Bob -
It is acceptable to replace antenna with a dummy load for this radio type
(13.56MHz, Part 15) for the measurement of the conducted emissions at the
transmit frequency of the radio. This may not be done for the AC conducted
emission measurement at other frequencies. The relevant Knowledge
Jim and group,
The British Standards version of EN 55022:2006 does not have a section 6.2 and
only covers radiated emissions 30 - 1000 MHz. I also have a version obtained
from Dansk Standards that consisted of a list of modifications to CISPR 22
that was attached to CISPR 22 Edition 5.2 (Edition
Grace, Charles
My understanding is that model number and brand name on the label need to
match the information related to the IC number that is detailed on Canada's
Radio Equipment List (REL) ... follow the link on the left side of Industry
Canada's wireless certification page ht
Mark, Andrew -
I would add that, in the case the device has modular approval, you are
compliant with radio specs (so long as you use the module within the
limitations of the grant conditions and installation requirements of the
module manufacturer). You would still need to test the complete
Andy
The source for the note is probably the FCC grant for the device.
After a quick look on the FCC's search page at
https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm
https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm I am
guessing that the module you are looking at
Grace -
The FCC electronic filing website
https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/ shows that 50% of applications
were processed within 43 calendar days; 90% were processed within 59
calendar days.
Mark
At 05:02 PM 7/29/2008, Grace Lin wrote:
Dear Members,
Can someone share your experience
Bob -
From memory 300 440 does address measurements for devices that use FHSS. EN
300 440 may be suitable if the product is being used under the EU allocation
for Non Specific Short Range Devices rather than the allocation for Wideband
Data Transmission Systems incl RLANs that would use EN 300
Craig -
Start with EN 300 330 for radio performance, EN 301 489-1 and EN 301 489-3 for
EMC.
Mark
At 06:19 AM 5/21/2008, Petrie, Craig D wrote:
On behalf of a friend, I am enquiring about what EMC standards would be
applicable in Europe for a Contactless Card Reader operating at
of the EMC Society. This is a half-day seminar -
more details at http://andreconsulting.com/IEEE.htm
http://andreconsulting.com/IEEE.htm
Mark Briggs
- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
Bob
From my (limited) experience with Japanese radio testing, even for
low power devices, all measurements are made via a direct measurement
at the antenna port. In this case the measurement would be made
using a resolution bandwidth of 1MHz and the limit is 3mW (4.8
dBm). There is also
sides
removed.
Mark
Mark Briggs
mbri...@elliottlabs.com
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com
office. They should hold the declaration of conformity.
Try looking at the following websites:
http://www.sma.gov.au/standards/index.htm
http://www.sma.gov.au/emc/index.htm
You can download some very good guidelines on the implementation of the
EMC Framework from here.
Mark
Mark Briggs
mbri
of time to perform tests. If you have a 16-port
device, the time taken to measure the emissions on each port in turn and
the numner of ISNs required would cost lots of $$$ in time and equipment.
Mark
Mark Briggs
mbri...@elliottlabs.com
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc
Some of the IEC 1000-4-x are identical to their EN counterparts (refer to
the front page of the EN standard) Some are not - notably EN 61000-4-3
is not identical to IEC 1000-4-3.
Mark
mbri...@elliottlabs.com
-Original Message-
From:Bailey, Jeff [SMTP:jbai...@sstech.on.ca]
is licence exempt, the same applies.
Regards,
Mark
Mark Briggs
mbri...@elliottlabs.com
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes). For help, send mail
At 05:12 PM 9/18/98 -0500, you wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but is the C-Tick Mark (Australia's EMC Framework)
required for
New Zealand too?
Based on what I have available, the Framework is an Australian regulation,
though the
standards (prefaced AS/NZS) happen to be aligned (harmonized?) on a
add more fuel to the fire !
Mark
Mark Briggs
mbri...@elliottlabs.com
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.com
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr
is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.com
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.co (the list
administrators).
Mark Briggs
FCC Part 15, section 103 paragraph e states that specialized medical
equipment is exempt from the specific technical requirements of Part 15.
Part 18 limits the technical requirements for medical ISM equipment to
certain sections.
Mark
mbri...@elliottlabs.com
Need to find the RFI/EMI
with our supplier of these
and I
just want to be armed with some accurate information.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Regards,
Richard Cass
Iris Graphics, Inc.
USA
++
+Mark Briggs MSc CEng, MIEE
of this this equipment type.
Any help will be appreciated.
Donald McElheran
Mark Briggs
mbri...@elliottlabs.com
input would be appreciated since we are trying to determine our effort
needed to achieve the CE mark.
As always, thanks in advance!
*
Ray Kester
Hardware Systems Manager
MTC
Fairfax, VA
Mark Briggs
mbri...@elliottlabs.com
.
Best Regards
Pryor McGinnis
++
+Mark Briggs MSc CEng, MIEE +
+ Manager, EMC Consulting Services +
+ Elliott Labs, 684 W Maude Avenue +
+Sunnyvale, CA 94086+
++
+ Phone: +1 (408) 245 7800
that, for EN standards, the dow and dop were to be
detailed in the Official Journal listing and not in the specificaiton
itself. Does anyone know if this is happening ?
Regards,
Mark Briggs
mbri...@elliottlabs.com
I have reviewed a copy of the IEC version of this standard. It calls
out a mandatory
Good point Eric - but I would have thought that IF the manufacturer does
not have an office in Australia and is relying upon the
importer/distributor to apply the c-tick mark then it would be
recommended that the manufacturer test at a NATA accredited lab (or at
least an impartial test-house)
Does this mean that products that are currently being certified against a
product or family standard, such as ITE equipment (EN55022) or ISM
equipment (EN55011) as opposed to a generic standard have to meet the
requirements of the EN61000-3 specs ?? Neither of these standards
mention testing
Heber -
I agree with your sentiments whole-heartedly.
Mark Briggs
mbri...@elliottlabs.com
And as expensive as standards are, the full text of their scope
statement
should be publicly available so people don't have to buy a copy just to
see
if they need to buy a copy.:-(
Anyone have
Ladies/Gentlemen -
Anyone have any leads regarding the type approvals for frequency-hopping
spread spectrum radios operating in the 2.4GHz ISM band in the following
countries:
Phillipines;
Indonesia;
Thailand;
Taiwan;
Russian Federation;
Mexico;
Slovenia.
Many thanks,
Mark
Mark Briggs
aptitude and attitude will be considered.
EMail resumes to: epa...@elliottlabs.com
Fax resumes to: (408) 245 7800
** Positions Available In Northern California For EMC
Technicians/Engineers **
Mark Briggs
mbri...@elliottlabs.com
Try downloading the free Eudora email programs - not only does it have
capability for signatures but it also allows you to reply to sender only
or sender and all recipients (so you don't have to look for the Email
address in the signature file or header). Eudora can (I think) be used
on top
In reply to your second question, I would agree with Richard Woods that,
as far as I am aware, there is no requirement for the person signing the
DoC to be resident in Europe. I believe the DoC must be held in Europe,
however, and so either the manufacturer's European office or
Ladies/Gentlemen,
Does anyone know anything about NAMUR - I believe this to be a German
spec/group/body that deal with ESD requirements, possibly others, and may
even be associated with the chemical industry.
Many thanks,
Mark Briggs
Parts 2 and 15 do not allow you to do so. What you could do is add a
paragraph in your manual to include your European DoC showing you believe
the unit meets Class B limits. Anyone who actually needs to know the
emissions levels from your unit will be able to see that you meet Class B.
Mark
possible. There is no real
need to test at 3m since the FCC will accept radiated emissions data
against the CISPR22 limits provided that the test methods and
requirements of ANSI C63.4 are met and that conducted emissions are also
taken against the CISPR22 limit.
Mark Briggs
I believe that this standard recently approved. The EN version will be
renumbered EN61326-1 and (according to ERA's Safety and EMC Newsletter)
should have been ratified by Cenelec in March. As for when it will be
published in the Official Journal (i.e. when it will become a standard
that can
.
Interesting to see what everyone else is doing ???
Any news on EN55024 anyone ???
Mark Briggs
To demonstrate compliance of a computer option board with the EMC
Directive, EN 55022/A1 allows testing in a single compliant host for
emissions. Immunity testing is another matter, with the lack
Mirko,
Will the limits for radiated emissions above 1 GHz be for a newly-specified
QP detector or for peak/average detectors (as in the case for FCC Part
15/ANSI C63.4) ???
Mark
At 02:42 PM 2/26/97 -0500, you wrote:
Radiated field strength limits above 1 GHz are in the final stage of
approval
Randall,
I was under the impression that the statement of compliance/Declaration Of
Conformity for Australia had to be held and signed by a Registered
Australian Company. This would mean that if you were not registered as an
Australian company your importer would do this for you. They would be
FCC will accept data compared to the EN55022A or B limits in lieu of the
limits detailed FCC Part 15. The test method to be used is ANSI C63.4,
however, which does have minimum system configurations (unlike EN55022) for
Class B PC peripherals. If selecting this route then, as has been noted by
Does anyone know the relevant EMC spec. (CE marking) for a cable tester? It
would be a portable unit, be used in homes and other locations.
I believe there is a cable TV spec but not sure if this device would fall
under its scope.
Mark Briggs
mrbri...@ix.netcom.com
to the authorities upon request, Part A within a
fairly short time period (8 days ?) and the second part within an extended
time frame (14 days ??).
Sorry I can't remember the specifics...can anyone else out there confirm
these requirements???
Regards,
Mark Briggs
mrbri...@ix.netcom.com
41 matches
Mail list logo
