Re: [PSES] BREXIT - UK Designated Standards

Excellent reference Han.  Thanks  very much. Carl On 8/9/2021 2:39 AM, Han Zuyderwijk wrote: Hi Carl. Please refer to this page of the UK government website: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/designated-standards <https://www.gov.uk/guidance/designated-standards> The UK Government can des

[PSES] BREXIT - UK Designated Standards

nment/publications/designated-standards-emc> It seems pretty clear to me that for now and the foreseeable future that the European Norm "EN" versions are also the UK Designated Standards.  But I'm looking for safety in numbers here. Thanks, Carl - -

Re: [PSES] South African SABS EMC Testing

ly because it briefly left their building. The fellow that's managing the project for this NRTL tells me that this is his first S.A. project and he's on a learning curve.   Lucky me. Best regards, Carl On 5/17/2021 5:43 PM, Richard Nute wrote: Hi Carl: I cannot confirm that the SABS acc

[PSES] South African SABS EMC Testing

accreditation demands that all conducted emissions be repeated because the hardware setup left the lab's possession (and adjusted their quote accordingly). Can anyone on the list here confirm that SABS lab accreditation mandates this type of action? Thanks, Carl

Re: [PSES] EU DoC on Thumb Drive?

Thanks to all for your responses.  They are very helpful. Best regards, Carl On 5/14/2021 4:54 PM, Richard Nute wrote: The symbol ISO 7000-3500  "Electronic instructions for use" is for medical equipment.  The related EU regulation is: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/Lex

[PSES] EU DoC on Thumb Drive?

a customer that would like to include it on a thumb drive document package that will ship with the device rather than a paper hard-copy. Do any of you have experience with this question that you can share? Thanks in advance, Carl

Re: [PSES] EU Authorized Representative service for Market Surveillance Regulation (EU) 2019/1020

Well said Charlie.  In my case I have to cover those circumstances where there is no "importer" in the chain. Thanks, Carl On 5/6/2021 4:09 PM, Charlie Blackham wrote: Strictly speaking the manufacturer doesn’t need a formal agreement with the Importer, the imp

Re: [PSES] EU Authorized Representative service for Market Surveillance Regulation (EU) 2019/1020

Yes Charlie.  I used the AR term loosely.  There are five types of operator that qualify.  Manufacturers still need a formal agreement with one of them. Best regards, Carl On 5/6/2021 2:33 PM, Charlie Blackham wrote: You don’t *have* to have an Authorised Representative *as long as* you

[PSES] EU Authorized Representative service for Market Surveillance Regulation (EU) 2019/1020

email address above if you prefer. Thanks very much, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings

Re: [PSES] FCC Emissions on Industrial Equipment

url?sa=t=j==s=web==rja=8=2ahUKEwj_8aiXr5nuAhXfAp0JHb2UDRsQFjAAegQIAxAC=https%3A%2F%2Fapps.fcc.gov%2Fkdb%2FGetAttachment.html%3Fid%3DaPHDD74GRH5N2s050fBjxA%253D%253D%26desc%3D772105%2520D01%2520Exempt%2520Devices%2520v01r01%26tracking_number%3D33062=AOvVaw1Mk1BMyAt4NZTEeO_bxGjd> Carl On 1/12/2021

Re: [PSES] CU TR 020/2011 (Russia+) Non-Residential EMC Exemption?

urer's EMC lab (non-accredited) reports be used for the Declaration of Conformity? Thanks again for your help, Carl On 5/20/2020 7:48 AM, Han Zuyderwijk wrote: Dear Carl, I have been involved in developing the EAEU system of technical regulation and TR 020/2011. When developing this TR, the

[PSES] CU TR 020/2011 (Russia+) Non-Residential EMC Exemption?

this list help with this understanding? Thanks in advance, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc posting

Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Section 6.4.8 Flammability Confusion

Thanks all.  I got the -2 rationale doc and it's helpful in that it traces the blending of 60065 and 60950.  Must have been some interesting debate in that TC. Carl On 5/6/2020 2:45 PM, John Woodgate wrote: This is the sort of thing that can easily happen in a huge document

[PSES] 62368-1 Section 6.4.8 Flammability Confusion

is requiring a lesser flame requirement than S.1, yet goes on to exclude V-0, but not V-1. I don't see the rationale.  I must be missing something here. The most fundamental question in my mind here is why does 6.8.8.4 all

[PSES] Taiwan BSMI CNS 13438 (CISPR 32) Ethernet Port Measurement

.  Can anyone here confirm that CNS 13438 requires that all three Ethernet speeds must be tested? Thanks, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list

Re: [PSES] Power supply 60335 or 60950...

ns-related EMC testing as well at that time.  So unless you find a 60950-1 LPS PSU which comes with promises to support the LPS rating within 62368-1 for that same model in the coming year, then you should avoid 60950-1 and have EMC testing performed near-term with a PSU that promises a long li

Re: [PSES] Power supply 60335 or 60950...

a capable 60950-1 supply would, if you have low-power requirement and want the design latitude that the LPS output rating provides. Carl On 10/24/2019 6:50 AM, John Woodgate wrote: Since it works with a phone, 62368-1 applies. I would not rely on 60950-1 because of the incidence of fires an

Re: [PSES] fire enclosure requirements for small Lithium battery

I had this experience once and the NRTL engineer stated that any traces and components between the output of the battery cell and the protective component(s) on the load side also need to be enclosed within that "local" fire enclosure.  I could not disagree. Carl On 9/30/20

Re: [PSES] {Ext} [PSES] Additional Japan WIFI Cert Needed?

Hello Robert, Your response is extremely helpful.  Thanks so much for taking the trouble. Best regards, Carl On 5/20/2019 6:40 AM, Campling, Robert wrote: Hi Carl, There are two schemes to be aware of here - Japan Radio Law (JRL) and Japan Telecommunications Business Law (JTBL). JRL

[PSES] Additional Japan WIFI Cert Needed?

with a lab or can I rely upon the existing SGS module cert? Thanks in advance, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail

Re: [PSES] CB Certificate For Samsung Tablet - Need Contact

Thanks very much John.  That's very kind of you. Carl On 8/16/2018 9:40 AM, John Woodgate wrote: I'll pass you request to someone in Samsung UK, but it may not help. John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associateswww.woodjohn.uk Rayleigh, Essex UK On 2018-08-16 13:43, Carl

Re: [PSES] CB Certificate For Samsung Tablet - Need Contact

l address that I can send the cert number and information to.  Hopefully that person can use it to locate the necessary docs. Thanks very much! Carl On 8/16/2018 12:39 PM, Erick Latvala wrote: Hello Carl, There appears to be a CB Test Report and Test Certificate for this tablet.  Yo

Re: [PSES] CB Certificate For Samsung Tablet - Need Contact

generous in this case because that doesn't ensure follow-up factory inspections.  I'm sure the fact that it's Samsung is the reason why. Thanks, Carl On 8/16/2018 10:29 AM, Kunde, Brian wrote: The power supply is NRTL certified and the battery is NRTL certified. The rest of the tablet I assume

[PSES] CB Certificate For Samsung Tablet - Need Contact

as has the company purchasing department to reach someone at Samsung to get the safety report but no luck so far.  Does anyone on this list have a contact or suggestion as to how I might get to the right department or person at Samsung? Thanks, Carl

Re: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia

with global market access groups that I spoke with are aware of this.  This was the status as of mid-summer. Best regards, Carl On 11/29/2017 2:25 PM, Kunde, Brian wrote: Greetings. I would love to hear your story about dealing with the EAC mark and shipping products to Russia. Though most all

[PSES] ExVeritas Reviews for ATEX/IECEx

Group, I would appreciate direct personal responses from any members that have worked with ExVeritas in the UK upon ATEX/IECEx projects.  I'm looking for reviews, pros and cons. Thanks in advance, Carl - This message is from

Re: [PSES] US EMC req. for EN 61010-1/EN 61326-1 equipment

only to the extent that it is in a dedicated building or large room owned or leased by the utility and does not extend to equipment installed in a subscriber’s facility. Carl On 11/28/2016 9:31 AM, Bill Stumpf wrote: For the USA, FCC Part 15 Subpart B, Class A is appropriate. Since

Re: [PSES] US EMC req. for EN 61010-1/EN 61326-1 equipment

for any function apart from control then it was not to be considered exempt. This means, for example, that if the computer is also storing, distributing, or printing data then it is not exempt. Carl On 11/27/2016 5:44 AM, Michael Loerzer wrote: Hi, is for a modular 19'' draw-out unit system

Re: [PSES] SAFETTY FEATURES controlled by ....SOFTWARE

the hardware architecture so that it cannot be corrupted and will have only that one dedicated function. Carl On 8/3/2016 10:32 AM, Bolintineanu, Constantin wrote: Dear Colleagues, I would like to kindly ask those who have an extensive experience regarding the above subject, to share their opinion

[PSES] Research Use Only Equipment on the EU Market

. Do any of you have experience with this scenario? Thanks, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.

Re: [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

equipment/systems that have applied Class A rating because they are only used within large facilities. This is not uncommon. Carl On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:27:02 -0500, Ken Javor <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com> wrote: Looking at the radiated emission requirements on things that ar

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

, Carl On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:23:54 -0500, Bill Stumpf <bstu...@dlsemc.com> wrote: Mr. Newton asked for opinions, so for what it's worth, here is mine. I hope you will all excuse my rant. Many will interpret the "exclusions" based on their viewpoint. Not

[PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

be costly. Regards XX X Technical Regulation Development Section Australian Communications & Media Authority ++ Thanks group, Carl -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ - ---

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

within that zone that Class B is warranted. I would still expect the vehicle to be no closer to homes than 10m in typical scenarios. From a pure EMC rationale point of view, consider that in the USA the FCC exempts auto hardware from Part 15 rules. Thanks, Carl On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:02:33

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

that CISPR 22 be applied. Thanks for your reply, Carl On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:23:10 -0500, Brian O'Connell <oconne...@tamuracorp.com> wrote: Correct - CISPR22 not scoped for automotive end-use installation. And there is additional stuff for ambulance (60601-1-2), where there are addi

Re: [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

are not excluded from their regulations. There is another path for auto accessory compliance, but it involves membership in one of several industry trade groups. Thanks, Carl On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:27:02 -0500, Ken Javor <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com> wrote: Looking at the radiated em

Re: [PSES] 3 phase 408V in EU and Emissions Classification

Doug, Excellent response. So if I'm understanding you correctly, the 408 V ac supplied to an apartment complex can be via the low-voltage public AC mains. Thanks very much, Carl On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:13:00 -0500, Douglas Nix <d...@mac.com> wrote: Carl, Standard AC mains v

Re: [PSES] 3 phase 408V in EU and Emissions Classification

Thank you John. This is very helpful. Carl On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:30:29 -0500, John Allen <john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: The answer regarding 408V – which is a N.American standard voltage ) - is "possible but doubtful" on any predictable basis because the d

[PSES] 3 phase 408V in EU and Emissions Classification

at a Class A device? Same for Australia. Thanks very much, Carl -- - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.

[PSES] UAE (Dubai) Regulations for Industrial Control Equipment

anybody here have experience with exporting industrial process control equipment to the UAE/Dubai and/or knowledge of the scope of the their LVE? Thanks very much, Carl -- - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety

[PSES] 60950-1 Needle Flame Test Questions

help, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and sear

Re: [PSES] 60950-1 Needle Flame Test Questions

Hi Rich, You've covered it all. Thanks! Carl On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:07:04 -0400, Richard Nute <ri...@ieee.org> wrote: Hi Carl: 1. Is the IEC 60695-11-4 flame more or less difficult to pass than the alternative 60695-11-5 flame? The 11-4 is a premixed flame. Th

Re: [PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Components

Good feedback John. Thanks very much. Carl On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:56:05 -0400, John Allen john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote: Carl Personally, I would: - Decide what is the most major part of the product which has a visible external surface which be carrying all the other product

Re: [PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Components

Thanks to all who responded to my post. They've been very helpful. Carl On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:39:13 -0400, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com wrote: Group, I'm dealing with a scenario in which a storage assembly that includes some electronic functionality is assembled on-site by end-users

[PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Components

. Is anybody within the group aware of some form of legal guidance that applies? Thanks, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail

[PSES] UL Trademark and Tradename Indexes no longer public

is that UL will no longer make this information public. Have any of you bumped into this issue yet, and if so, have you found an alternate solution? Thanks, Carl -- - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering

[PSES] Recommendation for Mains Harmonics/Flicker meter

directly if you prefer. Thanks in advance, Carl -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list

Re: [PSES] TTE Equipment and RTTE Directive

Thanks very much to all of you for your replies. Carl On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 03:18:01 -0500, Allen, Chris chris.d.al...@hp.com wrote: The TS 103-021 series has been replaced by ES 203-021 series. If you obtain an ES 203-021 test report it can be used in some countries outside the EU

Re: [PSES] TTE Equipment and RTTE Directive

Thank you for your insight Gert. Carl On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 05:32:32 -0500, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote: These standards do exist for a good reason, they guarantee interoperability with PSTN networks all over the world. So the good news

[PSES] TTE Equipment and RTTE Directive

above indicates? Thanks very much, Carl -- - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings

Re: [PSES] TTE Equipment and RTTE Directive

Excellent response Larry. When something sounds too good to be true it usually is. But not in this case. Thanks very much, Carl On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:26:53 -0500, Larry K. Stillings la...@complianceworldwide.com wrote: Hi Carl, What you have surmised is correct. You

[PSES] RoHS2 and Police Equipment

for existence is security. However, I've been unable to find any hard evidence that this is the case. Do any of you have experience or examples with this particular RoHS question? Thanks very much in advance, Carl

Re: [PSES] Another Machinery Directive Question

-declaration under the MD. Good information on the indicator requirements. I haven't yet studied the latest edition of 60204 and it's been many years since I've read the standard. Thanks again very much to all, Carl On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:32:57 -0400, Mr. Doug Nix C.E.T. d...@ieee.org

Re: [PSES] Another Machinery Directive Question

any other MD safety standard that can apply. Thanks all for your input. Sorry for the late reply, I've been motorcycling in northern Michigan sans laptop for the last four days. Carl On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:00:48 -0400, Douglas Nix d...@mac.com wrote: Carl, Paul, List members

[PSES] Another Machinery Directive Question

-assembly complies with the MD. Does the fact that the device includes an internal motor-driven shutter bring it into the scope of the MD? That seems to be a stretch to me. Thanks in advance for your help, Carl

[PSES] Reference for AU/NZ Responsible Supplier

at reasonable cost would please forward me a referral. Thanks in advance for your help, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e

[PSES] WEEE Directive Compliance for Small Operators

if you can help. Thanks very much, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings

[PSES] Grandfathered ETSI standards for CE Marking?

is certified that retesting is not necessary. I've double-checked the Blue Guide and I believe that their interpretation is not correct and that after the DoW the current revision listed in the OJ must be stated on the DoC. Safety in numbers, looking for a sanity check here. Thanks, Carl

Re: [PSES] Grandfathered ETSI standards for CE Marking?

are in docopocoss. Carl -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 12:43 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: Grandfathered ETSI standards for CE Marking? In message 000c01ce8174$b2b997e0$182cc7a0

[PSES] RoHS 2 - Definition of Industrial Monitoring Equipment

the question, what I'm really after are sources of information, ideally official, which expands upon the definition of industrial monitoring equipment. Does anyone on this list have experience with this question? Thanks much, Carl

Re: [PSES] RoHS 2 - Definition of Industrial Monitoring Equipment

and measurement equipment. While it's true that the control exemption expires in 2017, it would be a big help to apply that exemption at this time in this particular case. Carl From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 3:45 PM To: Carl Newton

[PSES] Revisit Old LVD - External PS question

, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable

Re: [PSES] NRTL requiring duplicate testing

] NRTL requiring duplicate testing Hi Carl: I suggest you take it up a notch with NRTL2. Take it up the management chain at NRTL2. NRTL managers tend to be more open to issues of added cost to their client, especially where the value of the requirement is questionable. At the same time

[PSES] NRTL requiring duplicate testing

the window. I'm interested in other points of view. Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc

Re: [PSES] NRTL requiring duplicate testing

with presence here in the USA concerning an IVD device. No problems. Thanks to all for your views. Carl -Original Message- From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 5:03 PM To: Carl Newton Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: NRTL requiring

[PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

Group, I have a radio system with wireless headphones and require sound pressure level testing per EN 50332-1. Can someone on the list provide a good reference for a USA lab capable of performing this test? Feel free to respond privately. Thanks in advance, Carl

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

is external and not portable, but the headphones appear to qualify as portable. What's your take on this? Thanks, Carl -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 12:48 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

point at portable systems and this is not a portable system. However, the authors likely didn't have wireless headphones with their own internal amps and volume control in mind when the standard was written. Thanks again, Carl -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

). Thanks again, Carl -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Tyra, John Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 1:46 PM To: John Woodgate; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1 EN60065 AMD12

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

I think that for the headphone safety report (required by RTTE) that there should be a Condition of Acceptability stating that the applicability of EN 50332-1 should be considered in the end-use product, or something to that effect. Excellent feedback from all. Thanks again everyone. Carl

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

Good info Kaz. The scopes are very well written/defined in my opinion. Carl -Original Message- From: kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com [mailto:kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 2:32 PM To: ghery.pet...@intel.com; emcl...@gmail.com; john_t...@bose.com; j

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

is to cover any cases where that same headphone may be applied to (sold with) a mobile sound player. Carl -Original Message- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 3:03 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: USA Lab

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

It appears that John Tyra was explaining that 60065 and 60950 have their own requirements specific to headphones and that they reference the 50332 standards to be used as the test methods. If that's the case then I believe that the scope of the method (50332) is irrelevant. Carl -Original

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

For those interested, the document at this link is issue by RTTE Compliance Association and concerns Guidance on Acoustic Safety. It is directly applicable to this case I believe and it notes the 50332 standards among others: http://www.rtteca.com/TGN14_Rev_2.pdf Carl -Original Message

Re: [PSES] 61010-1 automotive transients

Hello Andreas, It sounds like you need to consider the Automotive EMC Directive 2004/1004/EC. Take a look at Annex I, 3.2.1. If the function of your device cannot affect operator safety then you can likely apply EN 50498, which references the EMCD, which in turn references ISO 7637-2 Carl

[PSES] IR Diode transmission and EN 60825-1 -12 compliance

the diode still need to be subjected to an EN 60825-1 and -12 investigation in the end-user device in addition to the EN 60950-1 investigation? As always - thanks very much in advance. Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product

[PSES] Listing or Classification in the field?

, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web

Re: [PSES] Listing or Classification in the field?

, this is all excellent input and I very much appreciate it. I look forward to any additional remarks that may touch upon these comments. Carl On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Bryce Stammerjohan bstammerjo...@thoratec.com wrote: Hello group, UL does in fact issue Classification Marks

Re: [PSES] AAMI version of 60601-1 3rd ed - requirement for SI Units

Thanks very much to all of you who responded. I now have a path to pursue. Carl On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com wrote: Group, Does anyone have experience with the AAMI version of 60601-1, 3rd edition and clause 7.4.3? This clause requires that measurement

[PSES] AAMI version of 60601-1 3rd ed - requirement for SI Units

patients will be befuddled if required to enter kg. Anyone aware of a loophole? I'm working with the EN edition. Thanks, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post

Re: [PSES] Machinery Directive silly question?

of the Machinery Directive for the other risks - see §89 to §91: comments on Article 3. Carl On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Nick Williams nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk wrote: I've said this before. The status of standard DOES NOT determine whether product is within the scope of a particular

[PSES] EN 55022 and CISPR 16-1-4 above 1 GHz (again)

between horn and DUT? Thanks, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived

Re: [PSES] EU - Medical device also used in homes

can explain it in my 'Supplementary information' section. Carl On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:22 PM, John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.ukwrote: In message CANCKvwj7BSUsPeRac1MJ=J5LJhq2**q_+oMdN0HP3_rB+e632XtQ@mail.** gmail.com j5ljhq2q_%2bomdn0hp3_rb%2be632...@mail.gmail.com, dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012

[PSES] EU - Medical device also used in homes

device to home users that hasn't had EMC immunity testing applied. Thanks in advance, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail

Re: [PSES] EU - Medical device also used in homes

that there should be two model numbers with separate DoCs. This has to be considered. I would appreciate any opinions on this matter. Thanks very much for all replies Carl On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:20 AM, John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote: In message CANCKvwjd4c_D+fChmqA9mdzcn=F

EN 60950-1 Safety Report Template

there have such a thing that they are willing to share? Or can you point me toward such an item online somewhere? Thanks in advance, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p

Mains Harmonics, Flicker, and Industrial Applications

applications generally exempt from those standards due to this clause? Thanks, Carl - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable

Re: Mains Harmonics, Flicker, and Industrial Applications

that one can rely upon what I\we may consider to be common sense. Thanks again, Carl On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:34 AM, John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote: In message 60edd68a0812050721x332fdcc1n367cff7280314...@mail.gmail.com, dated Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com

RE: FCC Immunity Requirements

not be at all happy in the prospect of determining whether I should by the same brand the next time around after discovering the one I just bought didn't work under certain circumstances. That is almost certainly a good reason to return the product to the supplier via the front window. ;o) Carl

RE: FCC Immunity Requirements

and position protection. :-) Carl From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ken Javor Sent: 02 May 2008 15:47 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: FCC Immunity Requirements A lack of perspective is on display here. First, has anyone

RE: FCC Immunity Requirements

Not at all, since the price of any product includes the cost of achieving compliance, amongst other things. If you said I object to paying so much for a product and compliance is a major contributor to the bottom line then I might agree with you. Carl

RE: FCC Immunity Requirements

regulations are unnecessary, but regulation covering products interworking with other products or environments are IMO a good thing. Carl From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] Sent: 02 May 2008 16:13 To: Richards, Carl; EMC-PSTC

RE: UL approvals

Jim and All who responded, Many thanks for all the input, most of which confirmed what I thought I knew. The current un-answered question is regard to the UL/Manufacturer compliancy scheme, hopefully someone will read this who can answer it. All the best Carl Carl Richards, Regulatory

AMD and OEM NetPHY devices

Hi, Has anyone encountered any issues with these devices with regard to Radiated Emissions at 75MHz (and 100, 125, 150) and any recommendations to correct please. Many thanks Carl Carl Richards, Global Approvals Manager, Aspect Communications UK Limited, E-mail carl.richa...@aspect.com E

Separation between charging circuits and TNV-3(UL60950)

an isolation transformer to avoid increasing the cost. So does anybody there have any idea to solve this problem without an additional transformer?Thanks. Regards, Carl This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http

E26/E27 Lamp-Base

Hi, Does anybody know the differences between E26 and E27(lamp base)? Thanks. Regards, Carl Yi This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription

Re: LISN MATE

14161 Huntsville, Alabama 35815-0161 Good Luck Carl Newton At 09:18 AM 12/16/97 MST, you wrote: I'm looking for a source for devices known as: LISN MATE LISN MARK They were designed and build years ago by Mark Nave. I understand that these devices

Made in v. Assembled in USA

- Hi, Could someone provide me with the differences between 'Made in USA' and 'Assembled in USA' with respect to any restrictions on the use of 'Made in USA' Also is there similar types of statements for Mexico? Thanks for the information. Regards, Carl Bergard