Re: [PSES] Trusted resources for RoHS/Reach

In addition to what the other guys supported you with. https://echa.europa.eu/about-us https://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/rohs_eee/index_en.htm Dr. Paul Goodman (ERA Technology) and his team are very knowledgeable and practical when it comes RoHS and REACH

Re: [PSES] PLINE 1610

Thanks Doug… From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 11:42 AM To: Schmidt, Mark ; EMC-PSTC Subject: Re: [PSES] PLINE 1610 You might try ATE Corp. They still rent these and may also have maintenance shop services. Anyway, you could ask. Best, Doug

[PSES] PLINE 1610

Hello all, I have an old Haefely Trench PLINE 1610 Mains Interference Simulator that needs repair. Does anyone know who might be willing to repair the 1610. I have already gotten a couple of no quotes in which I appreciated their sincerity since there was typically a fee associated just for

Re: [PSES] Radio and Machinery Directive

...@us.tel.com] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 1:07 PM To: Schmidt, Mark ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: Radio and Machinery Directive Hi Mark, A mixture of opinion and facts... I think the concept of PCM is often mis-understood. For me, the important question is whether the item is being

[PSES] Radio and Machinery Directive

Hello Group, Not an expert in the Machinery Directive. Can't seem to find a clear answer and was hoping this group could assist me. We will be selling an OEM electromechanical devices for integration into their large scale equipment. Under the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC when partly

Re: [PSES] A question about FDA language and interlocking devices

Please see test below: “Safety Interlocks [21 CFR 1020.40(c)(4)(i)]:Each door of a cabinet x-ray system shall have a minimum of two safety interlocks. One, but not both of the required interlocks shall be such that door opening results in physical disconnection of the energy supply circuit to

Re: [PSES] Brexit requirements for UK manufacturers.

ayleigh, Essex UK On 2019-01-18 13:53, Schmidt, Mark wrote: If you read in to the contractual agreements you sign for these OSHA NRTL’s they are responsible for basically nothing and most likely would not support you in a court of law. However, some reputable labs that I have worked with th

Re: [PSES] Brexit requirements for UK manufacturers.

If you read in to the contractual agreements you sign for these OSHA NRTL’s they are responsible for basically nothing and most likely would not support you in a court of law. However, some reputable labs that I have worked with that are not recognized by OSHA I believe would. Bottom Line: the

Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5 Surge Testing Single plug vs. multiple plug system

Agreed, however this is typically done in the qualification and preliminary test phase of system integration. You should always know what your margins/limitations are. I believe the question focused on final test and in that case you test to the requirements of the standards. From: John Howe

Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5 Surge Testing Single plug vs. multiple plug system

Hello Larry, What is the intended end configuration? Is there one single external power cord from the system to the AC Mains? Or is it required that each individual instrument or component of the system be independently plugged into the AC Mains? I typically test each individual external power

Re: [PSES] Does incorporated barcode scanner result in a new laser product?

the action or process of providing someone or something with an “official document” attesting to a status or level of achievement. Thank you. From: lauren.cr...@us.tel.com [mailto:lauren.cr...@us.tel.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2018 10:51 AM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE

Re: [PSES] Does incorporated barcode scanner result in a new laser product?

It's been a while since I had to deal with this stuff but ask the manufacturer for the CDRH Accession Number, then conduct a search for it to assure its validity. This typically means that all the proper steps and paperwork were filed with the CDRH by the original manufacturer. It does not mean

Re: [PSES] Rechargeable li-ion batteries in toys for infants...

I believe UL/IEC 62133 would also be applicable to the battery pack and don’t forget to contact your local shipping/transport company on li-on battery requirements UN3480 and 3481. Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient,

Re: [PSES] Rechargeable li-ion batteries in toys for infants...

Matt, I think your problem will be that the POD is removable which then makes it user accessible when washing or otherwise. End user will have access to pins/connector to charge the battery. I am note a toy expert but If the charger is shipped with the toy product then it is intended to be

Re: [PSES] EU Requirements for Sample Performance Assessment.

Great Question. No absolute answer but my opinion would be create awareness. 1. Generate an official legal disclosure agreement between both parties with the understanding that your potential customer understands the fact this is not yet compliant outside the US and they will assume

Re: [PSES] How to lose another million dollars

Ignorance can be achieved at all levels of management. Not sure escalating is the best way forward. Just sayin. From: John Allen [mailto:09cc677f395b-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 1:19 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] How to lose another

Re: [PSES] External toothed star washer used in earth connection

Hi Scott, Can’t remember for sure (since I no longer have access to a copy of the standard) but IPC-A-610 may provide guidance on acceptability criteria for that. Regards, Mark From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2018 9:22 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

Re: [PSES] SEV Mark Required for Swiss Adapter Plug?

Hi Mike, SEV or ENEC Mark - Yes. It’s a corporate liability question or applied due diligence to protect your consumer. How did you verify the certification to the IEC standards? Either way I would think that your corporate layers would advise 100% to the letter of the law. Which doesn’t help

Re: [PSES] SEV Mark Required for Swiss Adapter Plug?

Hey Mike, Personally, I would accept that but….. I will refer back to my “grey” statement. Mark From: msherma...@comcast.net [mailto:msherma...@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2018 1:25 PM To: Schmidt, Mark Cc: EMC-PSTC Subject: Re: SEV Mark Required for Swiss Adapter Plug? "How di

Re: [PSES] Safety Test Templates Question

Hi Brian, “The good-old-days” Where have all the good times gone? Legislation destroyed the essence of common sense practices and logic. Influenced by power (monetary) and opinion which equates to politics. Yup, I said the “P” word. Regards, Mark From: Kunde, Brian

Re: [PSES] Dips and interruptions when connected to UPS

Agree with Charles, you need to provide a compliant system to the end user. This means test with the UPS since it plugs into the AC Mains. Regards, Mark From: Grasso, Charles [mailto:charles.gra...@dish.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 10:38 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re:

Re: [PSES] Customer Requests for Risk Assessments

Integrators of complex systems interfacing with other manufacturers equipment, aerospace and military excluded and should provide a RAR. I am sure there are other situations as well. If we look at Brian's intro to his question "Our company makes Laboratory Equipment (test and measurement

Re: [PSES] Customer Requests for Risk Assessments

Nice. From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 3:59 PM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Customer Requests for Risk Assessments An engineer and a lawyer argued about whose was the oldest profession. 'The creation

Re: [PSES] Customer Requests for Risk Assessments

Commentary as well, If the customer is a contractual partner or OEM I would typically share reports and such the contractual agreement between the two parties identify responsibility/liability and corporate lawyers involved. I believe the user manual is adequate for all other customers. Being

Re: [PSES] South Africa radio approvals

Hi Doug, Yes, this is normal. I do not believe 3rd parties could influence or expedite services with the ICASA due to the fact that they may be in violation of their own anti-bribery polices. That couldn't happen could it? Regards, Mark From: Kealey, Doug [mailto:doug.kea...@garmin.com] Sent:

Re: [PSES] FCC 433 MHz

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Michael Derby <micha...@acbcert.com> Date: 02/09/2018 4:54 PM (GMT-05:00) To: "Schmidt, Mark" <markschm...@xrite.com>, EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC 433 MHz ---

Re: [PSES] FCC 433 MHz

Hi Ghery, Thank you for your input. Best Regards, Mark From: n6...@comcast.net [mailto:n6...@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:40 PM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC 433 MHz Mark, "It depends". What is the purpose you have in mind

[PSES] FCC 433 MHz

Hello Group, Can anyone tell me if 433 MHz is a restricted operating frequency for commercial devices per the FCC? Thank you. Best Regards, Mark Schmidt Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by

[PSES] Eval and Demonstration Units

Hello Group, What is the procedure for Evaluation/Demonstration Units in China. This is a hand-held Wi-Fi device, FCC/IC/CE/AusNZ/SAR testing has been completed and I do not anticipate completion for China until end of March. Is this just a matter of Labeling the device "Engineering prototype

Re: [PSES] [Commercial] [PSES] Standards - CNS, KN, SI

Hi Grace, My understanding is that the KN standards need to be purchased and are written in Korean. I believe they are derived from the IEC but are not identical. You may want to add KN35 to your list. Regards, Mark From: Grace Lin [mailto:graceli...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Re: [PSES] Battery Charger

Hello Brian, This was defined by a NRTL to be a Class III battery charger. Thank you, Mark From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 1:55 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Battery Charger From: Schmidt, Mark

Re: [PSES] Battery Charger

thanks for that. In talking with some NRTL's and the direction they believe is appropriate can lead/mislead you down a path that may not be logical one. Thanks again, Mark From: Ted Eckert [mailto:ted.eck...@microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 12:21 PM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC

[PSES] Battery Charger

Hello Group, I am trying to understand which standard would be applicable for a single Li-on battery charger. It would be powered by an existing 12 VDC LPS that already has all the required regulatory evaluations and markings on it. We already use this EPS on many of the products that we

Re: [PSES] [Commercial] [PSES] Labeling - battery operated products

be advantageous. Mark From: Schmidt, Mark [mailto:markschm...@xrite.com] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2017 8:36 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [External] Re: [PSES] [Commercial] [PSES] Labeling - battery operated products This message originated from the outside of our organization and was sent

Re: [PSES] [Commercial] [PSES] Labeling - battery operated products

This is mandatory for any shipment of lithium Ion batteries. If UPS, USPS, DHL, Fedex or any other shipping company was aware that your product has li-on Batteries in it they would not accept it until all the necessary labeling and paperwork was properly completed. All these previously

Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling

Thank you, Mark From: Ben Kim [mailto:benki...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2017 12:03 AM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling Hi Mark, RRA notice 2015-26 and KATS announcement (date 4/26/2016) include this information. Click

Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling

Thank you Ben, Is there a link to this that is accessible? Is it on the RRA or KATS site? Regards, Mark From: Ben Kim [mailto:benki...@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 1:42 PM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling Mark, e-labelling

[PSES] KC Mark E labeling

Hello Group, Can anyone direct me to information concerning e labeling of a Bluetooth module and Device. We are currently marking the FCC, IC and KC ID physically on the product label but we ran out of room due to an OEM request on one of our products. I understand that FCC and IC accept e

Re: [PSES] crimp hardware for multiple conductors?

Hi Adam, For quick connects, whatever you do, make sure it conforms to UL310 if your product is attempting to meet the requirements of UL60950. Regards, Mark From: Adam Dixon [mailto:lanterna.viri...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 7:45 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject:

Re: [PSES] Korea KN 32

Hello Dieter, My experience with Korea is that they only accept 10 meter measurements even for KN 32. Not sure where you can get a Korean Standard in English. I doubt if they are available unless you have it translated of course. Regards, Mark Schmidt From: Paasche, Dieter

Re: [PSES] lowest emissions 4k TV?

Great discussion - thanks to all. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen" Date: 01/14/2017 6:06 AM (GMT-05:00) To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] lowest

Re: [PSES] lowest emissions 4k TV?

In the project that I am currently working on the main PC, HDMI cable and Touchscreen is a subsystem of a larger system which includes hydraulics, turntables, D65 lamps, power supplies and many other sources of potential emissions for this device. Only the poorly constructed HDMI cable is the

Re: [PSES] lowest emissions 4k TV?

I too have had numerous HDMI problems in the past and as a matter of fact currently I have one now. The only long term solution is a custom cable with a properly terminated shield. I know of no cable manufacturer that does terminates the shield appropriately (I have tried many). The problem

Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for EMC testing purposes

Hi John, Would this be applicable for Light Industrial equipment as well? Thank you. From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:49 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for EMC