Re: [PSES] BREXIT - UK Designated Standards

evised designated standards map across to the essential legal requirements in GB."/ Hope this is helpful. Kind Regards, Han -- On 8 Aug 2021, 23:52 +0200, Carl Newton , wrote: I'm seeing conflicting information as to whether the UK Declaration of Conformity "Designated S

[PSES] BREXIT - UK Designated Standards

I'm seeing conflicting information as to whether the UK Declaration of Conformity "Designated Standards" should  be the "BS" versions or the "EN" versions.  Every source that I've seen (including very reputable sources) has stated that the BS version should be cited.  However, I'm seeing that

Re: [PSES] South African SABS EMC Testing

rds, Rich *From:*Carl Newton *Sent:* Monday, May 17, 2021 11:52 AM *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* [PSES] South African SABS EMC Testing Group, I'm writing to ask if anyone in the group is familiar enough with South African SABS EMC testing through accredited labs to answer my

[PSES] South African SABS EMC Testing

Group, I'm writing to ask if anyone in the group is familiar enough with South African SABS EMC testing through accredited labs to answer my question regarding sequence of testing.  I'm trying to get an ITE setup through a major USA NRTL EMC lab in order to get the SABS EMC Certificate of

Re: [PSES] EU DoC on Thumb Drive?

able to as they’re not going to load up a CD or USB stick, and you will be considered to be shipping “non-compliant” product Best regards Charlie ** *Charlie Blackham* *Sulis Consultants Ltd* *Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317* *Web: **https://sulisconsultants.com/* <https://sulisconsultants.

[PSES] EU DoC on Thumb Drive?

Group, I've not been able to find anything that suggests that the EU DoC can be provided with the product electronically for a medical device.  I sent an inquiry to the commission and received no response.  The MDD and MDR require that the DoC is shipped with each product  and I have a

Re: [PSES] EU Authorized Representative service for Market Surveillance Regulation (EU) 2019/1020

ltants.com/ <https://sulisconsultants.com/> * Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 *From:*Carl Newton *Sent:* 06 May 2021 20:43 *To:* Charlie Blackham ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* Re: [PSES] EU Authorized Representative service for Market Surveillance Regulation (EU)

Re: [PSES] EU Authorized Representative service for Market Surveillance Regulation (EU) 2019/1020

tps://sulisconsultants.com/> * Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247 *From:*Carl Newton *Sent:* 06 May 2021 16:31 *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* [PSES] EU Authorized Representative service for Market Surveillance Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 Can anyone in the group offer one or more refe

[PSES] EU Authorized Representative service for Market Surveillance Regulation (EU) 2019/1020

Can anyone in the group offer one or more references for an Authorized Representative service within the EU that will satisfy the requirements mandated within Market Surveillance Regulation (EU) 2019/1020?  This comes into effect on July 16.  Please feel free to contact me directly at the CC

Re: [PSES] FCC Emissions on Industrial Equipment

Hello Brian, I worked for two industrial computer companies for many years in the past.  Way back in the '90's when  you could actually contact the FCC directly and get an answer I put this question to the OET and the answer at that time is that an industrial device is only exempt if it

Re: [PSES] CU TR 020/2011 (Russia+) Non-Residential EMC Exemption?

intention has not been to limit the application to residential applications, but to also include commercial and industrial applications. I hope this is helpful. Kind regards, Han Zuyderwijk On 20 May 2020, 13:36 +0200, Carl Newton , wrote: I've been going back-and-forth with a large Interna

[PSES] CU TR 020/2011 (Russia+) Non-Residential EMC Exemption?

I've been going back-and-forth with a large International GMA source over whether the Customs Union EMC Technical Regulation TR 020/2011 only applies to "consumers".  I have the English translation of that regulation which was issued by Bellis from Belarus and it states the following under the

Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Section 6.4.8 Flammability Confusion

On 2020-05-06 18:35, Carl Newton wrote: I'm wondering if any list members can explain the rationale behind 62368-1,  in sections 6.4.8.2.2 and 6.8.8.4.  I'm looking at the 2014 edition. Clause 6.4.6,  Control of fire spread in a PS3 circuit, states that, "/Fire spread in PS3 circuits

[PSES] 62368-1 Section 6.4.8 Flammability Confusion

I'm wondering if any list members can explain the rationale behind 62368-1,  in sections 6.4.8.2.2 and 6.8.8.4.  I'm looking at the 2014 edition. Clause 6.4.6,  Control of fire spread in a PS3 circuit, states that, "/Fire spread in PS3 circuits shall be controlled by applying all of the

[PSES] Taiwan BSMI CNS 13438 (CISPR 32) Ethernet Port Measurement

All, I have an NB GMA person telling me that our CISPR 32 test report doesn't show that the Ethernet ports were tested at three speeds and so it is not being accepted by BSMI in Taiwan.  Table B.3 states that Ethernet ports with multiple speeds only need to be tested at the highest speed. 

Re: [PSES] Power supply 60335 or 60950...

fe. Carl On 10/24/2019 12:25 PM, Carl Newton wrote: Another couple of comments concerning your PSU choice: I was told recently by a NRTL GMA pro that 62368-1 is not yet being accepted in China and Taiwan.  Accepted worldwide apart from those two at the moment.  So your global plans, if a

Re: [PSES] Power supply 60335 or 60950...

Another couple of comments concerning your PSU choice: I was told recently by a NRTL GMA pro that 62368-1 is not yet being accepted in China and Taiwan.  Accepted worldwide apart from those two at the moment.  So your global plans, if any, should be considered. Also, I just recently

Re: [PSES] fire enclosure requirements for small Lithium battery

I had this experience once and the NRTL engineer stated that any traces and components between the output of the battery cell and the protective component(s) on the load side also need to be enclosed within that "local" fire enclosure.  I could not disagree. Carl On 9/30/2019 1:51 PM,

Re: [PSES] {Ext} [PSES] Additional Japan WIFI Cert Needed?

ob Robert Campling Manager | Global Market Access TÜV SÜD Mob: +44 (0) 7967 650973 robert.campl...@tuv-sud.co.uk -Original Message----- From: Carl Newton Sent: 17 May 2019 14:44 To: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org Subject: {Ext} [PSES] Additional Japan WIFI Cert Needed? I have a product with

[PSES] Additional Japan WIFI Cert Needed?

I have a product with a wireless module that will ship to Japan. The product category is residential and commercial.   The module already has SGS certification for Japan Radio Equipment (WIFI+BLE). I'm writing because a source has told me that the BLE cert will is all that I need for Japan,

Re: [PSES] CB Certificate For Samsung Tablet - Need Contact

Thanks very much John.  That's very kind of you. Carl On 8/16/2018 9:40 AM, John Woodgate wrote: I'll pass you request to someone in Samsung UK, but it may not help. John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associateswww.woodjohn.uk Rayleigh, Essex UK On 2018-08-16 13:43, Carl

Re: [PSES] CB Certificate For Samsung Tablet - Need Contact

u can check by going to the following link and search in the “Free Text” box for SM-T820. http://certificates.iecee.org/ods/cb_hm.xsp This doesn’t give you the Certificate, but should confirm one exists and includes the standards used and national differences applied. Erick. *From:*Carl Newt

Re: [PSES] CB Certificate For Samsung Tablet - Need Contact

is limited energy circuit.  Does the tablet require NRTL certification? *Brian Kunde* Manager • Compliance Engineering LECO Corp • Compliance Testing Center *From:*Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, August 16, 2018 8:43 AM *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* [PSES] CB

[PSES] CB Certificate For Samsung Tablet - Need Contact

Group, I'm working with a company that manufacturers exercise equipment. They use a Samsung S3 tablet model SM-T820 as a user interface console.  The machine is being investigated at a USA NRTL for North American marks and they need a safety mark or report to validate the tablet.  The tablet

Re: [PSES] EAC Mark in Russia

Brian, I occasionally do work for a very large ITE product company with a worldwide presence and so I've been involved in international certs for a few of their products.  This year we learned that Russia started to reject all EAC certs not issued by a Russian national lab.  The other CU

[PSES] ExVeritas Reviews for ATEX/IECEx

Group, I would appreciate direct personal responses from any members that have worked with ExVeritas in the UK upon ATEX/IECEx projects.  I'm looking for reviews, pros and cons. Thanks in advance, Carl - This message is from

Re: [PSES] US EMC req. for EN 61010-1/EN 61326-1 equipment

Take a look at 15.103b). There is an exemption for electronic control equipment used within an industrial plant: (b) A digital device used exclusively as an electronic control or power system utilized by a public utility _or in an industrial plant._ The term public utility includes equipment

Re: [PSES] US EMC req. for EN 61010-1/EN 61326-1 equipment

Many years ago when you could still call the FCC and actually talk to someone I discussed this industrial plant exemption with them. I was working for an industrial computer company and management wanted to install specific 3rd party control cards and sell as a package. The problem was that

Re: [PSES] SAFETTY FEATURES controlled by ....SOFTWARE

My experience with UL Medical (as an example) is that their position is that software fails 100% of the time from a safety point of view (and I agree with that view). The manufacturer would have to prove to the lab that it is fail-safe, which is probably not a desirable task on the part of

[PSES] Research Use Only Equipment on the EU Market

Group, I'm working on a product that is not yet released to market. It is an in vitro diagnostic device. There are a number of universities within North America that have been using it for Research Use Only (RUO). The company would like to extend that offering to universities and other

Re: [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

unless the incoming signal is quite strong. Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 From: Carl Newton <emcl...@gmail.com> Reply-To: Carl Newton <emcl...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:09:41 -0500 To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretat

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

make sense. Jim Hulbert -Original Message- From: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 2:04 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation Gary, With regard to auto EMC compliance, that is

[PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

Group, My customer builds vehicular laptop and tablet docking stations intended for hard mounted use within emergency vehicles such as police and ambulance, as well as work trucks and forklifts. The vehicular power supply narrowly missed CISPR 22 radiated Class B limits. Then their AU

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

nk you stuck with Class B IMHO -Original Message- From: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 9:10 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation Group, My customer builds vehicular laptop and tablet d

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

owned by a telecom company. Doesn't mean there aren't other exemptions it just means I am unaware of them. So I think you stuck with Class B IMHO -Original Message- From: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 9:10 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [EX

Re: [PSES] AU CISPR 22 Class B Interpretation

expect compatibility. I would expect interference unless the incoming signal is quite strong. Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 From: Carl Newton <emcl...@gmail.com> Reply-To: Carl Newton <emcl...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:09:41 -0500 To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: [P

Re: [PSES] 3 phase 408V in EU and Emissions Classification

-5704 On 19-Nov-15, at 10:43, Carl Newton <emcl...@gmail.com> wrote: Group, Please forgive my ignorance, but I would appreciate some education concerning 3 phase power in the EU generally. I'm looking at a >>water handling system that is to employ 408 V ac, 3 phase in the EU. It

Re: [PSES] 3 phase 408V in EU and Emissions Classification

t ever since J.) -----Original Message- From: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com]Sent: 19 November 2015 15:43 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] 3 phase 408V in EU and Emissions Classification Group, Please forgive my ignorance, but I would appreciate some education

[PSES] 3 phase 408V in EU and Emissions Classification

Group, Please forgive my ignorance, but I would appreciate some education concerning 3 phase power in the EU generally. I'm looking at a water handling system that is to employ 408 V ac, 3 phase in the EU. It would be used with HVAC systems and I'm told that it can be used in apartment

[PSES] UAE (Dubai) Regulations for Industrial Control Equipment

List members, I have water treatment process control equipment that needs to get into Dubai, which I believe is part of UAE? I've learned that there is a Certificate of Conformity (CoC) issuance for Low Voltage Equipment (LVE), but I cannot find what is within the scope of that LVE. Does

[PSES] 60950-1 Needle Flame Test Questions

List members, I'm hoping that those of you with needle flame test experience can help me with the following questions. This is with regard to fire enclosure plastic compliance within 60950-1 cl. 4.7 and the alternative flame test allowed in A.2: 1. Is the IEC 60695-11-4 flame more or

Re: [PSES] 60950-1 Needle Flame Test Questions

Hi Rich, You've covered it all. Thanks! Carl On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:07:04 -0400, Richard Nute wrote: Hi Carl: 1. Is the IEC 60695-11-4 flame more or less difficult to pass than the alternative 60695-11-5 flame? The 11-4 is a premixed flame. The 11-5 is not a

Re: [PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Components

-Original Message- From: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:39 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Components Group, I'm dealing with a scenario in which a storage assembly that includes some

Re: [PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Components

Thanks to all who responded to my post. They've been very helpful. Carl On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:39:13 -0400, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com wrote: Group, I'm dealing with a scenario in which a storage assembly that includes some electronic functionality is assembled on-site by end-users

[PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Components

Group, I'm dealing with a scenario in which a storage assembly that includes some electronic functionality is assembled on-site by end-users. Various elements of this storage product are shipped from different factories. One package may include the electronic subassembly that has the

[PSES] UL Trademark and Tradename Indexes no longer public

Members, UL has always kept the list of their customers trademarks and tradenames indexes public. I've always relied heavily upon that information for ZPMV2 printed wiring board identification. I need to know what the temperature rating is on a power supply PWB and as usual, all I have

[PSES] Recommendation for Mains Harmonics/Flicker meter

Hello All, I'm in the market for a new Mains Harmonics and Flicker meter for testing in accordance with EN 61000-3-2 and -3. I don't need the power source, just the meter. If any of you can recommend an economical piece of gear then I would very much appreciate it. Feel free to reply

Re: [PSES] TTE Equipment and RTTE Directive

Thanks very much to all of you for your replies. Carl On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 03:18:01 -0500, Allen, Chris chris.d.al...@hp.com wrote: The TS 103-021 series has been replaced by ES 203-021 series. If you obtain an ES 203-021 test report it can be used in some countries outside the EU

Re: [PSES] TTE Equipment and RTTE Directive

: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:33 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] TTE Equipment and RTTE Directive Excellent response Larry. When something sounds too good to be true it usually is. But not in this case. Thanks very much, Carl

[PSES] TTE Equipment and RTTE Directive

Dear List Members, I haven't worked with land-line telecom hardware for many years. I have a device intended for use by handicapped persons that will enable a visual alarm if the land-line phone is ringing, so the device is listen-only. I've found what appears to be good and reliable

Re: [PSES] TTE Equipment and RTTE Directive

as neither given nor endorsed by it. -Original Message- From: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 3:10 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] TTE Equipment and RTTE Directive Dear List Members, I haven't worked with land-line telecom hardware

[PSES] RoHS2 and Police Equipment

List members, This company manufactures weapons sights that are distributed within the EU to military and police customers. I'm seeking confidence that weapons devices distributed to police organizations can be properly defined as excluded equipment which is necessary for the protection

Re: [PSES] Another Machinery Directive Question

Doug, I've reviewed the OJ list of safety standards applicable to the MD and there is nothing there applicable to X-ray equipment (no surprise). I view EN 60204 as a catch-all fall-back standard for electrical equipment that falls within the scope of the MD, but which has no other

Re: [PSES] Another Machinery Directive Question

are requesting MD of their component manufacturers. Thanks, Paul -Original Message- From: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 5:40 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Another Machinery Directive Question Group members, I'm working with a company

[PSES] Another Machinery Directive Question

Group members, I'm working with a company that manufactures an X-ray source sub-assembly. This product includes the X-Ray source and an electronic interface controller. The intended use is for the customer to incorporate the device into automated laboratory equipment that will be

[PSES] Reference for AU/NZ Responsible Supplier

List members, I'm seeking referrals for a suitable Australian agent to serve as responsible supplier for a company that markets ITE/wireless products via the internet. I would appreciate it if any of you that are familiar with a suitable company to serve as the in-country responsible supplier

[PSES] WEEE Directive Compliance for Small Operators

Group, I'm working with a startup that will import ITE into the EU. They market entirely via the internet so they have no distribution there. They've received a quote from one of the large well-known WEEED compliance organizations, but it exceeds 12K euros/year and they expect to sell less

[PSES] Grandfathered ETSI standards for CE Marking?

Group, I'm in a debate with a lab and a manufacturer that insist that a RTTE device doesn't need to be re-evaluated against a new revision standard when the previous is withdrawn. ETSI EN 300 228 V1.7.1 loses the presumption of conformity in 2014 (December I think). Customer is installing

Re: [PSES] Grandfathered ETSI standards for CE Marking?

$@gmail.com, dated Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes: I?m in a debate with a lab and a manufacturer that insist that a RTTE device doesn?t need to be re-evaluated against a new revision standard when the previous is withdrawn.   ETSI EN 300 228 V1.7.1 loses the presumption

[PSES] RoHS 2 - Definition of Industrial Monitoring Equipment

Group, I'm trying to find some reputable definitions of industrial monitoring equipment as it relates to RoHS 2. There is a very brief reference in the WEEE Directive Annex IB which refers to equipment installed within an industrial control panel, and that example is much too narrow. The

Re: [PSES] RoHS 2 - Definition of Industrial Monitoring Equipment

and measurement equipment. While it's true that the control exemption expires in 2017, it would be a big help to apply that exemption at this time in this particular case. Carl From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 3:45 PM To: Carl Newton

[PSES] Revisit Old LVD - External PS question

I'm opening a very old question here, but I'd like to hear some list member current views concerning the applicability of the LVD to devices that utilize external wall-wort and brick power supplies. In this example, an external brick AC/DC power supply is shipped with a device with in input

Re: [PSES] NRTL requiring duplicate testing

work as NRTL1. But, here, it appears that NRTL2 gets no money by imposing testing on you. Good luck! Rich On 4/29/2013 11:54 AM, Carl Newton wrote: Customer has a medical wall-wort power supply that has the typical NRTL (call them NRTL1) safety mark that you'd expect to see on a power

[PSES] NRTL requiring duplicate testing

Customer has a medical wall-wort power supply that has the typical NRTL (call them NRTL1) safety mark that you'd expect to see on a power supply marketed within the USA. Customer's entire device is located within the secondary of that wall-wort power supply and includes no connections to other

Re: [PSES] NRTL requiring duplicate testing

with presence here in the USA concerning an IVD device. No problems. Thanks to all for your views. Carl -Original Message- From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 5:03 PM To: Carl Newton Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: NRTL requiring

[PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

Group, I have a radio system with wireless headphones and require sound pressure level testing per EN 50332-1. Can someone on the list provide a good reference for a USA lab capable of performing this test? Feel free to respond privately. Thanks in advance, Carl -

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

: USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1 In message 00a601ce2c99$f12d7670$d3886350$@gmail.com, dated Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes: I have a radio system with wireless headphones and require sound pressure level testing per EN 50332-1. Are you sure

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 1:29 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1 In message 00c301ce2c9f$447f03c0$cd7d0b40$@gmail.com, dated Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes: I'm

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

$@gmail.com, dated Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes: I'm walking on new ground with this one. I have an automotive audio system with a wireless connection to portable headphones for use within the vehicle. Because they are wireless, the headphones have their own internal

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

, dated Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes: I'm particularly concerned with the reference to Part 2. The title does point at portable systems and this is not a portable system. However, the authors likely didn't have wireless headphones with their own internal amps and volume

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

and Standards Dell | Worldwide Regulatory Compliance -Original Message- From: Gawrzyjal, Kazimier Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 1:28 PM To: 'Pettit, Ghery'; Carl Newton; 'Tyra, John'; 'John Woodgate'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1 In message 00cc01ce2caa$976ba600$c642f200$@gmail.com, dated Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes: I think that for the headphone safety report (required by RTTE) that there should be a Condition of Acceptability stating

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

It appears that John Tyra was explaining that 60065 and 60950 have their own requirements specific to headphones and that they reference the 50332 standards to be used as the test methods. If that's the case then I believe that the scope of the method (50332) is irrelevant. Carl -Original

Re: [PSES] USA Lab for Headphone Sound Pressure Level Test per EN 50332-1

2013, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes: The reason that I would insert this CoA is to cover any cases where that same headphone may be applied to (sold with) a mobile sound player. My understanding was that you did not intend to do that. If it's sold with, or for (potential) use with a portable

Re: [PSES] 61010-1 automotive transients

Hello Andreas, It sounds like you need to consider the Automotive EMC Directive 2004/1004/EC. Take a look at Annex I, 3.2.1. If the function of your device cannot affect operator safety then you can likely apply EN 50498, which references the EMCD, which in turn references ISO 7637-2 Carl On

[PSES] IR Diode transmission and EN 60825-1 -12 compliance

Group, I'm trying to ferret out answers while not having the associated standards in my possession (common problem for many of us). I need the answer quickly and I'm hoping the one of our list members has experience with this question. A Vishay IR Diode is used to communicate with remote

[PSES] Listing or Classification in the field?

Group, I'm working with a company that manufactures high-end exercise equipment that is used in both therapeutic and general fitness applications. They want to consider NRTL Classification in lieu of Listing in order to reduce cost and complexity of compliance. My primary concern is acceptance

Re: [PSES] Listing or Classification in the field?

reflect those of my employer. From: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 6:42 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Listing or Classification in the field? Group, I'm working with a company that manufactures high-end exercise equipment

Re: [PSES] AAMI version of 60601-1 3rd ed - requirement for SI Units

Thanks very much to all of you who responded. I now have a path to pursue. Carl On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com wrote: Group, Does anyone have experience with the AAMI version of 60601-1, 3rd edition and clause 7.4.3? This clause requires that measurement

[PSES] AAMI version of 60601-1 3rd ed - requirement for SI Units

Group, Does anyone have experience with the AAMI version of 60601-1, 3rd edition and clause 7.4.3? This clause requires that measurement parameters be in SI units. I'm working on a therapeutic exercise device which requires patients to enter weight as a step in the setup process. American

Re: [PSES] Machinery Directive silly question?

Let's not overlook Article 3, Specific Directives, which states: Where, for machinery, the hazards referred to in Annex I are wholly or partly covered more specifically by other Community Directives, this Directive shall not apply, or shall cease to apply, to that machinery in respect of such

[PSES] EN 55022 and CISPR 16-1-4 above 1 GHz (again)

List members, There was a lot of push-back at the original EN 55022 / CISPR 16-1-4 method for measuring above1 GHz and implementation was delayed (as I recall). Do the changes to the latest CISPR 16-1-4:2010 address the measurement method any differently? Absorber still required on the floor

Re: [PSES] EU - Medical device also used in homes

, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes: At issue, however, is whether or not MDD, LVDD, and EMCD should be applied on one DoC. I received one off-line reply from a very reputable member source that believes that there should be two model numbers with separate DoCs. This has to be considered

[PSES] EU - Medical device also used in homes

Members, I'm seeking opinions regarding the application of EU Directives for a device that is primarily intended for use as a medical device within physical therapy clinics and hospitals. It's clear that the MDD applies to the device and a reputable Authorized Representative company has already

Re: [PSES] EU - Medical device also used in homes

-**-6SMYsX40u8iO94J5iVgVQ@mail.** gmail.com f--6smysx40u8io94j5iv...@mail.gmail.com, dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes: Should the General Product Safety Directive also be applied? If so, then that would mean that the EMC Directive would also be applied. The DoC would state

EN 60950-1 Safety Report Template

I seem to recall a few years ago there was a thread here in which a list member was looking for a report template for EN 60950-1, similar to a CB Scheme type of report. The idea is simply to use that template to create a safety report in support of an LVD self-declaration. Does anybody out there

Mains Harmonics, Flicker, and Industrial Applications

Dear List Members, It's my goal to gain confidence through consensus. I see within the Scope of EN 61000-3-2 and -3 that those standards should apply to devices which are connected to 'public low-voltage distribution systems'. Are panel-mount type devices intended for use in industrial

Re: Mains Harmonics, Flicker, and Industrial Applications

that one can rely upon what I\we may consider to be common sense. Thanks again, Carl On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:34 AM, John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote: In message 60edd68a0812050721x332fdcc1n367cff7280314...@mail.gmail.com, dated Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com

Re: LISN MATE

14161 Huntsville, Alabama 35815-0161 Good Luck Carl Newton At 09:18 AM 12/16/97 MST, you wrote: I'm looking for a source for devices known as: LISN MATE LISN MARK They were designed and build years ago by Mark Nave. I understand that these devices