers, Phill. > On 6 Mar 2019, at 12:50 pm, Gene Heskett

Re: [Emc-developers] Reverse Run

://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/commit/628626062188441f1dd29a8f948f190f40f47116 revert: https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/commit/5a63d03110ec0f9ed92799b3f6507042894ba833 Rod Webster +61 435 765 611 Vehicle Modifications Network www.vehiclemods.net.au On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 08:56, Phillip Carter

Re: [Emc-developers] Reverse Run

lly want to get this into master! Maybe just post > your repo URL here and hopefully the dev team will pick it up... > > Rod Webster > +61 435 765 611 > Vehicle Modifications Network > www.vehiclemods.net.au > > > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 16:39, Phillip Carter > wrote: >

[Emc-developers] Reverse Run

I have managed to incorporate the commits from the feature/reverse-run-master2 branch into the current version master as well as fixing issue #524. It was done by cherry picking one commit at a time and running make after any required edits. I did find that three of the original commits were

[Emc-developers] LinxCNC Python Module

Is the documentation correct for the LinuxCNC Python Module in regards to kinematics_type? In the documentation for the LinuxCNC Python Interface there is reference to: kinematics_type (returns integer) - identity=1, serial=2, parallel=3, custom=4 . in the kins manpage there is reference

Re: [Emc-developers] joint mode jogging in master

On 16/4/17 9:17 am, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 15 April 2017 06:29:22 Phillip Carter wrote: > >> I have just noticed in sim/axis/gantry that joint 3 does not jog with >> the leftbracket/rightbracket keyboard keys but does with the >> minus/equals keyboard keys. Is th

[Emc-developers] joint mode jogging in master

I have just noticed in sim/axis/gantry that joint 3 does not jog with the leftbracket/rightbracket keyboard keys but does with the minus/equals keyboard keys. Is this the correct behaviour? -- Cheers, Phill -- Check

Re: [Emc-developers] Help, after joints merge, my TLM is all miss-configured.

On 14/4/17 12:40 pm, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 13 April 2017 22:33:23 Phillip Carter wrote: > >> On 14/4/17 12:08 pm, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> On Thursday 23 March 2017 16:47:39 Gene Heskett wrote: >>> >>> There has been 3 or 4 lcnc updates since I

Re: [Emc-developers] Help, after joints merge, my TLM is all miss-configured.

On 14/4/17 12:08 pm, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 23 March 2017 16:47:39 Gene Heskett wrote: > > There has been 3 or 4 lcnc updates since I originally posted this, but I > still have the problem. The keyboards jog xz keys are still scrambled > UNTIL its been homed, after which everything